enerated_headers: ["my_genrule_type_module"],
export_generated_headers: ["my_genrule_type_module"],
}
- Dan
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:58 AM Vinayak Soni
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Suppose my header library depends on another module to be compiled first.
> For other mo
ntrol who uses files
within your directory (via visibility), and tools like `mma` and `atest`
are more likely to be able to handle "build/test everything in this
directory" properly.
- Dan
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 9:35 AM Akanksha wrote:
> Hello, I am trying to convert Android.mk to An
a `soong_namespace {}` definition, but that means you weren't using
that Android.bp in the first place).
- Dan
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 8:27 AM wrote:
> hello,
> say in a Android.bp file srcs:["../../../a.cpp"]
> I am getting the error Path is outside directory
under a directory.
I had written some about this in our best practices doc:
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/build/soong/+/master/docs/best_practices.md#headers
- Dan
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 9:46 AM REGURI AKANKSHA
wrote:
> How to write headers in Android.bp?
>
> say Android.mk h
tibility-device-util-axt",
],
sdk_version: "test_current",
min_sdk_version: "26",
}
In this case, it may have been possible to instead refactor the common file
into a library that would be used instead (and then only compiling the
files once instead of 2 times
The best thing to do is to leave them in Android.mk for now, converting
them next year when you integrate the R release (which is what master will
be).
- Dan
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019, 8:31 AM seekers here wrote:
> Thanks Dan.
> I am using a branch of Android Q code. So Now whats the so
properties here:
https://ci.android.com/builds/latest/branches/aosp-build-tools/targets/linux/view/soong_build.html
(this is based on master, if you're working on Q, not everything here may
work -- there's a local copy in $OUT_DIR/soong/docs/soong_build.html).
- Dan
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:52 AM
Yep, I've reproduced this on minimal installs of both ArchLinux and Ubuntu.
`apt install fontconfig` fixes it on Ubuntu. On Arch, I had to install
fontconfig and a font (I tried ttf-droid) before it started working.
- Dan
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 7:41 PM Daniel Fullmer wrote:
> I believe I
library, then statically in the dlopened
libsepolwrap.so). I've got a fix here:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/system/sepolicy/+/1173528
- Dan
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 6:15 PM Dr. Dhanyu Eshaka wrote:
> No moved back to Mojave . MAC OSX 10.14
> I think those errors has
That's strange, I've got no idea why you're hitting it, but that we haven't
seen it anywhere else.
I've filed https://issuetracker.google.com/145064117 with my findings so
far.
- Dan
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 6:15 PM Brian Moore wrote:
>
> I've been building AOSP for my pixel devices for
Then make
will only create a single installation rule. (I haven't tried it, but it
should work -- this is how we handle more complicated modules that need to
be different per device)
- Dan
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 3:58 PM 'Kyle Cai' via Android Building <
android-building@googlegroups.com> wrot
of the two rules).
- Dan
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 1:09 PM 'Kyle Cai' via Android Building <
android-building@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask about android.bp files.
> Here is an issue that I'm seeing and I can't figure out why I'm see
it with `m wpa_supplicant`
- Dan
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 12:53 PM sachin verma
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have done some changes in
> external/wpa_supplicant_8/wpa_supplicant/hs20_supplicant.c file and then
> compiling it by running make command in AOSP root directory, after
> complet
achine families may be more
efficient. For local developers, we're generally buying fast desktops -- 2x
Intel Xeon GOLD 6154 processor (18-core Skylake, up to 3.70 GHz) with 192
GB RAM and a few TB of SSDs.
- Dan
On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 11:52 PM 'Orion Hodson' via Android Building <
android
Oh, and for developer builds (and many frequent CI builds), we're almost
always using incremental builds, so the clean build times are somewhat less
limiting. If you're often doing clean builds or very large builds, that's
probably one of the first things to look at.
