Yes. If Analog does not have a DNS name for an IP, then the IP number will be
matched for INCLUDE/EXCLUDE commands.
--
Jeremy Wadsack
MCS, LLC
Will O Brien wrote:
Hi,
If analog fails to do a reverse lookup on an IP, will
HOSTEXCLUDE ipaddress
Have an effect even when analog is set to resolve
Hi,
If analog fails to do a reverse lookup on an IP, will
HOSTEXCLUDE ipaddress
Have an effect even when analog is set to resolve addresses to names?
Cheers,
Will
+
| TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
|
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
You could add printf()'s before and after gethostbyaddr() call, e.g. time(),
hostent, and errno, send patch to Ken and have him send you back the output.
Ah yes, the good old printf method of debugging. Why didn't I think of
that? Thanks, Dimitri.
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Ken Schweigert wrote:
I think I got everything, however I must be doing something wrong. After I hit
the first breakpoint and press 'c' to continue to the next, it just seems to
hang. I let it sit for about five minutes before I finally Ctrl-C'd out of it.
Ken,
I
On Thursday 28 August 2003 08:45 am, Stephen Turner wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Ken Schweigert wrote:
I think I got everything, however I must be doing something wrong. After
I hit the first breakpoint and press 'c' to continue to the next, it just
seems to hang. I let it sit for about
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Ken Schweigert wrote:
Since I'm quite sure I can get this to reproduce, I'll volunteer to step through
with the debugger. However, I must admit that my debugging skills are very
limited. I can compile stuff just fine, just never needed to debug anything
before. If
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 03:15:56PM +0100, Stephen Turner wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Ken Schweigert wrote:
Since I'm quite sure I can get this to reproduce, I'll volunteer to step through
with the debugger. However, I must admit that my debugging skills are very
limited. I can compile
To: ''[EMAIL PROTECTED]' '
Subject: RE: [analog-help] DNS wierdness
Hi Stephen/
When I start analog it runs for about 10 minutes and is able
to do lookups -
there are some failures but this doesn't affect analog.
Example:
D: Looking up 218.242.174.166:
D: can't resolve
D
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On Monday 25 August 2003 02:50 pm, Ken Schweigert wrote:
[ dns3.elan.net ]
This means that the DNS administrator forgot to set up a reverse entry for
this IP address. There are many domains just like this all over the net.
My observation came
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 11:44:34AM +0100, Stephen Turner wrote:
snipped
Of course, if anyone wants to take the time to step through a debugger and
see what the DNS calls are returning, I would be very grateful, but I'm not
going to ask anyone to do that because it's a bit of a chore.
Since I'm
On Saturday 23 August 2003 04:07 am, Stephen Turner wrote:
...
Strange. Nobody has reported anything like this before, and then two this
week. Thanks, Ken and David for your reports.
I didn't report it because I'm going to set up an external resolver program
when I get around to it anyway, so
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 01:36:31PM -0500, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On Saturday 23 August 2003 04:07 am, Stephen Turner wrote:
...
Strange. Nobody has reported anything like this before, and then two this
week. Thanks, Ken and David for your reports.
I didn't report it because I'm going to
On Monday 25 August 2003 02:50 pm, Ken Schweigert wrote:
[ dns3.elan.net ]
This means that the DNS administrator forgot to set up a reverse entry for
this IP address. There are many domains just like this all over the net.
My observation came from a DNS that was improperly configured; it
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Campbell, David wrote:
Hi,
we are running analog-5.32 on Solaris 8 on a sparc server.
Everything is working as it should bar DNS lookups.
When I kick off analog it starts without any errors and for the first 10
minutes or so does the lookups succesfully - new
/03 10:07
Subject: Re: [analog-help] DNS wierdness
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Campbell, David wrote:
Hi,
we are running analog-5.32 on Solaris 8 on a sparc server.
Everything is working as it should bar DNS lookups.
When I kick off analog it starts without any errors and for the first
10
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Campbell, David wrote:
Hi Stephen/
When I start analog it runs for about 10 minutes and is able to do lookups -
there are some failures but this doesn't affect analog.
However further down the line analog just can't lookup anything:
D: Looking up 210.187.246.209:
D:
On Saturday, August 23, 2003, at 06:09 AM, Campbell, David wrote:
The only other oddity about our setup is that we installed from a
binary
from
http://jrankin.ath.cx/analog/
That would be me :^)
I haven' noticed any problems with my DNS lookups, perhaps this is an
artifact of my binaries
On 8/23/03 6:09 AM Campbell, David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
When I start analog it runs for about 10 minutes and is able to do lookups -
there are some failures but this doesn't affect analog.
