Re: [all-audio] Zoom H6 thanks for the recommendation

Ah okay. Well keep us posted then. On 3/31/2018 11:07 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote: Unfortunately the chap who has been employed to do it didn’t turn up and I was annoyed about it to say the least so I’ll be following that one up after the Easter holiday break ends, Happy Easter and Happy listeni

Re: [all-audio] Zoom H6 thanks for the recommendation

Hell to the yeah. I mean I've heard a car recorded with the F4 the F8's little brother, but that was way too epic! So the F8 is obviously epic. On 3/31/2018 11:06 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote: I’ve had no reason to perform a full multi track recording as yet so I’m only going on what I read in th

Re: [all-audio] Zoom H6 thanks for the recommendation

Inmy jhumble opinion, recording at 96 khz 24 kbps is really a waste of time. Even with perfect hearing most people can't hear above 22 khz anyway. On 3/31/2018 11:07 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote: Unfortunately the chap who has been employed to do it didn’t turn up and I was annoyed about it to s

Re: [all-audio] Zoom H6 thanks for the recommendation

Ah I can hear up to 18 K. But I wana see how much difference I can really hear. Thing is I've done it with an LS-14 but of course this isn't as pro as the H6 is. Maybe an LS-100 would be but saddly couldn't get that. On 4/1/2018 2:08 PM, tim cumings wrote: Inmy jhumble opinion, recording at 9

Re: [all-audio] Zoom H6 thanks for the recommendation

I don’t agree with that. I take your point about people not hearing above 22KH~ however there are other characteristics you hear in a recording of high sample and bit rate that you don’t hear in lower sampled recordings so that’s why all the bother is with even Vinyl as the audio - from a good t

Re: [all-audio] Zoom H6 thanks for the recommendation

Yes I did initially think of recording my tree being felled with the Olympus LS-100 however that would be a very bad move since my LS-100 is one of those Neal talks about which is extremely sirseptable to wind noise even with a windscreen fitted. > On 2 Apr 2018, at 4:10 am, Hamit Campos wrot

[all-audio] Differences in audio recording quality

I’ve given this some thought and have decided that - for the purposes of this discussion - the participants should be able to hear for themselves the differences that high sampling rates etc offer so here’s a way. There a site called http://www.melbarecordings.com.au

Re: [all-audio] Differences in audio recording quality

Ah thanks for this. I'll get to the site right away. I do believe in HD. I do hear some more brightness, more openness and harshness on Blu-ray disks vs the DVDs but this will be good to hear. Cause like I said I've done different format files on my LS-14 but remember that thing ain't a pro rec

Re: [all-audio] Zoom H6 thanks for the recommendation

Yeah cause the wind even gets into the sides apparently. Well it didd for Neal anyways. On 4/1/2018 3:13 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote: Yes I did initially think of recording my tree being felled with the Olympus LS-100 however that would be a very bad move since my LS-100 is one of those Neal ta

Re: [all-audio] Zoom H6 thanks for the recommendation

Yep it certainly does. On 2/04/2018 5:35 AM, Hamit Campos wrote: Yeah cause the wind even gets into the sides apparently. Well it didd for Neal anyways. On 4/1/2018 3:13 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote: Yes I did initially think of recording my tree being felled with the Olympus LS-100 however th

Re: [all-audio] Zoom H6 thanks for the recommendation

Hi, Tim. True, but 96K is required for commercial broadcasting.--Matt, N1IBB. On 4/1/2018 2:08 PM, tim cumings wrote: Inmy jhumble opinion, recording at 96 khz 24 kbps is really a waste of time. Even with perfect hearing most people can't hear above 22 khz anyway. On 3/31/2018 11:07 PM,

Re: [all-audio] Zoom H6 thanks for the recommendation

Its also used for audio mastering though higher rates are used these days. I'm yet to hear a recording at 384K 32 bit as that the maximum my Rotel A14 Amp will handle. On 2/04/2018 4:12 AM, Matthew Chao wrote: Hi, Tim.  True, but 96K is required for commercial broadcasting.--Matt, N1IBB.

Re: [all-audio] Differences in audio recording quality

Besides sampeling rate, the number of bits of each filee influences heavily the sound quality. I like to record in 24 bit audio when I can. CD quality is 16 bit. bits refer to the size of each sample. Bigger samples mean a greater range of audio is captured in each sample. Even with spoken word rec

Re: [all-audio] Differences in audio recording quality

hmmm, I cannot find anything that says test recordings on that site. I tried with two different browsers, in case I was missing something. On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 15:24:17 -0400, Dane Trethowan wrote: > > I’ve given this some thought and have decided that - for the purposes of this > discussion - th

Re: [all-audio] Zoom H6 thanks for the recommendation

Yeah lots of the Onkyo AVRs will supposedly do 384 32 bit. They have 384 K 32 bit dacs. Some of the new Sound Blasters go to 385K. I just don't know how 1 records that. Soundforge pro use to be able to go to 32 bit. But I don't know of an interface or anything like that that whill do this. On

[all-audio] Soundblaster USB Audio HD

Don’t talk to me about Sound Blaster . I’m a little disappointed with the Audio HD device I purchased. Every other device has no trouble with the digital output of my Cable box but the Audio HD from Sound Blaster just refuses to play ball. Now perhaps I’m over reacting and perhaps the Sound Blaste

Re: [all-audio] Differences in audio recording quality

I can understand that. Its a great option to use when sampling Vinyl. These days I sample straight onto the Olympus LS-100 given its far more convenient to use than the PC or Mac. Given I’ve only had the Zoom H6 for a month I’ve not had time to try any Vinyl recording with it. > On 2 Apr 2018,

[all-audio] Talking Multi Meter

Hi! Was talking to someone several days ago who mentioned a new talking Multi Meter, this unit is made in Russia apparently. I’ve not been able to get further information other than what I’ve just written so perhaps someone else may know exactly what I’m talking about here. ** Those of a

[all-audio] Bluetooth True RMS Digital Multimeter | Jaycar Electronics

Wonder how useful this could be? At the price its certainly worth buying to find out I reckon. > https://www.jaycar.com.au/bluetooth-true-rms-digital-multimeter/p/QM1578 ** Those of a positive and enquiring frame of mind will leave the rest of the halfwits in this world behind. -=

Re: [all-audio] Differences in audio recording quality

They'll be great I'll tell you that. you heard Neal's demo threw his keyboard right? On 4/1/2018 7:26 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote: I can understand that. Its a great option to use when sampling Vinyl. These days I sample straight onto the Olympus LS-100 given its far more convenient to use than

Re: [all-audio] Talking Multi Meter

I don't have the exact URL, but if you look in the blind-hams archives on groups.io there is a thread which talks about and they give an email address where you can write for details. Its not on any website, this person just produces small quantities of them. On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 21:21:00 -0400, D

Re: [all-audio] Talking Multi Meter

Ah that explains it then as the person I’m talking to is most likely on that list so I’ll look that up, in the past I’ve been a member myself but I unsubscribed some time ago as I haven’t had much time to read lists now that I’m doing part-time work. > On 2 Apr 2018, at 12:32 pm, John Covici

Re: [all-audio] Differences in audio recording quality

For the person that said they couldn't find the test files page on the auidio site Dain provided here's the deal. So ya know that as ya go in there's a downloads link? It's on that page. What it is it looks like they put some files there for you to practise downloading stuff. I guess so yu can