- Dan
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020
://source.android.com/devices/tv/reference-tv-app
I believe the launcher team sometimes does development with gradle, but I
have no idea what the state is on that, especially on AOSP.
- Dan
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:21 PM GUNASEELAN N wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried to build the Aosp Launcher3 application in my
+Matthew Maurer Do we have any documentation on this
target? I think the last time we talked about this target it was only
minimally functional.
- Dan
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 12:51 PM Julien Robin
wrote:
> I succeeded to find a workaround for the issue I signaled here, editing
> device/g
These are the instructions on how to use the android emulator (with qemu):
https://source.android.com/setup/create/avd
- Dan
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 1:58 PM Julien Robin
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I need a little bit of help on building something working on QEMU (on any
> architectu
Which version of AOSP are you building? What's your build target? Do you
have any local changes?
- Dan
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 10:49 PM Kiên neiK Lê Trung
wrote:
> i got stuck build here https://del.dog/gipposirep.txt. anyone encounter
> this error.
>
> --
> --
> You rec
This is off-topic for this group, as the build error appears to be in
non-AOSP code. If I'm reading it right, your kernel is having problems
compiling (it can't find an openssl host header).
- Dan
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 2:02 PM Dnyanesh Mohite wrote:
> CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h W
that links to that library. We'd eventually like to get rid
of include_dirs (not local_include_dirs). See
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/build/soong/+/master/docs/best_practices.md#headers
for
more discussion around this.
- Dan
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 11:13 AM Shalini Salomi Bodapati
wrote:
>
jopt-simple-4.9 should be defined in prebuilts/tools/common/m2/...
https://cs.android.com/android/platform/superproject/+/master:prebuilts/tools/common/m2/repository/net/sf/jopt-simple/jopt-simple/4.9/Android.bp;l=17?q=jopt-simple-4.9=android%2Fplatform%2Fsuperproject
- Dan
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020
For the emulator, you'll need to use aosp_x86, or a similar emulator
product, not a physical device product like aosp_bullhead.
- Dan
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:57 AM 张亚琦 <1987zhangy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> *I compiled Android N, but there was an error running the emulator*
For the emulator, you'll need to use aosp_x86, or a similar emulator
product, not a physical device product like coral.
- Dan
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:27 PM Damir Usmanov wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> I just lunch aosp_coral-userdebug and started emulator.
> but it shows black scr
dex2oat[d] (the host version) is not supported on Mac, so you cannot use
WITH_DEXPREOPT=true on a Mac. (Not setting it should be the default)
- Dan
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 7:15 AM Eric Park wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Trying to build Android Q on macOS Catalina and I keep getting t
My understanding is that cuttlefish's arm[64] variant is meant to run on an
arm64 machine, not an x86 machine.
- Dan
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 7:30 AM Lawrence Lin wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I follow the steps on the cuttlefish intro. page, "
> https://android.googlesource.
-suite-dependencies=android%2Fplatform%2Fsuperproject
- Dan
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 9:28 AM Dan Willemsen wrote:
> The test_suite_name needs to match the individual module definitions that
> set `test_suites: ["vts"]` or `LOCAL_COMPATIBILITY_SUITE := vts`.
>
> The
pendencies=package:%5Eandroid$
https://source.corp.google.com/android/build/make/core/definitions.mk;cl=master;l=2899?q=COMPATIBILITY.*FILES%20lang:makefile%20case:yes=package:%5Eandroid$
- Dan
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 9:23 AM xiang tianyu
wrote:
> hellp ,can you help me with this
you using
incremental builds? (It also only affects 1/3-1/2 of the build, as the rest
of the actions are Java/etc)
- Dan
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 2:41 PM Eliane Fonseca
wrote:
> I trying to use ccache with newer AOSP (9, 10) to attempt to speed up
> compiling time,but it looks like
the
libhardware_headers header library to access them.
