issues, but, please
let us know if you notice anything.
Thanks a lot for the migration!
Greetings,
Jelle van der Waa
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
disks and have similar capacity to our
canonical archive.
Greetings,
Jelle van der Waa
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 06/12/2020 21:07, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
Hi all,
We've started the Boost rebuilds with automated builds in [staging], if
required a todolist will be created for the failing builds. Please don't
schedule any rebuilds which conflict with boost. Hopefully packages will
arrive in [testing
Hi all,
We've started the Boost rebuilds with automated builds in [staging], if
required a todolist will be created for the failing builds. Please don't
schedule any rebuilds which conflict with boost. Hopefully packages will
arrive in [testing] before the end of the week :)
Greetings,
On 23/11/2020 16:52, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
>
> Give me cake, or give me debug symbols.
> - Some comedian, probably.
>
> Yo!
>
> For quite a few years people has wanted debug packages, but there has never
> really been any progress towards them. Pacman got
On 21/11/2020 15:34, Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public wrote:
Hi all,
I want to propose adding all active Python versions to [community], not
just the latest one. This would only entail adding the interpreter
itself, no other packages.
Having access to interpreters for older active versions is
umble chat and get shared pad/thing to easily collaborate ideas.
Greetings,
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi All,
Our dedicated server orion (used to host
repos.archlinux.org/mail.archlinux.org) has been cancelled which means
it will be no longer accessible in 30 days.
If you have anything of value in your home directory, please copy it
before the 10th of November as then the server will be
On 23/10/2020 22:12, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Tomorrow we will migrate the mail server starting at Saturday the 24th
> October (tomorrow) on 12:00 GMT. The migration should take around four
> hours, but could take longer.
The migration is finished successfully. If yo
Hi All,
Tomorrow we will migrate the mail server starting at Saturday the 24th
October (tomorrow) on 12:00 GMT. The migration should take around four
hours, but could take longer.
This migration affects everything which sends email, so not only your
@archlinux.org address but also the bbs, AUR,
On 06/10/2020 03:15, Daniel Bermond via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 05/10/2020 02:16, Sven-Hendrik Haase via arch-dev-public wrote:
>> and TUs
>> can notify which packages they are interested to maintain in [community]
>
>> chromaprint
>
>> gifsicle
Moved
>> x11vnc
Moved
>> xine-lib
>>
On 06/10/2020 05:17, Ivy Foster via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 05 Oct 2020, at 7:16 am +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase via arch-dev-public
> wrote:
>> ttf-junicode
>> ttf-linux-libertine
>> x11-ssh-askpass
Moved to [community] thanks!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 05/10/2020 07:16, Sven-Hendrik Haase via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> It was suggested as part of this year's spring cleanup of [community]
> that we should be have a cleanup in [core]/[extra] and move packages
> downwards into [community].
>
> This round only concerns [extra]
ine results.
Can you create an isse on the infrastructure repository with these
steps? Would be nice to keep track of the progress in a central location.
Thanks!
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 09/07/2020 23:00, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> A lot of work has been put into getting Arch packages 100% reproducible,
> the [community] repository has been added to the rebuilderd instance on
> reproducible.archlinux.org. As of now [community] is 60% reproducible
Hi All,
A lot of work has been put into getting Arch packages 100% reproducible,
the [community] repository has been added to the rebuilderd instance on
reproducible.archlinux.org. As of now [community] is 60% reproducible
and packages with file ordering issues have been rebuild and are about
to
be ~ 2 MB? Would be nice to have an overview of
the real life numbers :)
Greetings,
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 26/06/2020 02:50, Gaetan Bisson via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Hi Jelle,
>
> [2020-06-25 23:36:15 +0200] Jelle van der Waa:
>> repos.archlinux.org, svn.archlinux.org and rsync.archlinux.org are now
>> on a new server which has plenty of diskspace for us to continue
>>
On 25/06/2020 23:36, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> repos.archlinux.org, svn.archlinux.org and rsync.archlinux.org are now
> on a new server which has plenty of diskspace for us to continue
> packaging for a while (16T free).
It seems the script which converts svn to git
Hi all,
repos.archlinux.org, svn.archlinux.org and rsync.archlinux.org are now
on a new server which has plenty of diskspace for us to continue
packaging for a while (16T free).
