Hi,
I realise this is not really an amavis issue, but I thought someone on
this list might have fought the battle with amavis-stats and rhel4
already.
Has anyone gotten amavis-stats.0.1.21 to run on a RHEL4, and if so, could
you tell me how.
My other option is to use awstats. Does anyone
Hi!
I have 2 problems:
a) A lot of mails going through doesn't get X-Spam* headers even if I
set sa_tag_level_deflt to a negative number. And in many cases it
doesn't change subject if the spam level is between sa_tag2_level_deflt
and sa_kill_level_deflt.
b) Amavis gives different spam level
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Noel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My opinion is no, don't do this. Spam and viruses commonly have forged
sender addresses, so your offsite warning will often just annoy some
innocent third party,
I fully agree. I still have some procmail rules
Hi,
I just found out what the problem was. I never realised that it is a
seperate package (i.e. php-gd) which needs to be installed. I just had gd
and php installed. Stupid me, sometimes, it is better to get sleep, than
to desperately try and solve a problem.
However, I am still curious,
Lucio Chiappetti wrote:
I've never really understood the fuss about banned files and bad header,
at the end we decided to let them pass (we get about 2 bad header per day
over 2000 spamham, and no banned files) silently.
The primary reason for banned files checks is to be able to catch new
Well, everything is in FAQ :-)
David Siroky píše v Čt 16. 11. 2006 v 10:07 +0100:
Hi!
I have 2 problems:
a) A lot of mails going through doesn't get X-Spam* headers even if I
set sa_tag_level_deflt to a negative number. And in many cases it
doesn't change subject if the spam level is
Hi Mark,
If I upgrade the Amavis will it go straight on or will I need to reconfigure
everything? just that it's currently running on a live system
I read through the release log and it looks like it would be a idea to upgrade
any way...
Thanks for all your help
Jus
Mark Martinec [EMAIL
Jus,
If I upgrade the Amavis will it go straight on or will I need to
reconfigure everything? just that it's currently running on a live system
I read through the release log and it looks like it would be a idea to
upgrade any way...
It is a drop-in replacement for your 2.4.3, no changes in
Hi *,
i'm trying to setup a policy banks in order to bypass spam scanning of
outgoing mails for a remote postfix server.
Following my configs:
xxx.xxx.xxx.45 = amavis server
xxx.xxx.xxx.62 = postfix server
main.cf:
--
cut
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
when using different virus scanners and a virus is found on
more than one scanners, is it possible to tell amavisd-new
which virus name to choose?
is there an easy way to extra tag the foud viruses strings with
infos about what scanner detected it?
for example W32/Stration.dr - [NAI]
Jus,
I'll be more specific:
If you don't ALTER the quarantine.mail_text to bytea then PostgreSQL
will complain when amavisd 2.4.4 tries to store a message to a SQL
quarantine.
You would be getting an error like:
TROUBLE in check_mail: quar+notif FAILED: temporarily unable to quarantine:
Il giorno gio, 16/11/2006 alle 12.24 +0100, Davide Corio ha scritto:
smtp-amavis unix - - n - 2 lmtp
1 error found :) - lmtp
--
Davide Coriodavide.corioatredomino.com
Redomino S.r.l.C.so Monte Grappa 90/b - 10145 Torino -
Hans du Plooy wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 17:40 +0100, Jona Joachim wrote:
I hadn't thought about fetching failures. I wanted the whole thing to be
lightweight because it should run on a 300MHz Pentium II with limited RAM.
How limited is the RAM?
64MB PC100 SDRAM currently.
To see of
Jona wrote:
Hans du Plooy wrote:
How limited is the RAM?
64MB PC100 SDRAM currently.
I'll try that out. If the box runs out of RAM I'll simply buy some more.
Those old DIMMs are not very expensive anymore.
If the machine architecture will allow it, you really need to.
Performance goes
Hi *,
I need to tag spam for certain domains and delete it directly for
others.
How can I obtain this behaviour?
regards,
--
Davide Coriodavide.corioatredomino.com
Redomino S.r.l.C.so Monte Grappa 90/b - 10145 Torino - Italy
Tel: +39 011 19502871 -
Davide wrote:
Hi *,
I need to tag spam for certain domains and delete it directly for
others.
How can I obtain this behaviour?
regards,
$final_spam_destiny = D_DISCARD; # or D_BOUNCE if you must
$spam_quarantine_to = undef; # black hole for anything over kill_level
# or, some who discard
It failed in much the same way. It reported the proper data, but then gave
me the bad file descriptor:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ./testfile testfile
result line from file(1): testfile: perl script text executable
Error reading from file(1) utility: Bad file descriptor at ./testfile line
24, GEN0 line
Hi,
I did an strace and get a loop that looks like the following:
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {10, 0})= 0 (Timeout)
time(NULL) = 1163696544
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {10, 0})= 0 (Timeout)
time(NULL) = 1163696554
select(0, NULL,
I installed
postfix-2.2.8
amavisd-new-2.4.1
clamav 0.88.6
spamassassin-3.1.3
I have auto-whitelist default in /var/amavis/.spamassassin/ (here I have
also bayes_* files)
I list this auto-whitelist db with my check_whitelist and I have:
-2.8(-2.8/1) -- [EMAIL
Hi Mark,
I've had the 2.4.4rc2 running all afternoon and no errors so far...excellent...
I'll give you another update tomorrow morning
Thanks for all your help
Justin
Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED] 16/11/2006 14:10
Jus,
I'll be more specific:
If you don't ALTER the
How limited is the RAM?
64MB PC100 SDRAM currently.
I'll try that out. If the box runs out of RAM I'll simply buy some more.
Those old DIMMs are not very expensive anymore.
If the machine architecture will allow it, you really need to.
Performance goes through the floor when you start
Bradley,
So I ran it on a couple of other boxes, monitor has identical hardware,
defiant, my Athlon-XP workstation and riogrande, my HP Pentium-M laptop:
Thanks, interesting.
So it works fine on monitor, but not on merrimac or defiant. All three
boxes are running Debian/sid. I'm looking
22 matches
Mail list logo
