Re: did it again. -- crc differ

2020-12-19 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 19 December 2020 15:26:07 Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 14:43:56 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Saturday 19 December 2020 12:12:07 Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 10:43:42 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > new error file,

Re: did it again. -- crc differ

2020-12-19 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 19 December 2020 15:26:07 Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 14:43:56 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Saturday 19 December 2020 12:12:07 Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 10:43:42 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > new error file,

Re: did it again. -- crc differ

2020-12-19 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 14:43:56 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Saturday 19 December 2020 12:12:07 Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 10:43:42 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > new error file, from /home on GO704:(word wrap off) > > > > > > dd

Re: did it again. -- crc differ

2020-12-19 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 19 December 2020 12:12:07 Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 10:43:42 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > new error file, from /home on GO704:(word wrap off) > > > > dd if=/sdb/dumps/20201219085654/GO704._home.0 bs=32k count=1 > > Okay, that output looks good good. >

Re: did it again. -- crc differ

2020-12-19 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 10:43:42 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > new error file, from /home on GO704:(word wrap off) > > dd if=/sdb/dumps/20201219085654/GO704._home.0 bs=32k count=1 Okay, that output looks good good. for completeness, can you post the section from this Amanda Report covering this

Re: did it again. -- crc differ

2020-12-19 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 19 December 2020 09:42:55 Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 03:32:07 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > But the problem is not fixed: > > Well, at least this time it's a one-part dump file, so that may make > investigation at little easier > > > FAILURE DUMP

Re: did it again. -- crc differ

2020-12-19 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 19 December 2020 09:42:55 Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 03:32:07 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > But the problem is not fixed: > > Well, at least this time it's a one-part dump file, so that may make > investigation at little easier > > > FAILURE DUMP

Re: did it again. -- crc differ

2020-12-19 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 03:32:07 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > But the problem is not fixed: Well, at least this time it's a one-part dump file, so that may make investigation at little easier > > FAILURE DUMP SUMMARY: > rpi4 /usr/lib lev 0 partial taper: source server crc

Re: did it again. -- crc differ

2020-11-30 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 18:41:40 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 12:46:46 -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > > > I assume that the first few lines of the > > > coyote._home_gene_Pictures.0 file is an Amana header (including an > > > XML chunk); can you post that here?

Re: did it again. -- crc differ

2020-11-30 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 12:46:46 -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > I assume that the first few lines of the coyote._home_gene_Pictures.0 > file is an Amana header (including an XML chunk); can you post that > here? Hmmm, it might also be useful to see the header from the

Re: did it again. -- crc differ

2020-11-30 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 03:12:41 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > Doing a level 0 on /home/gene/Pictures, it logged this in the email: > > coyote /home/gene/Pictures lev 0 partial taper: source server crc > (44cff778:11146117120) and input server crc (dfd0e83a:11146117120) > differ) > coyote

did it again.

2020-11-30 Thread Gene Heskett
My wrapper script failed to write its stuff to this mornings backup. Doing a level 0 on /home/gene/Pictures, it logged this in the email: coyote /home/gene/Pictures lev 0 partial taper: source server crc (44cff778:11146117120) and input server crc (dfd0e83a:11146117120) differ) coyote

I'm confused, again

2020-03-11 Thread Gene Heskett
Greetings all; Whats the exact syntax for specing the style of estimates done? >From the man page for amanda.conf, the estimate done seems to be part of a dumptype most logicly specified as estimate client # but could be estimate calcsize # or estimate server # and I just found it was

Re: again level 1 backup problems.

2018-02-14 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
From: owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org <owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org> on behalf of Charles Stroom <char...@stremen.xs4all.nl> Sent: February 13, 2018 4:28:02 PM To: amanda-users@amanda.org Subject: Re: again level 1 backup problems. To sum up the problems I have had:

Re: again level 1 backup problems.

2018-02-13 Thread Charles Stroom
To sum up the problems I have had: I have now a properly working amanda working with my pictures directory divided over 5 disks defined in the disklist, that all resides on a Windows formatted separate disk. I have done a number of tests with all kind of variations on my vfat disk, but I

Fw: again level 1 backup problems.

