Amanda + smbclient: about the archive bit

2000-11-03 Thread Pierre Volcke
hello there, I'm backing up (full incremental) my windows PCs using Amanda Samba's "smbclient". Smbclient unset the archive bit on all the backed up files onto the PC hardisk, so as to make incremental backups possible. Does someone have heard about any conflicts with some

Re: running amcheck

2000-11-03 Thread Peter Schaffrath
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Denise Ives wrote: Looks like there is no problem with client connections - but the subject header does have this BOLD warning message. Can this be ignored? No! You don't have a problem with your client connections, as you realized. But have a look at the server

HP-UX 11.00 client not responding

2000-11-03 Thread Austin Chamberlain
Hi all I have an unusual problem with an HP-UX 11.00 client running Amanda 2.4.1p1. The backup server is running FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE. amcheck returns the following: heri2000.u /usr lev 0 FAILED [Request to heri2000.uct.ac.za timed out.] The same client configuration works successfully on HP-UX

changer.conf for Breecehill QT2.15 tape robot

2000-11-03 Thread Clem Kumah
Hello, Does anyone have a working changer.conf file for a Breecehill QT2.15 robot?? This tape robot has 15 cartridges and a DLT4000 dirive Clem Kumah Telinco Limited Tel: +44 (0)870

Re: HP-UX 11.00 client not responding

2000-11-03 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
I have an unusual problem with an HP-UX 11.00 client running Amanda 2.4.1p1. The backup server is running FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE. amcheck returns the following: heri2000.u /usr lev 0 FAILED [Request to heri2000.uct.ac.za timed out.] The same client configuration works successfully on HP-UX

Re: HP-UX 11.00 client not responding

2000-11-03 Thread Austin Chamberlain
What's in /tmp/amanda/*.debug on the client? Here's the complete file: Start amandad: debug 1 pid 12061 ruid 401 euid 401 start time Fri Nov 3 11:44:02 2000 /usr/local/libexec/amandad: version 2.4.1p1 /usr/local/libexec/amandad: build: VERSION="Amanda-2.4.1p1"

Re: back to square 1 (fwd)

2000-11-03 Thread Peter Schaffrath
Sorry, wrong mailinglist address on the first try. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 13:31:34 +0100 (CET) From: Peter Schaffrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Denise Ives [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: back to square 1 Hi Denise! One point first: make

Tape failures

2000-11-03 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
Of course, once I mailed the list thanks and said I was up and running, I started having problems. They listen to us, I tell you. Anyway, on each of the last three nights, I've had tape errors. This is what amanda says in her mail: These dumps were to tape DailySet1-09. *** A TAPE ERROR

RE: syntax of .amandahosts

2000-11-03 Thread Downs, John
It has the same format as .rhosts THat is : hostname optional-user-name -john -Original Message- From: brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: syntax of .amandahosts maybe i am not looking hard enough, but i cannot

amrecover: Error binding socket: Permission denied

2000-11-03 Thread Stevens, Julian C
I'm still in urgent need of help with this problem, so if anyone can shed any light on it I'd be very grateful. I've searched the egroups archive and the nearest I can get to it is a problem raised by Marco Bagni (message no. 24,532). However, his error message is not quite the same and it

amcheck amverify ok, but selfcheck amdump hang

2000-11-03 Thread Jonathan D. Proulx
Hi, I have several machines backing up to a linux box sucessfully using amanda, however trying to migrate these to a Solaris server isn't working out... On the new server amcheck reports all is well, however amdump hangs. Watching the CPU usage the amanda processes slowly drop off to 0% CPU use

Re: amcheck reports error: can't access a windows system

2000-11-03 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Eric Wadsworth" [EMAIL PROTECTED] This was the tip I needed to resolve this, thanks John. It was actually more complex, becuase I am using FreeBSD's ports system to work with software applications. I modified the Makefile in the skeleton for the Amanda24 port to include this item in

I had enough holding disk but part of the dump failed -

2000-11-03 Thread Denise Ives
1 180800 180800 -- 1:50 1645.3N/A N/A (brought to you by A root@sundev1:adm/amanda/daily# more log.20001103.0 START planner date 20001103 START driver date 20001103 ERROR taper no-tape [no tape online] INFO planner Incremental of admin1.corp.walid.com:sda2 bumped to level 2. INFO

Re: I had enough holding disk but part of the dump failed -

2000-11-03 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Denise Ives" [EMAIL PROTECTED] claiming there was [no more holding disk space] - What do you think went wrong? Filesystemkbytesused avail capacity Mounted on /dev/md/dsk/d20 11560144 1847220 959732317%/dump Subject: daily AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR

Re: I had enough holding disk but part of the dump failed -

2000-11-03 Thread Denise Ives
Here is my amanda.conf file with respect to the holding disk - holdingdisk hd1 { comment "main holding disk" directory "/dump/amanda"# where the holding disk is use -500Mb # how much space can we use on it # a negative value mean:

Re: gradually adding resourses to back up

2000-11-03 Thread John R. Jackson
... Can I just haphazardly add lines to my disklist file, or should I do something special? As Nate said, you can probably just add them however you want. The only thing to keep in mind is that the first time Amanda sees a new disk it will insist on doing a full dump. So if you load it up with

Re: Data Corruption, Amanda 2.4.1p1 on SCO Openserver 5.0

2000-11-03 Thread John Vozza
Anybody? John - NetRom Internet Services973-208-1339 voice [EMAIL PROTECTED] 973-208-0942 fax http://www.netrom.com

Re: I had enough holding disk but part of the dump failed -

2000-11-03 Thread John R. Jackson
Here is my amanda.conf file with respect to the holding disk - ... use -500Mb ... That's OK. chunksize -1 ... This is not related to your problem, but you should change this at some point to something like "1000 Mb". Is the use wrong? It might be a little large (why not let Amanda

Re: strange dumps ?

