RE: [/sbin/dump returned 3]

2000-12-21 Thread Shane T. Ferguson
well updating to static rpm didn't work. I am not sure it's the problem of dump -- other partitions dump ok on the same system. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joi Ellis Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 5:30 PM To: Shane T. Ferguson Cc:

help

2000-12-21 Thread ReK2WiLdS

unsubscribe

2000-12-21 Thread ReK2WiLdS

RE: [/sbin/dump returned 3]

2000-12-21 Thread Shane T. Ferguson
I will try the static rpm update first and run that before giving gnutar a try. -Original Message- From: Joi Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 5:30 PM To: Shane T. Ferguson Cc: Bernhard R. Erdmann; Amanda-Users Subject: RE: [/sbin/dump returned 3] On Thu

RE: [/sbin/dump returned 3]

2000-12-21 Thread Shane T. Ferguson
oops, my mistake -- forgot to specify 'program gnutar' in my dumptype definition. I will try that to see if it will work. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shane T. Ferguson Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 10:12 PM To: Dan Wilder; Amanda

Re: typetape

2000-12-21 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Dec 21, 2000, Monserrat Seisdedos Nuñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Yes the system is hang. This is not something a user process should be able to do, ever. If the system hangs, you've got a problem with the kernel of the OS, more likely in the SCSI tape driver. You'll have to reset the

RE: [/sbin/dump returned 3]

2000-12-21 Thread Shane T. Ferguson
I even tried it using gnu-tar .. same results -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan Wilder Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 5:21 PM To: Amanda-Users Subject: Re: [/sbin/dump returned 3] On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 05:05:34PM -0400, Shane T.

Re: invalid mid from server

2000-12-21 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Dec 20, 2000, Thom Sulanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ? code 0 opening remote file \talks\cern092600.ppt (\talks\) > ? invalid mid from server! > sendbackup: error [/usr/bin/smbclient returned 1] > Does anyone know the source or remedy for this "invalid mid from > server" error? The source

Re: Firewall

2000-12-21 Thread Phil Davis
Wang, Depending on what firewall software you are using, you should be able to do port forwarding, i.e. when a request hits the firewall coming from the amanda server on port 1008x udp or tcp you would need to setup rules to forward these packets to the port lower than 1024 on the external inte

Firewall

2000-12-21 Thread Wang Chen
Hi folks, I've built the Amanda-2.4.2 backup inside firewall. Server and client machines are using the ports as: amanda 10080/udp amandaidx 10082/tcp amidxtape 10083/tcp . We'are going to backup servers outside firewall, the build require with option --with-portrange=x and --with-udpportrea

RE: [/sbin/dump returned 3]

2000-12-21 Thread Joi Ellis
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Shane T. Ferguson wrote: >Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 17:05:34 -0400 >From: Shane T. Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Bernhard R. Erdmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: Amanda-Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: [/sbin/dump returned 3] > >I got the latest dump from sourceforge abou

Re: [/sbin/dump returned 3]

2000-12-21 Thread Dan Wilder
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 05:05:34PM -0400, Shane T. Ferguson wrote: > I got the latest dump from sourceforge about 2 weeks ago. Dump has been problematic, off and on, for years and years. With each new release comes a new wave of users who proclaim, "dump works well for me, now". Then comes the t

RE: [/sbin/dump returned 3]

2000-12-21 Thread Shane T. Ferguson
I got the latest dump from sourceforge about 2 weeks ago. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bernhard R. Erdmann Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 4:41 PM To: Shane T. Ferguson Cc: Amanda-Users Subject: Re: [/sbin/dump returned 3] "Shane T.

Re: [/sbin/dump returned 3]

2000-12-21 Thread Bernhard R. Erdmann
"Shane T. Ferguson" wrote: > > Whenever I do my backups, everything dumps fine except for 1 specific > partition (the / (root) partition on a remote machine). I always get the > following error: [...] > | DUMP: master/slave protocol botched. > | DUMP: The ENTIRE dump is aborted. > sendbackup:

RE: [/sbin/dump returned 3]

2000-12-21 Thread Shane T. Ferguson
I updated the dump program on all machines. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 4:41 PM To: Shane T. Ferguson Cc: Amanda-Users Subject: Re: [/sbin/dump returned 3] "Shane T. Ferguson" wrote: > > Whenever I do my backu

[/sbin/dump returned 3]

2000-12-21 Thread Shane T. Ferguson
Whenever I do my backups, everything dumps fine except for 1 specific partition (the / (root) partition on a remote machine). I always get the following error: FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: mail hda2 lev 0 FAILED [/sbin/dump returned 3] taper: FATAL shmctl: Invalid argument FAILED