2018-02-07 Thread Charles Stroom
18:43:30 +0100 From: Charles Stroom <char...@stremen.xs4all.nl> To: Jean-Louis Martineau <jmartin...@carbonite.com> Subject: Re: again level 1 backup problems. Hi Jean-Louis, before your email arrived, I was testing something different. I copied the whole ~/pictures tree back

Re: again level 1 backup problems.

2018-02-07 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
fat, and I will add that feature to amgtar. Jean-Louis From: owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org <owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org> on behalf of Charles Stroom <char...@stremen.xs4all.nl> Sent: February 6, 2018 5:58:23 PM To: amanda-users@amanda.org Subject: a

again level 1 backup problems.

2018-02-06 Thread Charles Stroom
I have had level 1 problems about 4 years ago. In that case, the level 1 behaved as a level 0, so level 1 in fact did a real full backup. I have similar problems now again, similar, but not the same. I have amanda 3.5.5 running which on a daily base makes cycled backup on DDS-4 tapes of my Linux

multitape span always starts from first chunk again on the next tape

2012-06-07 Thread Karsten Fuhrmann
Hello, i have DLEs which are bigger than a single tape now. And i thought the solution would be to change the following in my amanda.conf runtapes 2 holdingdisk hd1 { comment first holding disk directory /mnt/amanda-holding # where the holding disk is chunksize 50Gb # size

Re: multitape span always starts from first chunk again on the next tape

2012-06-07 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On 06/07/2012 05:47 AM, Karsten Fuhrmann wrote: Hello, i have DLEs which are bigger than a single tape now. And i thought the solution would be to change the following in my amanda.conf runtapes 2 holdingdisk hd1 { comment first holding disk directory /mnt/amanda-holding # where

Re: multitape span always starts from first chunk again on the next tape

2012-06-07 Thread Karsten Fuhrmann
Thanks, but how do i tell amanda that i changed the tape when the backup is run through a cronjob each night? On 07.06.2012, at 14:11, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote: On 06/07/2012 05:47 AM, Karsten Fuhrmann wrote: Hello, i have DLEs which are bigger than a single tape now. And i thought the

Re: multitape span always starts from first chunk again on the next tape

2012-06-07 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On 06/07/2012 08:53 AM, Karsten Fuhrmann wrote: Thanks, but how do i tell amanda that i changed the tape when the backup is run through a cronjob each night? configuring chg-manual is the old way to do it, it is better to configure and interactivity module: # amanda.conf # define an

The canary has died, again.

2012-05-12 Thread gene heskett
It turns out I have been running on 4.0.0alpha-4692 for a while, all the newer ones have a broken build: libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../config -I../gnulib -fno-strict-aliasing -D_GNU_SOURCE - pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -Wall -Wextra

Back to looking for cifs again?

2011-10-11 Thread gene heskett
Greetings from the canary; I just built and installed the 4-alpha-4359 tarball, and I noted that the configure, or the build, paused for about 30 seconds, long enough to get my attention make move the solitaire I was playing to see what the hangup was, and it took off again just as I cleared

Re: amgtar set_euid Fixed Bug Broken Again

2011-04-20 Thread Trever L. Adams
On 04/19/2011 11:46 AM, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote: The fix is already committed. If you have a similar problem, then make a new bug report with all relevant information including the amgtar debug file. Jean-Louis Pardon me for not readily knowing, where would be the proper place to file a

amgtar set_euid Fixed Bug Broken Again

2011-04-19 Thread Trever L. Adams
Please reference: http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-amgtar-getting-Permission-denied-td28223185.html With Amanda 3.2.2 I am getting the symptom described in the web page above. I also notice that estimate, backup and restore code paths all are missing the appropriate seteuid(0)/setuid(0) code. Would

Re: amgtar set_euid Fixed Bug Broken Again

2011-04-19 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
The fix is already committed. If you have a similar problem, then make a new bug report with all relevant information including the amgtar debug file. Jean-Louis Trever L. Adams wrote: Please reference: http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-amgtar-getting-Permission-denied-td28223185.html With

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-30 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday, September 30, 2010 12:04:37 pm ad...@geronimoalloys.com did opine: Will you please take my email off the distibution list. ad...@geronimoalloys.com bran...@geronimoalloys.com *...@geronimoalloys.com *...@tejasalloys.com Thanks I do not readily know how to do that,

