Re: [Architecture] Modification of the gadget generation wizard's extension structure

Hi Tanya, I like to express few suggestions regarding the gadget structure. *Generated gadget structure* > > └── test_gadget > ├── conf.json > ├── gadget-controller.jag > ├── gadget.json > ├── index.png > ├── index.xml > ├── libs > │ └── vendorName_version > │

Re: [Architecture] RESTFul API for App Manager - Design discussion

> > ... "uninstall" is NOT a REST, even though it looks like REST. "uninstall" does not looks like REST. It looks like RPC. On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Ruwan Abeykoon wrote: > I disagree Manu, The point is this is not "DELETE" action on a "resource". > This is an action

Re: [Architecture] RESTFul API for App Manager - Design discussion

[+ Frank] On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:49 AM, SajithAR Ariyarathna <sajit...@wso2.com> wrote: > ... "uninstall" is NOT a REST, even though it looks like REST. > > "uninstall" does not looks like REST. It looks like RPC. > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:43 A

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [BPS] [UUF] Developing BPMN Explorer UI using UUF for BPS

Hi Sudharma, In the browser (client-side), you can do AJAX calls to the necessary REST APIs. However, doing HTTP requests from UI backend (which runs on the server-side) to REST APIs (which also runs on the server-side) is not recommended. Instead of that you should call OSGi services. Calling

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [BPS] [UUF] Developing BPMN Explorer UI using UUF for BPS

etween UI back-end and the actual server >>>>> (e.g. BPS runtime)? i.e. both always run in the same jvm? >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Manuranga Perera <m...@wso2.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>&g

Re: [Architecture] Open questions in C5 permission model

Hi Manu, > Permissions for UI pages > I think there is no need to introduce a separate permission namespace for > UI (or use a very limited one). Actual customer is concerned about giving > permission to a real resource (topic, API, proxy ...) not to a UI > URL. Ideally, for each page, we

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] Fwd: Why re-write User class? Why re-wrap RealmService?

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 5:12 PM, KasunG Gajasinghe wrote: > Hi Shariq, > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Muhammed Shariq wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 1:10 AM, KasunG Gajasinghe >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Manu, >>> >>> #1. Because UUF's

Re: [Architecture] Store framework for C5 based Products

Hi All, Creating a reusable Store component was one of goals we had in our minds at UUF initial discussions. At that time there was couple of products APIM, AppM, EMM mobile store, GReg etc. that need a Store UI. So developing a generalized Store component was a requirement. However with the new

Re: [Architecture] Store framework for C5 based Products

> need to take into consideration the release dependencies, version > incompatibilities, etc, etc. Isn't this the same thing we tried to do once > with Enterprise Store? > >> >> Regards, >> Chandana >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:01 PM, SajithAR Ariyarathn

Re: [Architecture] Carbon C5 - Server Configuration Model

Hi Danesh, Do we really need the @Ignore annotation? IMO, we can ignore frields wich are not marked with @Element annotation, thus we don't need a separate annotation. Thanks. On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Danesh Kuruppu wrote: > Hi all, > > In Carbon C5, we are going to

Re: [Architecture] Improving clint-side rendering support in UUF

Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Joseph Fonseka <jos...@wso2.com> wrote: > >> Hi Sajith >> >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:44 AM, SajithAR Ariyarathna <sajit...@wso2.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> 2. Why did we use comments to propagate Zones

Re: [Architecture] Improving clint-side rendering support in UUF

be OVERWRITE. > 2. Why did we use comments to propagate Zones to the client side instead > of Divs. > > Thanks > Jo > > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:37 PM, SajithAR Ariyarathna <sajit...@wso2.com> > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> To do $subje

Re: [Architecture] Improving clint-side rendering support in UUF

tch them and > render. > > What will be the location of these fragments? If it's the same as server > side fragments it will give control over different UUF components IMO. > > thanks, > Chanaka > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:37 PM, SajithAR Ariyarathna <sajit...@wso2.

