Kevin:
I don't think that the OP was trying to complain about SSB operators being
less capable or less polite or less facile in their Doppler tuning
correction or whatever in comparison to CW operators. He was just making an
observation that sometimes two pairs of communicating operators have
made a lot of Qs.
God Bless
R
W4BUE
K4AMG.org club
- Original Message -
From: tosca...@umn.edu
To: Kevin M n4...@yahoo.com
Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2014 12:33 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Listening on USB when operating CW
Kevin:
I don't think that the OP
I am not a constant user of the sats, but I notice this with both some CW
and SSB transmissions.
Some sats just have drift.
It is still fun.
God Bless
R
W4BUE
- Original Message -
From: Clayton Coleman kayakfis...@gmail.com
To: AMSAT-BB amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Friday, February
On 2/7/2014 11:18 AM, Ng, Peter wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't automatic doppler corrections dynamically
change your frequency to compensate for doppler? Would this mean anyone
engaging in doppler correction are actually drifting into a stable frequency?
by stable do you mean
Sent: February 7, 2014 09:27
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Listening on USB when operating CW
On 2/7/2014 11:18 AM, Ng, Peter wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't automatic doppler corrections
dynamically change your frequency to compensate for doppler? Would this mean
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't automatic doppler corrections dynamically
change your frequency to compensate for doppler? Would this mean anyone
engaging in doppler correction are actually drifting into a stable frequency?
73 Peter ve7ngp
-Original Message-
From:
Of John Becker
Sent: February 7, 2014 09:27
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Listening on USB when operating CW
On 2/7/2014 11:18 AM, Ng, Peter wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't automatic doppler corrections
dynamically change your frequency to compensate for doppler
Clayton,
Lately, as I have been listening a lot more with my FUNcube Dongle
Pro+, I have observed many CW stations drifting across the satellites'
passband. I realize this is not a new phenomenon. I would assume
these drifting stations are NOT using any type of computer Doppler
Thanks Clayton, that's good to know
73 Peter ve7ngp
-Original Message-
Peter,
That is correct and what I have attempted to describe. A station not adjusting
properly for Doppler shift will appear to move across the passband into
stations who are making corrections. (voice or CW)
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Listening on USB when operating CW
From: Clayton Coleman kayakfis...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, February 07, 2014 2:04 pm
To: Ng, Peter peter...@bccdc.ca
Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org amsat-bb@amsat.org
Peter,
That is correct and what I have attempted to describe. A station
Original Message
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Listening on USB when operating CW
From: Clayton Coleman kayakfis...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, February 07, 2014 2:04 pm
To: Ng, Peter peter...@bccdc.ca
Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org amsat-bb@amsat.org
Peter,
That is correct and what I have attempted
Many times I have been engaged in a QSO only to have someone CQ'ing on
CW drift across my existing QSO. Anyone who operates satellites has
probably had this happen to them many times. Sometimes myself or
others in QSO may try to tell the CW operator Hello - QSO in
progress but it is
Computer-control stations and manual-control stations are adjusting for
Doppler differently. I have done - and will continue to do - both. In my
opinion, neither is incorrect; they simply differ from each other.
This was posted during the assemblage of my long winded reply. I think it gets
13 matches
Mail list logo
