On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > From: "Rich Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:05 AM
> >
> >
> > > On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > >
> > > > - XHTML conversion
> > > > Stat
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Apache HTTP Server 2.0 Documentation Status File.
> Last modified: $Date: 2001/09/17 18:32:45 $
>
> - XHTML conversion
> Status: unknown
All the 2.0 documentation has been converted to XHTML. It is now ...
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/D
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: "Rich Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:05 AM
>
>
> > On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> >
> > > - XHTML conversion
> > > Status: unknown
> >
> > I was wondering about this. A few weeks
From: "Rich Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:05 AM
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>
> > - XHTML conversion
> > Status: unknown
>
> I was wondering about this. A few weeks ago I submitted some mod docs
> that had been xhtml-ized via w3c
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> - XHTML conversion
> Status: unknown
I was wondering about this. A few weeks ago I submitted some mod docs
that had been xhtml-ized via w3c tidy. Did anyone have any complaints
with those? If not, I can xhtml-ize the entire documentatio
Hello,
I'm still finding my way around the documentation, so I'm unsure where best
to help. However, I am fluent in reading/writing French, so if there is
any reviewing required for French doco, I'd be happy to do so.
Regards,
Andrew Willshire
Bank Of Ireland, C3 HO, Baggott St
604 4519
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 11:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: STATUS
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Albert J.Papadosifakis wrote:
> Hell all, i noticed that the apache documentation comes in several
language
> fl
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Albert J.Papadosifakis wrote:
> Hell all, i noticed that the apache documentation comes in several language
> flavours, including Hellenic(Greek)
> I always felt the need of offering something to the Apache Community , and
> therefore , i figured out that i can translate
> seve
Hell all, i noticed that the apache documentation comes in several language
flavours, including Hellenic(Greek)
I always felt the need of offering something to the Apache Community , and
therefore , i figured out that i can translate
several parts from the Apache documentation.
In an attempt to a
"Note: I am currently travelling; at the moment I am in Brasil.
As a result, my mail is piling up and I may not be
very responsive.. :-/"
The keyboard of Joshua Slive chattered:
>
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>
> > Joshua Slive wrote:
> > >
> > > - The STATUS Document.
>
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Ricardo Oliva wrote:
> I have been wanting to do some more tranlation work on the actual docs. But I
> haven't found any second "pair of eyes" to help me out! I wonder if I could
> start translating anyways?
This is just my opinion (as always) ...
Why don't you go ahead and s
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, you wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > - Translations
> > We appear to have people working on translation into the
> > following languages. These may just be the 'it worked' page, but if
> > so the authors of those should perhaps be contacted to help do the
> > rest.. :-) Note that t
Yoshiki Hayashi wrote:
>
> Yes, its Chinese/Taiwanese. Big5 is a MIME charset for
> traditional chinese and I can confirm its content is Chinese
> (I'm not very good at Chinese but I can guess meaning of
> most words by reading Chinese characters). It should be
> renamed to zh.big5... (if no on
Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - Twi (.tw.big5)
> (is that supposed to be Chinese/Taiwanese? Because if so, it is using
> the code reserved for Twi..)
Yes, its Chinese/Taiwanese. Big5 is a MIME charset for
traditional chinese and I can confirm its content i
[snip]
> - Translations
> We appear to have people working on translation into the
> following languages. These may just be the 'it worked' page, but if
> so the authors of those should perhaps be contacted to help do the
> rest.. :-) Note that this list is NOT identical to that for the 2.0
As you can see, I have *finally* followed through on
getting the docco project STATUS files into my weekly
report (corresponding to what I do for the httpd and
APR projects). I moved the STATUS file from /manual/
to the top level for the 2.0 docs tree, and added one
to the 1.3 docs tree.
--
#ken
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Patrik Grip-Jansson wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> > I don't know of anyone doing a Swedish translation, so you should feel
> > free to start one up. You might want to do a little web search to see if
> > anyone else is working on this. I got a few hi
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Joshua Slive wrote:
> I don't know of anyone doing a Swedish translation, so you should feel
> free to start one up. You might want to do a little web search to see if
> anyone else is working on this. I got a few hits with a search for
> "swedish apache" on google.
I did a
Hi Patrik,
Your contributions would be very appreciated.
If you haven't read:
http://apache-server.com/tutorials/ATdocs-project.html
then you should do so.
As far as the XHTML, we are just waiting for a concensus as to how we
should be constructing the files. I posted a proposal on a new header
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Joshua Slive wrote:
I'd really would like to get into the doc-project and help out. I looked
through the status document and think that the following areas might be
good places to start:
> There is also the XHTML issue. If anyone wants to go ahead with
> that, I would say you
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Joshua Slive wrote:
> >
> > - The STATUS Document.
> >- Is this the best organization/format? What else needs to be
> > added? Should this be auto-posted to apache-docs?
>
> Works for me. Shall I add it to my autopost list, as with
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> - The STATUS Document.
>- Is this the best organization/format? What else needs to be
> added? Should this be auto-posted to apache-docs?
Works for me. Shall I add it to my autopost list, as with the
httpd STATUS file?
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
...
> - Merging of changes in 1.3.
>- There have been many changes in the 1.3 docs which haven't
> been propagated into 2.0.
> Things which need to be merged:
> manual/howto/*
...
I added the howtos to the 2.0 tree, but don't (at the moment) have
suff
On Wed, 13 Aug 1997, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> STATUS of the Apache Documentation Project (ADP)
>
[snip]
> o Decision on the used markup tool:
[snip]
> - Simple Document Format (SDF)
> http://www.mincom.com/mtr/sdf/
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> So, have any decision has been reached about SGML vs. SDF ?
> I looked at the webpage written with SGML, then I looked at one written
> with SDF and personally, I like how SGML one looks. So, lets talk avout
> other stuff, otherwise we are gonna be s
So, have any decision has been reached about SGML vs. SDF ?
I looked at the webpage written with SGML, then I looked at one written
with SDF and personally, I like how SGML one looks. So, lets talk avout
other stuff, otherwise we are gonna be stuck here forever.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 1997, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> >
> > STATUS of the Apache Documentation Project (ADP)
> >
> >
> > Goal of the project:
> >
> > (Feel free to fix me)
> >
> > Init
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I suspect that a lot of the people on this list aren't familiar with
> the way we run the developer list, and that the whole business of
> subject lines and voting is rather mystical. I'm not at all sure
> that the same conventions - vo
On Thu, 7 Aug 1997, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> STATUS of the Apache Documentation Project (ADP)
>
>
> Goal of the project:
>
> (Feel free to fix me)
>
> Initial goals:
> 1. Create an Apache Handbook and an Apache FAQ.
On Thu, 7 Aug 1997, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> I suspect that a lot of the people on this list aren't familiar with
> the way we run the developer list, and that the whole business of
> subject lines and voting is rather mystical. I'm not at all sure
> that the same convent
Ralf,
I suspect that a lot of the people on this list aren't familiar with
the way we run the developer list, and that the whole business of
subject lines and voting is rather mystical. I'm not at all sure
that the same conventions - voting, at least - are really
appropria
31 matches
Mail list logo
