[arch-general] Boost

2010-06-18 Thread Daniel Bumke
Hi, Does anyone know what's going on with boost? It seems it was downgraded from 1.42.0 to 1.41.0 a while back, and hasn't been updated to the latest 1.43.0. I was going to build the latest on my machine, but if there's something wrong with it I might hold off or go with the older version.

Re: [arch-general] Boost

2010-06-18 Thread Allan McRae
On 18/06/10 16:24, Daniel Bumke wrote: Hi, Does anyone know what's going on with boost? It seems it was downgraded from 1.42.0 to 1.41.0 a while back, and hasn't been updated to the latest 1.43.0. I was going to build the latest on my machine, but if there's something wrong with it I might

Re: [arch-general] New Google Group for discussion and notices on Arch security.

2010-06-18 Thread Andres P
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim jfs.wo...@gmail.com wrote: ah yes, SSL! sorry :) On 2006-05-01 22:34:12, Ulf Möller, openssl developer [1], responded [2] to openssl packager Kurt Roeckx [3] saying that he was for applying the patch just to keep valgrind quiet. But openssl

Re: [arch-general] Boost

2010-06-18 Thread Daniel Bumke
On 18/06/10 13:30, Allan McRae wrote: From memory 1.42 broke encfs. The encfs developers blame boost, the boost developers blame encfs, so nothing was done in recent updates from either side. So we either update boost or break encfs... Thanks for the tip! Presumably you mean either we

Re: [arch-general] New Google Group for discussion and notices on Arch security.

2010-06-18 Thread Jeffrey 'jf' Lim
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Andres P aep...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim jfs.wo...@gmail.com wrote: ah yes, SSL! sorry :) On 2006-05-01 22:34:12, Ulf Möller, openssl developer [1], responded [2] to openssl packager Kurt Roeckx [3] saying that he

Re: [arch-general] intel video suspend

2010-06-18 Thread Christoph Rissner
On 05/07/2010 07:16 PM, Isaac Dupree wrote: please inform us, what does xset dpms force off do? And for what circumstances/purpose do you use it? Sorry it took so long, I missed your reply. xset dpms force off is supposed to turn off the screen immediately using DPMS, at least thats what it

Re: [arch-general] b43: wireless issues

2010-06-18 Thread Philipp Überbacher
Excerpts from Magnus Therning's message of 2010-06-18 01:22:48 +0200: I'm having problems getting my wireless connection to work properly. It's a broadcom card, using the b43 driver. It connects fine on login, but once I actually use the network I'm disconnected and all attempts to

Re: [arch-general] intel video suspend

2010-06-18 Thread Philipp Überbacher
Excerpts from Christoph Rissner's message of 2010-06-18 09:36:27 +0200: On 05/07/2010 07:16 PM, Isaac Dupree wrote: please inform us, what does xset dpms force off do? And for what circumstances/purpose do you use it? Sorry it took so long, I missed your reply. xset dpms force off is

Re: [arch-general] intel video suspend

2010-06-18 Thread Philipp Überbacher
Excerpts from Ray Rashif's message of 2010-06-18 09:54:55 +0200: On 18 June 2010 15:36, Christoph Rissner c...@visotech.at wrote: On 05/07/2010 07:16 PM, Isaac Dupree wrote: please inform us, what does xset dpms force off do?  And for what circumstances/purpose do you use it? Sorry it

Re: [arch-general] intel video suspend

2010-06-18 Thread Christoph Rissner
On 06/18/2010 09:54 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: That_is_ the default behaviour - the laptop should do nothing at all when the lid is closed. I know of no particular hardware/BIOS that sets a sleep action upon lid closure. It is only altered by userspace tools/daemons like for eg. when using a DE. I

Re: [arch-general] intel video suspend

2010-06-18 Thread Ray Rashif
On 18 June 2010 16:12, Christoph Rissner c...@visotech.at wrote: On 06/18/2010 09:54 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: That_is_  the default behaviour - the laptop should do nothing at all when the lid is closed. I know of no particular hardware/BIOS that sets a sleep action upon lid closure. It is only

Re: [arch-general] Boost

2010-06-18 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 06/18/2010 09:30 AM, Allan McRae wrote: On 18/06/10 16:24, Daniel Bumke wrote: Hi, Does anyone know what's going on with boost? It seems it was downgraded from 1.42.0 to 1.41.0 a while back, and hasn't been updated to the latest 1.43.0. I was going to build the latest on my machine, but if

Re: [arch-general] Boost

2010-06-18 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 18.06.2010 11:38, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 06/18/2010 09:30 AM, Allan McRae wrote: On 18/06/10 16:24, Daniel Bumke wrote: Hi, Does anyone know what's going on with boost? It seems it was downgraded from 1.42.0 to 1.41.0 a while back, and hasn't been updated to the latest 1.43.0. I was

[arch-general] How do I get my Canon MP630 working under Arch?

