* Matt McManus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20001213 04:00] thus spake:
I have now got amanda running very happily on my network. I have a query
about how to turn hardware compression 'off' on my Quantum DLT4000 drive.
At the moment I use the 'density select' button on the front of the drive,
but I
* Ron Snyder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20010423 15:50] thus spake:
For those of you with tape changers and barcode readers: are any of you
using any software to generate your own custom barcodes? It seems like it
might be a bit nicer (for locating/moving tapes around) if the barcode label
could
Hello,
Amanda fails on /root on the tape server with the error
in the Subject: line. Any ideas?
I just added / on the amanda tape backup server using
gtar (1.13.17) with compression.
Here is some debug info:
amandad: version 2.4.2-19991216-beta1
amandad: build:
Hello John,
* John R. Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20010502 15:52] thus spake:
Amanda fails on /root on the tape server with the error
in the Subject: line. Any ideas?
...
Here is some debug info:
...
But not enough :-).
Weren't there some messages in the FAILED AND STRANGE DUMP
* Jan Boshoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20010614 10:27] thus spake:
Hi everyone
[...]
Every once in a while, when running amcheck, it returns with an error
stating that a filesystem is not readable. Maybe someone else has run
into this problem, it only seems to occur on the SGI Irix 6.5
Hello,
I searched the amanda archives but didn't see a conclusive
answer to my question: any problem with an autoPAK library
with a VXA-1 tape drive (V17 cartridge) driven by Amanda
on a Linux box (Redhat-6.2) with a Adaptec AHA-2940U2/W?
(This server will be upgraded to RH-7.1 real soon).
How
* Brian Cuttler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20010702 14:14] thus spake:
I should probably also say that I'm re-building amanda 2.4.2p2
on IRIX 6.5.x (usually 6.5.7m and up, currently installing
6.5.12m on some systems).
I have amanda running as a client on 6.5.11 and 6.5.12 and I used the
On what OS exactly?
I have an adic-218 with a dlt7000 running on irix-6.5.6m and
working with amanda-2.5.0 for more than a year now, thanks to
patches provided by Thomas Hepper [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Relevent entries in amanda.conf:
runtapes1# number of tapes to be used in a
* Mark P. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20010808 12:50] thus spake:
I am an amanda super-newbie. I just got amanda [and on this mailing list]
yesterday. Can amanda be used simply to move tapes around and access their
various informations remotely? In other words, not to back stuff up.
If so, or even
* Marty Shannon, RHCE ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20020119 13:00] thus spake:
The proper mechanism for this is obtained by man stinit under recent
versions of Linux; Solaris has an analogous mechanism. Other systems
probably also have it, but I don't know for sure. To use hardware
compression,
* Dave Edick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20020215 14:28] thus spake:
Hi all,
I'm in the process of setting up an Amanda backup server to back up a
collection of new servers. The Linux and Solaris servers aren't posing
any problems so far. But I also have to back up a SNAP 4100 appliance. In
my
* John R. Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20020314 23:15] thus spake:
This looks to me to be a temporary index file that has been removed after
tar started.
Yup.
Is this a problem? ...
Nope.
If it isn't a problem, is there a way to prevent it? ...
You should be able to give GNU
* Eric Zylstra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20020320 14:00] thus spake:
I'm running into an old problem--this is in the archives from a few
years back. I have done `rm config.*` and rerun configure with the same
result.
Compiling amanda-2.4.2 (client only) on Irix 6.5.x, with gcc 3.0.3 and
* Anne M. Hammond ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20020812 18:54] thus spake:
The header at the beginning of the amanda dump file says
to restore use
dd if=tape bs=32k skip=1 | /sbin/xfsrestore -f... -
However, this is producing errors from xfsrestore.
and these would be?
If you have used a dd
Hello,
I just installed and configured amanda-2.4.3b4-20020829 on a Linux box
with an ecrix tape library and I might be stumbling on some bug and/or
feature: relative path exclude list don't seem to be used at all...
Perusing in the posts for 2.4.3b4 announcement from Jean-Louis I see
that this
* Frank Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20020903 11:18] thus spake:
--On Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:10:18 -0400 Jean-Francois Malouin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I just installed and configured amanda-2.4.3b4-20020829 on a Linux box
with an ecrix tape library and I might
* Frank Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20020903 12:53] thus spake:
[...]
