No, CCS is infact installed on the machine. Any other suggestions?
Catherine
Jason Linhart wrote:
> On 10/20/99 5:49 PM Catherine Montalvo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> >When trying to compile Analog for Unix (Solaris), I receive the
> >following error:
> >
On 10/20/99 5:49 PM Catherine Montalvo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>When trying to compile Analog for Unix (Solaris), I receive the
>following error:
>
>make -f Makefile
>gcc -O2 -DUNIX -c alias.c
>sh: gcc: not found
>*** Error code 1
>make:
Jeff Longland wrote:
> I'm currently attempting to run Analog 3.19B on an NT IIS 4 machine. I
> have taken a some what unorthodox method to run Analog. My ISP doesn't
> support Perl files, hence I can't use the CGI script to run Analog. So
> here's what I've done. I've placed analog.exe, an
I'm currently attempting to run Analog 3.19B on an NT IIS 4 machine. I
have taken a some what unorthodox method to run Analog. My ISP doesn't
support Perl files, hence I can't use the CGI script to run Analog. So
here's what I've done. I've placed analog.exe, analog.cfg and all the
necessary l
Here are my changes for Solaris. Make what you will of them. Looks like your first
problem is finding a C compiler.
cheers,
Simon
$ diff analog3.90beta1/Makefile new/Makefile
3c3
< CC = gcc # which compiler to use: eg cc, acc, gcc. NB Different
---
> CC = /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Catherine Montalvo wrote:
CM>>When trying to compile Analog for Unix (Solaris), I receive the
CM>>following error:
CM>>
CM>>make -f Makefile
CM>>gcc -O2 -DUNIX -c alias.c
CM>>sh: gcc: not found
CM>>*** Error code 1
CM>>
When trying to compile Analog for Unix (Solaris), I receive the
following error:
make -f Makefile
gcc -O2 -DUNIX -c alias.c
sh: gcc: not found
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `alias.o'
_
I downloaded the new version to try the form interface, and I'm afraid I
got an unpleasant surprise. anlgform is now implemented as a perl
script, and I don't have perl installed on my server, so I couldn't use
it.
I'm not knocking perl, and the ActiveState implementation is very
impressive,
I set up a form for each subdirectory
which parses the log file pulling information for that directory only
in dacota.cfg
DIRINCLUDE /dacotah
REQEXCLUDE /*.*
REQINCLUDE /dacotah/*.html,/dacotah/
PAGEINCLUDE /dacotah/*.html,/dacotah/
FILEINCLUDE /dacotah/*.html,/dacotah/
the form dacotah.html is
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I found that one myself yesterday. The next version will ignore
> > PRINTVARS from the form.
> >
>
Well, it might also reveal information about your system.
> But wouldn't this be something that you might want to do from a form?
> Especial
Stephen Turner wrote:
> > Another beta buglet I found is that "PRINTVARS ON" gives me a server error
>
> Yes, I found that one myself yesterday. The next version will ignore
> PRINTVARS from the form.
>
But wouldn't this be something that you might want to do from a form? Especially
when debug
I am using REFREPEXCLUDE http://www.some_site.com/*
but the site still shows up in the Referer Report. Does this directive
need to come before or after some other particular directive? I have
encountered such behavior before with the LOGFORMAT directive, so that's
my only hypothesis for now.
I a
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, ikong wrote:
> I am using REFREPEXCLUDE http://www.some_site.com/*
>
> but the site still shows up in the Referer Report. Does this directive
> need to come before or after some other particular directive? I have
> encountered such behavior before with the LOGFORMAT directiv
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Stephen Turner wrote:
ST>>> I'm having a problem getting my LOGFORMAT right. Any help would be
ST>>> appreciated!
ST>>>
ST>>> Here is a typical log line (the server is WN):
ST>>>
ST>>> # proxy-443.public.paix.webtv.net - - [16/Oct/1999:01:02:00 -0400] "GET
ST>>> /store/Html
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Stephen Turner wrote:
ST>>> I guess that I am having a case of the stupids today.
ST>>> The format of /var/log/wn.log.001 is the same all of the way through. Analog
ST>>> is only being asked to analyze this one file. I have only one LOGFORMAT
ST>>> command in the config file.
