On Friday, November 8, 2002, at 09:35 AM, Dossy wrote:
This is how I implement this:
<%
if {[check $something] == 1} {
ns_adp_puts {
break out of Tcl mode and process some HTML
conditionally
}
}
%>
The only reason I do the other thing
On Thursday, November 7, 2002, at 09:27 PM, Gabriel Ricard wrote:
- Note: my only gripe with ADP is that the following does not
appear
to work:
if { [check $something] == 1 } {
%>
break out of Tcl mode and process some HTML
conditionall
On Thursday, November 7, 2002, at 09:27 PM, Gabriel Ricard wrote:
I guess I'm just spoiled by the associative arrays in PHP.
Tcl arrays are associative. Tcl has pretty much 3 data structures:
- scalars
- lists
- arrays (which are associative)
The trick is that a list is
On Wednesday, November 6, 2002, at 11:03 PM, Nathan Folkman wrote:
What are the major differences that would need to be bridged between the
stock 3.5.1 code base and 3.3+ad13
The ACS version of AOLserver has i18n support and changes in the DB
interface to support bind variables for the Oracle d
On Thursday, November 7, 2002, at 06:55 AM, Dossy wrote:
What version of Solaris? 2.6? 2.8?
2.8
Ouch, that's a shame. How much traffic does the site get?
A fair amount.
Hmm. Any custom C modules involved?
Nope. The only non-standard modules where nsopenssl and the Oracle driver.
Or in an external database driver. You can set up a driver where the "SQL"
it accepts is whatever you need, and then it returns results in a single
column of a single row. This works especially well if you want to set up
a pool of them
On Thursday, November 7, 2002, at 04:49 AM, Zoran Vasiljevi
On Wednesday, November 6, 2002, at 10:56 PM, Janine Sisk wrote:
I haven't a clue what's going on in there, but it can't be good!
You could try to attach gdb to the running process, and then poke around
(start with a stack backtrace); many Unix variants allow this. You could
also just "kill -A
Yes, Purify definitely seems to be the way to go.
On Wednesday, November 6, 2002, at 06:12 PM, Andrew Piskorski wrote:
But then I got Purify, which AFAIK
covers everything that Electric Fence can do
On Wednesday, November 6, 2002, at 06:00 PM, Dossy wrote:
Sorry I can't be more constructive. I just had a problem like this, and
didn't solve it, so the system just crashes regularly.
Ouch. That's a real drag. Want to describe the problem in case there
might be some ideas from the community
I recently tried the Solaris malloc debugging facility, but the AOLserver
(running ACS) went from taking about 5 minutes to start up to taking over
72 hours to start up. AOLserver uses so much dynamic memory that any
malloc debugging solutions that work by adding virtual-memory hardware
guard buff
On Tuesday, November 5, 2002, at 03:21 PM, Scott S. Goodwin wrote:
Don't let this stop you from writing manual or automated tests -- it
should be fairly straightforward to migrate that code into the framework.
Or from using other quality management tools than testing -- those get
forgotten a lo
On Sunday, November 3, 2002, at 02:33 PM, Scott Goodwin wrote:
Documenting multiple commands on the same page ... will confuse the
readers
I disagree; I find, for example, that the traditional AOLserver
documentation including all variants of ns_return on a single page helps
me to better unders
On Sunday, November 3, 2002, at 02:09 PM, Scott Goodwin wrote:
It breaks the unix standard of one command per man page
I think Tcl commands are more akin to library calls than shell commands,
and there is no standard for a single library call per man page. For
examples, look at the documentat
But I'd avoid using ns_sendmail for a production system, unless you build
around it the mechanisms to handle retries on failures. If you're calling
ns_sendmail from a .adp, and the sendmail server, for some reason, isn't
up, you'll just get an error, and lose what would have been in the message.
On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 11:39 AM, Dossy wrote:
But, as it's been pointed out, Apache 2 is multithreaded,
You can run Apache 2 with a threaded multiprocessing module (MPM), but you
can also run one that uses a preforked process pool as well. There are at
least 3 MPMs as of now, as fa
The article mentions that they stayed away from Java because of the thread
implementation on FreeBSD (presumably 4.x). Given that AOLserver uses
threads heavily, does anyone have experience running it under FreeBSD? Is
it OK? OK under load?