- Dan
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:13 PM Jay Jeon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to use the header files in
> './out/soong/ndk/sysroot/usr/include' directory by building some libraries,
> but I didn't find some android header files.
&g
uilt python2?
>
That already happened with Android 10 (Q).
- Dan
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 8:23 AM XING WANG
wrote:
> Thanks Dan,
>
> Please let me clarify further.
>
> So AOSP will not modify all python2 in the build script to be python3
> compatible(like dict.iteritems), and
I'm not overly familiar with the kernel build scripts, but it looks like
you can set SKIP_MRPROPER=1 to skip the initial `make mrproper` (clean)
step.
- Dan
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 9:14 PM Vova Ivanov wrote:
> Having followed the instructions on the Android Open Source Project
>
like:
$ source build/envsetup.sh
$ lunch aosp_crosshatch-eng
$ m
None of those steps will use COMMON_LUNCH_CHOICES.
- Dan
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 8:58 AM Bo YU wrote:
> Hi,
> please correct me if i understood wrong.
> In AOSP/build call chains,we know, `source
> ao
Sorry, apparently that link didn't
work. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/android-building/t-70r0IdkZY/sY_NhNd6AgAJ
should work better.
- Dan
On Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 9:45:15 AM UTC-7 Dan Willemsen wrote:
> Yep, that's not intended to be a buildable tag. See my previous messages:
>
enames? Why do they share the same module name?
- Dan
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 8:10 AM Pranitha Reddy <
pranitha.alugube...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello
> Say there is module 'X' writtern twice in Android.mk
>
> include $(CLEAR_VARS)
> LOCAL_MODULE
Yep, that's not intended to be a buildable tag. See my previous messages:
https://groups.google.com/g/android-building/c/t-70r0IdkZY/m/sY_NhNd6AgAJ
- Dan
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:41 AM Varun Kumar wrote:
> Hi Dan Willemsen,
>
> I have used below branch/tag
>
> *rep
t; actions
concurrently), but that may still need tweaking.
- Dan
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 8:27 AM Steve wrote:
> Trying to build a standard AOSP on Ubuntu 14.04, target aosp_arm-eng.
> The build works fine until the metalava and the use of kotlin, when it
> fails with:
>
> WARNI
would be
adjusting these defaults based on what we detect we're running on)
- Dan
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 1:11 PM Steve wrote:
> The machine has only 8Gb and 5580Mb are available when the build starts
> for 'm api-stubs-docs'. Running a single job does not help.
> This happens on th
.
The [2] module reference you're using is also coming from master, which is
why cc_fuzz is showing up as valid. You can get the equivalent docs locally
that are specific to your checkout by running `m soong_docs` and browsing
to out/soong/docs/soong_build.html (which shouldn't include cc_fuzz).
- Dan
What branch/tag did you use to initialize this source tree? (`repo init
...`)
- Dan
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 8:57 PM Varun Kumar wrote:
>
> PLATFORM_VERSION_CODENAME=R
> PLATFORM_VERSION=R
> TARGET_PRODUCT=aosp_arm64
> TARGET_BU
excessive
for that -- it claims that there are ~3M nodes in the cache:
verbose: *kati*: 3071468 find nodes
One of my AOSP trees (after removing out/) is closer to 1M nodes (~2s), and
after a hikey960 build it has ~1.5M nodes (3.4s).
- Dan
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 8:36 AM Yongqin Liu wrote:
>
skewed significantly
between old and new projects.
- Dan
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:10 PM Guoyin Chen wrote:
> There are quite a lot of build error with android-preview-2 build. I think
> google have several wrong tag on different gits.
>
> On Tuesday, March 31, 2020 at 8:41:18 AM UT
The `libsonic` in Android only includes `sonic.c`:
https://cs.android.com/android/platform/superproject/+/master:external/sonic/Android.bp
openInputWaveFile and readFromWaveFile are in `wave.c`
- Dan
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:56 PM jrw wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i'm facing an issue with t
eps files, which will be shared
across all devices in a single output tree. It looks like yours is taking
~4s based on the trace. So your minimum incremental build times are
probably ~2x as long as they could be.