2010-06-18 Thread Jordan Windsor
I would like to get my Canon MP630 (all in one) printer working under Arch, I only need the printing abilities though. I have installed the following packages and read the Arch wiki CUPS article along with many other websites: cnijfilter-common 3.00-3 hal-cups-utils cups-canon cups libcups I've

Re: [arch-general] How do I get my Canon MP630 working under Arch?

2010-06-18 Thread Gmail
Jordan Windsor kirjoitti perjantai, 18. kesäkuuta 2010 13:22:00: I would like to get my Canon MP630 (all in one) printer working under Arch, I only need the printing abilities though. I have installed the following packages and read the Arch wiki CUPS article along with many other websites:

Re: [arch-general] What should the Arch Security Team be called?

2010-06-18 Thread Baho Utot
On 06/18/10 01:05, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: On 06/18/2010 03:48 AM, J. McBlane wrote: Arch Security Enhancement Team? Securing Arch For Everyone? Arch Guard? On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:46:59PM +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote: On to the first order of business. As the subject says, what should

Re: [arch-general] Boost

2010-06-18 Thread Loui Chang
On Fri 18 Jun 2010 11:52 +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On 18.06.2010 11:38, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 06/18/2010 09:30 AM, Allan McRae wrote: On 18/06/10 16:24, Daniel Bumke wrote: Does anyone know what's going on with boost? It seems it was downgraded from 1.42.0 to 1.41.0 a while back,

Re: [arch-general] What should the Arch Security Team be called?

2010-06-18 Thread Chris Bannister
SUPER ARCH TEAM AWESOME On 18 June 2010 11:32, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote: On 06/18/10 01:05, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: On 06/18/2010 03:48 AM, J. McBlane wrote: Arch Security Enhancement Team? Securing Arch For Everyone? Arch Guard? On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:46:59PM

Re: [arch-general] How do I get my Canon MP630 working under Arch?

2010-06-18 Thread Jordan Windsor
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Gmail jesse.ja...@gmail.com wrote: Jordan Windsor kirjoitti perjantai, 18. kesäkuuta 2010 13:22:00: I would like to get my Canon MP630 (all in one) printer working under Arch, I only need the printing abilities though. I have installed the following packages

[arch-general] Upgrading from Arch 0.8 O.o

2010-06-18 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan
I recently got a VPS and installed arch from their control panel just to know that it was arch 0.8 !!! How do I upgrade from arch 0.8 to the latest ? -- Regards, Nilesh Govindarajan Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/nilesh.gr Twitter: http://twitter.com/nileshgr Website: http://www.itech7.com

Re: [arch-general] Upgrading from Arch 0.8 O.o

2010-06-18 Thread Angel Velásquez
pacman -Syu On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote: I recently got a VPS and installed arch from their control panel just to know that it was arch 0.8 !!! How do I upgrade from arch 0.8 to the latest ? -- Regards, Nilesh Govindarajan Facebook:

Re: [arch-general] Upgrading from Arch 0.8 O.o

2010-06-18 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 06/18/2010 03:38 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: I recently got a VPS and installed arch from their control panel just to know that it was arch 0.8 !!! How do I upgrade from arch 0.8 to the latest ? you should ask them to get the latest openvz template:

Re: [arch-general] Upgrading from Arch 0.8 O.o

2010-06-18 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan
On 06/18/2010 06:10 PM, Angel Velásquez wrote: pacman -Syu On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Nilesh Govindarajanli...@itech7.com wrote: I recently got a VPS and installed arch from their control panel just to know that it was arch 0.8 !!! How do I upgrade from arch 0.8 to the latest ? --

Re: [arch-general] Upgrading from Arch 0.8 O.o

2010-06-18 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan
On 06/18/2010 06:14 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 06/18/2010 03:38 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: I recently got a VPS and installed arch from their control panel just to know that it was arch 0.8 !!! How do I upgrade from arch 0.8 to the latest ? you should ask them to get the latest openvz

Re: [arch-general] Upgrading from Arch 0.8 O.o

2010-06-18 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 18.06.2010 14:38, schrieb Nilesh Govindarajan: I recently got a VPS and installed arch from their control panel just to know that it was arch 0.8 !!! How do I upgrade from arch 0.8 to the latest ? I don't think you can:

Re: [arch-general] Upgrading from Arch 0.8 O.o

2010-06-18 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan
Its over finally. Some tar -xf stuff, etc. made it possible :) Basically upgraded pacman and its deps directly from archlinux.org as someone suggested. Thanks to that one ! -- Regards, Nilesh Govindarajan Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/nilesh.gr Twitter: http://twitter.com/nileshgr Website:

Re: [arch-general] Upgrading from Arch 0.8 O.o

2010-06-18 Thread Damjan Georgievski
I recently got a VPS and installed arch from their control panel just to know that it was arch 0.8 !!! How do I upgrade from arch 0.8 to the latest ? you should ask them to get the latest openvz template:

Re: [arch-general] b43: wireless issues

2010-06-18 Thread Magnus Therning
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:55, Philipp Überbacher hollun...@lavabit.com wrote: Hi. I have the same chip and same issue. I found out that the b43 devs didn't figure out yet how to get the chip to work correctly, so unless something changed during the last weeks/months there's no real solution.