Does anyone know if the bug Zoran fixed was patched in the ArsDigita
AOLserver (3.3+ad13)?
Zoran, can you post the changes to the list, please, if they're not too
large?
Thanks,
Pete.
On Monday, October 28, 2002, at 10:58 AM, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
I will send you the changes to the cl
At 11:55 AM 10/28/2002 +0100, you wrote:
b9ff9778b351918b01deebd508cae98a558bfe01
[snip]
B9FF9778B351918B01DEEBD508CAE98A558BFE01
These are both hexadecimal representations, and as such, both are "correct.
" What results you get depends on what accepts these strings. Many C
implementation
On Monday, October 28, 2002, at 01:46 AM, Andrew Piskorski wrote:
On shared libraries, I think that if I have two processes both loading
the same .so, then that .so is shared between them, and if the library
is not thread safe I'll be hosed, even if all access to the library
within each process i
On Friday, October 25, 2002, at 12:59 PM, Durga wrote:
Informix drive
Does Informix have a JDBC driver?
On Thursday, October 24, 2002, at 05:41 PM, Durga wrote:
At last, I am able bring up the Web Server!!...I replaced the "gmake",
"gcc"
with latest version, then I installed it.
I'm glad to hear you've got past this roadblock!
Pete.
AOLserver 2.3 includes a web interface to the permissions database,
available from http://yourservername/NS/Admin which you can use to add the
restriction to a part of your page tree by hostname. Make sure you add
permission records for both GET and POST methods.
I no longer have a 2.3 installati
On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 08:33 PM, Dossy wrote:
2) nc (netcat, useful in a pinch like this)
3) openssl (handy command-line)
4) a simple shell script
You're working too hard! Try using stunnel (http://www.stunnel.org/)
On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 01:17 PM, Andrew Piskorski wrote:
How do I properly fix this so it uses the compiler specified in CC in
Makefile.global?
Does "env CC=/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc gmake nativeme=1" work for you?
I'm leaning toward a broken version of libtool, but as others have written,
we'll need to see the entire build output.
On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 07:27 AM, Durga wrote:
Can you give the output of the command:
file /users/WWW/AOL/aolserver_3.5/bin/nssock.so
nssock.so: ELF 32-bi
On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 05:34 AM, Durga wrote:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 www www 1692 Oct 21 15:05 nssock.so*
On a Solaris 8 box, nssock.so is 74752 bytes. Something went very wrong
with your installation procedure.
?
/users/WWW/AOL/aolserver_3.5$ bin/nsd -ft nsd.tcl
Thanks,
-Durga
-Original Message-
From: AOLserver Discussion [mailto:AOLSERVER@;LISTSERV.AOL.COM]On Behalf
Of Peter M. Jansson
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 2:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] Failed to Load nssock.so
On Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 05:08 PM, David Walker wrote:
I liked everything the way it was.
While I didn't mind getting the SF tracker messages on the mailing list, I
winced when folks replied to the list, rather than to the tracker, only
because I knew that meant the person who initiated
On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 04:36 AM, Durga wrote:
Hello Dossy/Jansson,
I did re-install the AOL server. However, I still see same error message.
Here it is:
[22/Oct/2002:14:24:34][1222.1][-main-] Notice: modload: loading
'/users/WWW/AOL/aolserver_3.5/bin/nssock.so'
[22/Oct/2002:14:24:34
On Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 11:05 AM, Jim Wilcoxson wrote:
Has anyone ever though about using BBS software, like UBB or vBulletin?
It's more like a community. SF is a development environment.
SF has forums like those, and (once you've bookmarked them) they work just
about the same way. I
On Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 10:37 AM, Nathan Folkman wrote:
1. Continue to use existing AOL listserv
2. Start up SF listserv and shut down AOL listserv
3. Keep using the AOL listserv for most discussion, and use the SF
listserv for just tracker announcements.
On Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 07:52 AM, Dossy wrote:
I would, however, suggest that the group be set up as read-only
(announce-only) so that people don't try and reply to the email.
This is a really good idea.
I notice that the SF project for AOLserver has mailing lists turned off --
can we
On Friday, October 18, 2002, at 02:50 PM, Dossy wrote:
On 2002.10.18, Peter M. Jansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not saying you can't make your server fail hard, I'm saying that the
driver author should be the one to make the call.