One thing you might try is to add a line like:
#define NOALARM
to anlghea3.h near the top, perhaps
Hi,
we are running analog-5.32 on Solaris 8 on a sparc server.
Everything is working as it should bar DNS lookups.
When I kick off analog it starts without any errors and for the first 10
minutes or so does the lookups succesfully - new entries are written to the
DNSCACHE file - I
On Friday 22 August 2003 08:24 am, Campbell, David wrote:
Hi,
we are running analog-5.32 on Solaris 8 on a sparc server.
Everything is working as it should bar DNS lookups.
When I kick off analog it starts without any errors and for the first 10
minutes or so does the lookups
On Friday 22 August 2003 03:10 pm, Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
Dimitri Maziuk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]; Friday, August 22, 2003 11:36 AM):
On Friday 22 August 2003 08:24 am, Campbell, David wrote:
Hi,
we are running analog-5.32 on Solaris 8 on a sparc server.
Everything is working as it should
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 11:51:24 + (GMT) Stephen Turner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ST There is already a #define for this. Use -DHAVE_ADDR_T in the DEFS in
ST the Makefile.
Thanks, should have spotted that :(
+
| TO
As our website is hosted externally, up until recently I've been able to
download the log files onto my machine and run analog on them there, with
the DNS lookups happening automatically across our network.
Due to a change in policy and a tightening of security I am now unable to do
DNS lookups
Sarah Lander wrote:
Due to a change in policy and a tightening of security I am now unable to do
DNS lookups and indeed cannot connect to the Internet without going through
a proxy server. Is there an option to configure analog so that I can give it
the details of the proxy server to allow it
Sarah Lander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Due to a change in policy and a tightening of security I am now
unable to do DNS lookups and indeed cannot connect to the Internet
without going through a proxy server. Is there an option to configure
analog so that I can give it the details of the proxy
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Keith A. Gillow wrote:
I am upgrading from analog 4.13 to the latest version 5.31. I am running
analog on an HP/Compaq alpha with OS Tru64 UNIX 5.1a. The build process
works fine (using gcc version 3.2) but the resultant binary fails to
resolve ip numbers so the
I am upgrading from analog 4.13 to the latest version 5.31. I am running
analog on an HP/Compaq alpha with OS Tru64 UNIX 5.1a. The build process
works fine (using gcc version 3.2) but the resultant binary fails to
resolve ip numbers so the dnscache file I produce is now useless. This
worked
Hsiao Ketung Contr 61 CS/SCBN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What should the DNSFILE format looks like ?
It's defined in http://analog.cx/docs/dns.html
This is one of my testing DNSFILE content:
1.2.3.4 3600IN PTR system113-199.losangeles.af.mil.
Just use DNS WRITE to allow Analog
this ?
Happy Holiday to you all !!
-Original Message-
From: Aengus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 2:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [analog-help] DNS problem!
Hsiao Ketung Contr 61 CS/SCBN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What should the DNSFILE format looks
Hsiao Ketung Contr 61 CS/SCBN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My Analog run now without error messages with the correct DNSFILE file
format.
But I decide the unresolved IP address is not important and I use
DNS_NONE in the anlghead.h file now.
Why are you modifying anlghead.h? Why not just put DNS
Hi,
The Analog run fine for me except the following warning message:
Ignoring corrupt line in DNS file
Part of my Web server log has IP address only, I've tried to use DNSFILE in
the anloghead2.h file.
But I get warning like this:
Warning G: Ignoring corrupt line in DNS file
I've tried
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Arthur McBryan wrote:
I thought the maximum for DNSTIMEOUT was 200
Analog doesn't have a maximum, but the OS usually has a timeout of
30 seconds or so, and there is nothing analog can do to increase this.
DNSTIMEOUT only serves to interrupt the lookup.
--
Stephen
October 2002 08:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [analog-help] DNS resolution fails on IRIX6.5
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Arthur McBryan wrote:
I thought the maximum for DNSTIMEOUT was 200
Analog doesn't have a maximum, but the OS usually has a timeout of
30 seconds or so, and there is nothing
but I get 91% of unresolved numerical addresses with Analog 5.24 on SGI
IRIX 6.5.17m.
