Tom Jackson wrote:
Actually you can't do this, because a url can contain chars that are
legal for
a url, but dangerous to run 'subst' on.
All you need to do is to 'not run subst', it is only used to avoid the need to
quote in this particular case.
For example:
ns_return 301
ACS (Open, etc.) has a version of httpget called util_httpget, which
allows a little more customization, i.e. allowing you to set headers.
So the equivalent to putting the username and password into the URL is
adding an Authorization header of the form Basic $token where token
is
We just decided to move everything left on 3.3ad13 to 4.0, but to help
those who need it:
Can we get everyone who's experiencing this problem to provide a few
things:
1) ns_info patchlevel
I think you mean info patchlevel
I've got 8.3.2
2) uname -a
Linux servername 2.4.21-4.EL #1 Fri
] Something wrong after 2006-05-12 21:25 (was Re: Weird
memory leak problem in AOLserver 3.4.2/3.x)
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:35:07 -0400
On 2006.05.17, Titi Ala'ilima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just decided to move everything left on 3.3ad13 to 4.0, but to help
those who need it:
So, you're
Since we don't use putty, I don't think that has anything to do with the
scheduled procs problem, but you seem to having different issues. Might
you have some environment differences between the two different means of
logging in?
-Titi
CArole Lahaye wrote:
Hi All,
Funny stuff. Never seen
Bas Scheffers wrote:
On 3 Jun 2006, at 00:56, William Scott Jordan wrote:
And then the bigger question is, is there any way to tell AOLserver
which SSL cert to use, based on the host information?
If you are indeed talking about 1000s of sites, it may be worth it to
look into some hardware
We have a problem with AOLserver 4.0.10 where within the span of 15
minutes or so, the number of idle threads drops off to zero, so the nsd
stops responding, but scheduled procs work fine. No clear pattern has
emerged regarding what triggers it. The system could be running fine
for days or
On AOLserver 4.0.10, ns_server active tells me that there are a couple
of bad connections, file uploads that are eating up processor (the
system load is consistently at or above 2.00) but not getting anywhere
(stuck for nearly a day at this point). Is there any way to terminate
those
Gleaning from this conversation a few main points/questions, with a couple
cents of my own thrown in:
1) AOLserver probably needs a new name. Something that uses the NS initials
would be ideal so that all those ns_* commands actually make sense again.
Could we resurrect the NaviServer name?
Rick Gutleber wrote:
2) The biggest bang for our buck would be improving the Tcl language
and the codebase available for it rather than bringing in another popular
language. It took Rails to put Ruby on the map. What would our Rails be?
I would be careful to say improve upon, or
1:45 PM
To: AOLSERVER@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver's documentation woes and its future
On 5 Sep 2006, at 17:57, Titi Ala'ilima wrote:
1) AOLserver probably needs a new name. Something that uses the NS
initials would be ideal so that all those ns_* commands actually
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver's documentation woes and its future
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 11:06, Titi Ala'ilima wrote:
How long ago did this fork take place? If AOL does indeed drop
AOLserver and we rebrand it, are there any reasons other than the work
involved to maintain a forked
It's not a bug, it's a feature. Seriously. Sometimes you want to return a
response to the connection and then continue processing afterwards. Or at
least, sometimes _I_ want to do that. :-)
-Titi
-Original Message-
From: Daniel P. Stasinski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
of protocol.
-Titi
-Original Message-
From: Daniel P. Stasinski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 2:50 PM
To: AOLSERVER@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] internal server redirects
On 9/6/06, Titi Ala'ilima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not a bug, it's
Another thing to remember is that different people have different ways of
thinking about things. I work with another programmer who approaches things
very practically and incrementally, whereas I think about problems from the big
picture down. The methods we use to understand what the code is
Title: Message
Hi
all,
What I'd love would
be a way to have an nsdthread listen for a certain db event and fire Tcl
as a result. Anyone knowhow to accomplish this other than
polling? I'd hate to have to grab a handle, query, and then release a
handle. In a pinch I know I could have the db
I'm hoping for faster response than once a minute, but I don't want to have a
thread wasting a lot of resources polling too frequently. Which is why Id
like it to be asynchronous/event-based. The AOLserver side wouldn't use any
resources until explicitly called upon to do so. I'd settle for
This would best be asked in a postgres forum, but does anyone happen to know if
you can use the socket command in PL/Tcl? I know I can use UTL_TCP in Oracle,
and ns_sock* in AOLserver.
-T.
-Original Message-
From: Titi Ala'ilima
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 12:41 PM
I have some data urlencoded by JavaScript's escape function which is
turning a Unicode apostrophe into %u2019. AOLserver doesn't recognize
this. I can certainly fix this in specific locations, but to handle
this universally it seems it this would need to be be fixed in
ns_urldecode and/or
What I meant was I can fix it on the Tcl side where I'm getting the data, but
to make it universal and transparent to Tcl coders such as myself it would have
to fixed in the C code of things like ns_urldecode and ns_getform. And I have
neither the time nor the chops to take that on right now.
After further research, I found I can use encodeURI() instead of escape() in
JavaScript and I don't have this problem. Apparently escape() has a reputation
for not being Unicode-friendly. So this fix probably doesn't need to be
made. It doesn't quite merit mention in the AOLserver Wiki I
: [AOLSERVER] urldecoding unicode?
Is is possible to describe what you were sending to AOLserver so that we know
what the problem was? Was it just javascript encoding a form value?
thanks,
tom jackson
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 08:38, Titi Ala'ilima wrote:
After further research, I found I
22 matches
Mail list logo