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-29 Thread Gene Heskett
, no amflush. Just amtape (which worked for your main config) and amcheck (which didn't), checking the data link in between. Find the underlying pattern, so we can map that pattern to a solution. Dustin There appears to be tracking, I did 'amtape test slot next' all the way around to slot-1 again

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-29 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 08:23:54 am Dustin J. Mitchell did opine: On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: Like run a catchup loop of at least 2 runs? Or just plain amdump test by hand and see what falls out for two runs? No, no amdump, no

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-29 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: For SG, I removed the data link from the test setup.  Running amcheck test does restore it. Removing it from the running setup and running amcheck Daily does not.  But it doesn't seem to effect amdump or amcheck in

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-29 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:24:04 am Dustin J. Mitchell did opine: On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: For SG, I removed the data link from the test setup. Running amcheck test does restore it. Removing it from the running setup and

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-29 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: Note the --with-config=Daily \, but the subdir when running am* Daily is /amandatapes/Dailys,  note the plural.  Is this line even required? No, --with-config is largely ignored, and the name of the vtape directory

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-29 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 01:35:19 pm Dustin J. Mitchell did opine: On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: Note the --with-config=Daily \, but the subdir when running am* Daily is /amandatapes/Dailys, note the plural. Is this line even

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-29 Thread Chris Nighswonger
amcheck dead in water: [ama...@coyote amanda-3.2.0alpha.svn.3460]$ amcheck Daily Amanda Tape Server Host Check - Holding disk /usr/dumps: 620929024 kB disk space available, using 620417024 kB amcheck-device: syntax error at

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-29 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 13:40:27 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 01:35:19 pm Dustin J. Mitchell did opine: Can you add some debug prints to Amanda/Changer/disk.pm? 494 # TODO: locking Amanda::Debug::debug(set_current: symlinking $curlink to slot$slot)

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-29 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Chris Nighswonger cnighswon...@foundations.edu wrote: Line 473 should have a double colon rather than a single... ie. Amanda::Debug::debug rather than Amanda::Debug::debug Sorry about that, Gene. You can just edit the file under /usr, rather than re-making

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-29 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 02:32:52 pm Chris Nighswonger did opine: amcheck dead in water: [ama...@coyote amanda-3.2.0alpha.svn.3460]$ amcheck Daily Amanda Tape Server Host Check - Holding disk /usr/dumps: 620929024 kB disk space available, using

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-29 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 02:51:47 pm Dustin J. Mitchell did opine: On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Chris Nighswonger cnighswon...@foundations.edu wrote: Line 473 should have a double colon rather than a single... ie. Amanda::Debug::debug rather than Amanda::Debug::debug Sorry

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-29 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: Wed Sep 29 14:41:23 2010: amcheck-device: set_current: symlinking /amandatapes/test/data to slot1 And is this link in place on the filesystem now? What's the difference between the 14:31 and 14:41 runs of amcheck?

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-28 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com wrote: That said, the new chg-disk *is* supposed to duplicate the data symlink quirk, so I'll take a look at why it's not doing that. And I just verified that this works for me -- it's also tested for by the installchecks.

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-28 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday, September 28, 2010 07:14:47 pm Dustin J. Mitchell did opine: On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com wrote: That said, the new chg-disk *is* supposed to duplicate the data symlink quirk, so I'll take a look at why it's not doing that. And I just

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-28 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: I now see a 'data' link to slot 5, I nuked that 2 days ago because nothing was paying an attention to it, and neither amcheck nor amdump was updating it, and the loss causes no errors, none, nada, zip.  My helper script

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-28 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday, September 28, 2010 09:42:43 pm Dustin J. Mitchell did opine: On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: I now see a 'data' link to slot 5, I nuked that 2 days ago because nothing was paying an attention to it, and neither amcheck nor amdump was

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-28 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: Anyway, its setup, and awaiting orders Cap'n.  Next? Can you replicate any of the failure-to-update-data errors with this test config? Dustin -- Open Source Storage Engineer http://www.zmanda.com

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-28 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday, September 28, 2010 11:16:55 pm Dustin J. Mitchell did opine: On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: Anyway, its setup, and awaiting orders Cap'n. Next? Can you replicate any of the failure-to-update-data errors with this test config?

Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-26 Thread Gene Heskett
to get my database all in step again. Is anyone else actually using GenesAmandaHelper-0.6? I can send you the two scripts that are changed privately, just yelp. -- Cheers, Gene There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order. -Ed

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-26 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
-disk around the beginning of August. I have now patched my script for new means of assuring my data files go into the correct subdir of a vtape setup, but it will take a month or so to get my database all in step again. Is anyone else actually using GenesAmandaHelper-0.6?  I can send you

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-26 Thread Gene Heskett
of it in the ChangeLog, I read it again early this morning from about the middle of July. I have now patched my script for new means of assuring my data files go into the correct subdir of a vtape setup, but it will take a month or so to get my database all in step again. Is anyone else actually using

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-26 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: Yes I did, but that didn't give me a clue that the 'data' link to whatever had been deprecated and that for cleanliness, I should go around an nuke it.  No mention of it in the ChangeLog, I read it again early

Re: Amanda changes bite me again.

2010-09-26 Thread Gene Heskett
an nuke it. No mention of it in the ChangeLog, I read it again early this morning from about the middle of July. The new changer was added sometime before that. YOU changed your configuration to use it in August. In retrospect, we should have named it something different -- perhaps chg-vfs

Re: The canary just died again

2010-06-12 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 11 June 2010, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, but todays 3156 just fell over, same perms problem. Right, I haven't fixed it yet. And 3161 is still confused. ;-) In the final mix, how is this supposed to

Re: The canary just died again

2010-06-12 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: And 3161 is still confused. ;-)  In the final mix, how is this supposed to work?, and I'll change my 2 scripts accordingly. I think you're just pulling my chain now, but I'll go again: Right, I haven't fixed it yet

Re: The canary just died again

2010-06-12 Thread Gene Heskett
, but I'll go again: I didn't think I was. Right, I haven't fixed it yet. The patch is in review - there's some lingering discussion of the proper permissions for amrecover and oldamrecover. Is it intentional now that amcheck, amplanner and a couple others are now owned by root:root

Re: The canary just died again

2010-06-12 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: Is it intentional now that amcheck, amplanner and a couple others are now owned by root:root? No, they should be owned by root:disk (or root:backup, depending on your system), and setuid. Dustin -- Open Source

Re: The canary just died again

2010-06-12 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 12 June 2010, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: Is it intentional now that amcheck, amplanner and a couple others are now owned by root:root? No, they should be owned by root:disk (or root:backup, depending on your

Re: The canary just died again

2010-06-11 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: At the end of the install, it falls over with: make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/amanda/amanda-3.2.0alpha.svn.3147' bash: /usr/local/sbin/amcheck: Permission denied And sure enough, when I go check, amcheck is owned

Re: The canary just died again

2010-06-11 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 11 June 2010, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: At the end of the install, it falls over with: make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/amanda/amanda-3.2.0alpha.svn.3147' bash: /usr/local/sbin/amcheck: Permission denied

Re: The canary just died again

2010-06-11 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, but todays 3156 just fell over, same perms problem. Right, I haven't fixed it yet. Are you sure you want to change how that works? Yes - chowning everything to amanda is actually *less* secure (since it means that

Re: The canary just died again

2010-06-11 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 11 June 2010, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, but todays 3156 just fell over, same perms problem. Right, I haven't fixed it yet. Are you sure you want to change how that works? Yes - chowning everything to

The canary just died again

2010-06-10 Thread Gene Heskett
Greetings folks; I just used my usual scripts to install 3.2alpha-3147, and its dead. Something in the install script isn't properly setting ownerships and perms. At the end of the install, it falls over with: make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/amanda/amanda-3.2.0alpha.svn.3147' bash:

Re: Amanda didn't start over again on the next tape if the end of one tape is reached

2009-09-24 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Dominik Schips domi...@s235.de wrote: The error message in the amanda status report is: dump to tape failed: driver: [writing file: No space left on device] Can you attach the trace log so we can see what happened after that? And also the taper's debug log.