Tips:
1) nslookup (in the same machine) can resolve much more addresses than
analog
2) Analog 5.24 running on Windows 2K (same analog.cfg, log file, DNS
cache file, 1st and 2nd DNS name servers, LAN
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Domen Setar wrote:
Do I need domains file if I already have IP names (not IP addresses) in my
Web server's log file?
Yes. The domains file says which are legal domains and which countries they
correspond to.
--
Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK
Domen Setar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I put this two lines in analog.cfg:
DNSFILE /csdsk1/www_statistika/sw/dnsdatoteka.txt
DNS WRITE
The entries in DNS file are like this:
17248757 195.246.29.68 *
17248757 164.8.251.97 *
17248757 193.77.249.167 BSN-77-249-167.dsl.siol.net
17248757
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Domen Setar wrote:
I put this two lines in analog.cfg:
DNSFILE /csdsk1/www_statistika/sw/dnsdatoteka.txt
DNS WRITE
The entries in DNS file are like this:
17248757 195.246.29.68 *
17248757 164.8.251.97 *
17248757 193.77.249.167 BSN-77-249-167.dsl.siol.net
: [analog-help] DNS resolution fails on IRIX6.5
but I get 91% of unresolved numerical addresses with Analog 5.24 on SGI
IRIX 6.5.17m.
Tips:
1) nslookup (in the same machine) can resolve much more addresses than
analog
2) Analog 5.24 running on Windows 2K (same analog.cfg, log file, DNS
cache
Hi!
I have problems with domain, organisation and host reports. My Web server
makes DNS resolution so I have IP names (not IP numbers) in the logfile. But
I don't get right host, organisation and domain reports. Log entries with IP
names are included in reports as unknown domain. Wher is a
Hi,
several persons had similar problems before, but
the answers I found in the archive didn't help me.
I've turned on DNS resolution, SETTINGS ON and
DEBUG +D:
DNS level is WRITEDNS file is
/usr/local/analog-5.24/dnscacheDNS lock file is
/usr/local/analog-5.24/dnslockResolved DNS
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Domen Setar wrote:
Hi!
I have problems with domain, organisation and host reports. My Web server
makes DNS resolution so I have IP names (not IP numbers) in the logfile. But
I don't get right host, organisation and domain reports. Log entries with IP
names are included
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Manuel González Castro wrote:
but I get 91% of unresolved numerical addresses with Analog 5.24 on SGI IRIX 6.5.17m.
Tips:
1) nslookup (in the same machine) can resolve much more addresses than analog
2) Analog 5.24 running on Windows 2K (same analog.cfg, log file,
-help;lists.isite.net]On Behalf Of Stephen Turner
Sent: 17 October 2002 15:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [analog-help] DNS resolution fails on IRIX6.5
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Manuel González Castro wrote:
but I get 91% of unresolved numerical addresses with Analog 5.24 on SGI
IRIX 6.5.17m
Arthur McBryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if DNSTIMEOUT doesn't work Windows (Win98), what do we use
instead, how do we make the system wait longer while it looks up the
DNS addresses during an Analog run?
You can't control DNS Timeouts in Windows. The OS doesn't provide the
hooks necessary
-help;lists.isite.net]On Behalf Of Aengus
Sent: 17 October 2002 16:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [analog-help] DNS resolution fails on IRIX6.5
Arthur McBryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if DNSTIMEOUT doesn't work Windows (Win98), what do we use
instead, how do we make the system wait
Arthur McBryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then I guess I'll have to look for alternative dns lookup programs.
Not because I have more than a trivial need, but because I just
hate to see anything unresolved.
You'll find them listed at http://www.analog.cx/helpers/#dns
Aengus
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [analog-help] DNS resolution fails on IRIX6.5
Arthur McBryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then I guess I'll have to look for alternative dns lookup programs.
Not because I have more than a trivial need, but because I just
hate to see anything unresolved.
You'll
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Arthur McBryan wrote:
So if DNSTIMEOUT doesn't work Windows (Win98), what do we use instead, how
do we make the system wait longer while it looks up the DNS addresses during
an Analog run?
On Windows, the system waits the maximum possible time. The problem is the
I get this kind of result for the HOST report ( no dns information )
---BEGIN
Affichage des hôtes représentant au moins 4 requêtes, triés par le nombre de
requêtes.
Nb de req.: % octets: hôte
--: :
823: 35,03%: 156.166.162.1
300:0,39%:
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, LE BRETON Christian DTI Saclay 174286 wrote:
I get this kind of result for the HOST report ( no dns information )
---BEGIN
Affichage des hôtes représentant au moins 4 requêtes, triés par le nombre de
requêtes.
