Re: [altusmetrum] Flight forensics?

Sorry, that should read: "...by the switches or was the air flow non-laminar ?" ___ altusmetrum mailing list altusmetrum@lists.gag.com http://lists.gag.com/mailman/listinfo/altusmetrum

Re: [altusmetrum] Flight forensics?

That should read: "...by the switches or was the air flow non-laminar ?" On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:30 PM, w9ya wrote: > Hi Chris; > > Hmmm. well the logical question is did the two holes on either > side if the camera shroud ever function correctly ? i.e. Were they >

Re: [altusmetrum] Flight forensics?

Hi Chris; Hmmm. well the logical question is did the two holes on either side if the camera shroud ever function correctly ? i.e. Were they occluded in any way by the switches or was the air pressure non-laminar ? If so, then you really only had two holes total; one of which could have been

Re: [altusmetrum] Flight forensics?

I had nylon rivets between the sections. They need ~80lbs to shear. It shouldn't have drag separated. From: altusmetrum [mailto:altusmetrum-boun...@lists.gag.com] On Behalf Of Geoff Hendrick Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 4:50 PM To: Altus Metrum Subject: Re: [altusmetrum] Flight forensics

Re: [altusmetrum] Flight forensics?

> Von: altusmetrum [mailto:altusmetrum-boun...@lists.gag.com] Im Auftrag > von Keith Packard > Gesendet: Monday, May 23, 2016 08:49 > An: Chris Attebery; Kurt; Altus Metrum > Betreff: Re: [altusmetrum] Flight forensics? > > Chris Attebery <chrisattebery1...@gmail.com> wri

Re: [altusmetrum] Flight forensics?

Um. I like to have THREE pressure portsi.e. just in case. Here's how (and why): It seems that this flight qualified as a "just in case" scenario. I generally make each hole .67-1.0 the size of the specified size of the single hole specification, all of them the same actual size, and space

Re: [altusmetrum] Flight forensics?

-boun...@lists.gag.com] Im Auftrag von Keith Packard Gesendet: Monday, May 23, 2016 08:49 An: Chris Attebery; Kurt; Altus Metrum Betreff: Re: [altusmetrum] Flight forensics? Chris Attebery <chrisattebery1...@gmail.com> writes: > I've attached a rendering of the altimeter bay and came

Re: [altusmetrum] Flight forensics?

Chris Attebery writes: > I've attached a rendering of the altimeter bay and camera shroud. In > hindsight I should have sealed the camera in a separate bay from the > altimeters. I would probably stretch the rocket a bit more to get some > separation between the

Re: [altusmetrum] Flight forensics?

Chris Attebery writes: > I made an L3 attempt today but it ended with an early deployment. I had a > Telemetrum V2 and an RRC2+ onboard. I had a video camera with a shroud in > the bay with the electronics. I'm pretty sure that it caused some sort of > barametric