I see what you're literally
On Friday, October 18, 2002, at 02:37 PM, Jim Wilcoxson wrote:
What is the point of having the DB module load, if it can't connect to
the DB server?
I use the external database driver interface to wire up AOLservers to
things that aren't really databases, so I can take advantage of pooling.
Som
One of the reasons I raised this point is that, today, modules are wildly
inconsistent about fataling. If the nssock module fails to load or to
listen, the server continues, ever hopeful; if the nscp module fails, on
the other hand, it's going down and it's not going alone! Between the two,
I ca
I agree with Jim's position in a different way...he wants to allow
configuration of when to emit a fatal. I think it's silly to depend on
polling to determine when a failure has occurred -- when the failure
occurs, log something, drop a file in a known place, or something. Just
because a module f
I think that modules should not issue fatal errors and terminate the
server unless the module determines that the error it has encountered will
absolutely prevent correct operation of any part of the server. For
example, the current nscp module will terminate the server with a fatal
error if it ca
On Friday, October 18, 2002, at 11:39 AM, Psycho Tux wrote:
[18/Oct/2002:17:27:51][1480.1024][-main-] Error: nscp:
could not listen on 127.0.0.1:
[18/Oct/2002:17:27:51][1480.1024][-main-] Error:
modload: failed to load '/usr/local/aolserver/bin/n
scp.so': 'Ns_ModuleInit' returned -1
[18/Oct/2
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 03:15 PM, Durga wrote:
% ./configure
% make install
--with-tcl=/pub/lib/
--prefix=/pub/msp/
Since you didn't give a --prefix arg to ./configure, it should have
installed in /usr/local/aolserver, and not /pub/AOLserver. Also, y
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 12:32 PM, Durga wrote:
[16/Oct/2002:16:54:12][21439.1][-main-] Warning: modload: no such
symbol'Ns_ModuleInit' in module '/pub/AOLserver/bin/nssock.so'
[16/Oct/2002:16:54:12][21439.1][-main-] Fatal: modload: failed to load
module '/pub/AOLserver/bin/nssock.so'
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, jerome wrote:
> i tried downloading postgres
> driver in openacs and [bad French omitted]
Before you grabbed the OpenACS pg driver, were you running the latest from
the AOLserver SourceForge repository? Wasn't someone working on getting
the AOLserver SF version of the PG dr
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Patrick Spence wrote:
> Just to be sure its clear, since you seem to be implying that the stack size
> thing is in 3.5.0 here.. I am running 3.4.2 not 3.5 and I had to increase
> the stack space.
The stack space thing appears to be related to updates to RedHat Linux
beyond 7
Try doubling your stack...that seems to help folks running newer RedHat
versions.
Also, see if you can get a core dump or run the AOLserver under gdb and
get a stack backtrace -- we'll be able to tell what kind of a segfault you'
re having.
Pete.
On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 11:51 AM, Kev
What happens if you don't load php? I understand it may be required for
your application; I'm just looking for effects.
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Patrick Spence wrote:
> ns_paramphp ${bindir}/libphp4.so
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Patrick Spence wrote:
> I am using the same binary file on disk to launch all three instances of
> aolserver on that machine.
Does this mean that you launch three instances from the same binary, but
only one exhibits the gethostbyaddr problem? Are there differences in
either
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Patrick Spence wrote:
> Yes, I have a restriction based on IP, and taking it out removes the
> problem. I am starting to think that maybe something that got updated with
> up2date hosed something here...
The only thing up2date would have done is to replace the resolver
libr
Usually, POST content contains query parameters, which can be accessed as
members of the ns_set returned from ns_getform. Are you POSTing something
that isn't a query parameter? If so, can you redo things so that you post
it as a query parameter? (That's the easiest thing, then you can just do
n
OK, it's dying inside the name resolution routines, trying to obtain the
contents of a class IN record of type IN for "42.192.99.68.in-addr.arpa".
You can do this yourself by doing "nslookup -q=ptr
42.192.88.68.in-addr.arpa", but I don't think you're going to get a
problem, because this is using th
If the process segfaults, it should leave a file named "core" in the
directory from which the process was started. There are, however, a
number of reasons why a core file may have been suppressed; to figure this
out, if you don't have a core file, you'd need to say which OS you're
using.
