microSD card's between manufactures vary way to much (even between
lots), for BeagleBoard.org we eventually settled on 85% of stated
size.
dd if=/dev/zero of="${media}" bs=1024 count=0 seek=$((1024 * (GB_SIZE * 850)))
been using that default for a few years now.
Regards,
--
Rob
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 09/01/2015 12:14 PM, Robert Nelson wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> How is sy
in some steps? Or the image
just can not boot up on Beagle Bone Black by design?
That old factory bootloader in the eMMC doesn't know about how to deal
with newer extlinux image's.
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
https://rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm
in another message, I am suspecting that Linux is lacking some
support for the board. I'm totally out of ideas now; will see if I can
recompile Linux later, maybe.
CONFIG_CRYPTO_MANAGER_DISABLE_TESTS=y ?
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com
..
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
to the TI
manual, but i don't have a board to confirm that.)
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks
fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com wrote:
Follwup: I was unable to boot on beagleboard XM. I used the same offsets to
write MLO and u-boot.img as for beaglebone
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Scott M. Jones sc...@aprr.org
. But, there's not enough sram for both vfat extX so
it's a choice you need to make.
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
will ask on the beagleboard list.
You could git the current uboot and test with that rather than the 10-4 GA
uboot in F21.
beaglebone =/= cubieboard..
u-boot's not going to fix this at all, it's a kernel issue that'll be
fixed in v3.19-rc0..
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com
Well good to know that something else is going to push us toward getting the
3.19 kernel! ;)
Or just locally backport 22 patches when rc1 hits.
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
-CONFIG_CONS_INDEX=1
+CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS=SERIAL1,CONS_INDEX=1
+S:CONFIG_ARM=y
+S:CONFIG_TARGET_AM335X_EVM=y
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
itches and share them to
kernel.org as patches. So you need working video today, it looks
like you need write a kms driver for the hardware.. ;)
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
be nice that it was
working by the time F21 ships.
It'll only work on F21, if someone actually works on it.
btw: Luc recently posted a u-boot video patch for these devices.
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2014-August/185193.html
You should work with him..
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http
the opportunity cost of all the days you've spent
asking and troubleshooting on this list for video on the cubieboard 2,
spending an extra $29 would have more then paid for all your time
wasted.
If that doesn't work: in 2003: $100 was worth today's $129
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn
for this
regression, reply here for the number and I'll sort out a patch.
On mainline it got held up behind the: OPP modifier
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/309466
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
{
enable-active-high;
};
};
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
seen anything.
I also tried to just fix this in u-boot, but it got rejected..
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2014-January/172154.html
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
patchset.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg315656.html
Which now has more discussion going on last week.
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
.
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
Maybe, or maybe something else missing, I keep poking it on occasion
but I've not worked out what bit of glue we're missing.
I admit I gave up too easily yesterday, built a Robert Nelson 3.12.13
and got my F20 image going with that. After I got running, I did update
the Fedora kernel to current
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I admit I gave up too easily yesterday, built a Robert Nelson 3.12.13
and got my F20 image going with that. After I got running, I did update
the Fedora kernel to current 3.13.6 and tried to boot that. Same
problem
.
For reference, I've been using:
loadaddr=0x8030
fdtaddr=0x815f
initrdaddr=0x8160
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
wrote:
You may have some success booting by appending the DTB
.
Does anybody know if the Pandaboard A6 suffers from the same issues as with
the Pandaboard ES B3?
Really an A6? Great, svtronics knows no one works for pandaboard.org
anymore... ;)
What's the memory ID on top of the chip?
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Peter TB Brett pe...@peter-b.co.uk wrote:
Hi folks,
Just wanted to check whether anybody had tried Fedora 19 on the Pandaboard
A6.
Since the Pandaboard A3 worked well with Fedora
%, 600 MHz:0.00%, 800 MHz:0.00%, 1000 MHz:100.00%
# /usr/lib/python2.7/test/pystone.py
Pystone(1.1) time for 5 passes = 3.39
This machine benchmarks at 14749.3 pystones/second
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm
you've got the cpufreq driver built in rather than a module as
it doesn't auto load.