Nb de req.: % octets: hôte
--:
yes, i can. all hosts have a name our local network...
chris
-Message d'origine-
De : Stephen Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : jeudi 3 octobre 2002 11:19
À : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Objet : Re: [analog-help] DNS ?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, LE BRETON Christian DTI Saclay 174286
LE BRETON Christian DTI Saclay 174286 wrote:
yes, i can. all hosts have a name our local network...
When you say have a name, do you mean that forward resolution from
name to ipaddress works, or also that reverse resolution from ipaddress
to name works? Could you show the output of an
:autissier.saclay.cea.fr
Address: 156.166.162.1
chris
-Message d'origine-
De : Klaus Johannes Rusch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : jeudi 3 octobre 2002 14:36
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [analog-help] DNS ?
LE BRETON Christian DTI Saclay 174286 wrote:
yes, i can. all
LE BRETON Christian DTI Saclay 174286 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, i can. all hosts have a name our local network...
Create a simple, 1 line log file, using the DNS address of one of these
machines. Then run Analog with
DEBUG D
in the configuration file. this should show you if DNS is
LE BRETON Christian DTI Saclay 174286 wrote:
is that what you want ?
--- nslookup 156.166.192.6 [return]
Serveur: muguet.saclay.cea.fr
Address: 156.166.192.6
Nom:autissier.saclay.cea.fr
Address: 156.166.162.1
I assume this is on the same machine which also runs analog,
no, it's a another one
-Message d'origine-
De : Klaus Johannes Rusch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : jeudi 3 octobre 2002 15:03
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [analog-help] DNS ?
LE BRETON Christian DTI Saclay 174286 wrote:
is that what you want ?
--- nslookup
DNS settings are
DNS WRITE
DNSFILE /home/wanalog/dnscache
DNSGOODHOURS 672
DNSLOCKFILE /home/wanalog/dnslocks
chris
-Message d'origine-
De : Klaus Johannes Rusch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : jeudi 3 octobre 2002 15:03
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [analog-help] DNS
octobre 2002 14:49
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [analog-help] DNS ?
LE BRETON Christian DTI Saclay 174286 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, i can. all hosts have a name our local network...
Create a simple, 1 line log file, using the DNS address of
one of these
machines. Then run
LE BRETON Christian DTI Saclay 174286 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
De : Klaus Johannes Rusch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
even better let analog display its settings.
DNS settings are
He didn't ask what you think the DNS settings are, he suggested you get
Analog to tell you what it thinks the
ok, it says
DNS level is NONE
?? what can i do ??
-Message d'origine-
De : Aengus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : jeudi 3 octobre 2002 15:42
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [analog-help] DNS ?
LE BRETON Christian DTI Saclay 174286 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
LE BRETON Christian DTI Saclay 174286 wrote:
no, it's a another one
It would be helpful to check nslookup on the same machine on which you
run analog -- could be a problem with DNS resolution on that machine.
--
Klaus Johannes Rusch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.atmedia.net/KlausRusch/
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Aengus wrote:
If you use a 3rd party tool like QDNS, you can strip out addresses that
were marked as unresolved, and try again. Addresses that were resolved
the first time will still be in the file, and so won't be looked up, but
addressed that weren't resolved the
Stephen Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Aengus wrote:
If you use a 3rd party tool like QDNS, you can strip out addresses
that were marked as unresolved, and try again. Addresses that were
resolved the first time will still be in the file, and so won't be
looked up, but
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Aengus wrote:
But I think the issue is somewhat moot - given that upwards of 1/3 of
all addresses fail to resolve, there isn't really that much point in
trying to pick up a handful of slow ip addresses by doing a second run
of lookups immediately after the first.
I am using analog 4.02 on UNIX system. I just started DNS logging. It
is writing to the file and doing DNS lookups, but there are IP
addresses in the host report that aren't in the DNS log file. Also
the DNS lookups return many more domains than show up in the host
report.
I have DNSFILE
Natasha R . Gallaty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using analog 4.02 on UNIX system. I just started DNS logging. It
is writing to the file and doing DNS lookups, but there are IP
addresses in the host report that aren't in the DNS log file. Also
the DNS lookups return many more domains than
I'm new at this, so please forgive my ignorance. But I thought the
Host report shows the IP's of the computers that visited my site and
that the DNS lookups translated the IP's into names.