If you h
Can you get a core dump and do a stack trace on it? Failing that, can you
run the server under a debugger with -i or -f, and then do a stack trace
when the segfault occurs?
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Patrick Spence wrote:
> I am getting a really wierd segfault on my servers.. if I try and enter an
>
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Dossy wrote:
> During times of heavy traffic, you might lose some packets. But,
> is that critical? From the sounds of it, probably not.
Good point. If it is critical that every, then the Swiss Army Knife might
not be right choice. You would probably be better served by h
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Jerry Asher wrote:
> Now there are various ways we might make this more efficient, but one
> way that seems to stick out is if we can use some form of broadcast or
> multicast so that one system can speak to everyone at a time. This would
> be very nice for heartbeats (as spec
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Jerry Asher wrote:
> First of all, I know nothing about IP Multicast.
Me, too. Sorry. But that won't prevent me from asking a couple of
questions anyway...
> I believe there are too many systems to use typical tcp/ip unicast
> connections, and it strikes me that this may b
compiled from scratched into a specific area so
> we know exactly what's being used, and so an OS upgrade from, say, RH
> 7.2 to 7.3 doesn't break something for us.
>
> /s.
>
>
> On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 08:39:57 -0400, "Peter M. Jansson"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Scott Goodwin wrote:
> it's time to break OpenSSL into its own openssl.so module, and have it
If you build OpenSSL as a shared lib, and the build procedures for
the AOLserver modules are friendly to that practice, do we really need an
OpenSSL module? What would it do?
Last
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Daniël Mantione wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Peter M. Jansson wrote:
>
> > if we figured out a way to present that information using the sourceforge
> > project page
>
> You don't, just like you don't put a list of refere
The old site is in cvs. Just checkout the aolserver.com module and you
can get the pages to see what links there were. I think it would be good
if we figured out a way to present that information using the sourceforge
project page, so we can start moving forward. Do other sf projects have
page
SSL requires a 7-step handshake between the two systems in order to
establish an SSL connection before any data can be passed. This handshake
also requires multiple cryptographic operations including generation of a
fairly small random number, as well as disk accesses of the digital
certificate f
On Thursday, August 29, 2002, at 11:42 AM, Janine Sisk wrote:
> We have an installation of nsd 3.2+ad12, which I would like to configure
> to
> use an alternate location for it's temp files. /tmp on this system isn't
> large enough for the files that need to be uploaded, and an attempt to
> repl
There's not a module for it, but check out RRDTool, written by the same
author. Even if you just spin off new processes to work with it, it's
capable of accepting samples and emitting a graph, without your having to
do anything else. You can use it with MRTG, too (and one of these
versions, you'
I don't know how much this will help...
It's a fairly common feature of socket implementations that send() over a
tcp connection may not write all of the data, which is why it returns the
amount of data written. The amount written in one call depends on various
network conditions -- if you write
On Friday, August 9, 2002, at 04:29 PM, C. R. Oldham wrote:
> Does anyone have any other clues for tuning? The tuning documentation
> for AOLserver (at aolserver.com) isn't very helpful.
The big secret to tuning AOLserver is that there isn't much to tune.
There's minimal gain to be made by incr
On Friday, August 9, 2002, at 05:22 AM, Jerry Asher wrote:
> Back in '99, Philip Greenspun wrote:
>
>> America Online is fielding 28,000 hits per second across all of its
>> various Web services and servers
>
> I am curious if anyone knows what the configuration looked like at that
> time. How m
That's the right way to stop it. If you want to make sure it stopped,
check the server log, which is usually log/server.log under the AOLserver
install directory. AOLserver will wait for activity to subside, including
background threads, so it can take a little while for AOLserver to
actually te
we're not
really getting a picture of any performance difference between Tcl 8.3 and
Tcl 8.4.
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Roberto Mello wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 08:37:12AM -0400, Peter M. Jansson wrote:
> > How many database connections are configured in the database pools? The
&g
How many database connections are configured in the database pools? The
closeness of the times suggests a bottleneck somewhere.