2000-11-03 Thread John R. Jackson
Can you tell me something about this report ? What does it mean FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP ... Amanda watches the stderr lines from the backup program and pattern matches them against things it expects (normal). Every other line is considered "strange". If the backup failed or there were any

amdump error: lev 0 FAILED [/usr/bin/tar returned 1]

2000-11-03 Thread Eric Wadsworth
I am trying to find why tar is failing. Here is information, if anyone has ideas: 'amadmin DailySet1 version' shows where GNUTAR is set: GNUTAR="/usr/bin/tar" I verified, and yes, tar is there. These are in the amanda.conf file: define dumptype global { comment "Global definitions"

Re: I had enough holding disk but part of the dump failed -

2000-11-03 Thread Denise Ives
tting estimates 0 (5101407) 1 (737663) -1 (-1) setting up estimates for admin1.corp.walid.com:sda6 admin1.corp.walid.com:sda6 overdue 11 days for level 0 setup_estimate: admin1.corp.walid.com:sda6: command 0, options: last_level 1 next_level0 -11 level_days 2 getting estimates 0 (9

Re: Failure to allocate memory

2000-11-03 Thread John R. Jackson
Finally got everything set up right (I think). Ran my first test dump, and it mailed me a report saying it failed: taper: FATAL shmget: Cannot allocate memory Shared memory is a kernel feature that you may have to enable or turn on in some way. Try "ipcs -a", which should report all current

Re: where am i going wrong.

2000-11-03 Thread John R. Jackson
... i am getting the following error(s?) when i run amcheck: ... ERROR: /dev/nst0: Permission denied I assume this one is obvious. You need to enable read/write permission to the tape device for the Amanda user. Typically this is done by putting the device in the same group as the Amanda user

Re: amdump error: lev 0 FAILED [/usr/bin/tar returned 1]

2000-11-03 Thread John R. Jackson
I am trying to find why tar is failing. ... What's in /tmp/amanda/sendbackup*debug on the client? Are you getting FAILED or STRANGE messages logged in the E-mail? John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Data Corruption, Amanda 2.4.1p1 on SCO Openserver 5.0

2000-11-03 Thread John R. Jackson
Needed to restore some files only to find that somehow the files are corrupt. For example a 46MB file restores as a 36MB file. Are you saying the dump image restored from tape, e.g. with amrestore, is bad (short) or that when you then process it with tar to extract a single file, that file is

Re: Compiling

2000-11-03 Thread John R. Jackson
I'm new to Amanda and I cannot compile it. ./configure says to me: "can't guess host type. you have to specify one". I plan to use amanda 2.4.1.p1 on a RedHat 6.1 system. Thanks in advance. And are you building it on "a RedHat 6.1 system"? What does "uname -a" say? Olaf John R. Jackson,

Re: where am i going wrong.

2000-11-03 Thread John R. Jackson
bash-2.04# ls -lL /dev/nst0 crw-rw 1 root mail 9, 128 Aug 7 12:08 /dev/nst0 - and - bash-2.04# groups amanda2 amanda2 : amanda2 mail Well, I don't know. This looks like it should work. What happens if you (temporarily) "chmod a+rx /dev/nst0" to allow access to anyone? I'm

Re: where am i going wrong.

2000-11-03 Thread brian
Well, I don't know. This looks like it should work. What happens if you (temporarily) "chmod a+rx /dev/nst0" to allow access to anyone? I'm trying to find out if the drive works at all. Were you able to run amlabel? I have not tried the permissions thing, but yes, i have successfuly

Re: where am i going wrong.

2000-11-03 Thread John R. Jackson
I have not tried the permissions thing, but yes, i have successfuly run amlabel. Then that makes absolutely no sense. It's the same code. I assume you ran amlabel as the Amanda user and not root? John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: amcheck amverify ok, but selfcheck amdump hang

2000-11-03 Thread John R. Jackson
On the new server amcheck reports all is well, however amdump hangs. Watching the CPU usage the amanda processes slowly drop off to 0% CPU use and stay that way forever (well atleast 72hours). ... Does this machine have an 100 Mbit/s Ethernet? Those are notorious for not negotiating the duplex

Re: running amcheck

2000-11-03 Thread John R. Jackson
... the subject header does have this BOLD warning message. Can this be ignored? ... Subject: daily AMANDA PROBLEM: FIX BEFORE RUN, IF POSSIBLE Amanda is not meant to be run without a tape and that's what it is warning you about. Since you plan to work that way, it doesn't apply. Note that

Re: Tape failures

2000-11-03 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000 at 6:30pm, John R. Jackson wrote Curiously, each of the three times, the tape error occurs just under 3 minutes into the amdump run. Of course, the amflush the next day works just fine, taking almost an hour to do so. ... The only thing that pops to mind is a SCSI

Re: I had enough holding disk but part of the dump failed -

2000-11-03 Thread John R. Jackson
I think that's what's happening, a dump with est_kps larger than the bandwidth will never be scheduled to dump on holding disk. I agree it looks like that could happen in principle (in fact, I wonder if other such "don't do this now" states should be examined), but in this particular case the

Re: amcheck amverify ok, but selfcheck amdump hang

2000-11-03 Thread John R. Jackson
I'm relieved to hear it only takes an incantation, I was affraid we were going to have to slaughter the fatted calf and I've been saving that for when the old drives in the next rack over decide to stick :) :-) You didn't mention if you needed the magic or not, but here it is just in case (add