Yeap, it's built in..
https://github.com/RobertCNelson/linux-dev/blob/am33x-v3.13/patches/defconfig#L574
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Steve Underwood ste...@coppice.org wrote:
Hi,
It looks like the BeagleBone Black is still running
://github.com/RobertCNelson/linux-dev/blob/am33x-v3.13/patches/dts/0002-arm-dts-am335x-boneblack-add-cpu0-opp-points.patch
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Steve Underwood ste...@coppice.org wrote:
Hi,
It looks like the BeagleBone Black is still running at 550MHz with the
latest Fedora 20. Does anyone know what is holding it back from
minimal right now, going to throw the kitchen
sink at it tomorrow so v3.12.x users won't be missing stuff.
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
in mainline, use a newer version of u-boot: post
v2014.01-rc1 contains this commit:
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=675cc77a3ae45e8b0ec17128563264d4a509f628
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Peter TB Brett pe...@peter-b.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 07:34:04 -0600, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'd potentially be interested in trying something like the following
plan:
1) Find out enough info from Nishanth to make a F20 respin
the kernel is 3.13-rc4 +
f5837ec11f8cfa6d53ebc5806582771b2c9988c6 , ehci had been broken for a
long time in the device tree world. (the board file is scheduled for
removal in 3.14-rc)
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm
, or the wrong u-boot address's..
Any ideas what I did wrong? Is there a recommended way to get F20 on the
eMMC?
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
-boot,
purely for end user debugging..
https://github.com/RobertCNelson/Bootloader-Builder/blob/master/patches/v2013.10/0001-am335x_evm-uEnv.txt-bootz-n-fixes.patch#L121
not upstream..
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
?
Anywho, that was just an offer of help to Kyle, as it looked like
something was still missing as the images are not out yet..
(Crap, stupid gmail reply button.. Sorry Dennis for the double
response, i wasn't personally emailing you directly)..
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Kyle McMartin kmcma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:59:20PM -0500, Robert Nelson wrote:
Kyle, as i haven't seen your patchset/config
If you happened to start with our reference 3.12 config from
github.com/beagleboard/kernel there was an issues
disabling: CONFIG_USB_OTG_WHITELIST
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
as it is
currently in shawn's for-next branch:
https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/shawnguo/linux-2.6.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-next
https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/shawnguo/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=c9d96df207a2caadfb521c7b6108ef9172f5bf55
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com
off from the
front of the file..
or:
dd if=boot.scr bs=64 skip=1 of=boot.txt
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
it out to the staging tree.
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
omap4/panda developers left...
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's really great timing, as there really isn't any paid TI
omap4/panda developers left...
And how do they expect the Pandaboard
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Clive Messer clive.m.mes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 17:05 -0500, Robert Nelson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Brendan Conoboy b...@redhat.com wrote:
Starting in Fedora 20 / kernel 3.11, we think the following devices may be
newly
. There is also a question of timing- what is the
cutoff for adding a new release blocking device? Alpha? Beta? Is it a
feature request? Feedback appreciated.
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
Fedora *rpm's, idk anymore...
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
, it will break boot on all omap34xx/35xx
based systems. (aka BeagleBoard A/B/Cx's, igepv2's, overo's, etc
boards) that share the same kernel image as the xM..
Main thread on the issue/patch is here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg64931.html
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com
but it looks as though the KConfig
depends wasn't updated... Ran into this last week with the Beagle..
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
strongly suspecting there's
something wrong with the images, but haven't had time to track down
exactly where the problem lies.
What issue are you seeing with bconoby's F17-hardfp image? (theres
no dm9000 on the beagle xm)
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com
useful stuff.
Jon.
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
kernel based off omap2plus_config defconfig..
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
54 matches
Mail list logo