Some important notes:
The ssh hostkeys changed for repos.archlinux.org which means if you use
archco/communityco this
Hi al,
On Thursday 25th June at 14:00 UTC work will begin on migrating the
following services to a new machine:
* repos.archlinux.org
* svn.archlinux.org
* Arch mirror infrastructure
This will impact all packaging and svn activities as those services are
not available during the migration
On 29/05/2020 11:20, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A quick updated on the progress of reproducible builds.
>
> You may have noticed a couple of large rebuilds that occurred recently.
> These fixed issues of non-reproducible file ordering with old versions
> of makepkg.
Hi all,
I'm going to disown some packages as I no longer actively use them and I
want to shift focus into my on other Arch roles:
ettercap
openttd-opensfx
openttd-opengfx
rdesktop
tesseract
tesseract-*
tidy
unshield
vim-pastie
vim-align
pstreams
pdf2djvu
bonnie++
gsmartcontrol
leptonica
jbigkit
Hi,
The new planet.archlinux.org has a different implementation and RSS feed
url. I've added fallback urls for two variants of the RSS feed but would
like users to switch to the new url so a news post seemed appropriate.
News proposal below:
# Planet Arch Linux migration
The software behind
On 02/14/20 at 09:24am, Andrea Scarpino via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On Thursday, 13 February 2020 23:59:17 CET Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > * Implement planet functionality for archweb, to replace
> > planet.archlinux.org which is Python 2 and not going to be ported.
> >
Hi,
A new archweb has been deployed with the following notable changes:
* Implement planet functionality for archweb, to replace
planet.archlinux.org which is Python 2 and not going to be ported.
Every user on archweb can configure the website and website_rss urls
in their profile which
Hi,
A new archweb has been deployed with the following notable changes:
* Implement planet functionality for archweb, to replace
planet.archlinux.org which is Python 2 and not going to be ported.
Every user on archweb can configure the website and website_rss urls
in their profile which
ies
> [1] we think there is no reason to have it there. Thus I would like to move
> it (and its dependency pkcs11-helper) to [extra].
> If you have any concern please raise your hand now!
Sounds good to me, openvpn is not really installation critical.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
re if this is unique.
> > * Maintainers have the possibility to test the packages.
>
> Did you have any problems with testing the recent language rebuilds?
We have never tested anything in [staging] where rebuilds happen since
that's not possible at all since it's always half broken. Testing
happens in [testing].
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 01/02/20 at 05:12pm, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> 2020 happened and Python 2 is very much still alive, even worse there
> will be an update in April.
Looking at unneeded orphans on archweb we can remove more packages if no
one adopts them at the end of the week: [1
removing their makedepends!
[1] https://www.archlinux.org/devel/reports/non-existing-dependencies/
[2] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/archlinux/state_DEPWAIT.html
[3] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/python-pytest-shutil/
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 01/02/20 at 11:18am, Santiago Torres-Arias via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 05:12:33PM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>
> > For packages still providing python2 functionality such as vim and
> > others I propose we remove python2 support to acti
On 01/02/20 at 07:09pm, keenerd via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 1/2/20, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > * armagetronad - dead upstream, optional dep can be removed
>
> Fixed instead. It still works a treat.
Thanks a lot! This was my hidden agenda all along ^_^
I've found many pack
* graphviz - remove python2 bindings or update to python3
* notmuch - switch to python3 bindings
* libproxy - remove python2 bindings
* many others!
Greetings,
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 12/27/19 at 07:10pm, Sven-Hendrik Haase via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019, 16:31 Robin Broda via arch-dev-public <
> arch-dev-public@archlinux.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > We have just tested and released everything necessary for zstd packages in
> > our repos.
> >
ything else.
from main.models import Package
pkg = Package.objects.filter(pkgname='python2').first()
for repopkg in pkg.get_requiredby():
if not repopkg.pkg.get_requiredby():
print(repopkg.pkg)
--
Jelle van der Waa
>
> Leaving only python2 modules that are really re
lo
> unless I'm mistaken and soyuz had more duties than I thought. In the latter
> case, we should migrate that to apollo. Could anyone shed some light on
> this?
