[android-developers] Re: ADC2 Challenge - Is this allowed?

2009-08-27 Thread Teo
I think it's also a bit unfair to think like that. It was pretty obvious they won't allow existing apps into the contest as apps made without a deadline would benefit from an unfair advantage (in development time and popularity). Also, i guess the point of this contest is to promote innovation

[android-developers] Re: ADC2 Challenge - Is this allowed?

2009-08-27 Thread Timothy F
I believe from the very beginning it was stated publicly that it was for apps that had not previously been published. I was fearing that they would not allow the entered apps to be published until after ADC2, so the fact that they are allowing them to be published even before ADC2 begins is good

[android-developers] Re: ADC2 Challenge - Is this allowed?

2009-08-27 Thread Ehab Bassilli
Vaz and I sent out a bit too many threads on this because what happened was we sent out 1 and it didnt appear on the forum.. so we sent out a few more thinking there was a problem with the submission. Anyway, all of them arrived at the same time - so our apologies for that! Secondly, thanks for

[android-developers] Re: ADC2 Challenge - Is this allowed?

2009-08-27 Thread Dan Morrill
Yes, this is correct. We will review all apps that make it on to the second round to confirm eligibility. - Dan On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Dan Sherman impact...@gmail.com wrote: a) I'd imagine, they'll go through ADC getting rated, but if they should win, I'd imagine Google would check

[android-developers] Re: ADC2 Challenge - Is this allowed?

2009-08-27 Thread Dan Morrill
Timothy is quite correct. In fact, the original rules said that you couldn't have published your app publicly anywhere at all, but we loosened that rule in response to feedback since it unintentionally excluded open source projects. We also were originally going to require apps to wait until the

[android-developers] Re: ADC2 Challenge - Is this allowed?

2009-08-26 Thread Dan Sherman
a) I'd imagine, they'll go through ADC getting rated, but if they should win, I'd imagine Google would check if theres a duplicate on the market that was released prior to Aug1, and remove it at that point. Not to mention, if they announced the winners, and someone else noticed, I'm sure it would

[android-developers] Re: ADC2 Challenge - Is this allowed?

2009-08-26 Thread Houba
Thanks, but I have just seen this: http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/08/android-developer-challenge-2-open-for.html He clearly States As a final note, if you've uploaded a version of your app to Android Market, you'll need to use a different Android package name for the version you

[android-developers] Re: ADC2 Challenge - Is this allowed?

2009-08-26 Thread Dan Sherman
Pretty sure they're talking about anyone who published after Aug1, who would need to rename the package for launch in ADC2. The eligibility rules were posted on May 27th (when ADC2 was announced), so unless you published your app before May 27th, not sure theres much unfairness going on here...

[android-developers] Re: ADC2 Challenge - Is this allowed?

2009-08-26 Thread Romain Guy
Therefore, it seems to me that what Google are looking for is for developers who HAVE developed already prior to Aug 1st, need to rename their apps. No, it's for developers who have published their app *after* August 1st. It is EXTREMELY Cruel for a Google official NOT to answer this.

[android-developers] Re: ADC2 Challenge - Is this allowed?

2009-08-26 Thread Houba
Merci Romain, Romain, we published our app before the exactly rules were out (i.e. in early May). It seems a tad bit unfair that we are left out because of that. Don't you think? Cheers, E On Aug 26, 11:29 pm, Romain Guy romain...@google.com wrote: Therefore, it seems to me that what Google

[android-developers] Re: ADC2 Challenge - Is this allowed?

2009-08-26 Thread Houba
Dan, Yes, I published my app BEFORE the 27th May. So therefore, it is unfair. On Aug 26, 11:15 pm, Dan Sherman impact...@gmail.com wrote: Pretty sure they're talking about anyone who published after Aug1, who would need to rename the package for launch in ADC2. The eligibility rules were