Hi,
On 4/25/23 16:40, Randy DuCharme wrote:
Am I the only one having difficulties with this? It's worse than half
as fast as f37 was, NTP/Chrony refuses to work. I could go on.
Afraid I'm going to have to ditch this. Kernel's been building for 7
hours now. Clocking, over-clocking,
Hi,
On 9/19/21 8:53 AM, Barry wrote:
On 19 Sep 2021, at 11:17, Stefan Wahren wrote:
Hi,
Am 18.09.21 um 21:58 schrieb Barry Scott:
On this page it states that the RPi4 is not supported.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi#Raspberry_Pi_4
yes the statement
On 2/1/21 11:30 AM, Andreas Reschke wrote:
Hi there,
I've received as a gift a Raspberry Pi 4B (8GB). While installing Fedora
on it I see difference behavior on booting.
a) booting from USB3
(https://fwmotion.com/blog/operating-systems/2020-09-05-installing-fedora-workstation-onto-pi4/)
Hi,
On 1/15/21 2:29 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Sorry for not being clear. Yes, I mean the Tianocore firmware.
So I've added Jeremy to my reply as he's the maintainer of this
firmware but as it's EDK2 and ACPI, as opposed to device tree, I'm not
sure it's intended to work.
As the driver would
Hi,
On 1/15/21 2:29 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Sorry for not being clear. Yes, I mean the Tianocore firmware.
So I've added Jeremy to my reply as he's the maintainer of this
firmware but as it's EDK2 and ACPI, as opposed to device tree, I'm not
sure it's intended to work.
As the driver would
Hi,
Welcome!
On 1/13/21 3:42 PM, Joel Savitz wrote:
Good afternoon,
A group of computer science undergraduates and I are interested in
contributing to the usability of Fedora Linux on the Raspberry Pi 4.
I was a part of this group as an undergrad and we developed a compatibility
layer for
Hi,
On 1/3/21 12:46 PM, Zach Villers wrote:
I recently got Fedora 33 Server booting on my RPI 4 - 8G using the RPI4 UEFI
firmware. The usb3 adapter I used worked fine with Raspbian, but with Fedora
33, there was an issue. I've worked around this issue and another involving F33
complaining
Hi,
On 12/14/20 2:15 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 01:39:26PM +0100, Daan Hoogland wrote:
and in addition, do you think this is a lot of work to get to
fedora33? can you shortlist it?
I've asked Peter to _not_ personally shortlist this. I know it's a hugely
important
Hi,
Just a quick note here, per IRC this morning in case someone finds this
but not that conversation.
On 05/18/2018 12:06 PM, Zamir SUN wrote:
On 05/17/2018 08:41 PM, Zamir SUN wrote:
On 05/16/2018 01:08 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
Hi,
On 05/14/2018 10:26 AM, Zamir SUN wrote:
Hi
Hi,
On 05/14/2018 10:26 AM, Zamir SUN wrote:
Hi,
Today I am trying my HikeyBoard (620) with
Fedora-Minimal-28-1.1.aarch64.raw.xz. It simply cannot boot.
So, two quick questions. What firmware & version are you using, and have
you tried booting one of the installer images?
(I tend to use
On 09/22/2017 07:41 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 03:19:12PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
Hi,
On 09/18/2017 02:18 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Hey,
The HiKey960 is one of the supported list of devices per
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM?rd
Hi,
On 09/20/2017 10:27 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 04:14:04PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Hi,
On 09/18/2017 02:18 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Hey,
The HiKey960 is one of the supported list of devices per
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM?rd=Architectures/AArch64)
where it mentions that the 96Boards.
But I am not finding any docs on how to install?
I don't
On 10/19/2016 12:29 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
Jeremy,
On 21.09.16 14:57:45, Jon Masters wrote:
Going forward, I would /also/ like to be 52-bit VA tolerant.
are current fixes for 48 bits sufficient to later extend it to 52
bits? It would be good if userland can already support 52 bits to
On 10/19/2016 12:29 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
Jeremy,
On 21.09.16 14:57:45, Jon Masters wrote:
Going forward, I would /also/ like to be 52-bit VA tolerant.
are current fixes for 48 bits sufficient to later extend it to 52
bits? It would be good if userland can already support 52 bits to
Hi,
On 09/22/2016 04:58 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
2016-09-21 20:47 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton <jeremy.lin...@arm.com>:
On 09/15/2016 08:15 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
2016-09-14 23:59 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton <jeremy.lin...@arm.com>:
js185:
couchdb-0:1.6.1-16
On 09/15/2016 08:15 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
2016-09-14 23:59 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton <jeremy.lin...@arm.com>:
js185:
couchdb-0:1.6.1-16.fc25.x86_64
...
erlang-js-0:1.3.0-7.fc25.x86_64
I've got patches (mostly untested) for building erlang-js with mozjs170.
https://gith
Hi,
On 09/14/2016 02:55 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
Hi Jeremy, all,
(trimming)
Perhaps Jeremy can update us on the status, and then he and others can
help drive this forward (someone should nominate themselves as the ring
leader too). I spoke with Cavium earlier today, and I know they'll be
keen
18 matches
Mail list logo