All mail is handled by mail.archlinux.org (orion), not by pkgbuild.com or
apollo. Nothing changes in this regard.
--
on the mailing list) [3]
Please reply if you are interested in becoming an archiso maintainer, so
far Alad has shown interested.
[1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/63683?project=6
[2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/53864?project=6
[3] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/63166?project=6
--
Jelle van der
Hi all,
A new archweb release has been deployed on our server, with a couple of
notable changes:
- Signoff status has been moved up in the Developer Dashboard for more
attention
- When enough signoffs are reached, archweb automatically sends a mail
to the packager that the package has
at 12:00 UTC.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
which can be useful for rebuilds. [2]
[1] https://www.archlinux.org/devel/reports/non-existing-dependencies/
[2] https://www.archlinux.org/devel/
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi all,
We have some packages which used to be maintained by toofishes which he
no longer seems to take care of. So if anyone is willing to maintain
these packages, please adopt them, if they need to be moved to
[community] for a TU, ping me. The packages are:
* munin{,-node}
* numactl
*
Hi Archers,
This there is another FroSCon 2019 organized! Last year we had a dev
room on sunday and two talks, if enough dev/tu/community members want to
hold a talk then I can organize a room again :-)
[1] https://www.froscon.de/en/cfp/
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On 02/07/19 at 10:22pm, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Tommorow night (CET) I will update archweb (archlinux.org) to Python 3.
> We've already tested it on a staging server and it seems to work well so
> tommorow I'll update it on our main server.
>
> This will me
some manual work with removing and creating a
new virtualenv.
--
Jelle van der Waa
munity.git/tree/trunk/grafana.ser=
vice?h=3Dpackages/grafana
P.S. sorry for splitting up into a new thread, but it seems replying
makes spamassasian mark my reply to the thread as spam.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 05/23/17 at 10:23pm, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
>
> infrastructure side (which is in fact too generic term that could be
> better described). I am totally in love with What can I do for
> Mozilla?[1] which is open source, so why not steal this wonderful idea?
> But it also means we need a
nferences) for those that can't be there.
>
> We would like to get some input from all of you regarding time, space
> and scope :)
>
> [1]
> https://web.archive.org/web/20130313105945/http://www.archlinux.ca/archcon2010/
> [2] https://c3voc.de/
>
> --
> https://sleepmap.de
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ally ancient ones otherwise these bugs can be
reproduced, patches made and submitted to the tracker :)
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi All,
I propose we hold another (in)famous bug day on the first weekend of January
i.e. 5th and 6th of January. To start the new year with a cleaned up bug
tracker.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 11/10/18 at 08:15pm, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 11/9/18 5:29 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > On 11/09/18 at 10:54pm, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> There are rebuilds ongoing for packages build before 2017-01-01, this
On 11/09/18 at 10:54pm, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There are rebuilds ongoing for packages build before 2017-01-01, this
> *should* add PIE and the newer BUILDINFO format to these old packages.
> And uncovers some build failures, which should be fixed and I will ma
:-( Packages without PIE
are listed here, note that Haskell will require some research to enable
PIE. Golang/Rust packages also require special treatment. [1]
[1] http://pkgbuild.com/~jelle/repro_sec_status.txt
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi all,
I'll be away for two weeks without a laptop so I won't be able to do any
packaging. Feel free to update my packages or fix my open bugs ^_^
If there is something really urgent, I should be able to reply via
e-mail.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 09/04/18 at 08:54pm, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> On 08/29/18 at 10:23pm, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > Most of our PKGBUILDs svn propset's break reproducible builds and the
> > pkgbuild_sha256sum in the BUILDINFO file. When building a package before
> > commiting the PKG
On 08/29/18 at 10:23pm, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> Most of our PKGBUILDs svn propset's break reproducible builds and the
> pkgbuild_sha256sum in the BUILDINFO file. When building a package before
> commiting the PKGBUILD the propset $Id will differ since the $Id is set on
> commit.
/trunk/PKGBUILD
1c1
< # $Id$
---
> # $Id: PKGBUILD 375007 2018-08-28 17:24:26Z jelle $
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ist with the
> following
> information:
>
> * Reddit username.
> * What you do.