---
exclude file
---
[root@blade]# cat .amanda-gnutar-exclude-list.txt
./diffusion/
./extra-TLE/
./F_MRI/
./MRI_misc/
./MT/
./neda/
./PREVIOUS/
./relaxo/
./restore/
./samson/
./thalamus/
Bonjour Jean-Louis,
* Jean-Louis Martineau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20020904 20:21] thus spake:
Hi Jean-Francois,
The relative exclude list works for me.
Could you send me all the log files for an amcheck and amdump run?
amandad.*.debug
selfcheck.*.debug
selfcheck.*.exclude
I have stumbled on this in the past but looks like I'm brain dead
today...when I run amrecover I get
[blade]# cat /tmp/amanda/amindexd.20021003153113.debug
amindexd: debug 1 pid 1683 ruid 33 euid 33: start at Thu Oct 3 15:31:13 2002
amindexd: version 2.4.3b4-20020829
amindexd: time 0.000: could
* Jean-Francois Malouin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20021003 16:21]
thus spake:
I have stumbled on this in the past but looks like I'm brain dead
today...when I run amrecover I get
Replying to myself...I'm brain dead, but not totally flat-lined (yet)! ;)
Turns out that I had a bogus server_args
Hello,
* David Trusty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20030105 13:25] thus spake:
I have more information on this problem.
I see these messages in the 'amdump' file:
dumper: logfile.c@202: memory allocation failed (28 bytes requested)
dumper: debug.c@345: memory allocation failed (22 bytes
* Joshua Baker-LePain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20030117 16:54] thus spake:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 at 4:17pm, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote
So after going through some index files and cleaning them and
verifying that amrecover can deal with them I wonder what else might
have gone wrong using
Hello,
* Martin Oehler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20030124 11:52] thus spake:
Hi, Jon!
Am Fre, 2003-01-24 um 16.27 schrieb Jon LaBadie:
Maybe you hit what Gene describes in another posting today.
Once a tape has been written to with HW compression, the drive senses it
and automatically
Hi,
I have amanda version 2.4.3b4-20020829 running on a SGI Origin2000
since last September and even I had a few problems (mainly I was
hitting known bugs with tar and exclude lists) the last one just
got me stumped and I can't clearly anymore even though I know the
answer must be staring at me
Hello,
* Jon LaBadie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20030330 17:02] thus spake:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 03:32:52PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hi,
I have amanda version 2.4.3b4-20020829 running on a SGI Origin2000
since last September and even I had a few problems (mainly I was
hitting
Hi again,
* Jon LaBadie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20030330 19:10] thus spake:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 05:32:27PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hello,
* Jon LaBadie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20030330 17:02] thus spake:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 03:32:52PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote
* Jon LaBadie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20030331 10:26] thus spake:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 03:39:04PM +0200, Mats Blomstrand wrote:
In amanda.conf, set mailto to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
Yes, i know about that option. But that is not the problem that i have.
Sorry for being inprecise.
I
Hello,
I have a directory with which amanda experiences timeouts problems
after adding a *lot* of files and directories in it (something of the
order of 500,000). How can I increase the timeout value (and which one
is it?). I'm running Amanda 2.4.3b4-20020829 (soon to upgraded
to 2.4.4) on an
Hi,
* Dietmar Goldbeck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20030402 02:59] thus spake:
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:07:11PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hello,
I have a directory with which amanda experiences timeouts problems
after adding a *lot* of files and directories in it (something
* Paul Bijnens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20030619 16:43]:
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 at 4:57pm, Tom Brown wrote
ISTR you saying this is Linux? If so, then 'mt compression 0' should do
it. You can check the status by pointing 'tapeinfo' (from the mtx
distribution) at
* Bruno Negrão [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20030922 14:36]:
Hi Martinez,
The devices /dev/*st0
Various letters in front of st0 mean different things, like no-rewind,
no-compress, etc.
I already knew that. But I´m asking for what is the exact letter for disabling
hardware compression - if
Hi,
I have a little situation here: a large disk partition (500GB) to be
backed up using amanda with LTO 100GB tapes in a STK-L40 library.
