Re: [AOLSERVER] Ns_Tls

On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 20:49:13 EDT Nathan Folkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a message dated 6/6/2003 6:03:40 PM Central Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > Hello, > > > > when I start AOLServer on NetBSD -current it gives an error: > > Ns_Tls: invalid key: 0: sould bee between 1

Re: [AOLSERVER] Net access for patients ...

On Friday 06 June 2003 06:27 pm, you wrote: > A guy I know - a research biochemist who is very fit and in his mid-fifties > but has been having episodes of skipping heart beats, racing etc - was > given a really cool device by OHSU, our local med school. Sorry I meant to e-mail that to Vinod pers

[AOLSERVER] Net access for patients ...

On Friday 06 June 2003 06:13 pm, you wrote: > On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 05:42 PM, Don Baccus wrote: > > (for those of you not part of the OpenACS community, Vinod is a > > practicing MD. > > Isn't Open Source great?) > > Open Source definitely is great. I can't wait for the day that my > patient

Re: [AOLSERVER] ns_eval is EVIL in AOLserver 4

On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 05:42 PM, Don Baccus wrote: (for those of you not part of the OpenACS community, Vinod is a practicing MD. Isn't Open Source great?) Open Source definitely is great. I can't wait for the day that my patients come with error logs and gdb-hook-ups. Then my 2 worlds will

Re: [AOLSERVER] Ns_Tls

In a message dated 6/6/2003 6:03:40 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, when I start AOLServer on NetBSD -current it gives an error: Ns_Tls: invalid key: 0: sould bee between 1 and 100 and dumps core. Can sombody tell me what it means? TIA Feri which version? i had intro

[AOLSERVER] Ns_Tls

Hello, when I start AOLServer on NetBSD -current it gives an error: Ns_Tls: invalid key: 0: sould bee between 1 and 100 and dumps core. Can sombody tell me what it means? TIA Feri -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list: http://www.aolserver.com/listserv.html

Re: [AOLSERVER] ns_eval is EVIL in AOLserver 4

On Friday 06 June 2003 11:54 am, Vinod Kurup wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 11:12:43 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: > > So, when a patch for OpenACS that doesn't use ns_eval is ready, those of > > you who have problems with the nsdb0 stuff, if yu could please determine > > whether the elimination of ns_eval

Re: [AOLSERVER] ns_eval is EVIL in AOLserver 4

On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 11:12:43 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: > So, when a patch for OpenACS that doesn't use ns_eval is ready, those of you > who have problems with the nsdb0 stuff, if yu could please determine whether > the elimination of ns_eval fixes it. I made a patch

[AOLSERVER] LISTSERV problems....

Sorry to post this to the list :-( I can't seem to get a response from LISTSERV, either by email or using the web interface. Whoever is an admin on this list, please email me. -- Tom Poindexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nyx.net/~tpoindex/ -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove y

Re: [AOLSERVER] ns_eval is EVIL in AOLserver 4

On Friday 06 June 2003 11:50, Don Baccus wrote: > On Friday 06 June 2003 08:12 am, Lamar Owen wrote: > > The other side effect (that we've been seeing complained about lately) is > > related to the following in acs-tcl > I didn't bother mentioning these because I thought pointing out the problem >

Re: [AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Feature Requests-746579 ] Server instance

THis isn't the listserv I wanted to be connected to, how do i get off this one?? thanks -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list: http://www.aolserver.com/listserv.html List information and options: http://listserv.aol.com/

Re: [AOLSERVER] ns_eval is EVIL in AOLserver 4

On Friday 06 June 2003 08:12 am, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Thursday 05 June 2003 22:28, Don Baccus wrote: > > The implementation in AOLserver 4 is very, very different. The script is > > executed then the ENTIRE set of namespaces and procs are saved to the > > server's "tcl.script" pointer. > > Argh!

Re: [AOLSERVER] ns_eval is EVIL in AOLserver 4

On Friday 06 June 2003 08:15 am, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: > My initial idea was to simply make the Nsd as static package by doing > Tcl_StaticPackage() at the end of InitInterp() and then do from Tcl: > > set interp [interp create] > $interp eval {load "" Nsd} > $interp eval [ns_ictl get] > > and s

Re: [AOLSERVER] ns_eval is EVIL in AOLserver 4

On Friday 06 June 2003 17:11, you wrote: > > how about: > ns_interp sync > ns_interp eval ? > Hey Tom, thanks! You just gave me the idea: extend the Tcl "interp" with custom "ns_interp" and do the necessary plumbing on C level before returning the interp to caller. This might work. Have to check

Re: [AOLSERVER] ns_eval is EVIL in AOLserver 4

On Friday 06 June 2003 17:11, Don Baccus wrote: > On Friday 06 June 2003 08:03 am, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: > > Nevertheles, to be really fair, there is some more work to be done > > under the hood to get this working. The problem is in 1/. > > Simple "interp create" won't work since script passed t

