Nokin,
Because I've already tunned my spamassassin (and spend some time on it), I
don't want to change my setup for migrate spamassassin from postfix to
amavis.
As Matthias pointed out, most of your work done on SA (local.cf, SARE)
still work unchanged when SA is called from amavisd instead
MJ,
I am running postfix 2.2.4 on Solaris 8 with amavisd-new.2.3.2,
SpamAssassin 3.1.0 and Clamav 0.8.7.1 as an AV/AS gateway to my main
email system. Today I saw following errors when I executed postqueue
-p command to get the queue. Any idea?
(host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0
Nokin Jérôme a écrit :
Hello,
I'm currently using Postfix + Spamassassin at my office.
So my master.cf file look like this :
#---
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=
spamassassin
Hi,
I am running postfix 2.2.4 on Solaris 8 with amavisd-new.2.3.2,
SpamAssassin 3.1.0 and Clamav 0.8.7.1 as an AV/AS gateway to my main
email system. Some messages specially from hotmail.com are getting very
high scores, specially RATWARE_ZERO_TZ, can some one tell me what is
RATWARE_ZERO_TZ and
Need DATE headers.
RATWARE_ZERO_TZ may refer to a timezone lookup or check, so, need ALL
date headers as well.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search
Hi Mark,
Currently, when a message gets quarantined, you have
the following:
Dec 20 16:36:10 spamwall01.mweb.co.za amavis[28442]: (28442-01-89) SEND via SQL: [EMAIL
PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED], mail_id brjsRlsJZ9fZ
Would you accept a patch (or be willing to write it),
so that the output
MJ,
Some messages specially from hotmail.com are getting very
high scores, specially RATWARE_ZERO_TZ, can some one tell me
what is RATWARE_ZERO_TZ
grep the SA rules for RATWARE_ZERO_TZ:
20_ratware.cf:
# This ratware always uses a + TZ in the Date header, and has a multiplicity
# of
Thanks Michael, here is another example with full header
Received: from hotmail.com (bay20-f13.bay20.hotmail.com [64.4.54.102])
by mailgate2.cyberia.net.sa (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33A71F07EF
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 17:44:05 +0300
(GMT)
Received: from mail pickup
Mark Martinec wrote:
John,
I'm not sure I understand your setup - are these mailers processing mail
one after another? There is only one 'Received' header field in your sample.
amavisd-new removes all previous X-Spam-* headers from a message
if it is doing spam checking by itself. This is to
Mark wrote:
Gary,
...you can set: $sa_spam_subject_tag = '***SPAM*** ';
if you have not already done so. In fact you may want to do this as an
alternative to setting this in SQL because the trailing space will get
trimmed from the SQL data (annoying).
Oops, annoying indeed, thanks for
from future 2.4.0 rel.notes:
- new config variable $trim_trailing_space_in_lookup_result_fields controls
trimming of trailing whitespace from SQL fields, LDAP attribute values
and associative array righthand-sides (hash values) as read by read_hash();
enabled by default for
John,
Mail comes into the network through one of the two MX hosts, is filtered
for spam and viruses, and is delivered to the mailbox server. The
mailbox server runs amavis, but only as a virus scanner.
Ok, so the mailbox server is not stripping X-Spam-* header fileds,
as it has spam checking
--- Gary V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter wrote:
--- Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter,
Should the subject line being edited be reflected in the logs then?
I just want to make sure it's being done.
At log level 5 you should see log entries like:
(55083-04)
--- Gary V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter wrote:
I put $DO_SYSLOG = 1 and now I see a lot more logging including the
subject editing stuff. However, at the same time I added
$sa_spam_modifies_subj = 1;
$sa_spam_subject_tag = '*** SPAM *** ';
to my config file so I'm not sure
I am using custom log reporting ($log_temp1) in my amavisd.conf; however, I
am having a difficult time trying to come up with the proper syntax to
report virus scanners detecting a virus and the virus name the scanner
reported. I am looking for a format as follows:
Scanner1 detected
Peter wrote:
Side question: Let's say a few SQL-defined users DO NOT want their mail
passed (D_PASS). How do I accomodate them?
Let's just consider spam. I think you would have to rethink the structure.
If you are passing spam to everyone right now, if it were me, I would
start by insuring
Ok guys,
Many thank for your awnswer. I see more clearly now .
Jérôme
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Martinec
Sent: mardi 20 décembre 2005 14:42
To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Include spamassassin
17 matches
Mail list logo