Amanda didn't start over again on the next tape if the end of one tape is reached

2009-09-17 Thread Dominik Schips
Hello, I did an upgrade from Amanda 2.4.4p3-3 (Debian sarge) to Amanda 2.5.2p1-4 (Debian lenny). After this upgrade Amanda didn't take a new tape if a DLE failed because of emty space on the current tape. With Amanda 2.4.4 it took the next tape if it reaches the end of one tape. I changed some

Fw: Amanda 2.5.2p1-1 - Broken Pipe .....again

2009-08-18 Thread Yogesh Hasabnis
Additional information about this problem. An additional external USB hard drive has been added to this host about one month ago. The filesystem on this hard drive is not backed up with Amanda. But the observation is that the Broken Pipe problem seems to disappear when the filesystem on this

Amanda 2.5.2p1-1 - Broken Pipe .....again

2009-08-11 Thread Yogesh Hasabnis
sure that it doesn't occur again. Thanks, Yogesh   amdump.1 Description: Binary data

Re: defunct jobs - again

2009-07-10 Thread Brian Cuttler
Dustin, I was playing with dividing a large DLE, 270Gig (which is yet another thread for this same server) and started a run yesterday morning, so the PM run with maxdumps reduced from 4 to 3 did not run last night. The client is in a 'good' state, so we should be set for tonight, but a known

defunct jobs - again

2009-07-08 Thread Brian Cuttler
Server is Solaris 10 x86 (on an X4500), Amanda 2.6.1p1 Lyra client is the same version on also running Solaris 10, but Sparc, on a T1000. Both Lyra:/ and Curie:/ are standard comp-root, ufs file systems. (Other DLEs on both systems use zfs-snapshots). (amnda client) Lyra has defunct jobs again

Re: defunct jobs - again

2009-07-08 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Brian Cuttlerbr...@wadsworth.org wrote: (amnda client) Lyra has defunct jobs again. I removed all of the cruft a couple of days ago and amanda ran successfully, but the issue has recurred. The defunct jobs are a known deficiency, but as you said earlier, they go

Re: defunct jobs - again

2009-07-08 Thread Brian Cuttler
that type of cross interaction). On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:06:39AM -0400, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Brian Cuttlerbr...@wadsworth.org wrote: (amnda client) Lyra has defunct jobs again. I removed all of the cruft a couple of days ago and amanda ran successfully

Re: defunct jobs - again

2009-07-08 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Brian Cuttlerbr...@wadsworth.org wrote: The job on the server completes, the amandad on the client does not terminate, causing the 'dump' failures following days on the particular client. OK. Sorry if I missed that in the earlier emails. What authentication

Amanda does it again! - Wins LJ Readers' Choice Award

2009-05-06 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
All, Amanda has won Linux Journal's Linux Choice Award for 2009: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/10451 Jean-Louis

Re: amanda, tar and new kernels again.

2008-11-08 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which means it should be in the CONFIGURATION-OVERRIDE section of a 'man amanda'. But it isn't mentioned that I can see. This is the latest 2.6.0p2 from your home page at zmanda. I'm not sure why you'd look in

Re: amanda, tar and new kernels again.

2008-11-08 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 08 November 2008, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which means it should be in the CONFIGURATION-OVERRIDE section of a 'man amanda'. But it isn't mentioned that I can see. This is the latest 2.6.0p2 from your home

Re: amanda, tar and new kernels again.

2008-11-07 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Older? 1.17 is the default for an F8 install. Are you saying that this has finally been addressed, and that amanda can now tell tar to ignore that? Yep -- check the amanda-users and bug-tar archives. Dustin -- Storage

Re: amanda, tar and new kernels again.

2008-11-07 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 07 November 2008, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Older? 1.17 is the default for an F8 install. Are you saying that this has finally been addressed, and that amanda can now tell tar to ignore that? Yep -- check the

Re: amanda, tar and new kernels again.

2008-11-06 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just went back through my emails from amanda for the last several days, and its appears that the device mapper has struck again by using volatile numbers. With 2.6.28-rc2, all the disks are now at a major device number

Re: amanda, tar and new kernels again.

2008-11-06 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 06 November 2008, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just went back through my emails from amanda for the last several days, and its appears that the device mapper has struck again by using volatile numbers

amanda, tar and new kernels again.

