[Architecture] Include Ninja Framework for MSF4J performance benchmark tests

What about ${Subject} [1] [1] - http://www.ninjaframework.org/ Thanks ! -- Sagara Gunathunga Architect; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com V.P Apache Web Services;http://ws.apache.org/ Linkedin; http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara Blog ; http://ssagara.blogspot.com

[Architecture] Open questions in C5 permission model

Following are few questions I have on C5 permission model. Answers may have already been discussed, and I might have missed. If so, shall we get them on mail. Action namespaces We have namespaced the permission by the “protocol” of the resource URI. Then, do we need to namespace the actions as

[Architecture] [Dev] WSO2 Identity Server 5.2.0 Beta2 Released

WSO2 Identity Server 5.2.0-BETA2 Released! Date: 14th July 2016The WSO2 Identity Server team is pleased to announce the release of WSO2 Identity Server 5.2.0 Beta2. You can download this distribution from

Re: [Architecture] Open questions in C5 permission model

Hi Manu, Please find my inline comments. Action namespaces > We have namespaced the permission by the “protocol” of the resource URI. > Then, do we need to namespace the actions as well? topoic:view, api:view, > dashboard:view has almost the semantic. Having it just as “view” will be > useful

[Architecture] Open questions in C5 permission model

Following are few questions I have on C5 permission model. Answers may have already been discussed, and I might have missed. If so, shall we get them on mail. Action namespaces We have namespaced the permission by the “protocol” of the resource URI. Then, do we need to namespace the actions as

Re: [Architecture] Open questions in C5 permission model

Hi Manu, > Permissions for UI pages > I think there is no need to introduce a separate permission namespace for > UI (or use a very limited one). Actual customer is concerned about giving > permission to a real resource (topic, API, proxy ...) not to a UI > URL. Ideally, for each page, we

[Architecture] UUF Application Delivery Approach

Hi All, In UUF, We have three different artifact types. UUF Applications(A), Components(C) and Themes(T). Given that an Application can have UUF dependencies (i.e. Components & Themes) and non-UUF dependencies(i.e. Back-end osgi bundles, jax-rs or p2-features(BE)). Same way, a Component also can

Re: [Architecture] UUF Application Delivery Approach

Hi All, Please ignore this mail and reply to the thread "[Architecture] Unified UI Framework(UUF) Application Delivery Approach". Thanks, Rasika On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Rasika Perera wrote: > Hi All, > > > In UUF, We have three different artifact types. UUF

Re: [Architecture] ESB Analytics Dashboard Memory Usage

Hi Sinthuja, Its not observed in the VizGrammar sample website [1]. Here we maintain a max length on real time charts where library will drop points and data. I will give you an update by conducting an extensive test on DAS pack and check whats causing the memory leak. [1]

[Architecture] Facilitating Updating API with import/export tool in APIM

Hi All, Current import/export tool doesn't facilitate updating a imported API. I modified the implementation of import/export tool in APIM to update a API once its been try to import a already imported API using APIM REST API. When a user attempt to import a existing API using *"*create a new

[Architecture] Improvements for API import/export base on APIM REST API

Hi All, Current import/export tool of APIM is based on APIM internal Java API implementations for its functionality, Which been lead to tight coupling between the code and the API. This make restrictions on API maintenance across versions and code changes. Recently I'm working on modifying

Re: [Architecture] ESB Analytics Dashboard Memory Usage

Hi, When i further analyze this issue, it looks like it's coming from charting library. Basically I commented out chart.insert(data); and then I don't see the memory growth. So I doubt there is some sort of memory leak from the charting library. @Tharik, Can you please check further in this

Re: [Architecture] Supporting OpenIDConnect Scope Parameters

Hi Isura, Yes when we mark 'all' in the xml for scope 'openid' it behaves as the previous way. We need to rethink whether it is the correct behavior as it is sending all the claims without considering other scopes. So other scopes become useless. How ever yes, we are using 'openid' scope to

Re: [Architecture] ESB Analytics Dashboard Memory Usage

Hi, I tried this scenario with DAS 3.1.0 beta pack, and this is only observable for the gadgets created by the gadget generation wizard. And I could see a fast growth of the memory usage when the refresh interval for the gadget is reduced. I think the data is getting accumulated in the gadget