Trying to break up that partition in chunks less than 100GB is a bit
difficult: one subdir contains more than 100GB but
also has something close to 2000
Hi,
I'm having strange problems with the include thingy in an
entry in my disklist:
bullcalf /data/nihpd/nihpd1/data/assembly_0 /data/nihpd/nihpd1/data/assembly {
include ./0*
exclude ./[1-9]*
high-tar
} 1
Looking at what got written to tape (a full backup) I see only
directories (no files at
Hello again,
Oups, forgot to mention one important fact: the gnutar version:
/usr/freeware/bin/tar --version
tar (GNU tar) 1.13.25
* Jean-Francois Malouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20031124 12:00]:
Hi,
I'm having strange problems with the include thingy in an
entry in my disklist:
bullcalf
* Paul Bijnens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20031124 13:02]:
Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hi,
I'm having strange problems with the include thingy in an
entry in my disklist:
bullcalf /data/nihpd/nihpd1/data/assembly_0
/data/nihpd/nihpd1/data/assembly {
include ./0*
exclude ./[1-9]*
high-tar
* Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20031124 14:15]:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:59:41AM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hi,
I'm having strange problems with the include thingy in an
entry in my disklist:
bullcalf /data/nihpd/nihpd1/data/assembly_0 /data/nihpd/nihpd1/data/assembly
* Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20031124 15:23]:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 02:57:56PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
* Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20031124 14:15]:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:59:41AM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hi,
I'm having strange problems
* Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20031125 02:48]:
FWIW, I am doing the same thing (splitting the stuff), my DLEs look
something like this:
host /home/all /home {
always-full
exclude ./hugemap ./evenhugermap ./*/.sambarecycle
}
host /home/hugemap /home {
always-full
include
* Paul Bijnens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20031125 11:04]:
Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
different than yours. in /.../assembly I have a few thousands
of subdirs, 186 of them starts with a '1'. I just calculated
their total combined size: 11286948 KB or a little less than 11GB.
OK, now look
* Paul Bijnens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20031126 06:02]:
Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
The relevent sendbackup file for this DLE with include stanza:
sendbackup: debug 1 pid 10655570 ruid 666 euid 666: start at Tue Nov 25
04:41:51 2003
/opt/amanda/amanda1/libexec/sendbackup: version 2.4.4p1
* Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20031126 08:26]:
Maybe the line 'include ./[1]*' makes a difference? (instead of ./1*)
Martin
Turns out that the include stanza will show up if it is *after*
the dumptype line, ie:
bullcalf /data/nihpd/nihpd1/data/assembly_1 /data/nihpd/nihpd1/data/assembly {
* Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20031126 11:17]:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 08:42:14AM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Turns out that the include stanza will show up if it is *after*
the dumptype line, ie:
...
ah! A bug?
It would be the normal behavior if tar-high contain
I didn't see any follow up on this one.
Which version of GNU make/automake/autoconf?
I remember hitting this but that was years ago
on a O200 with irix-6.5.x, x small with a beta
amanda
regards,
jf
* Brian Cuttler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20040206 11:41]:
SGI 6.5.19 (both build and
* Brian Cuttler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20040302 15:19]:
Hello Amanda users,
Sorry that I don't have a better defined question...
I think mtx is working correctly but I've got some odd
results - most likely my glue config.
the cross post.
I've installed amanda 2.4.2p2
mtx
* Brian Cuttler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20040317 16:40]:
IRIX 6.5.19
Amanda 2.4.2p2
I've installed gtar on a new amanda-server, a system that was
never a client nor a server before. Currently its only client
is itself. This server mounts /usr/local from another system
(another IRIX system).
* Byarlay, Wayne A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20040330 11:14]:
Greetings all.
I have a computer here, that I'm trying to get amanda installed
configured on. The OS is RedHat9, and I've got an adaptec SCSI card with
a Quantum DLT7000 in there.
I know the tape device is fine hardware-wise,
* Byarlay, Wayne A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20040330 11:27]:
from dmesg:
scsi0 : Adaptec AIC7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 6.2.8
Adaptec 2944 Ultra SCSI adapter
aic7880: Ultra Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/253 SCBs
blk: queue c14f6214, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask
* Joshua Baker-LePain [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20040730 11:20]:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 at 10:50am, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote
I find myself forced to use ACLs for a finer-grained permissions setup
of a few filesystems (Irix CXFS) and I wonder if any of you had done a
similar thing. The irix tar
* Ernest Byaruhanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20040813 10:31]:
hello amanda-users,
i am a newbie to backups and amanda in particular. i am trying to get the
parameters for the HP-Ultrium LTO-1 100/200G tape so that i can paste in
amanda.conf.
