Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, kevin ernste wrote:
--- Florin Andrei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone using M-Audio Delta 1010?
Does it work ok with ALSA? Can you change sampling rates, etc?
Hi Florin -
I am running Planet with ALSA 1.0.1. (Fernando's cvs build).
Our studio has
solved. The same 1010 box shows no noise in windows. On
recordings it
sounds like a ground hum (again, not present on the same box in
MS).
I thought that I fixed this problem in 1.0.1. It seems not :-( Can
you
make a report in our bug-tracking system?
Jaroslav, Kevin, et al.
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, kevin ernste wrote:
--- Florin Andrei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone using M-Audio Delta 1010?
Does it work ok with ALSA? Can you change sampling rates, etc?
Hi Florin -
I am running Planet with ALSA 1.0.1. (Fernando's cvs build).
Our studio has two 1010's.
I thought that I fixed this problem in 1.0.1. It seems not :-( Can
you
make a report in our bug-tracking system?
Let me first double check my versions of ALSA on that machine. If it
is 1.0.1 (up to date with Planet as I assumed) then I'll post it in the
bug-tracking system.
1. Bass
Actually both:
2.4.23 w/ low latency patches applied and 2.6.1 on Slackware 9.1. I
haven't run 2.6.1 extensively, just enough to confirm everything works,
and await good low latency performance.
moron wrote:
On February 4, 2004 10:01 pm, Doug wrote:
Using a Delta 1010LT here, works great.
--- Florin Andrei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone using M-Audio Delta 1010?
Does it work ok with ALSA? Can you change sampling rates, etc?
Hi Florin -
I am running Planet with ALSA 1.0.1. (Fernando's cvs build).
Our studio has two 1010's. Sampling rate switching works great, but I
Hi Kevin,
Are you using the 2 1010's together? I am planning on getting a second
one to add 16 track capability. Right now I use about 13 mic inputs for
our live band recording, and do things like sub'ing the 3 tom mics
together on the board, for example, to get down to 8 tracks.
I've read
--- Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Are you using the 2 1010's together?
Yes, but not the way you are planning. We have two machines in the
same studio which are often used in conjunction (two different OS's).
Both boxes talk digitally to one another via S/PDIF, and then they are
That said, I see no reason why two cards couldn't be used together,
With proper clocking to ensure they are synced
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the
especially with JACK and the fact that m-audio cards tend to be
brainlessly easy to set up in linux. Other than the issues I list
Having just battled with the MAudio Transit for the past month, your
characterisation of MAudio is not correct. Plus the fact that Maudio
tends to be very closed
--- Bill Unruh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
especially with JACK and the fact that m-audio cards tend to be
brainlessly easy to set up in linux. Other than the issues I list
Having just battled with the MAudio Transit for the past month, your
characterisation of MAudio is not correct. Plus
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 13:37, kevin ernste wrote:
Now that the HDSP driver is stable (and the mixer is working so well!)
I'd say it's a toss up between these two boxes depending on you
needs/finances (this is much discussed elsewhere on this list).
It seems to me that the Multiface is more
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 13:37, kevin ernste wrote:
Other than the concerns I listed, I am very happy with the 1010 in
linux. The only box I have liked as much is the HDSP mentioned above,
but it's more expensive and doesn't sound as good to my humble ear.
Interesting!
Most of the other
It seems to me that the Multiface is more extensible than the Delta
1010. And of course it has more ways to connect to other devices. But
then it's a lot more expensive ($920 vs. $600).
I think your instinct is right on. Do you see yourself wanting to use
this rig remotely? The cardbus adds
--- Florin Andrei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 13:37, kevin ernste wrote:
Other than the concerns I listed, I am very happy with the 1010 in
linux. The only box I have liked as much is the HDSP mentioned
above,
but it's more expensive and doesn't sound as good to my
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 21:06, kevin ernste wrote:
It seems to me that the Multiface is more extensible than the Delta
1010. And of course it has more ways to connect to other devices. But
then it's a lot more expensive ($920 vs. $600).
I think your instinct is right on. Do you see
Anyone using M-Audio Delta 1010?
Does it work ok with ALSA? Can you change sampling rates, etc?
Can you control the channels with the provided utility?
What's in the Windows drivers that's missing in ALSA?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
Using a Delta 1010LT here, works great. Instead of the generic
alsamixer, build the envy24control tool in the alsa-tools package fora
gtk mixer / router / control interface with bar graph displays for every
input / output and digital mix bus. Has advanced s/pdif control,
clock rate / source
On February 4, 2004 10:01 pm, Doug wrote:
Using a Delta 1010LT here, works great. Instead of the generic
alsamixer, build the envy24control tool in the alsa-tools package fora
gtk mixer / router / control interface with bar graph displays for every
input / output and digital mix bus. Has
19 matches
Mail list logo