[AOLSERVER] Bytecode-compiled Tcl question

Hello, I am getting a SIGABRT when evaluating string objects in AOLserver 4.0 b6. The pseudocode is: interp=Ns_GetConnInterp (Ns_GetConn ()) obj = Tcl_NewStringObj (utf8string, len) Tcl_IncrRefCount (obj) repeat a_few_times     Tcl_EvalObjEx (interp, obj, 0) end Tc

Re: [AOLSERVER] ns_eval is EVIL in AOLserver 4

On Thursday 05 June 2003 22:28, Don Baccus wrote: > The implementation in AOLserver 4 is very, very different. The script is > executed then the ENTIRE set of namespaces and procs are saved to the > server's "tcl.script" pointer. Argh! > One EVIL side effect of this is that some of the standard

Re: [AOLSERVER] ns_eval is EVIL in AOLserver 4

Don Baccus wrote: I would love to have time to contribute to AOLserver It sounds like you just contributed 4 hours tracking down a bug. Yes, that's my thinking, too. An "ns_sync" tthat copies state and "ns_eval" that works as it did in AOLserver3 would probably both be useful. how about: ns_i

Re: [AOLSERVER] ns_eval is EVIL in AOLserver 4

On Friday 06 June 2003 08:03 am, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: > Nevertheles, to be really fair, there is some more work to be done > under the hood to get this working. The problem is in 1/. > Simple "interp create" won't work since script passed to ns_eval > might contain ns_* commands which are not p

Re: [AOLSERVER] ns_eval is EVIL in AOLserver 4

On Friday 06 June 2003 16:12, Don Baccus wrote: > On Friday 06 June 2003 02:53 am, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: > > On Friday 06 June 2003 11:48, you wrote: > > > Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: > > > > I would love to hear some other oppinions. But, I'm already thinking > > > > about what we'd need to do so th

Re: [AOLSERVER] ns_eval is EVIL in AOLserver 4

On Friday 06 June 2003 02:53 am, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: > On Friday 06 June 2003 11:48, you wrote: > > Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: > > > I would love to hear some other oppinions. But, I'm already thinking > > > about what we'd need to do so that both approaches are available. > > > > My simple guess

Re: [AOLSERVER] ns_eval is EVIL in AOLserver 4

On Thursday 05 June 2003 11:36 pm, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: > This effect is not exactly stated in the docs, right, but it is the way > the new mechanism (look at ns_ictl) is working, yes. > The purpose was to enable people to sync-up interps at runtime > allowing for dynamical load of packages and

Re: [AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Feature Requests-746579 ] Server instance

> -Original Message- > From: AOLserver Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Jim Wilcoxson > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 9:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Feature Requests-746579 ] Server > instance > > > We still have instances where AOLSer

Re: [AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Feature Requests-746579 ] Server instance

We still have instances where AOLServer (3.2) "goes deaf" for some reason. The nsd processes are there, but they aren't handling any requests. So while I think this suggestion is a good idea, it probably won't take the place of watchdog monitoring, at least not for real production sites. "Are yo

Re: [AOLSERVER] aolserver + php

- Original Message - From: "Michał Nasiadka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 6:16 AM Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] aolserver + php > On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 10:55:44AM -0600, Patrick Spence wrote: > > Micha?Nasiadka said: > > > Hi. > > > I've exp

Re: [AOLSERVER] ConnsPerThread, nsxml and 'memory leak'

On Thursday 05 June 2003 20:12, you wrote: > Although very well documented, it looks like the ConnsPerThread > configuration parameter is unimplemented. I've checked in 3.4, 3.5 and > 4.0beta8. Can anyone confirm this? Is there any special reason why it is > not implemented? > Good hint. Mind

Re: [AOLSERVER] ConnsPerThread, nsxml and 'memory leak'

Thanks for tracking this down. Would you mind filing a few bug reports on SF? Thanks again! Matthew Krenzer wrote: > Although very well documented, it looks like the ConnsPerThread > configuration parameter is unimplemented. I've checked in 3.4, 3.5 and > 4.0beta8. Can anyone confirm this?

Re: [AOLSERVER] Anyone had this error before?

Those errors occur when the connection is interrupted in mid-download, such as when a user hits the browser "stop" before an image is completely downloaded. Doug --- Doug Harris               (202) 473-3118              [EMAIL PROTECTED] XD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: AOLserver Discussion

Re: [AOLSERVER] aolserver + php

What version of PHP and AOLserver are you running? You might want to also contact the folks at php.org as they actually maintain the AOLserver/PHP module. Michał Nasiadka wrote: > Hi. > I've expierenced problems with running php on aolserver. > Aolserver is segfaulting, while trying to

Re: [AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Feature Requests-746579 ] Server instance controller process

My vote is to put it in too. It sounds particularly useful on Win32 where its harder to do the watchdog type stuff, and where quite honestly you need a second watchdog watching the first watchdog ;-) In older AOLservers there seemed to be a '-k' command line option to kill the running server. Co

Re: [AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Feature Requests-746579 ] Server instance controller process