- Dan
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 7:58 AM Yongqin Liu wrote:
> Hi, Dan
>
was using flex/bison:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/external/mesa3d/+/1203548
- Dan
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 7:58 AM Michael Goffioul
wrote:
> I'm experimenting with android-r-preview-2 and found a problem compiling
> mesa, which didn't occur with android-10. The error
`LOCAL_PROGUARD_ENABLED := disabled` would be the equivalent of `optimize:
{ enabled: false }`
- Dan
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:51 AM Kbc K wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Soong build system "Android.bp" has a useful flag called "optimize" which
> allow to disabl
I believe the prebuilt comes from the python support in the platform build
system, not setup.py:
source build/envsetup.sh
m acloud
cp out/host/linux-x86/bin/acloud-dev .../acloud
- Dan
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:16 AM Andre D wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to replace the
over
its lifetime). next, kati takes ~6GB
For some of our larger branches/targets, I've seen peaks at >14GB (~50GB
lifetime allocs), with kati using >10GB.
- Dan
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:05 PM Eliane Fonseca
wrote:
> same problem with 2 processes and I have only 8 GB of phy
lso on the list is hiding things
like /usr/include from the build, as we never want to use it. Potentially
changing what parts of the output tree are read/write vs read-only vs
invisible during different parts of the build is another idea I've had.
- Dan
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 9:43 AM Ricky Ng-A
-shared-libs-deps.
- Dan
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 8:48 AM 임정민 wrote:
> Hi I found there are no shared library in ota packages.
>
> I expect there are some modules and shared libraries.
> but only existing were modules like lpunpack.
> I hope there are shared libraries such as libbase
of the build.
> And be sure to use make -k to take advantage of all your CPUs.
'-k' is keep going, you're thinking of '-j', but that's been the default
for a while now.
- Dan
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 12:29 PM 'Glenn Kasten' via Android Building <
android-building@googlegroups.com> wrote
remove those arguments and be successful, this
may be something to bring up in their forums / support channels.
- Dan
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 9:23 AM Yuvaraj Velumani wrote:
> 1. I have my Ubuntu server 16.04.10 installed which has python 2.7.12 and
> 3.6.9(I installed it - following pro
a jar to put in
the bootclasspath; etc.
- Dan
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 8:58 AM XING WANG
wrote:
> I checked the doc in build repo
> https://cs.android.com/android/platform/superproject/+/master:build/make/Deprecation.md,
> Google is coverting the make to soong.
>
> Will google con
ss they're
used via `dlopen`).
- Dan
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 4:27 PM 임정민 wrote:
> I'm checking R OS
> And I made something wrong the question.
> I need OTATOOLS have shared library
> until Q OS there is lines like
> --
> 2504# Shar
-host.so
-rwx-- 2.0 unx16736 bl defN 08-Jan-01 00:00
lib64/libcrypto_utils.so
-rwx-- 2.0 unx 199776 bl defN 08-Jan-01 00:00 lib64/libcutils.so
...
- Dan
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 4:58 PM 임정민 wrote:
> Thanks for quick response.
> Why I'm doing this. We use lpunpack including OTA
to it, so maybe save it away in your own
variable directly after this line:
INTERNAL_OTATOOLS_PACKAGE_FILES := \
$(filter $(HOST_OUT)/%,$(call
module-installed-files,$(INTERNAL_OTATOOLS_MODULES_WITH_DEPS)))
- Dan
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 12:41 AM 임정민 wrote:
> I haven't been checking otatools.
for temporary debugging, you probably want to use the
VendorConfig functions instead, so that it can be configured by the product
that you're building.