I don't have HP but Seagate and IBM, shouldn't make
* Ernest Byaruhanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20040813 10:57]:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
* Ernest Byaruhanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20040813 10:31]:
hello amanda-users,
i am a newbie to backups and amanda in particular. i am trying to get the
parameters for the HP
* Ernest Byaruhanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20040813 11:31]:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
make sure you use a no rewind no compression tape device.
i am still fuguring amanda out - where do i specify this?
If you mean in amanda.conf then its called 'tapedev
* Ernest Byaruhanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20040817 09:11]:
hello,
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Christoph Scheeder wrote:
Hi
you definitly use the wrong wrapperscript for your changer.
okay, i have now changed the script from chg-multi to chg-zd-mtx. does
anyone have a sample config file for
* Andreas Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20040909 14:31]:
I set my DLE up like this to try and split a 430Gb area so it can fit on my
40Gb tapes, similar to what's described in Chapter 18 of the ALPHA docs, under
the size-question:
archimedes.atc.no home-a /mnt/san0 {
* Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20041013 09:43]:
Alexander Jolk wrote:
Toralf Lund wrote:
tar: Skipping to next header
tar: Archive contains obsolescent base-64 headers
37800+0 records in
37800+0 records out
gzip: stdin: invalid compressed data--crc error
tar: Child returned
* Mike Brodbelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20041027 06:03]:
Hi,
I've been using Amanda for ages, but the data volume I'm trying to back
up has grown, and I'm looking for a new tape drive. Currently, I'm using
an internal SCSI Quantum DLT7000, 35Gb native, with Amanda 2.4.2p2 on
Debian Woody.
Hello Matt,
* Matt Emmott [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20050303 11:22]:
Hi all,
I can't find any documentation on this, but if I'm just missing
something, please point me in the right direction, and I'm sorry for
wasting everyone's time.
2 questions: First, where can I specify who amanda sends
* Chuck Amadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20050418 11:17]:
Hi reinstalled amanda as Root make distclean
As amanda ./configure --( My preferences)
As amanada make
As Root make install
Thus checked /local/sw/amanda/bckup/sbin/amcheck ls -al command the
output as below:
-rwsr-x--- 1 root disk
* Luc Lalonde [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20050512 12:51]:
Hello Folks,
What are your recommendations for spliting directories with excludes
without having to reorganize directories in a partition that I want to
backup?
Basically, I want:
client /foo/a* dumptype-a
client /foo/b*
* Nina Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20050527 15:34]:
I can't run amcheck, the error message is : amcheck:running as user
root instead of general.
Then run it as user=general:
su general -c /usr/sbin/amcheck @conf@
and replace @conf@ with your specific conf name.
I configure amanda to run
* Paul Bijnens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20050603 20:36]:
Ryan Pagquil wrote:
2005/6/3, Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
man amdump shows:
SYNOPSIS
amdump config [ host [ disk ]* ]*
Hi guys,
The scenario is this, one night one of the servers to be backed up
hanged and it will not
* Alexander Jolk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20050606 16:17]:
Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
su amanda -c /opt/amanda/amanda6/sbin/amdump archival-conf6 bullcalf \
/data/ipl/ipl10/broche/colindata
The DLE from the disklist:
bullcalf /data/ipl/ipl10/broche/colindata /data/ipl/ipl10/broche
Hi,
In the last few days I've been getting this error:
[/usr/freeware/bin/tar returned 2]
in the sendbackup report on a client running 2.4.4p3-20040805 and the
whole backup run fails. This is the system disk / on the client.
Anyone has run into this before?
The client is an O200 SGI
* Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20050824 17:08]:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 02:59:03PM -0400, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hi,
In the last few days I've been getting this error:
[/usr/freeware/bin/tar returned 2]
Return code (exit status) 2 seems, I think, to be reserved by tar
Hi there,
* Robert Tilden [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20051018 13:14]:
I'm having a problem with amanda backups on one node in our group of linux
boxes.
The error in the daily report reads:
node1 / lev -1 FAILED [no estimate]
The error in the node1 sendsize.20051018004609.debug file from
* Robert Tilden [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20051018 15:05]:
On Tue, October 18, 2005 12:23 pm, Jean-Francois Malouin said:
Hi there,
* Robert Tilden [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20051018 13:14]:
I'm having a problem with amanda backups on one node in our group of
linux
boxes
Hello,
* FM [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20051024 12:40]:
Hello,
Is there a way to backup backup server after all the others server and
not in the same time ? I have perf issue because the backup server is
backed up in the same time as the other servers ?