> * What Monday fits for you?
* jvdwaa
* Developer, Security Team, DevOps, Reproducible builds, Archweb maintainer
* Most mondays
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
signing the repository DB and
ISO's. So we can list all the benefits and downsides along with the
threat vector.
[1] https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_Signer
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Koji_Build_Autosign_Proposal
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 07/20/18 at 09:05am, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> On 07/19/18 at 07:23pm, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > On Wed 18.07.18 - 15:28, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > > I would like to add this to [community], but I'm unsure what people
> > > thi
what I can recall, we had one in, some discussion and it was gone
again. I'll try to find the post in the archives.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 06/17/18 at 10:29pm, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> On 06/17/18 at 07:09pm, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> > I could do a talk I guess. Do you know till when we have to create our
> > program to get it on the Froscon schedule?
>
> Yup, qouting the mail I received:
>
> >
just quickly made up, the idea is to get rid of as many
python2 orphans as possible. No required/makedepends/programs should be
removed, but please check for the programs on the list if there is a
Python 3 equivalent.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
part of it :)
Please reply if you have objections.
A list of modules / programs can be obtained as following or viewed here
[1]
$ pacman -Sqs python2 > list
$ expac -S '%n %N' -l ' ' - < list | awk NF==1
[1] http://pkgbuild.com/~jelle/python2_modules.txt
--
Jelle van der Waa
signatu
posal, the other
> packages are still not removed either.
Since no one replied with objections, I guess we can start cleaning up the repo.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Frab.
So far I have two other Developer/Tu's who might be able to give a talk
and with you and myself included that will be 4 talks. 4 talks of 30
minutes + ~ 15 minute break.
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've managed to get a
give some talks or a workshop. Since I'm not sure how much
of the TU/Dev's can attend, community members are also welcome to mail
me with an proposal for a talk!
P.S. I'll hope to bring Arch stickers.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 02/06/18 17:06, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> Looking at the packages in the BUILDINFO rebuild list, I've found some
> packages which are so old that they might not longer suit [core] or our
> repos in general. So I'd like to propose that we either move or remove
> the follow
n't see why it is required in core, also orphan
- libgssglue/librpcsecgss - move to extra, nothing in [core] deps on it.
(archboot and nfs-utils used to dep on it)
- b43-fwcutter - Is this still required for more recent broadcom cards?
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
elp is appreciated!
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
l dockerr image repo)
> 3. Image building instructions.
A PR to this repository is also required, not sure if you mentioned it
:) [1]
--
Jelle van der Waa
[1] https://github.com/docker-library/docs
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
y on github. (As long I understood sangy correct it
> would be just some new branches).
This would be nice, how do we share the credentials to the docker login
though? Or can we make multiple people owners?
[1] https://github.com/orgs/archlinux/people
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 12/18/17 at 10:47am, Gaetan Bisson via arch-dev-public wrote:
> [2017-12-18 10:54:37 +0100] Bartłomiej Piotrowski via arch-dev-public:
> > - tclap:
> > bisson: hugin
>
> I've just orphaned hugin too. Happy adopting! :)
Gotta catch them all!
--
Jelle van de
On 11/16/17 at 02:01pm, Morten Linderud wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:30:21PM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > [snip]
> > # Products
> >
> > * Arch packages (core/extra or split this up)
> > * Community packages (community)
> > * Pacman
> &
On 11/15/17 at 09:07am, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 at 20:30:21, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > It's time to switch our to something which is maintained and can be
> > extended to
> > our wishes. Flyspray isn't actively maintained, has had several securi
ing
Input would be welcome, on what we should migrate from flyspray and what
products we should define.
[1] https://github.com/Flyspray/flyspray/releases/tag/v1.0-rc6
[2] https://github.com/Flyspray/flyspray/releases/tag/v1.0-rc4
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
with these requirements if I keep
getting bugged that it's missing md5sums, https while I have a GPG sig.
Calling out people, bugging them, isn't really the method to get things
done.
Note that this is my personal opinion, I surely do not speak for Arch as
a whole.
> And yes, I am doing stuff in the background. I wrote a guide and a tool
> that simplifies source code signing[1] and I am doing a detailed
> security analysis on all ArchLinux packages. And once it is ready I will
> request gpg signatures from every upstream source, especially packages
> from [core].