The time per request suggests that the mean request takes about 2.5
seconds. Does that match your experience? Does it take 2.5 seconds to
get the page displayed?
On
If you're running Solaris 7 or later, and you need to increase the number
of file descriptors beyond 1024, you can follow the instructions here:
http://www.science.uva.nl/pub/solaris/solaris2/Q3.45.html
You'll also need to recompile with FD_SETSIZE set to the new value (which
must not exceed 65
Could this be done with the Tcl encoding commands?
On Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 11:27 AM, Matthew Krenzer wrote:
> does anyone have another suggestion?
While it might be possible to get the oratcl extension to work, it
probably wouldn't take advantage of AOLserver's DB handle pools, which are
one of the major benefits of AOLserver. Still, for folks coming in with
oratcl experience, it might help get them up-to-speed more quickly. But I
think an
ns_db verbose usually works for me, on a per-pool basis.
Also, keep in mind that the LogSQLErrors parameter tells the database pool
manager to log an SQL statement that generates an error return, even of
verbose is off. In production, I'd usually recommend that you run with
verbose off and LogSQ
Kriston has mentioned that there are problems with exec in a multithreaded
environment, mostly in reference to using CGI; still if they're present at
that level, I'd expect they're also present for Tcl's exec command. I'm
not sure what the problems are, but I can imagine some issues (signal
handl
To make Mac IE (and some older Windows IEs) work, you need to turn on
session caching and turn off some ciphers. Here's an example config:
ns_section "ns/server/${servername}/module/nsopenssl"
ns_param ServerPort $httpsport
ns_param ServerHostname $hostname
On 4/18/02 10:49 AM, "Jim Wilcoxson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This test is a
> 10-15 line TCL loop to read through a file containing around 500K lines,
> do 3-4 string operations, set an ns_share array entry
Can you try the same test with an nsv instead of an ns_share?
> I'd gladly move if
I'll second Rob's note, and I'll add that you'd be well-served to abstract
your storage methods so that you can switch out how you manage the storage
of your data without affecting how the application runs. Then you can build
a quick version that grabs stuff directly from the database, do some
pe
To answer your question, there's no way to avoid the "Tcl tax" in
AOLserver. But maybe that's not a bad thing.
The linked lists are setting off warning alarms in my head. Linked lists
are terrific if most of what you do is accessing your data items in a
serialized stream, but if you are going t
Create an ns_event, then spin the query off into one thread which will
signal the event when it's done, and spin off a second thread that does a
sleep and then signals the event. In your main request thread, you wait for
the event and see which thread signaled it (an nsv, I guess), and then you
c
I think the previous thread dealt with detecting client shutdown, so that
long-running queries could be stopped in the hope of reclaiming resources,
and the conclusion was that the way AOLserver had implemented reads from the
client, that it was impossible to determine whether the client bailed.
I'm not sure if this is related or not, but you are using the same variable
name at different scopes, so things might get strange. I'd suggest while
you work this out, you use different variable names all around.
There was a problem with the fancy parser that it would not parse attributes
inside
On 3/5/02 1:26 PM, "Jerry Asher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think is is true with the additional prologue:
>
> "If you are distributing your derived work, THEN, "
Jerry is spot-on here, at least for the GPL.
On 3/5/02 12:36 PM, "Zoran Vasiljevic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The point is, I did some changes to the core server
Again, I'm not a lawyer, but this looks troublesome. My reading of the
licenses is that a product of yours which includes changes to the core
server would constitute a derived
The short version is that if you create a derived work, you must allow
access to the source of your derived work. If used AOLserver code and
hacked it to specialize it somehow, then your hacks must be available. If
your product only uses AOLserver as a program, and only interfaces with it
throug
On 3/3/02 6:56 PM, "Jason Tauber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do you specify port 25, I thought it was 'telnet localhost:25'?
You're really close. Try "telnet localhost 25". Removing the telnet daemon
has no effect here, so don't worry about it -- it's not involved in this
problem.
Do you have an SMTP server running on localhost, or did you specify a mail
server with the MailHost parameter to your nsd.tcl configuration file?