- Dan
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:35 AM fanx lin wrote:
> hi, I am buildding android Q , I want to build a app . and I want to use
> build e
The Android.bp next to that go file is going to have a dep entry of
"soong-cc" (which gives you access to the "android/soong/cc" package).
"soong-java" will allow you to reference the "android/soong/java" package.
- Dan
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:00 AM fan
How much RAM have you given docker? `free -h` shows how much is available.
IIRC, unlike on linux, because docker on Mac is a VM, it can't grow to use
as much as necessary. Our docs list 16GB as the minimum available to the
build.
- Dan
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 9:30 AM 6020peaks /\/\/\ <602
Does my-services.jar contain .class files, or .dex files?
java_import_libs is expecting .class files.
- Dan
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 9:07 AM bersaty wu wrote:
> I want to add my own jar to the wmtest apk, so I modify the .bp file like
> this:
>
> static_libs: [
> "frame
/superproject/+/master:bootable/recovery/updater/Android.mk;drc=2bb374a86d0161700f01b68433063b0b13adc86a;l=25
That being said, I don't know anything about this code, so I don't know if
it's valid to use libinstall within the updater executable, since it's
normally in the recovery executable.
- Dan
to
be on the product image (product_specific: true), and use /product instead
of /system.
- Dan
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:47 AM శంకర్ కుమార్ యల్లపు <
sankarkumar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just trying to integrate our changes into cuttlefish. I am getting
> an error called *Offending
elated to Bazel, and currently integrates
with the build similarly to ccache -- as a compiler wrapper.
- Dan
On Monday, March 23, 2020 at 7:39:55 AM UTC-7 mooo...@gmail.com wrote:
> hi,
>
> Android Building group,
>
> I noticed that One PPT called "Remote Execution and Cachi
is still standardized on Ubuntu 14.04 because it still needs
to build some older versions of Android, which is why that text around
"tested internally" is still there. Our developers are on a version of
Debian Testing <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GLinux> that is much more up
to date
, are you able to execute it?
- Dan
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 7:57 AM 박종현TV wrote:
> I build android-8.1.0_r64 but an error occurred while build
>
>
> pjh@pjh-System-Product-Name:/media/pjh/android/AOSP$ make
> /media/pjh/android/AOSP/build/soong/cmd/microfactory/microfactory.bash: 줄
&
I believe this was fixed with
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/build/soong/+/1384901,
so sync your tree and that should go away.
- Dan
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 11:11 AM Suhang Wang wrote:
> I sync the latest code, but get fallowing build fail.
>
> Mac OS Catalin
)
$(MAKE) -C $(PRIVATE_SRCDIR) O=$$(cd $(PRIVATE_OUT); pwd) ...
(If you can guarantee that nothing later in the build will change
KERNEL_SRCDIR/KERNEL_OUT, then you wouldn't need to use the PRIVATE_*
indirection, but it's generally a good idea to do so to prevent issues in
the future)
- Dan
On T
ant as we improve per-action sandboxing to get
better incremental builds and remote execution / cross-machine caching of
build actions. We're not there yet, but that's the direction we'd like to
be heading.
- Dan
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 9:08 AM Sumit Kumar wrote:
> hi all,
> i am trying to
files (which define things that may not even be used by the
current build). What's your use case for setting this in an Android.mk /
Android.bp file?
- Dan
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 1:11 PM Simon Williams <
simondavidwilliam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Using Android.mk, I'm able to add a new
Can you file an issue at
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/gerrit/issues/entry?template=GoogleSource+Issue
?
Thanks
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 2:38 PM Sasha Sirotkin
wrote:
> Tried 10 times already
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020, 22:25 Ljube Babunski wrote:
>
>> Try again to sync.
>>>
>>> --
>> --
>> You
variable is set.
- Dan
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 8:29 AM 'Wesolowski, Krzysztof' via Android
Building wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have pretty big codebase, with most of BP modules specifying tidy: true.
>
> This codebase is then included in multiple product variants, and tidy
> c
it working.
