Dear Chris,
dear John,
What do you have maxduumps set to? Maybe increasing or decreasing it
for this one host will help.
increasing maxdumps did not help. Again I got
adler / lev 0 FAILED [missing result for / in adler response]
this night for the 33rd filesystem on
/-- fs.rocnet. /dev/sda6 lev 0 FAILED [data timeout]
sendbackup: start [fs.rocnet.de:/dev/sda6 level 0]
sendbackup: info BACKUP=/sbin/dump
sendbackup: info RECOVER_CMD=/sbin/restore -f... -
sendbackup: info end
| DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Mon Oct 22 23:02:49 2001
| DUMP: Date of
dump is waiting for I/O - in my opinion it's a dump issue, not an amanda
issue. Try to run dump several times by hand, e.g. dump 0af /dev/null
/dev/md2.
The results are:
root 11659 11177 0 16:56 pts/200:00:00 dump 0af /dev/null /dev/md2
So I have yet another hung process I
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mvh / best regards,Roy Andre
TollefsenSystemkonsulentEM Software Partners ASDir tlf +47 51 96 98
92Fax +47 51 96 98 98Web: www.emsp.no
unsubscribe
On 23 Oct 2001 at 11:39pm, Claus Rosenberger wrote
i have a lot of problems with data timeout while backing up my local
partitions. the installation is very simple. i only backup my local
machine. there are a few small partitions. sometimes it work, sometimes
not. i use redhat 7.0 and the
Hi,
I am having a problem backing up one of my UNIX boxes with Amanda. When I
run AmCheck I get the error:
WARNING: bill: selfcheck request timed out. Host down?
Client check: 7 hosts checked in 29.678 seconds, 1 problem found.
As you can see the check runs successfully on 6 hosts but times
I'm currently using GTAR for Amanda backups. The only problem I'm still
having is a [data timeout] error on one of the directories. I can only
assume this is because there are hundres of thousands of files under this
directory and it takes GTAR forever to get data moving for amandad.
1) Is
I'm backing up 99 filesystems. I am using one of the postscript forms
(forget which one) to print out a report at the end of the run. Clearly 99
won't fit in one page.
Sugestions?
--
Stan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]843-745-3154
Charleston SC.
--
Windows 98:
unsubscribe
Upgrade your version of dump to the latest. I used to sporadically see
data timeouts with dump on Redhat 7.1.
Alternatively, switch to tar, which I did for all our Linux hosts and
haven't seen any data timeouts since.
Yes, I also had problems with dump timing out on RH7.1, tar works
On Tuesday 23 October 2001 06:07 pm, John wrote:
Hello,
I would like to start using amanda to handle backups on my lan.
However, I am not sure how to handle it. I have a 4MM Dat drive w/ 4
tape library (Archive DAT). Can amanda be configured to support each of
the 4 tapes individually or
All,
Thanks to the help of this list, I have just recently configured Amanda and
run my first backups. However, I'm experiencing problems with amverify and
amrecover. The morning after the first backups ran, I tried to run amverify
on the first tape of the run. Here's the report I got back
unsubscribe
I am using amanda server 2.4.2p2-1 to backup a remote
solaris system. Backups of the remote client appear to
be running properly - index records for the remote
host reflect a complete list of directories/files. The
amount of data backed up (for full backups)
corresponds with directory sizes on
If I try:
amrestore -p /dev/device no-such-host /dev/null
amrestore correctly lists all the dump images on the tape. However, if I
try and restore with:
amrestore -p /dev/device real hostname real disk name /dev/null
I get:
amrestore: 3: restoring realhostname.diskimage.0
the console
Howdy,
I'm running amanda 2.4.2p2 on RH7.1 Linux and HP-UX 10.20, with a Linux box
acting as server. On the server, there is a gzip --best process running
even though I have compress none in the global configuration. Is this
normal?
--Dave Chin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi.
I have an odd problem (I think atleast).
Things work ok when backing up and when recovering but when I try to run
amverify I get something like this:
Waiting for device to go ready...
Rewinding...
Processing label...
Rewinding...
Rewinding...
Daily-001 ():
checking
I'm running amanda 2.4.2p2 on RH7.1 Linux and HP-UX 10.20, with a Linux box
acting as server. On the server, there is a gzip --best process running
even though I have compress none in the global configuration. Is this
normal?
If you are indexing, yes. The indexes are compressed.
The archives at yahoogroups were not recording postings
for most of the third quarter (~200 articles when the
normal flow is 2000).
I have a pretty complete set of list articles covering
the last 9 quarters (for this need, nicely grouped by Q).
Has anyone information as to whether the missing
I'm trying to use amanda to backup my colocated Solaris server to
a local machine, and I don't have a tape drive. I do have plenty of
hardi drive space handy, however.
I've tried and tried, but I cannot seem to get amanda to spool the
backups to disk. I typically end up with
driver: fs.rocnet.de /dev/sda6 0 [dump to tape failed, will try
again]
BRE I assume this is Linux' dump. What version are you using? Why don't
you
BRE use a holding disk instead of writing directly to tape?
do you think thats why i'm using no holding disk. i will try it. but i
don't
I recently read a message here about a native NT client (doesn't
require samba) for backing up NT boxes using Amanda but I cannot fond
the message in Google or the archives. Can someone point me to a web
or ftp site?
--
-- Stephen Carville
UNIX and Network Administrator
Ace Flood USA
Are you indexing your backups?
Amanda compresses the index files stored on the server. Amanda may also
compress other process-oriented (not backup) files on the server, indexes
are the only ones I'm certain of though.
HTH
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 12:17:24PM -0700, Stephen Carville wrote:
I recently read a message here about a native NT client (doesn't
require samba) for backing up NT boxes using Amanda but I cannot fond
the message in Google or the archives. Can someone point me to a web
or ftp site?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/amanda-win32/
it's a bit tricky to get working...
-edwin
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Carville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:17 PM
To: Amanda Users
Subject: NT backups
I recently read a message here about a native
we may have to reboot the internet for this.
-Original Message-
From: Hilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AMANDA WEBSITE ???
To whom it may concern.
I would like to access your website but it
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Rivera, Edwin wrote:
we may have to reboot the internet for this.
Which of course means we first have to send a notice to all users...
-Mitch
I just moved my tape drive from one machine to another and I upgraded
from 2.4.1p2 to 2.4.2p2 at the same time. I moved my configuration
files over and all of the logs and curinfo files and the indexes
(indices?).
When I look at my holding disk, ./bkup, I see:
truk!backup 110# ls -l /bkup
I just moved my tape drive from one machine to another and I upgraded
from 2.4.1p2 to 2.4.2p2 at the same time. I moved my configuration
files over and all of the logs and curinfo files and the indexes
(indices?).
When I look at my holding disk, ./bkup, I see:
truk!backup 110# ls -l
2) Which timeout value can I adjust in amanda.conf to avoid the data
timeout error?
amanda.conf, dtimeout
31 matches
Mail list logo
