Thomas Mueller wrote:
40 MB total for Borland C++ 3.1 included all the Windows stuff.
Oh, well I don't have that (atleast I don't think so g).
Would DJGPP work for Insight?
With some changes yes, and with an upcomming Linux version of Arachne
beeing able to compile it under DJGPP will be a
Of course anything compiled with DJGPP will require a 386 (and cwsdpmi.exe
which we already have with Arachne).
Yes, but an old version.
I believe Borland C++ 3.1 took 40 MB.
I do not think so since my p:\bc directory is ca 20M B and then I got many
files in there that shouldn't be there.
40 MB total for Borland C++ 3.1 included all the Windows stuff.
IMHO DJGPP is the best alternative, especially since you then can (more or
Borland c/c++ 5.5 is free now, and its 7.8 Mb for download.
http://www.inprise.com/bcppbuilder/freecompiler/cppc55steps.html
Rebel,
Your next message after that gave system requirements suggesting it would not be
suitable for DOS. We need DOS support for Insight; 32-bit Windows stuff does us
Hi!
Why not porting the Linux version to DJGPP.? As graphic lib Allegro could be
used.
Bye, Florian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Richard Menedetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Freitag, 07. April 2000 17:05
Betreff: It AIN'T all that easy [was Re
Richard Menedetter wrote:
TM or maybe Perl? Perl has a DOS version, though I am not sure if the
TM DOS version includes the Internet functionality.
Nope !
Does PERL have much Internet functionality ??
I have only used it for some CGI Scripts under Linux.
Dos version of Perl can work
Does PERL have much Internet functionality ??
I have only used it for some CGI Scripts under Linux.
CGI simply takes the commands, executes them locally , and delivers the
result back to the browser at the other end.
Anything that will communicate through STDIN and STDOUT. So PERL does not
InSight is opensourced, see http://gnu.arachne.cz/ (you'll need Borland
C/C++ 3.x as well).
//Bernie
Is Borland C/C++ 3.x now available for free download, and, if so, how big is it?
I believe Borland C++ 3.1 took 40 MB. I see I have a CD for Borland C++ 4.0,
and manuals, from 1994 (?). Would
From: "Rebel" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Thomas Mueller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
InSight is opensourced, see http://gnu.arachne.cz/ (you'll need Borland
C/C++ 3.x as well).
file://Bernie
Is Borland C/C++ 3.x now available for free download, and, if so, how
big
is it?
Borland c/c++ 5.5
From: "Thomas Mueller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
InSight is opensourced, see http://gnu.arachne.cz/ (you'll need Borland
C/C++ 3.x as well).
file://Bernie
Is Borland C/C++ 3.x now available for free download, and, if so, how big
is it?
Borland c/c++ 5.5 is free now, and its 7.8 Mb for download.
Hi
"Thomas Mueller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TM Would I be better off with WATT-32,
??? WATT-32 is a _library_ ;)
It's another flavour of the WATTCP library which Arachne is linked against!
Do you mean DJGPP ?? (the 32 bit C/C++/Obj. C compiler)
(http://www.delorie.com)
TM or maybe Perl?
P.S. I feel cheated. I'm supposed to be able to get 10Mbs downstream,
and that means 34Mbytes should take 34 seconds, right? It took me 38
minutes to download 18Mbytes! }; If I didn't know how internet works,
I might actually be disappointed. I doubt the doze cable users on the
system know
L.D wrote:
Lantcp.cfg is used with Waterloo TCP. But I'm not using that as far
as I know. In fact, looking at the lantcp.cfg file, if I were calling
on it, I wouldn't be getting through at all because all values are still
default ... which means inoperable.
It is included in Arachne. Let me
Thomas Mueller wrote:
Bernie, your math is off! That was 8 KB/sec. A CD has capacity of 650 or
680 MB, so the download, figuring 38 min for 18 MB, would take near 24 hours.
Yes, I've already said so myself. I do hope it was an error on my part and
not my calculator. Another one I had (way
Bernie,
It made NO difference, since those values and that lantcp.cfg file are
both ignored. G
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000 18:36:17 +0200 (MET DST), Bernie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want to try something like that set mss=0 in arachne.cfg instead.
//Bernie
http://bernie.arachne.cz/ DOS
Hi
"L.D. Best" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LB *NOW* if I hit ALT-M I see my local IP of 10.5.16.15 but *only*
LB because that's what I told Arachne my IP was. G
OK ... I have sent you tcpinfo.exe privately ...
Hope this helps !
LB Thanks to whomever said to mess with Telnet -- it was the only
L.D wrote:
Thanks to whomever said to mess with Telnet -- it was the only way I had
to find out what I needed. So far using static IP is working fine.
Great :)
(I will not answer your private mail to me about this then).
P.S. I feel cheated. I'm supposed to be able to get 10Mbs downstream,
Ricsi,
In laughingly speaking of cable modem speed, I said you asked ...
On Sun, 02 Apr 2000 09:43:55 +0200 (CEST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter)
wrote:
LB I doubt the doze cable users on the system know the difference. G
What do you mean by that statement ???
At last count
Ok, I'm confused again. :)
On Sun, 2 Apr 2000 10:25:09 +0200 (MET DST), Bernie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
You could perhaps change your mss value (lantcp.cfg) to something larger
than the normal 1024 bytes (2048 or 4096 for instance) and get a speed
increase that way.
Lantcp.cfg is
When running a NIC, Arachne doesn't show your IP unless *you* have
manually entered said IP in your arachne.cfg file, or set it up as
environmental variable.
If you enter static IP, Gateway, etc in cfg file, nothing is set as an
environmental variable because it doesn't vary so no need for
20 matches
Mail list logo