2008-11-01 Thread Gene Heskett
Greetings all; I just went back through my emails from amanda for the last several days, and its appears that the device mapper has struck again by using volatile numbers. With 2.6.28-rc2, all the disks are now at a major device number of 8, where they used to be 254. /usr/movies, which

Re: Trying to backup to disk, getting dump to tape failed, will try again

2007-11-27 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Jennifer Luisi schrieb: /export/amanda/vtapes/tape1/slots: total 44 lrwxrwxrwx 1 amanda disk 39 Nov 26 13:53 data - /export/amanda/vtapes/tape1/slots/slot4 -rw--- 1 amanda disk 11 Nov 26 13:53 info drwxr-xr-x 2 amanda disk 4096 Nov 26 12:38 slot1 [...] You seem to have mixed

Re: Trying to backup to disk, getting dump to tape failed, will try again

2007-11-27 Thread Jon LaBadie
: SUCCESS taper [hostname] /export/backup 20071126 0 [sec 188.985 kb 0 kps 0.0 {wr: writers 0 rdwait 188.984 wrwait 0.000 filemark 0.000}] INFO driver [hostname] /export/backup 0 [dump to tape failed, will try again] I've googled and read docs and how-to's to get where I am now

Re: Trying to backup to disk, getting dump to tape failed, will try again

2007-11-27 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
shows: SUCCESS taper [hostname] /export/backup 20071126 0 [sec 188.985 kb 0 kps 0.0 {wr: writers 0 rdwait 188.984 wrwait 0.000 filemark 0.000}] INFO driver [hostname] /export/backup 0 [dump to tape failed, will try again] What's the dumper result for the disk? Jean-Louis

Re: Trying to backup to disk, getting dump to tape failed, will try again

2007-11-27 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
PROPERLY! again, this is probably because I killed them. How long should amanda be running before it completes? I've got my disklist down to one host and one very small directory and I'm still not able to get any data written to my tape/disk. Thanks, Jen

Re: Trying to backup to disk, getting dump to tape failed, will try again

2007-11-27 Thread Jennifer Luisi
failed: Connection timed out driver: result time 189.086 from dumper0: TRY-AGAIN 01-2 could not connect to data port: Connection timed out On the client-side, I found the following in my sendbackup.*.debug file: sendbackup: debug 1 pid 30171 ruid 33 euid 33: start at Tue Nov 27 11:49:37

Re: Trying to backup to disk, getting dump to tape failed, will try again

2007-11-27 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Jennifer Luisi schrieb: I think I'm getting closer to the problem. There seems to be a connection issue between my server and client. If anyone has any input, I'd appreciate it. I've got iptables on my client set up to accept port 10080 connections from my server, and it's obviously talking

Re: Trying to backup to disk, getting dump to tape failed, will try again

2007-11-27 Thread Jennifer Luisi
driver: result time 189.086 from dumper0: TRY-AGAIN 01-2 could not connect to data port: Connection timed out On the client-side, I found the following in my sendbackup.*.debug file: sendbackup: debug 1 pid 30171 ruid 33 euid 33: start at Tue Nov 27 11:49:37 2007/usr/lib/amanda/sendbackup

Re: Trying to backup to disk, getting dump to tape failed, will try again

2007-11-27 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Jennifer Luisi schrieb: Okay, I figured out what my silly little problem was. Apparently, you need to turn on amanda on your server before anything will work. An interesting observation: software has to be started to work ;) It's interesting that there isn't a useful error to point out

Re: Compression again

2007-04-16 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
1051091 158.7 2:36 6737.3 5:39 3097.9 server /projekte 0 8876700 11223553 126.4 43:33 4295.4 60:48 3076.9 Once again the data seems to grow while it's written to the tape. But I think I figured out the problem. During the calculation of the estimates everything seems to be ok and all

Re: Compression again

2007-04-16 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
2971.2 server /literatur 0 662255 1051091 158.7 2:36 6737.3 5:39 3097.9 server /projekte 0 8876700 11223553 126.4 43:33 4295.4 60:48 3076.9 Once again the data seems to grow while it's written to the tape. But I think I figured out the problem. During the calculation

