I have a USRobotics internal PCI hardware modem that works with DOS but not
with EPPPD, only with LSPPP. IRQ is 11, base address is 0xd400, which I
determined by running a PCI program by Ralf Brown. This same information also
shows in Linux in /proc/pci . Sometimes an ISP or more distant server
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:55:47 -0800, Ray Andrews wrote:
Hi All,
I've got to disagree with Sam:
This is because the North Korean leaders are not thought of as
being as psychopathic as Sadam Hussein.
Really? Sadam, until not to long ago, was one of the best good-old-boys in
the entire
Hi All!
I don't understand what suicide attacks have to do with guns or the lack
thereof.
Anyways ... I see that there is a HUGE cultural difference on how guns are
viewed.
But it is clear that owning guns is no deterrent to crime, as well as the
capital punishment is (provenly) also no
Hi All!
Very amazing results on european edition of american time magazine ...
--
http://www.time.com/time/europe/gdml/peace2003.html
Which country poses the greatest danger to world peace in 2003?
North Korea 10.4 %
Iraq 16.0 %
The United States 73.6 %
Total Votes Cast: 76862
Hi Roger!
12 Jan 2003, Roger Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RT Has anyone else noticed that virtually all of the headers indicate
RT that they are from Ronald Bleckendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This individual sent all letters he got back to the list, instead of sending it
to arachne-owner or
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:42:30 +0100, Bart Buitinga wrote:
How much difference one man can make in American politics has been
wonderfully demonstrated by gov Ryan, who is first to break the myth that
the American justice system would be infallible. I sure hope this will
reach Tx, too. And
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:39:25 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter) wrote:
Eg. america wants war, but doesn't share information about the iraqi nuclear
program.
W often said that he has important information about it, but the UN nuclear
organization (here in vienna :) has still
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:06:28 -0400, L.D. Best wrote:
Bart,
Before you accuse others of applying labels to you, and particularly
before you apply your own labels, it would help if you knew what they
meant.
The only purely communist society to have survived was started here in
the USA.
Hi all ,
This list is in my USEX life (user experience field) firt time I am against
my will !
I have blocked some senders :) but not all.as Bob tells below
resembling secession history otherwise I will lack some interesting
information not seriously available at other forums.
Hi Samuel!
sorry ... very long ... and very OT
But it contains very important views at the end.
About how America wants american law everywhere, and about the RIGHT OF AMERICA
TO DO WHAT IT WANTS, to kill people etc.
13 Jan 2003, Samuel W. Heywood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SH Also it is
Hi Sam!
13 Jan 2003, Sam Ewalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SE We ought to be able to tolerate Hussein for awhile longer.
See the very long letter to Sam (the other one)
It is no matter of tolerate.
As long as he doesn't commit crimes, you can't do anything.
You can't punish somebody for nothing.
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Sam Ewalt wrote:
More guns will equal more shootings. Maybe they can handle their weapons
safely in Switzerland but here in the USA we're not doing so hot.
Anybody want to deny that obvious fact?
GUN OWNERSHIP MANDATORY IN KENNESAW, GEORGIA
Crime Rate Plummets - Why
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Richard Menedetter wrote:
Anyways ... it is very important to me how american's think about international
law.
If the majority thinks that america should do its thing, while killing and
breaking law, I will try to unsubscribe ...
The US Constitution allows the US to
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:36:14 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter)
wrote:
Hi All!
I don't understand what suicide attacks have to do with guns or the lack
thereof.
Anyways ... I see that there is a HUGE cultural difference on how guns are
viewed.
But it is clear that owning
Sorry Sam,
The lay orders, convents, and the priesthood -- none of then are
communistic in concept or day-to-day operation. The control is
strict, from the top down, and it is dead wrong to equate poverty, or
self-deprivation with communism.
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:52:33 -0500, Sam Ewalt
If the unsubscribe function cannot be fixed in a reasonable amount of time,
which is something that has now long past then it should be completely
scrapped as a list, if it cannot be run in a reasonable manner it should not
be run at all.
- Original Message -
From: Sam Ewalt [EMAIL
Hi Folks,
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:26:07 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:00:26 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter)
wrote:
Anyways ... another big surprise for me:
Bush administration handles Korea conflict 100 times better than I would have
thought
Hi Folks, Sam,
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:00:32 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
In the US and Switzerland there is a very high positive correlation
between low violent crime rates and high gun ownership rates. Recently
in Australia the firearms-related crime rate soared immediately after
Hi Steve!
13 Jan 2003, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyways ... it is very important to me how american's think about
international law.
If the majority thinks that america should do its thing, while
killing and breaking law, I will try to unsubscribe ...