My confusion came from the fact that not ALL of the IP's listed in my
Host Report are listed in my DNS
Natasha R . Gallaty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is an example:
From Host Report:
760: 0.59%: 216.239.46.26 (this IP is not found in dnscache.txt, but
name resolves with nslookup)
That can sometimes happen if the server responsible for that IP address
is slow. When you did the original
I added DNS LOOKUP to my config file but I still get no domains in my
domain report. It looks like this:
#reqs: %bytes: domain
-: --: --
10867: 77.11%: [unknown domain]
1706: 19.65%: [unresolved numerical addresses]
294: 3.24%: [domain not given]
I ran tcpdump and verified that
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Pierre Abbat wrote:
I added DNS LOOKUP to my config file but I still get no domains in my
domain report. It looks like this:
#reqs: %bytes: domain
-: --: --
10867: 77.11%: [unknown domain]
1706: 19.65%: [unresolved numerical addresses]
294: 3.24%:
Pierre Abbat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I added DNS LOOKUP to my config file but I still get no domains in
my domain report. It looks like this:
#reqs: %bytes: domain
-: --: --
10867: 77.11%: [unknown domain]
1706: 19.65%: [unresolved numerical addresses]
294: 3.24%:
Thanks, both of you. The unknown domains after I told it the domain file are
accesses from my LAN, which resolves to a .lan domain, so I added that.
There actually is a .lan TLD out there, but I don't know who runs it, or on
what root server. Do you know?
phma
On 6/10/02 10:30 AM Pierre Abbat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
There actually is a .lan TLD out there, but I don't know who runs it, or on
what root server. Do you know?
No there isn't. It certianly isn't an official IANA domain, and I don't
see it on any of the major alternative DNS families
It's just used frequently by people to name internal computers...
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 10:57:12 -0400
Jason Linhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/10/02 10:30 AM Pierre Abbat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
There actually is a .lan TLD out there, but I don't know who runs it,
or on what root
On Monday 10 June 2002 10:57, Jason Linhart wrote:
On 6/10/02 10:30 AM Pierre Abbat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
There actually is a .lan TLD out there, but I don't know who runs it, or
on what root server. Do you know?
No there isn't. It certianly isn't an official IANA domain, and I don't
www.nameslinger.com allows you to register any string as a top level
domain. .lan is one of theirs, as are thousands of other strings.
Pacific Root supports the Nameslinger list, as well as several of the
other alternative lists (New.Net for example).
Jason
On 6/10/02 3:18 PM Pierre Abbat
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Stephen Turner wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2002, Lance Spitzner wrote:
D: Looking up 202.95.145.83:
D: can't resolve
D: Looking up 134.96.82.21:
D: can't resolve
D: Looking up 24.120.203.64:
D: can't resolve
D: Looking up 67.35.162.12:
D: can't resolve
Hi Everyone,
I've finally discovered the joys of Analog and what a great package,
just what I've been looking for! Just installed Analog and have a few
questions I'd like to run past you all...
Firstly, I'm using Windows 2000 servers, with IIS5.0 and extended log
formats. I've set up with
Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Firstly, I'm using Windows 2000 servers, with IIS5.0 and extended log
formats. I've set up with configuration files but get a Category M
warning for EVERY log file, as below:
analog: warning M: Logfile :\Analog\log_files\ex020419.log contains
lines
Hello,
I have been using Analog for 6 months without any trouble until last month
when my computer stating freezing during dns lookup, I don't think this is a
problem with Analog as I tried the LookupIP Helper Application which also
froze my computer.
Has anyone got any ideas why this is
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Pavils Jurjans wrote:
Ok, I did this... some of the report text follows...
4 Compile-time optional code:
5 Pie chart code included
6 Pipes included
7 DNS lookup code included
8 No DNS timeouts
9 Win32 dirent included
10 Using open() function
..
31 DNS
umm... this is my config here. I know Analog is reading this file since
logfile location is read.
# Configuration file for analog 5.2
# See http://www.analog.cx/
#
# Here are a couple of configuration commands to get you started. Add any
more
# you like from the Readme.
#
# Lines starting with #
Have you got another config file being read as well? The top of the
SETTINGS ON output will tell you exactly which config files were read.
--
Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UKhttp://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/
This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7 matches. BBC, 2/Jul/01
Hallo,
This is so dumb..