I appreciate the effort of contacting upstream about providing GPG
signatures, that's really great!
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
to follow GCC's behavior similarly to
> what Alpine does. [1]
>
> We can discuss dropping the related compilation flags from
> makepkg.conf at a later stage.
>
> [1] https://git.alpinelinux.org/cgit/aports/tree/main/clang
Seeing that Arch is defined, will you upstream these
so they can be properly maintained in AUR
>
> - xen (xenstore, xe-guest-utilities, python2-xenstore)
> - openvas (-cli,-libraries,-manager,greenbone)
Unless anthraxx wants to maintain it, I'd say drop it.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> Can we make this project official? Or do we even want to make this
> official? I would like to start a discussion with this questions.
What would be needed to make it official? And which part, as I see the
docker container as being official (tm).
Thanks for all the effort btw!
--
Jelle va
ntributors can find projects, but this will require
mentoring from Developers or TU's.
A few things I can think of which need help:
* Automate rebuilds, this is something we really need to keep rolling.
* New dbscripts, moving to git, etc.
* Archweb, although a lot of work is currently in progress.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
/cfprojects/
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ortant contributor of this project.
>
Thanks for the upgrade! 1.8 will still received security updates till
April 2018. So before that date archweb should be upgraded to 1.11
LTS.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
557d1b58b3546bab2c5bc2d624c5709840e6b10.patch
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
pendency, on AUR
> packages.
As I already said in aur-general, I agree that we should keep this
separate to avoid confusion.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I've adopted bitlbee.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 04/18/17 at 09:33am, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> * fcgi
> * fetchmail
> * hefur
> * imap
> * lighttpd
> * logrotate
> * lynx
> * rsync
I'd adopt rsync
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ould be fine.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
he best solution IMHO, but I think we
> should be fine with svn/git right now. We have a lot more resources than
> we had back then. We could also set up automatic mirrors on github once
> we use git or just mirror the repos internally.
+1 for the Github mirror and for droppi
finish this before April fools day!
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Never really studied the output, but it contains some valid warnings.
On 02/27/17 at 12:22am, repoma...@archlinux.org wrote:
> Mismatched Pkgnames
> -
> python-polib vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/community/python2-polib
Faidoc can you make python-polib, provide both the python2 and
On 02/25/17 at 01:41pm, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> On 02/25/17 at 01:32pm, Nicola Squartini via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Berkeley DB is currently at version 6.2.23, while Arch is still at
> > 5.3.28. Is any compatibility reason preventing the upgrade?
&
On 02/25/17 at 01:32pm, Nicola Squartini via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Berkeley DB is currently at version 6.2.23, while Arch is still at
> 5.3.28. Is any compatibility reason preventing the upgrade?
>
Well it's not flagged out of date is it? :-)
--
Jelle van der Waa
ate a
mirrorlist' here, so you might want to remove the 'use mirror status'
option there too. (or was that not part of the plan?) [1]
[1] https://www.archlinux.org/mirrorlist/
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
and goocanvas1 will hopefully disappear.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
vi (as dead upstream ~ 2005)
[1] http://wxwidgets.org/news/2016/02/wxwidgets-3.1.0-released/
[2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/52516
P.S.
seems new years clean up has started :)
Mayhbe I should drop pygoocanvas and goocanvas1 too.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
for example:
* archweb
* auto staging-rebuild system
* dbscripts
* reproducible builds
* security tracker
* 32 bit deprecation :)
The date and location for FrOSCon is:
19. + 20. August 2017
Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg
https://www.froscon.de/en/faq/
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description
On 12/24/16 at 09:28am, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2016-12-24 20:18:21 +0100] Jelle van der Waa:
> > I'd like to see some improvements in the maintenance of pyalpm.
>
> I'm not sure what improvements you have in mind but there's two things
> called pyalpm: Remy's personal git re
/arch-projects/2016-October/004424.html
[4] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2016-October/004420.html
[5] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2015-October/004309.html
~
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
le
bonusses. We could extend the auto build solution for reproducible
builds (yay!). Auto rebuilds and maybe later when vendors get their act
togehter (aarch64 *cough*).
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