S The US Constitution
I'm sorry, my mistake. I thought I had set it so the messages are all
sent to Michael. I'm just desperate to get off the list. I believe it is
working now the way I intended it to, and all messages will be sent to
Michael. Hopefully this will get some results.
The death penalty doesn't act as a deterent to killing, except that the
murderer will never murder again.
If everyone were armed there MIGHT be a lot more shootings, but it is
likely that the people with enough brains to deserve to remain in the
gene pool will learn how to use and care for those
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Richard Menedetter wrote:
13 Jan 2003, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
S The US Constitution allows the US to go to war under 3
S conditions only:
You don't get my point.
I *don't* care about american constitution.
American constitution is irrelevant for non
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:41:47 +1300, skywalker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the unsubscribe function cannot be fixed in a reasonable amount of time,
which is something that has now long past then it should be completely
scrapped as a list, if it cannot be run in a reasonable manner it should not
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:55:16 -0500 (EST), Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Richard Menedetter wrote:
Anyways ... it is very important to me how american's think about international
law.
If the majority thinks that america should do its thing, while killing and
breaking
Very interesting!
Maybe the villans moved out off Kennesaw and do their things elsewere?
Bastiaan
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:21:19 -0500 (EST), Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Sam Ewalt wrote:
More guns will equal more shootings. Maybe they can handle their weapons
safely
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:36:14 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter) wrote:
Hi All!
I don't understand what suicide attacks have to do with guns or the lack
thereof.
Neither do I.
Anyways ... I see that there is a HUGE cultural difference on how guns are
viewed.
There is...
No guns would probably not reduce crime... but will sure reduce the
number of casualties dramaticaly!
Bastiaan
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:30:10 -, John Sparks wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Glenn McCorkle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003
snip
It's a pretty well documented fact that criminals are
deterred by the knowledge that potential victims might be
armed.
That's kinda what I meant by the citizens acting as an armed police force.
One of the roles of the police is to deter crime.
What I was implying is that the cure
Yes, it took a while... but the delete key was at hand.
Bastiaan
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:59:54 -0500, Roger Turk wrote:
Has anyone else noticed that virtually all of the headers indicate that they
are from Ronald Bleckendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED], even when the message
is signed by Glenn,
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:21:56 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter) wrote:
Hi Samuel!
sorry ... very long ... and very OT
Very long, but very to the point (from a European point of view) so I
snipped most and make just some remarks.
But it contains very important views at the
Hi John,
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:18:53 -0800 (PST), John Vertegaal wrote:
Ron Clarke wrote:
I have found that re-sizing the graphic to the exact size specified
in the web page will do the trick best. It will give you exactly the
right size graphic for ther way you want it shown. PictView
L, (or should I try D?)
Going off topic for a brief introduction seems a necessity among a group so
more or less condemned to each other as is our little Arachnian society
with a couple of people and a half (my other mailbox) which just may or may
not have to do anything with politics. Also some
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:21:56 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter)
wrote:
Hi Samuel!
sorry ... very long ... and very OT
But it contains very important views at the end.
About how America wants american law everywhere, and about the RIGHT OF
AMERICA
TO DO WHAT IT WANTS, to
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ wrote:
The US Constitution allows the US to go to war under 3
conditions only:
1) US attacked. US can counterattack.
2) Congress declares war.
3) US sends troops in accordance with provisions of a treaty.
If I am correctly informed:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:24:25 +00, Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:55:16 -0500 (EST), Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Richard Menedetter wrote:
Anyways ... it is very important to me how american's think about
international
law.
If the majority
Hi Sam, Ricsi;
Sam, I was going to rebut your reply to my post, but Ricsi did it for me.
Just to recapitulate what we think:
The only hope of mankind to rise above international barbarism, is
international law. International law prohibits aggression of one nation
against another, but allows
Bart, You can try Mrs. Best
I didn't read your entire lecture; I'm certain you feel you have all the
facts straight and that I would have benefited had I only persevered.
However, I can remember before I had to recite the Pledge of Allegiance
with under god added to it. The Korean Police
arachne-digestMonday, January 13 2003Volume 01 : Number 2019
--
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:57:25 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Possessing Guns (was Re: Keeping track of the news [was Re: UT
arachne-digest Tuesday, January 14 2003 Volume 01 : Number 2020
--
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:31:23 +0100 (CET)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter)
Subject: Iraq vs. N Korea
Hi Sam!
13 Jan 2003, Sam
arachne-digest Tuesday, January 14 2003 Volume 01 : Number 2021
--
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:16:00 +00
From: Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Guns [was Re: Keeping track of the news [was Re: UT
40 matches
Mail list logo