Re: [Architecture] Improving clint-side rendering support in UUF

s...@wso2.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> +1, few clarifications bellow. >> >> 1. I guess the default mode will be OVERWRITE. >> 2. Why did we use comments to propagate Zones to the client side instead >> of Divs. >> >> Thanks >> Jo >>

[Architecture] Improving clint-side rendering support in UUF

Hi All, To do $subject, we are hoping to give a UUF client JS library. With the client-side library, webapp developers will be able to render fragments and push to zones similar to the server-side. Functions in the library: UUF.renderFragment(fragmentFullyQualifedName, templateFillingObject,

[Architecture] [UUF] Introducing 'app.yaml' for apps, and deprecating 'config.yaml' from apps & components

Hi All, We are hoping to do $subject. *UUF Component:* Currently a UUF component has two configuration files, 'component.yaml' and 'config.yaml'. 'component.yaml' contains APIs entries and bindings (see mail thread [1] for more details); 'config.yaml' contains business-logic related

Re: [Architecture] [UUF] Introducing 'app.yaml' for apps, and deprecating 'config.yaml' from apps & components

le, widget related information can be kept > in the component.yaml or do we need to have separate files for this? > > Regards, > Chandana > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:23 PM, SajithAR Ariyarathna <sajit...@wso2.com> > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> We are h

[Architecture] WSO2 Carbon Unified UI Framework 1.0.0-M9 Released!

Hi All, We are pleased to announce the *ninth milestone* of WSO2 Carbon Unified UI Framework (UUF). You can download the UUF server distribution at [1]. UUF is an UI framework that let webapp developers to build shareable UI components and to build webapps by composing those UI components.

Re: [Architecture] Dashboard Component Permission Model

Hi Johann, Once you login using CAAS (carbon authentication and authorization service) > components you will get a CAAS User object [1]. This User object is a proxy > object which can be used to call all the underlying identity store and > authorization store methods. Ideally you will store this

Re: [Architecture] Dashboard Component Permission Model

> > [1] - https://github.com/thanujalk/carbon-identity-mgt/ > blob/master/components/org.wso2.carbon.identity.mgt/src/ > main/java/org/wso2/carbon/identity/mgt/User.java > > Thanks, > Thanuja > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:45 PM, SajithAR Ariyarathna <sa

Re: [Architecture] Improving clint-side rendering support in UUF

ragment. Need to know what will happen if we > implemented to get the JSON object (which will be used to fill the > fragment's template) by calling an OSGI service, in the onRequest() method > of the fragment. That will replace the "templateFillingObject" passed in > the UUF.re

Re: [Architecture] [UUF] Extensible Authorization for UUF

rate it in here? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Chandana >>> >>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Imesh Gunaratne <im...@wso2.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> As we discussed offline I think it would be better to provide a default >

[Architecture] [UUF] Removing creation of inline JS script tags upon calling sendToClient()

Hi All, We are in the process of doing $subject. # What is sendToClient() function? Its a server-side JS function provided by UUF that can be used to send a server-side value to the client-side. function onGet(env) { sendToClient("contextPath", env.contextPath); } Which will produce

Re: [Architecture] [UUF] Removing creation of inline JS script tags upon calling sendToClient()

still it has a meaning that it stores app data instead of > HTML document metadata. > > Cheers, > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:50 PM, SajithAR Ariyarathna <sajit...@wso2.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Jerad, >> >> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Jerad Rutnam <

Re: [Architecture] [UUF] Extensible Session Management for UUF

Hi Dilan, The purpose of the SessionHandler and SessionManager is different. SessionManager is an extension point (a plugin for UUF) for webapp developers. SessionHandler is meant to be passed for other plugins (e.g. Authenticator) as a way do session related operations (e.g. create a new

[Architecture] [UUF] Extensible Authorization for UUF

Hi All, We are in the process of introducing an extensible authorizer for Carbon UUF. At the moment authorization is done via the org.wso2.carbon.uuf.spi.auth.User interface [1]. When creating an user session, implementation of the User interface (e.g. CaasUser [2]) should be passed. The main

[Architecture] [C5] Skipping service registrations from Startup Order Resolver in ther server startup

Hi All, We encountered an issue in the Startup Order Resolver when incorporating the Carbon Deployment framework into the Carbon UI Server. Problem: Carbon UI Server binds each web app to the transport layer via a microservice (MSF4J). For each web app that will be deployed in the Carbon UI

Re: [Architecture] Webapp server for React based webapps

be useful to add a new page to the store app. But we will have to write the >> react app client side routing to pick the extension as a new route. >> >> >> thanks, >> Chanaka >> >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:35 PM, SajithAR Ariyarathna <sajit...@wso2.com&