Re: [arch-general] Upgrading from Arch 0.8 O.o

2010-06-18 Thread Damjan Georgievski
you should ask them to get the latest openvz template: http://download.openvz.org/contrib/template/precreated/arch-2010.05-i686-minimal.tar.gz http://download.openvz.org/contrib/template/precreated/arch-2010.05-x86_64-minimal.tar.gz those are created by me and mostly because nobody cared

Re: [arch-general] b43: wireless issues

2010-06-18 Thread Philipp Überbacher
Excerpts from Magnus Therning's message of 2010-06-18 16:49:11 +0200: On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:55, Philipp Überbacher hollun...@lavabit.com wrote: Hi. I have the same chip and same issue. I found out that the b43 devs didn't figure out yet how to get the chip to work correctly, so

Re: [arch-general] Upgrading from Arch 0.8 O.o

2010-06-18 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan
On 06/18/2010 06:14 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 06/18/2010 03:38 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: I recently got a VPS and installed arch from their control panel just to know that it was arch 0.8 !!! How do I upgrade from arch 0.8 to the latest ? you should ask them to get the latest openvz

Re: [arch-general] Upgrading from Arch 0.8 O.o

2010-06-18 Thread Fabiano Furtado Pessoa Coelho
Eh... someone like... me? :) On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote: Its over finally. Some tar -xf stuff, etc. made it possible :) Basically upgraded pacman and its deps directly from archlinux.org as someone suggested. Thanks to that one ! -- Regards,

Re: [arch-general] Upgrading from Arch 0.8 O.o

2010-06-18 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan
On 06/18/2010 09:14 PM, Fabiano Furtado Pessoa Coelho wrote: Eh... someone like... me? :) On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Nilesh Govindarajanli...@itech7.com wrote: Its over finally. Some tar -xf stuff, etc. made it possible :) Basically upgraded pacman and its deps directly from

Re: [arch-general] Upgrading from Arch 0.8 O.o

2010-06-18 Thread Gaurish Sharma
Hi, If I may ask, which VPS provider it is? Gaurish

Re: [arch-general] Upgrading from Arch 0.8 O.o

2010-06-18 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan
On 06/18/2010 10:15 PM, Gaurish Sharma wrote: Hi, If I may ask, which VPS provider it is? Gaurish fsckvps.com This was the second VPS I am configuring for a friend. I have been using their UK service (link in my signature) for more than two years. They offer excellent quality service. --

[arch-general] perl-5.12

2010-06-18 Thread Caleb Cushing
So is there anything I can do to help to get this in stable? I haven't had any problems personally in over a month. I think the only bug still open for rebuilds is the dbd* one. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com

Re: [arch-general] Boost

2010-06-18 Thread Alexander Duscheleit
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 06:56:48 -0400 Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote: On Fri 18 Jun 2010 11:52 +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On 18.06.2010 11:38, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 06/18/2010 09:30 AM, Allan McRae wrote: On 18/06/10 16:24, Daniel Bumke wrote: Does anyone know what's going on

[arch-general] gnome only install - installing compiz pulls in kde4-runtime?? Why?

2010-06-18 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, First install with the 2010-5 dual net install on an i686 box. Kudos, install was painless. Only issue was I had my pkg/ dir on a usb stick and I couldn't get the installer to use it for install. I mounted it where it was supposed to be mounted according to the installer (don't

Re: [arch-general] gnome only install - installing compiz pulls in kde4-runtime?? Why?

2010-06-18 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 7:51 AM, David C. Rankin drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote: Guys,        First install with the 2010-5 dual net install on an i686 box. Kudos, install was painless. Only issue was I had my pkg/ dir on a usb stick and I couldn't get the installer to use it for

Re: [arch-general] gnome only install - installing compiz pulls in kde4-runtime?? Why?

2010-06-18 Thread Allan McRae
On 19/06/10 14:51, David C. Rankin wrote: Guys, First install with the 2010-5 dual net install on an i686 box. Kudos, install was painless. Only issue was I had my pkg/ dir on a usb stick and I couldn't get the installer to use it for install. I mounted it where it was supposed to be