If you have a tape changer with multiple
* Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20051024 13:59]:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:13:46PM -0400, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hello,
* FM [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20051024 12:40]:
Hello,
Is there a way to backup backup server after all the others server and
not in the same time ? I have
Hi,
[ BTW, I noticed a thread addressing this question yesterday or so
but I don't want to hijack it... ]
I just upgraded to 2.4.5 and noticed that if a DLE is sent directly to
tape it is not retried if it hits EOT (a full dump that won't fit in
the holdding space). I have runtapes = 10 and
* Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20051101 16:02]:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:55:28PM -0500, Scott R. Burns wrote:
I observed this same issue with:
2.4.4p4
NetBSD/i386
HP DAT24*6
My last DLE was than the remaining tape, but would fit entirely on the
next empty tape in the
.
Thanks a bunch,
jf
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:37:02AM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
dumper: driver: result time 23806.848 from dumper0: FAILED 00-00031
--
Jean-Louis Martineau email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Département IRO, Université de Montréal
C.P. 6128, Succ. CENTRE
* Jean-Francois Malouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20051102 07:58]:
* Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20051101 19:56]:
Hi Jean-Francois,
Thanks for the good report.
The problem is the result of the dumper, which is FAILED, in that
case the dump is not retried.
Could you try
Amanda-2.4.5 WITH the dumper retry patch provided by Jean-Louis
Martineau on Nov 1st.
I'm having a LOT of problems right now with failed retries and to me
it makes no sense that amanda should not be able to dump/tape or flush
an image of a DLE weather it's in the holding disk or still sitting
Hello Joshua,
* Joshua Baker-LePain [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20051109 07:07]:
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 at 6:26am, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote
I'm having a LOT of problems right now with failed retries and to me
it makes no sense that amanda should not be able to dump/tape or flush
an image of a DLE
Hi,
I've got this amanda client (server and client at v2.4.5) with a 1.5TB
raid splitted/chunked in ~70 DLEs (using gtar) and some of them don't
make it to tape as the planner timeouts. Now, would someone be kind
enough to jolt my memory as to what is the relationship between UDP
packet size and
* Paul Bijnens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20051207 07:41]:
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:06:19PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
I've got this amanda client (server and client at v2.4.5) with a 1.5TB
raid splitted/chunked in ~70 DLEs (using gtar) and some of them don't
make
Replying to myself,
* Jean-Francois Malouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20051207 16:03]:
* Paul Bijnens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20051207 07:41]:
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:06:19PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
I've got this amanda client (server and client at v2.4.5
* Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060501 13:34]:
amstatus doesn't like ':' in diskname because we use at as separator
between the hostname and diskname.
Anyone know if ':' is a valid character in a hostname?
What are the valid characters of a hostname?
RFC 952 says:
1. A name
* James Lamanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060522 21:52]:
Hi.
I have a couple of XFS + TAR partitions that I'm backing up onto tape.
There are no errors thrown when backing up, however whenever I try to
amrestore one of the XFS partition dump files I get the following:
# amrestore /dev/nst0
* James Lamanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060523 11:02]:
On 5/23/06, Jean-Francois Malouin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* James Lamanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060522 21:52]:
Hi.
I have a couple of XFS + TAR partitions that I'm backing up onto tape.
There are no errors thrown when backing up, however
* Anne M. Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060606 13:59]:
Is anyone using a fiber channel tape drive or library
with amanda and linux?
We have a STK-L180 library and LTO drives (all fibre channel) on a SAN
and even though it's not in use by amanda right now I did some tests
when we got the unit
Hi,
* Sung, Raymond CW [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060627 10:40]:
Dear Amanda Users,
I'm new to using makefiles and I need to install the client part of Amanda on
an IRIX 6.5 machine.
I was away all week last week so I'll jump in even though
this thread seems to be dead.
I have an irix box
* Julian C. Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060713 15:44]:
I've got a Linux workstation which uses xfs as one of its volumes
(/dev/md2), but which I can't back up using Amanda because Amanda appears
to call /sbin/dump on it, which under Linux blows up (/sbin/dump is ext2/3
only).
How do I make
Oups! Forget that!
xfsdump is a package by itself on Debian.
Mea Culpa
jf
* Jean-Francois Malouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060713 15:49]:
* Julian C. Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060713 15:44]:
I've got a Linux workstation which uses xfs as one of its volumes
(/dev/md2), but which I can't back
Hello,
I'm experiencing estimates that are way off with the result that level
0s and 1s use the same space on tapes and now obviously that
throws the balance completely and every amdump eats through a lot
of tapes.