No Subject

2000-12-21 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 14:34:19 +0800 "Mark Berger" said: >What I cannot seem to figure out is supposing I have 8 machines ( 1 main >server & 7 others) & want to do a full backup of the main server every night >& a full backup of one other machine per day either in rotation or ad-h

Re: amanda

2000-12-21 Thread Chris Karakas
Jan Van den Abeele wrote: > > For obvious reasons (inetd is no more ... xinetd.conf) this doesn't work > for Redhat 7.0... Check the list archives using "xinetd" as keyword. This has been handled already some times in the past. I found the following posting (but there might be more out there):

Re: your mail

2000-12-21 Thread Bill Carlson
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Mark Berger wrote: > Hi, > > > I was inspired to mess with the Amanda program for the nth time recently. > > It seem to have the feature that I want - & some that I do not want as > well! > > What I cannot seem to figure out is supposing I have 8 machines ( 1 main > server

Help to solve a dump problem

2000-12-21 Thread Helio Coelho Jr. - CompuLand ISP Admin
Hi: I'm having a problem with 3 filesystem to get them dumped. Everything was running smoothly until about 30 days ago. In the search of a solution I've already upgraded to Amanda2.4.2 but no lucky. Persusing the logfiles I've noticed that Amanda is trying to dump those 3 filesystems directly

Re:typetape

2000-12-21 Thread Monserrat Seisdedos Nuñez
> > > > > Yes the system is hang. I can't do anything nor even move the mouse. > > Any way, what is exactly the meaning of much quicker??, 1 > or 2 days?? > > Thanks for your help > > mo > > > -Mensaje original- > > > De: Jens Krause [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Enviado el: jueves

Re: your mail

2000-12-21 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 at 2:34pm, Mark Berger wrote > Hi, Hi. These types of questions really belong only on amanda-users. So that's where I've responded, and set follow-ups. > I was inspired to mess with the Amanda program for the nth time recently. If you devote just a little more time to yo

Re: tapetype

2000-12-21 Thread Jens Krause
Monserrat Seisdedos Nuñez wrote: > Hello every body: > i have run tapetype in a PV-100T-DDS4, in a Power Edge 2450. It is running > since yesterday at 2 PM, almost 24 hours, the system is completely halt, it > is normal or should i stop the process??? > thanks What do you mean with "the system i

amanda

2000-12-21 Thread Jan Van den Abeele
Hi I want to setup a client on Redhat Linux 7.0. The Amanda server (2.4.1) is installed on another linux machines (redhat 6.1). I used to setup a client by adding to the inetd.conf amanda dgram udp wait root /sysman/amanda-2.4.1p1/pineau/libexec/amandad amandad For obvious reasons (ine

tapetype

2000-12-21 Thread Monserrat Seisdedos Nuñez
Hello every body: i have run tapetype in a PV-100T-DDS4, in a Power Edge 2450. It is running since yesterday at 2 PM, almost 24 hours, the system is completely halt, it is normal or should i stop the process??? thanks

Re: newby

2000-12-21 Thread Jens Krause
Monserrat Seisdedos Nuñez wrote: > > Hello : > > i'm a newby users of amanda. > > I'm testing the amanda utility and i just want to backup the > > /home fs in > > /home/amanda which is the holding disk but not dumping it to > > the tape, (i > > haven't got any yet),so i typed /dev/null in the co

Re: amrecover problem

2000-12-21 Thread Urte Fuerst
Hi Mirko and list, > We set up a new amanda-2.4.2 backup-server, and right now I'm > involved in testing > the backup and recover with the server. > While testing amrecover, some strange behaviour showed up: > I'm unable to see all backed up files while browsing trough the > directorys > via amre

Re: hostnames do not match

2000-12-21 Thread David Lloyd
Bernhard! > And verify DNS reverse lookup Off the top of my head that gives a different error... :-) -- GOD SAVE AMERICA! - because President Bush, the Second Will Not!

Re: hostnames do not match

2000-12-21 Thread Bernhard R. Erdmann
David Lloyd wrote: > > Roshan! > > > ERROR: stat: [hostnames do not match: amanda1 amanda1.popken.de] > > Client check: 1 host checked in 0.264 seconds, 1 problem found > > amanda1 is not the same as amanda1.popken.de. They don't match... > > specify: > > amanda1.popken.de in the disk list fi

Re: [ BUG? ] Running out of disk space...

2000-12-21 Thread Vincenzo Marchese
Jean-Louis Martineau wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 10:00:23AM +0100, David Klasinc wrote: > > Banzai! > > > > I upgraded to 2.4.2 and I noticed that if dump won't fit on one disk that > > amdump will go into endless loop trying to do a backup. > > Could you try this patch? > > Jean-Louis > --