Here's my cfg for DNS lookup:
DNSFILE dnsfile.txt
DNS WRITE
DNSGOODHOURS 840
DNSBADHOURS 840
DNSTIMEOUT 10
when I run analog.exe, dnsfile.txt is not created and no error messages are
given. I don't really know frow where to start looking what is my problem...
Please
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Pavils Jurjans wrote:
Hallo,
This is so dumb..
Here's my cfg for DNS lookup:
DNSFILE dnsfile.txt
DNS WRITE
DNSGOODHOURS 840
DNSBADHOURS 840
DNSTIMEOUT 10
when I run analog.exe, dnsfile.txt is not created and no error messages are
given. I don't really know
]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: [analog-help] DNS WRITE fails to make file
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Pavils Jurjans wrote:
Hallo,
This is so dumb..
Here's my cfg for DNS lookup:
DNSFILE dnsfile.txt
DNS WRITE
DNSGOODHOURS 840
DNSBADHOURS 840
DNSTIMEOUT 10
Title: DNS lookup problem.
I am running analog on my windows 2000 server. The logs that I use are W3C logs. In the Organization section of my report it only displays the IP address and I want it to display the actual domain. I tried adding
DNSFILE dnscache.txt
DNS WRITE
To my analog.cfg
Scott Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I am running analog on my windows 2000 server. The logs that I use are
W3C logs. In the Organization section of my report it only displays
the IP address and I want it to display the actual domain. I tried
adding
DNSFILE dnscache.txt
DNS WRITE
jonathan chetwynd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Is there a way just to have dns for the domains named in the reports rather
than all of the ones in the stats.
I've 66MB of stats, and the dnscache is already 448KB and its not finished
yet. I'm using adsl and it seems to be taking hours.
See
might seem pathetic, but I've no idea what to do with what I imagine is a
perl script. the analog site seems to skip on this vital piece of info.
certainly looks like the right one for me (671KB/66MB and gaining), apologies
for being lazy in not finding it.
See minidns on the helper
jonathan chetwynd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
might seem pathetic, but I've no idea what to do with what I imagine is a
perl script. the analog site seems to skip on this vital piece of info.
certainly looks like the right one for me (671KB/66MB and gaining), apologies
for being lazy in not
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Webmaster wrote:
ok I have loaded and run Qdns.exe.
It then resolved most of the IP addresses that are in dnscache.txt. :)
I have the following lines in my analog.cfg file
DNSFILE \www\analog\dnscache.txt
DNS READ
When I use the form I get the following for Domain
ok I have loaded and run Qdns.exe.
It then resolved most of the IP addresses that are in dnscache.txt. :)
I have the following lines in my analog.cfg file
DNSFILE \www\analog\dnscache.txt
DNS READ
When I use the form I get the following for Domain Report
Listing domains, sorted by the number of
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:08:13 +0100 (BST)
From: Stephen Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [analog-help] DNS, HOSTALIAS, and Cachefiles
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
Q: Can I use this method (or other ones) to do away with the need for
DNS lookups?
If you
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Jonathan B. Horen wrote:
Pass #2: Analog reads our three 100+GB (gzipped-size) logfiles, reads
from the DNS cachefile, reads the CACHEFILE (the previous
day's CACHEOUTFILE, and generates the new report.
Pass #2: Analog reads our three 100+GB
Jonathan B. Horen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Pass #1: Analog reads our three 100+GB (gzipped-size) logfiles,
does what DNS name-resolution that it can, and writes to
the DNS cachefile.
/bin/sed -f dnscleanup dnscache dnscache.tmp
(dnscleanup uses those
Shalom!
First of all, I've been reading and re-reading TFM; however, something
eludes me, apparently.
Our site runs several proxy/caching servers for the Israeli university
system. To my dismay, a number of universities do not have IN PTR
entries for DHCP-assigned IP addresses, making it
Jonathan B. Horen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
When Analog performs its DNS lookups, it writes the results to our
dnscache file. Unfortunately, those unresolvable hosts result in
entries of the form
timestamp IP address *
which end-up being reported/displayed as unresolved numerical
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
Q: Can I use this method (or other ones) to do away with the need for
DNS lookups?
If you want to write Aliases to replace all DNS lookups you could. But
that might be a lot of records to maintain (in multiple places).
You also have to
First I can now get DNS working by calling analog directly and
changing analog.cfg directly to vary report output. So the main
question is solved.
On 8 Mar 2001, at 17:51, Stephen Turner wrote:
Clearly the DNS WRITE is being ignored. The only ways this can
happen are if
the whole config
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