Re: Compression again

2007-04-16 Thread Sebastian Henrich
0 1221325 1796309 147.1 4:44 6321.5 9:46 3065.4 server /intorg 0 188995 199786 105.7 1:22 2427.2 1:07 2971.2 server /literatur 0 662255 1051091 158.7 2:36 6737.3 5:39 3097.9 server /projekte 0 8876700 11223553 126.4 43:33 4295.4 60:48 3076.9 Once again

Re: Compression again

2007-04-13 Thread Sebastian Henrich
2427.2 1:07 2971.2 server /literatur 0 662255 1051091 158.7 2:36 6737.3 5:39 3097.9 server /projekte 0 8876700 11223553 126.4 43:33 4295.4 60:48 3076.9 Once again the data seems to grow while it's written to the tape. But I think I figured out the problem. During

Re: Compression again

2007-04-13 Thread Sebastian Henrich
1051091 158.7 2:36 6737.3 5:39 3097.9 server /projekte 0 8876700 11223553 126.4 43:33 4295.4 60:48 3076.9 Once again the data seems to grow while it's written to the tape. But I think I figured out the problem. During the calculation of the estimates everything seems to be ok and all

Compression again

2007-04-12 Thread Sebastian Henrich
Hello again, I still try find the cause of my problems with amanda. When the backup finishes, I get the following dump summary: DUMPER STATSTAPER STATS HOSTNAME DISKL ORIG-kB OUT-kB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s MMM:SS KB/s

Re: Compression again

2007-04-12 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Post the amdump.1 log file. Jean-Louis Sebastian Henrich wrote: Hello again, I still try find the cause of my problems with amanda. When the backup finishes, I get the following dump summary: DUMPER STATSTAPER STATS HOSTNAME DISK

Re: selfcheck request failed (again)

2007-02-18 Thread Cédric Lucantis
Hi! Amanda can't find the IP for the hostname 'pc-cedric'. Check your name server configuration, /etc/hosts, ... Jean-Louis Cédric Lucantis wrote: hi! I'm actually trying to upgrade amanda to the latest svn version (from the cvs 2.51b2 version which was working fine) and by the same

selfcheck request failed (again)

2007-02-13 Thread Cédric Lucantis
hi! I'm actually trying to upgrade amanda to the latest svn version (from the cvs 2.51b2 version which was working fine) and by the same time installing it in another directory. I could build and install it but i now have this message after an amcheck which I don't understand: WARNING:

Re: selfcheck request failed (again)

2007-02-13 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Cédric, Amanda can't find the IP for the hostname 'pc-cedric'. Check your name server configuration, /etc/hosts, ... Jean-Louis Cédric Lucantis wrote: hi! I'm actually trying to upgrade amanda to the latest svn version (from the cvs 2.51b2 version which was working fine) and by the same

Re: selfcheck request failed (again)

2007-02-13 Thread Cédric Lucantis
Amanda can't find the IP for the hostname 'pc-cedric'. Check your name server configuration, /etc/hosts, ... well, I have the following in my /etc/hosts: 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost pc-cedric and this in .amandahosts: localhost.localdomain amanda

did it again

2006-09-18 Thread Gene Heskett
Greetings; amanda, version 2.5.1b2-20060829, just did it again. The whole firewall box failed, and there are still 16 copies of gtar running on that box, each consuming 5 to 8% of the cpu. This is with those timeout numbers doubled from the thread of 2 weeks or so ago doubled. I suspect

strategy incronly and skip-full again: According to manual page, both are buggy. Have bugs been fixed?

2006-06-22 Thread Toralf Lund
Regarding my recent post regarding strategy incronly and skip-full, I just found out more about the problems I've had in the past with this simply by checking the amanda.conf manual page it says: skip-full /boolean/ Default: no. If true and planner has scheduled a full backup,

Amflush Problem - Again!

2006-03-03 Thread Rohit Peyyeti
Hello All: After a very long time, maybe after 2 years or so, I started seeing amflush problems again. No configuration was changed and nothing was touched too. Amflush refuses to backup stuff left in the holding space to the tape. My tape drive blinks with activity as soon as I start amflush

  1   2   3   >