I'm using calcsize in my DLEs but it's the first time that the
estimate are
* Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060725 16:22]:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 04:13:08PM -0400, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hello,
I'm experiencing estimates that are way off with the result that level
0s and 1s use the same space on tapes and now obviously that
throws the balance
Continuing with my estimate saga...
What would cause a level 1 backup of a DLE with gnutar
be as big as a full? Estimates are done with calcsize
and gnutar is 1.13.25 with amanda-2.4.5
Could it be that the gnutar-lists file is corrupted?
Looking at them I see that they all have the same size
for
* Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060727 12:11]:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 10:26:28AM -0400, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Continuing with my estimate saga...
What would cause a level 1 backup of a DLE with gnutar
be as big as a full? Estimates are done with calcsize
and gnutar
* Luc Lalonde [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060811 11:52]:
Hello Folks,
I'm getting this error when I try to use the tapes (LTO1) on a
StorageTek L40 Jukebox:
st1: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes.
st1: Incorrect block size.
st1: Incorrect block size.
scsi(0): Resetting Cmnd=0x01004a871b00,
Hello,
I had my first compilation try at amanda-2.5.1 today on a SGI irix-6.5
and apart from the fact that I had to add '-lgen' to LDFLAGS while
configuring everything went smooth. I read the release notes on the
wiki on the new auth scheme and updated inetd.conf and the amandahost
file and after
* Ronan KERYELL [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060908 06:41]:
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:34:36 -0400, Jean-Francois Malouin [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
Jean-Francois Hello, I had my first compilation try at amanda-2.5.1
Jean-Francois today on a SGI irix-6.5 and apart from the fact that I
Jean
* Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060908 15:01]:
On Friday 08 September 2006 09:46, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
* Ronan KERYELL [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060908 06:41]:
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:34:36 -0400, Jean-Francois Malouin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Jean-Francois Hello, I had my
something.
attached.
regards,
jf
Jean-Louis
Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
I've started from scratch and followed the order of keyword
as explained on the wiki and I still get the error:
line XXX: configuration keyword expected
line XXX: end of line is expected
where XXX is the 1
Sep 12 10:00:49 2006
Jean-Louis
Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hello,
Thanks to some Jean-Louis who provided a patch to make amanda
parse properly the config file when running irix-6.5.x
Now next problem: amcheck complains that selfcheck failed due to
connection refused. I wonder
Hello,
amanda-2.5.1 on irix-6.5.x using bsdtcp auth
amrecover don't want to play ball:
yorick 130# /opt/amanda/amanda10/sbin/amrecover
AMRECOVER Version 2.5.1. Contacting server on yorick ...
220
Setting restore date to today (2006-09-21)
200
Scanning /holddisk/conf10/stk_180...
200
200
Use
* Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060921 13:04]:
Jean-Francois,
Could you send the amrecover.timestamp.debug and
amindexd.timestamp.debug files?
here they come attached.
jf
Jean-Louis
Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hello,
amanda-2.5.1 on irix-6.5.x using bsdtcp auth
?
Jean-Louis
Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
* Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060921 13:04]:
Jean-Francois,
Could you send the amrecover.timestamp.debug and
amindexd.timestamp.debug files?
here they come attached.
jf
Jean-Louis
Jean-Francois Malouin wrote
* McGraw, Robert P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060922 10:58]:
I have upgraded to amanda 2.5.1.
I need to restore a file and when I run amrecover I get the following
AMRECOVER Version 2.5.1. Contacting server on zorn ...
NAK: user root from zorn.math.purdue.edu is not allowed to execute the
Hello,
I've been testing 2.5.1 for a few days now and I have 2 nitpicks:
With 2.4.5 'amtoc -a' produces outputfile with names
label_of_tape.toc as per the man page. This doesn't seem to be the
case anymore with 2.5.1 where I just get a file called tape.toc. And
in the situation where more than
* Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060922 20:16]:
Jean-Francois,
Could you try this patch?
sorry to get back that late...
The patched amstat now show the tape usage
and amtoc looks fine too.
regards,
jf
Jean-Louis
Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hello,
I've been testing
* Lee, Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20060926 16:02]:
Sometimes the files you're recovering are on a tape that's no longer in
the changer, so you must manually insert it into the changer and mount
it to a drive before telling amrecover to continue.
I think it would be nice if Amanda could mount
1 - 100 of 382 matches
Mail list logo
