Re: [Amsn-devel] IMPORTANT : Re: Hosting plans WAS : an old discussion...

2006-10-12 Thread Boris Faure (aka billiob)
* amsn-project.net - Tom H - billiob * amsn-team.net -- Boris FAURE (aka billiob) mail, msn : [EMAIL PROTECTED] No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly agitated.

Re: [Amsn-devel] IMPORTANT : Re: Hosting plans WAS : an old discussion...

2006-10-10 Thread Sander Hoentjen
Ok I spoke with my employee today and the will sponsor aMSN a VDS, if we put up an advertisement banner for them. ( http://www.jronline.nl ) Sander On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 02:51 -0400, Youness Alaoui wrote: Just reminding everyone that if noone disagrees or proposes something else, we will sign

Re: [Amsn-devel] IMPORTANT : Re: Hosting plans WAS : an old discussion...

2006-10-10 Thread Philippe Valembois - Phil
Hum Is it a good thing to depend on the firm where someone of us is employed ? Do you know what happenned to Ethereal ? And what are the specs ? Phil Le Tuesday 10 October 2006 16:03, Sander Hoentjen a écrit : Ok I spoke with my employee today and the will sponsor aMSN a VDS, if we put up

Re: [Amsn-devel] IMPORTANT : Re: Hosting plans WAS : an old discussion...

2006-10-10 Thread Philippe Valembois - Phil
Hi, he means that we won't use Xen for the virtualization but another system This system will create more overhead... He said : I have a couple environments that will support debian with IP tables Phil Le Tuesday 10 October 2006 00:25, Youness Alaoui a écrit : Ok, thx for the info... I'd

Re: [Amsn-devel] IMPORTANT : Re: Hosting plans WAS : an old discussion...

2006-10-10 Thread Youness Alaoui
Hello all, This is to announce that after reviewing the specs and the opportunity that was given to us by jronline, we decided to go with jronline, providing a simple text (or image) line thanking them for their hosting with a link to their site.. kind of the same we already have for thaking

Re: [Amsn-devel] IMPORTANT : Re: Hosting plans WAS : an old discussion...

2006-10-10 Thread Harry Vennik
I also prefer amsn-project.net rather than amsn-team.net. Still another idea: amsn-messenger.net. Op dinsdag 10 oktober 2006 22:47, schreef Youness Alaoui: Hello all, This is to announce that after reviewing the specs and the opportunity that was given to us by jronline, we decided to go with

Re: [Amsn-devel] IMPORTANT : Re: Hosting plans WAS : an old discussion...

2006-10-10 Thread Tom Hennigan
Hey,Personally I like http://amsn-project.net. So just on the vote so far it's:* amsn-project.net- Tom H* amsn-team.net-TomPS. amsn.biz is avaliable..On 10 Oct 2006, at 21:47, Youness Alaoui wrote:Hello all,This is to announce that after reviewing the specs and the opportunity that was given to us

Re: [Amsn-devel] IMPORTANT : Re: Hosting plans WAS : an old discussion...

2006-10-10 Thread Lord Zak
lol Harry Vennik, same idea :D2006/10/10, Lord Zak [EMAIL PROTECTED]: amsn-project is nice... There is also amsn-messenger.You're right, amsn-team reveal that amsn is used by a sect :D2006/10/10, Youness Alaoui [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello all,This is to announce that after reviewing the specs and

Re: [Amsn-devel] IMPORTANT : Re: Hosting plans WAS : an old discussion...

2006-10-09 Thread Philippe Valembois - Phil
I mailed Lee from Leeware : My mail : Hi, I am part of the aMSN project and we are actually seeking for a hosting servie... We would be interested to rent a VPS300 server but before, we have some questions about how it works... First, it's not clear if we can reboot remotely our server if it

Re: [Amsn-devel] IMPORTANT : Re: Hosting plans WAS : an old discussion...

2006-10-09 Thread Youness Alaoui
Thank you Phil for taking the time to write Lee... I'm still not convinced by him... he is indeed alone, he makes a promise for a 24h answer, but it can't be a always true (you never know, he has an accident and he's at the hospital for a month... or whatever). Also, in case we have a big

Re: [Amsn-devel] IMPORTANT : Re: Hosting plans WAS : an old discussion...

2006-10-09 Thread Youness Alaoui
Ok, thx for the info... I'd be interested in knowing what are the solution for a protected system in case that iptables can't run (and I still don't understand why it won't run)... how 'secure' is the system without iptables (firewalling taken care of by the host system?) not important