Scott Goodwin wrote: My vote is to put it in. /s. I agree completely. Feature: it is backwards and forward compatible with existing scripts AND it will make AOLserver implementation easier for newcomers by eliminating one more piece of the puzzle. Jerry -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com

[AOLSERVER] ConnsPerThread, nsxml and 'memory leak'

Although very well documented, it looks like the ConnsPerThread configuration parameter is unimplemented. I've checked in 3.4, 3.5 and 4.0beta8. Can anyone confirm this? Is there any special reason why it is not implemented? Now on to the real questions . . . We have an aolserver here that is

Re: [AOLSERVER] aolserver + php

On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 10:55:44AM -0600, Patrick Spence wrote: > Micha?Nasiadka said: > > Hi. > > I've expierenced problems with running php on aolserver. Aolserver > > is segfaulting, while trying to use phpmyadmin, so I think it's > > something linked to mysql connectivity from php. Trie

Re: [AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Feature Requests-746579 ] Server instance controller process

This is a very useful feature that would be very helpful for new users especially. I think it's so good, I would prefer to see it integrated such that you trigger it with a command line flag to nsd at start time. Many of you use other tools to perform watchdog activities, which is great. But others

Re: [AOLSERVER] aolserver + php

Micha³Nasiadka said: > Hi. > I've expierenced problems with running php on aolserver. Aolserver > is segfaulting, while trying to use phpmyadmin, so I think it's > something linked to mysql connectivity from php. Tried changing > stacksize, tried even the devel versions of php, no luck. > C

[AOLSERVER] Anyone had this error before?

Anyone has any ideas what these errors are? [05/Jun/2003:13:23:20][16795.284][-conn196-] Error: ora8.c:4358:stream_write_lob error writing to connection. incomplete write of 0 out of 16384 [05/Jun/2003:13:23:20][16795.284][-conn196-] Error: can't write to connection for writing. received error R

Re: [AOLSERVER] ns_eval is EVIL in AOLserver 4

On Friday 06 June 2003 11:48, you wrote: > Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: > > I would love to hear some other oppinions. But, I'm already thinking > > about what we'd need to do so that both approaches are available. > > My simple guess would be that the easiest solution would be to > 1/ create a temporar

[AOLSERVER] aolserver + php

Hi. I've expierenced problems with running php on aolserver. Aolserver is segfaulting, while trying to use phpmyadmin, so I think it's something linked to mysql connectivity from php. Tried changing stacksize, tried even the devel versions of php, no luck. Can anybody help? -- Michal Na

Re: [AOLSERVER] ns_eval is EVIL in AOLserver 4

Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: I would love to hear some other oppinions. But, I'm already thinking about what we'd need to do so that both approaches are available. My simple guess would be that the easiest solution would be to 1/ create a temporary interpreter 2/ eval the initialization code in it 3/ ev

Re: [AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Feature Requests-746579 ] Server instance

On Friday 06 June 2003 10:55, you wrote: > time), I'd prefer to see a plug-in architecture similar to the db > and comm modules. Support http-get-monitoring with a plug in and > let others develop their own X-Y-monitoring with plug ins of > their own. >Leave Tcl out of the parent and we can be ass

Re: [AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Feature Requests-746579 ] Server instance

Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: On Friday 06 June 2003 10:29, you wrote: >But maybe it's simpler and more reliable just to put in a bare >bones http get implementation For people using aolserver as http-server, well, ok. But there are others, not necessarily employing it as http-server at all. I think in

Re: [AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Feature Requests-746579 ] Server instance

On Friday 06 June 2003 10:29, you wrote: > But maybe it's simpler and more reliable just to put in a bare > bones http get implementation For people using aolserver as http-server, well, ok. But there are others, not necessarily employing it as http-server at all. I think in order to have a gener

Re: [AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Feature Requests-746579 ] Server instance

Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: On Friday 06 June 2003 09:50, you wrote: >At the risk of adding complexity to the parent process, I >wouldn't mind seeing such a monitoring facility added to the >parent process. That implies, the parent (watchdog) should have at least one thread with the instantiated Tcl

Re: [AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Feature Requests-746579 ] Server instance

On Friday 06 June 2003 09:50, you wrote: > At the risk of adding complexity to the parent process, I > wouldn't mind seeing such a monitoring facility added to the > parent process. That implies, the parent (watchdog) should have at least one thread with the instantiated Tcl interp with ns_* comm

Re: [AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Feature Requests-746579 ] Server instance

Indeed they are not. I'd add some more confusion by extending the second to "Are you *correctly* answering requests?" So, the solution window may vary between a very simple dumb one "Are you still running?" to some AI-based custom behaviour, which is, by it's very nature, hard (if possible at all)

Re: [AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Feature Requests-746579 ] Server instance

On Thursday 05 June 2003 22:35, you wrote: > for real production sites. "Are you running?" and "Are you answering > requests?" are not the same question... Indeed they are not. I'd add some more confusion by extending the second to "Are you *correctly* answering requests?" So, the solution wind