Tom,
I reaalise that it is difficult to keep pace with the developments in
technology but what we thought was fantastic technology 10 years ago is now
very ordinary.
For Olympus digital audio recorders, take a look at the following web page:
https://www.olympus.com.au/Products/Digital-Audio-Re
Ah yes now I remember. The over dub and multi track stuff doesn't speak.
If they did it like the LS-14 does the over dub though then no problem.
I think Neal said that is still a problem. Why they don't do something
about it I don't know.
On 12/23/2017 3:50 PM, Merv Keck wrote:
I seem to rem
Ah the good trusty PTR 2. Note I skipped on old? Here's y.
Cause if you have $900 you can still get 1. Yes the PTR2 is stil alive
and well.All though how people use it with the compact flash limits it
has I don't know. In 2010 my PTR1 rejected a whole bunch of CF cards.
Last year I tried 1 mo
Alright well if you would like a DS I think that this then means and I
don't know if this even ixists anymore, I'll suggest the DS 71. My
friend Brian has it. What exactly of the DS do you want in your new
recorder? Here's the thing with the LS-P2. It's part of the LS line with
is a bit more pr
Bob and list: So this kind of brings me to the question I should have asked:
what is the actual replacement for the Olympus DS-40 or Olympus DS-50? >From
what I've heard about the PS-2 (not sure I have that right) am sure it is a
fine unit; it just might be a little more machine than I really
If you look around, you can still find an LS-14. I purchased a brand new one
as recently as 6 weeks ago.
However, you may find it cheaper and just as good, quality wise, to purchase an
LS-P2.
The LS-P2 has the voice guidance for the menus and is, to all intents and
purposes, the replacement
The Ls 14 is gone? Nuts! Isomeone sent me a Neal Ewers review of the ls 14,
but I didn't know how old that was, as there was no date on it. I need a
digital recorder which will be accessible for a piano cd. My old ptr2
plextor machine just died.
Vinny
-Original Message-
From: Aidan
I seem to remember hearing that the 100 did not speak all of the menus when it
first came out. That may have been corrected since.
-Original Message-
From: all-audio@groups.io [mailto:all-audio@groups.io] On Behalf Of Hamit Campos
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2017 3:10 PM
To: all-audio@g
Ah which issues were those? Meh I can't tell you how accessible it is
now VS then as I saddly have never had 1. But if you list the issues It
might refresh my memory.
On 12/23/2017 11:36 AM, Merv Keck wrote:
I didn't realize the LS 100 was still accessible. I had heard it had some
issues bac
I didn't realize the LS 100 was still accessible. I had heard it had some
issues back when it was first released.
Merv
-Original Message-
From: all-audio@groups.io [mailto:all-audio@groups.io] On Behalf Of Hamit Campos
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2017 11:29 AM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Su
Ah yeah that's right. But I seem to remember Neal having that channal
issue with boath. But yes you're right. It's a limiter that the 14 has.
A digital 1 I might add. Which a guy on youtube named Curtus Jud doesn't
verry much like. Cause as it's a software thing the distorsion can still
happen
Well, the 14 don't have a compressor as far as I no, or at least not
one you can adjust, only a limiter. But 100 have both limiter and
compressor.
On 23/12/2017, Hamit Campos wrote:
> As to the 14 being gone yeah I'm surprised too as it was being sold as
> the side arm as it were to the 100. Meh
12 matches
Mail list logo