- Dan
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 8:13 AM Arthur Clark wrote:
> this is output message:
>
>
> PLATFORM_VERSION_CODENAME=REL
> PLATFORM_VERSION=9
> TARGET_PRODUCT=aosp_x86
> TARGET_BUILD_VARIANT=eng
> TARGET_BU
This is definitely a bug, I uploaded a fix here:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/build/soong/+/1489596
- Dan
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 8:30 AM Yongqin Liu wrote:
> Hi, All
>
> I want to build hikey960 with the default aosp tree with OUT_DIR specified,
> but I g
If that doesn't work, try rebuilding the blob files, my understanding is
that they've been fixed.
Thanks,
Dan
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 3:34 PM cptl...@gmail.com
wrote:
> In vendor/qcom/redfin/proprietary/Android.mk:
>
> There are several lines that say:
> *LOCAL_NOTICE_FILE :=
/arm64,
but that's for cross-compiling binaries for that configuration on an x86-64
system.
- Dan
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 7:27 PM kkh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone manage to build AOSP on arm host? After repo sync on
> android-11.0.0_r35, did the source envsetup.sh and lunch command, b
commands in an AOSP tree,
where they would work).
If you didn't make changes to the ABI, you'd want to debug that issue
further rather than attempting to update the ABI to fix your build issue.
- Dan
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 10:09 PM figs개발자 wrote:
> Hi All
>
> i have a problem with the A
ct/+/master:external/bouncycastle/srcgen_platform/generate_android_src.sh>
used
for bouncycastle are doing differently.
- Dan
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 10:10 PM Yolo Pucky wrote:
> So I actually got a solution to my problem mentioned on 09.06.2021.
> However, I have another problem now, that
That doesn't actually look like the error -- there should be a line
starting with `FAILED:` earlier in your console. You can always look at the
dedicated error log after the build too, in out/error.log, which should
only contain errors (not other build output that finished after the error).
- Dan
in clang too, but that's rarer (and with clang & code that old, not all
that useful to track down).
- Dan
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 10:12 PM sazer kpla
wrote:
> Android Building
>
> [ 0% 13/29446] //external/llvm/lib/LTO:libLLVMLTO clang++ LTOModule.cpp
> FAILED:
> out/s
other VNDK libraries that are exposed to /vendor code.
- Dan
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 10:10 PM Vitaly Bortz wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is there a modifiable condition[s]/rule[s] which I could change to allow
> linking between two given libraries types and prevent the "can not link
&g
t in Android
12 either. You could always attempt to revert those removals in your own
tree, but I don't know how complex that could be. RBE works with
significantly more of the build actions than GOMA ever did.
- Dan
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 3:37 PM Ruben Wu wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> While I un
efactoring those so that you don't need to build a system image
in order to build the platform/build-tools zips.
- Dan
On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 2:47:43 PM UTC-7 connor.t...@gmail.com wrote:
> I saw this message - "*Important: Platform development on MacOS isn't
> supported as of
We've got a public code search site that can help find these:
https://cs.android.com/search?q=deployagent.inc==android%2Fplatform%2Fsuperproject
--
in this case, it's defined in packages/modules/adb/Android.bp.
- Dan
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 9:07 AM Daniel Caruso wrote:
> Hi
You can see a list of all the commands run in the out/verbose.log.gz file
after a build completes (at least on modern builds -- for older builds
specify `showcommands` on the command line)
- Dan
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 3:06 PM anands...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am debugging
soong.log and compare timestamps of the files in
out/soong/build.ninja.d to see what's triggering soong_build to run.
- Dan
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 8:52 AM Mikael Björklund <
mikael.bjorkl...@vidhance.com> wrote:
> I have an AOSP tree were out/soong/.bootstrap/bin/soong_build
> out/soo
best bet -- platform builds on
Mac aren't entirely full-featured anyways (close enough for most
development, but a handful of things can be missing).