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Susan Alderman wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> We have a web layout that has a branch point close to the root, with
> different directories off those branches. Here are some examples:
>
> /Departments/French
> /Departments/German_Studies
> /Departments/Egyptology
> ...
> /Students/Ch
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Jim Balcom wrote:
>
> I guess that I am having a case of the stupids today.
> The format of /var/log/wn.log.001 is the same all of the way through. Analog
> is only being asked to analyze this one file. I have only one LOGFORMAT
> command in the config file.
>
And is the LO
Hi -
We have a web layout that has a branch point close to the root, with
different directories off those branches. Here are some examples:
/Departments/French
/Departments/German_Studies
/Departments/Egyptology
...
/Students/Chinese_Students_Association
/Students/Brown_Men_Rugby
et cetera.
On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, Jim Balcom wrote:
> I'm having a problem getting my LOGFORMAT right. Any help would be
> appreciated!
>
> Here is a typical log line (the server is WN):
>
> # proxy-443.public.paix.webtv.net - - [16/Oct/1999:01:02:00 -0400] "GET
> /store/Html/Images/header.jpg HTTP/1.0" 200
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Stephen Turner wrote:
ST>>On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Jim Balcom wrote:
ST>>>
ST>>> /usr/local/bin/analog.new: Warning L: Large number of corrupt lines in
ST>>> logfile
ST>>> /var/log/wn.log.001: try different LOGFORMAT
ST>>> Current logfile format:
ST>>> %S %j %j [%d/%M
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
>I've been running into a few problems lately as we recently switched to
> the MS-Extended log file format on our webservers and i have been getting
> about 80-90% of my log entries not being analized and in the report analog
> creates
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Jim Balcom wrote:
>
> /usr/local/bin/analog.new: Warning L: Large number of corrupt lines in
> logfile
> /var/log/wn.log.001: try different LOGFORMAT
> Current logfile format:
> %S %j %j [%d/%M/%Y:%h:%n:%j] "%j%w%r%wHTTP%j" %c %b\n
> %S %j %j [%d/%M/%Y:%h:%n:
Dear Mr. Turner,
thank you a lot!
Regards,
Joachim
On 20 Oct, Stephen Turner wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm...i am not sure! I can see e.g.
>>
>> U: citynet
>> U: den
>> U: local
>>
>> and in my cfg file, there is e.g.
>>
>> HOSTALIAS *.citynet.net "
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Simon McClenahan wrote:
> To answer my own question, I found that the problem lies with anlgform.pl
> . There is a line that hard-codes "DNS NONE", and I think it will add a
> "DNS READ" if there is a DNSFILE CGI variable defined. Unfortunately
> setting the DNSFILE variable
Hello,
I've been running into a few problems lately as we recently switched to the
MS-Extended log file format on our webservers and i have been getting about 80-90% of
my log entries not being analized and in the report analog creates it says that they
are unwanted(in both the newest beta
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
>
> If I understand what you're looking for, try this.
> PAGEEXCLUDE REGEXP:^/([^/]+)/\1\..*$
>
> I'm not familiar with all the POSIZ extensions. Does Analog support the \1
> matching?
>
Yes.
--
Stephen Turner[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Joe Hewitt wrote:
>
> I was installing analog last week and noticed that when I run analog as a
> command, it prints a page that includes the domain name report, but when I
> try it from the web interface, nothing gets resolved. How come?
>
There's another thread about th
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Jeff Longland wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> Many people have probably asked this before, and I stand here before you
> to ask it again. I present the infamous error:
>
> "The system cannot find the path specified. Analog failed to run or
> returned an error code. Maybe your s
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hmmm...i am not sure! I can see e.g.
>
> U: citynet
> U: den
> U: local
>
> and in my cfg file, there is e.g.
>
> HOSTALIAS *.citynet.net "citynet.net"
>
> Maybe i have a mistake?
>
If citynet is an unknown domain, that means there is a host
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Simon McClenahan wrote:
>
> BTW, on anlgform.html there is no option for selecting the Host Report,
> but there are inputs for filtering and sorting!
>
Whoops! I'll fix that. Thanks for pointing it out.
--
Stephen Turner[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.statslab.cam.ac
30 matches
Mail list logo