On 3/2/02 8:02 PM, "Jason Tauber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Error: Expected a 220 status line; got:
>
> Expected a 220 status line; got:
>
This piece indicates that the mail server to which you are connecting did
not return a greeting, or possibly did not return a greeting in time, so
ns_se
On 2/28/02 11:55 AM, "Sean Redmond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a module to do SHA1 encryption (nssha1) from Ars Digita, but I
> need a way to do SSHA encryption. Any implementations/ideas?
>From the description on this page:
http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/347.html
It looks
OK, that makes some sense. Can you run the SQL statement in isql without
problems? Do any errors show up in your syslog?
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, oetjoen wrote:
> I'am using a stray dollar sign on "id" because that is a variable which
> referring to variable procedure get_payment_method,
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 08:14 AM, Dossy wrote:
> I'd be curious to know if the database name really IS required by ns_pd.
I'm sure that the database is not required by ns_pd (meaning the protocol)
since the protocol is meant to support a number of datasource formats.
As for the Sybase
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 05:25 AM, oetjoen wrote:
> set sql "select distinct $id from paymentmethodsdescr where
> keynr=$keynr"
You have a stray dollar sign there -- it should be "distinct id", not
"disting $id".
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Scott S. Goodwin wrote:
> You have logsqlerrors set to true; I guess that's why you're seeing the
> NSINT in the log file. You'll want to figure out how to identify which SQL
> statement causes this error.
The logsqlerrors param is intended to help identify the SQL statement
AOL has used AOLserver on HP-UX for a number of production systems both
internally and customer-visible. www.aol.com used to have HP-UX boxes in
the rotation, but I believe they were eventually phased out (for a number
of reasons, but not for lack of compabitility with AOLserver). Of course,
A
On Wednesday, February 6, 2002, at 10:53 AM, Scott Goodwin wrote:
> Not true, Pete. Go look at Dell.
I had not looked at Dell before. You're right, they offer two annual
support options for RH Linux, although I can't find details of these
offerings on their website. The only thing I can find on
On Wednesday, February 6, 2002, at 10:11 AM, Roberto Mello wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 04:22:23PM -0500, Peter M. Jansson wrote:
>> One of the biggest issues in a "serious" production environment is that
>> Sun will sell you a reasonably-priced service contract wher
In most modern OS's, the vm implementation will use copy-on-write so that
only modified pages are copied. Also there are optimizations so that if
you exec in a child process shortly after forking, the process will use
minimal memory. If you stress the facility, you may encounter problems,
but it
Nothing formal here, but while debugging a performance issue with the
Sybase driver, I had a Sun E250 with 2 400MHz CPUs and 1GB RAM, and one
generic Linux box with a 700MHz PIII and 512MB RAM. Both systems ran
AOLserver 3.x; the Linux box ran a Sybase server using the Sybase 11.x
server availabl
Before you call ns_returnfile, add a content-disposition header to your
output headers like this:
ns_set update [ns_conn headers] content-disposition \
"attachment; filename=1.abc"
Be aware that not all browsers honor the content-disposition header, or
interpret it correctly, so make
On Tuesday, January 22, 2002, at 11:22 AM, Dossy wrote:
> Anyone here running AOLserver (or developing other threaded
> apps.) under Linux 2.4? Specifically, I'm using 2.4.17.
I've got a box with a 2.4.1 kernel running a lightly-used AOLserver; it's
been up for about 60 days with no kernel panic
I bet this wouldn't catch anything. It looks to me like the segfault
happens as a result of blowing the stack, and since the function doesn't do
anything that would cause an error, it won't pop the catch.
On 1/16/02 12:07 PM, "Daniel P. Stasinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if { [catch
Do you think the proc you previously sent is an example of the problem, or
is it just something else that generates a segmentation fault? The code you
previously sent has the error I've mentioned, which will cause a
segmentation fault. If you have a similar piece of code, you need to fix it
in a
Infinite loops are platform independent. Your code has an infinite loop.
What are you trying to do?
On 1/16/02 12:38 PM, "Chiriac Petrica Clement" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My OS is RedHat 7.2.
>
> Under RedHat 6.2 work best !
e this value "50" ?
> Why produce Segmentation fault ?
>
> "Peter M. Jansson" wrote:
>>
>> Don't do that! You have an infinite recursion here. You need to include
>> some condition in the code which will stop the recursive calls to "x&
101 - 200 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