- Dan
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 2:07 PM Dan Willemsen wrote:
> Older versions of Android don't build with newer versions of MacOS (the
> i
GOMA support has been removed on the AOSP master branch, and has been
replaced with RBE.
- Dan
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 9:30 AM 唐木村 wrote:
> @Dan Willemsen
>
> >>> The build team does not recommend using Goma -- it does not work
> particularly well with the Android
bet is probably to use a Linux virtual machine. That may be
faster anyways.
- Dan
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 9:30 AM Abhijeet Salunke
wrote:
> I have setup my Mac OS X for building Android. I am able to execute
> following commands
> - source build/envsetup.sh
> - lunch
> But w
It would be simple enough to write one that handles a few use cases, but
no, I don't know of one. The Android.mk that ndk-build uses was never the
same format as the Android.mk used by the platform builds -- they just
happened to share some names (and both used make).
- Dan
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021
se. If
you are trying a platform build, have you successfully downloaded the code
and built something without any changes?
- Dan
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:16 AM Akshay Sakare wrote:
> Hello,
> May be this document will help you
> https://android.googlesource.com/platform/build/soo
argument list here
<https://cs.android.com/android/platform/superproject/+/master:build/soong/ui/build/sandbox_linux.go;drc=0506361a60215defc5098a6253fdc8f51371ce88;l=158>
.
- Dan
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:40 AM Longping Tang
wrote:
> Hi Dan
> I want to increase priority when building aos
tall a
"/vendor/bin/foo -> /vendor/bin/my_binary" symlink whenever my_binary is
installed.
Then in your product makefile (no need to add libmylibrary, as it will get
installed as a dependency):
PRODUCT_PACKAGES += my_binary
- Dan
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 10:49 AM Curt Schwaderer
w
Android.bp (and the Soong build system in general) wasn't really supported
until Android-O, so an Android.bp will be ignored in Nougat. (There was
some prototype support in Nougat under a USE_SOONG flag, but I really doubt
that'll work for you)
- Dan
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 4:19 PM Saurabh
javadoc tag, not an annotation / etc), so it cannot be disabled.
- Dan
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 9:56 PM Ravishankar S
wrote:
> This process given below (for the Droid documentation build) does not work
> for AOSP11 build! We have to use the method given below:
>
>
> https://forum.xda-develope
re no longer getting that protection. It would be a better idea to mark
that as a known failure until you do the real testing on the release image
(especially since in this case it'll also complain about you running an
'eng' build).
- Dan
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:20 AM Salini Venate
wrote:
&
It looks like this was an issue in "VSDK"-based trees that are using a
vendor snapshot, and was fixed in master (but not in Android 12):
https://android-review.googlesource.com/q/topic:vendor_snapshot-192647618
You can either try to cherry-pick that topic, or disable the VSDK.
- Dan
O
) to
$DIST_DIR (defaults to out/dist/) after a build, but you'd still need
something wrapping the build to put them where you wanted, so that may or
may not simplify things.
- Dan
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 12:13 PM Abhayadev S wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a cc_binary module (name myBin) defin
tps://android.googlesource.com/platform/build/soong/+/master/README.md#namespaces>
and
the same module name(myBin) so that only one will ever be exported to Make
at a time, that can be chosen through PRODUCT_SOONG_NAMESPACES
(PRODUCT_PACKAGES would just have myBin in either case).
- Dan
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 12
serdebug && m dist
- Dan
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 2:41 PM Abhayadev S wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using a master build script to trigger the android build and the
> master script does the following steps,
>
> *source build/envsetup.sh && lunch *
>
> Now in my ma
is was mentioned,
> that Google will no longer maintain the blueprint Git repository.
>
The standalone github project <https://github.com/google/blueprint> is no
longer maintained, but it is still actively used within Android
<https://android.googlesource.com/platform/build/blueprint/+l
101 - 200 of 234 matches
Mail list logo
