--
Andrius
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>
> >
> > Other than user-tar depending on the existence of and inheriting root-tar
> > parameters, and having different priority levels, is there any other
> > difference between the two? Are DLEs using each treated differently
>
x27;t make that distinction on my disks.
>
> Deb Baddorf
>
>
> On Jan 29, 2014, at 2:41 PM, "Andrius D. Ilgunas"
> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Still going through my learning curve and I'm studying dumptypes by
> looking at the examples.
> &
Hey all,
Still going through my learning curve and I'm studying dumptypes by looking
at the examples.
How/why does amanda differentiate between a root partition and a user
partition?
e.g.
define dumptype root-tar {
global
program "GNUTAR"
comment "root partitions dumped with tar"
Thanks a brazillion all!
There's a lot of good info here that I'll need to take some time to digest.
Amanda sure is a big sandwich.
While I'm processing it all, might someone point me to the syntax of what
might be called a 'compound DLE' ?
Instead of something like:
localhost /bin simple-gnu
--
Andrius
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Gerrit A. Smit wrote:
>
> Andrius D. Ilgunas wrote on 12-01-14 21:42:
>
>
>
> I'm not quite clear on your response. Creating a separate storage
> volume isn't a problem since I'm using vtapes. Do you mean t
Hey again Jon,
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > Heck, I even learned about the Tower of Hanoi scheme! But one piece of
> > advice stuck with me, and that is "when restoring data, you don't have
> time
> > to try to remember/decipher which files are on which tapes". In ot
--
Andrius
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
so when 500Gig and up hard drives became available, I converted to vtapes
> on a hard drive, which has turned out to be, dollar for dollar, about 100x
> more dependable,
Awesome, that answers another question I had - "Why use tap
have a less taxing schedule.
Now I suppose that I could combine these two schedules into one config, but
it seems that it would make more sense from an administrative view to have
two (more?) configs.
Do you/anyone else have any thoughts on that?
--
Andrius
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 9:10 PM
responses and ideas!
--
Andrius
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Andrius D. Ilgunas wrote:
> Hey Jon,
>
> I would expect them to be network-type speeds on a T1 even as the buckets
> are mounted via FUSE. I don't have numbers, but I can say that a copy of
> one of my databa
data
growth is expected to be around 7% annually.
And now that I brought that up, I haven't yet considered any kind of
long-term archiving. One step at a time though.
--
Andrius
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:29:27AM -0800, Andrius D. Ilgu
Heh, can't argue that. :)
--
Andrius
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Alan Hodgson wrote:
> On Saturday, January 11, 2014 09:46:21 AM you wrote:
> > Given the option, is there any real benefit of using tape over using HDD
> as
> > a resource for storing backups?
> >
>
> They're a lot easier to
Thanks a brazillion Charles!!
I'll probably setup my systems likewise, but I wonder if anyone has any
other opinions on this.
--
Andrius
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Charles Curley <
charlescur...@charlescurley.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 09:44:07 -0800
> &q
Given the option, is there any real benefit of using tape over using HDD as
a resource for storing backups?
--
Andrius
Hey All!
We're setting up amanda on our servers, and the primary backup is going to
be on a dedicated disk/virtual tapes. One of the offsite locations is
going to be a bucket on Amazon's S3.
Now I see that amanda has the capability of writing to multiple volumes in
parallel, but I'm wondering if
14 matches
Mail list logo