Re: [Architecture] [C5] Skipping service registrations from Startup Order Resolver in ther server startup

. On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 2:31 PM, SajithAR Ariyarathna <sajit...@wso2.com> wrote: > Hi Kishanthan, > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Kishanthan Thangarajah < > kishant...@wso2.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 8:49 PM, SajithAR Ariyar

[Architecture] Option for the customer to change the app context path in React based web apps

Hi All, *What is app context path?* In http://localhost:8080/store/apis/1234 URL, the app context path is /store. Customer might want to deploy the Store app in /my-store context path (in that case the URL will be http://localhost:8080/my-store/apis/1234). Currently in React based web apps,

[Architecture] Webapp server for React based webapps

Hi All, We are in the process of developing $subject. Tentatively this webapp server is named as "Carbon UI Server". # Major goals of this webapp server are following: - Enforcing security measures. - Setting proper cache headers - Setting recommended security related HTTP

Re: [Architecture] Multiple runtime support for C5 based products

Hi Thusitha, On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne < thusit...@wso2.com> wrote: > Hi Jayanga, > > From the beginning of C5, we tried to achieve a clear separation between, >> User(Custom) space and Server space. >> IMO, having just a single deployment directory (for both

Re: [Architecture] Webapp server for React based webapps

ill have to write the > react app client side routing to pick the extension as a new route. > Extensions are React components. Thanks. > > > thanks, > Chanaka > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:35 PM, SajithAR Ariyarathna <sajit...@wso2.com> > wrote: > >> Hi All

[Architecture] WSO2 Stream Processor 4.0.0-beta Released!

Hi All, The WSO2 Analytics team is pleased to announce the release of *WSO2 Stream Processor Version 4.0.0 Beta*. WSO2 Analytics let digital business creating real-time, intelligent, actionable business insights, and data products which are achieved by WSO2 Stream Processor's real-time,

[Architecture] Customizing React based web apps with Carbon UI Server

Hi All, We are in the process of implementing the option for customers to customize (by overriding or adding new things) React based web apps. *Overriding:* Customer can override a file of a web app by putting the custom version of that file in the same relative path inside the

Re: [Architecture] Database template query configuration reader for Stream Processor.

r >> WSO2, Inc. >> #20, Palm Grove, Colombo 03, Sri Lanka >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=20,+Palm+Grove,+Colombo+03,+Sri+Lanka=gmail=g> >> Mobile: +94 (71) 214 1576 <+94%2071%20214%201576> >> Email: lasant...@wso2.com >> Web:www.wso

[Architecture] [Dev] [VOTE] Release WSO2 Stream Processor 4.0.0 RC1

Hi Devs, We are pleased to announce the release candidate of WSO2 Stream Processor 4.0.0. This is the Release Candidate version 1 of the WSO2 Stream Processor 4.0.0 Please download, test the product and vote. Vote will be open for 72 hours or as needed. Known issues:

[Architecture] [Dev] [VOTE] Release WSO2 Stream Processor 4.0.0 RC2

Hi Devs, We are pleased to announce the release candidate of WSO2 Stream Processor 4.0.0. This is the Release Candidate version 2 of the WSO2 Stream Processor 4.0.0 Please download, test the product and vote. Vote will be open for 72 hours or as needed. Known issues:

Re: [Architecture] Design Review : User Preferences in Carbon Dashboard Widgets

Hi Devs, On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Irindu Nugawela wrote: > Hi All, > I am implementing a feature for Widget Configuration Panel of Carbon > Dashboard's designer view, > to allow users(dashboard designers) to configure the properties of the > widgets such as the widget

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [VOTE] Release WSO2 Stream Processor 4.1.0 RC1

Hi All, We are calling off this vote. We will do a RC2 release soon. Thanks. On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Sriskandarajah Suhothayan wrote: > -1 > In Mac, the graphics of the editor event flow is not rendering correctly. > > Please check the attached image. > > On Thu, Mar

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [VOTE] Release WSO2 Data Analytics Server 3.2.0 RC1

Hi All, We are closing this vote, we will announce RC2 release soon. Thanks. On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Anusha Jayasundara wrote: > -1 , > > Missing client-truststore.jks file in several samples directories > including smart-home and apim-stats > > > > On Thu, Mar 15,