2016-09-15 15:15 GMT+02:00 Peter Lemenkov :
> Hello All!
>
> 2016-09-14 23:59 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton :
>
>> js185:
>> couchdb-0:1.6.1-16.fc25.x86_64
> ...
>> erlang-js-0:1.3.0-7.fc25.x86_64
>
> I've got patches (mostly untested) for building erlang-js
On 10/19/2016 12:29 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
Jeremy,
On 21.09.16 14:57:45, Jon Masters wrote:
Going forward, I would /also/ like to be 52-bit VA tolerant.
are current fixes for 48 bits sufficient to later extend it to 52
bits? It would be good if userland can already support 52 bits to
On 10/19/2016 12:29 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
Jeremy,
On 21.09.16 14:57:45, Jon Masters wrote:
Going forward, I would /also/ like to be 52-bit VA tolerant.
are current fixes for 48 bits sufficient to later extend it to 52
bits? It would be good if userland can already support 52 bits to
Hi,
On 09/22/2016 04:58 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
2016-09-21 20:47 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton :
On 09/15/2016 08:15 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
2016-09-14 23:59 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton :
js185:
couchdb-0:1.6.1-16.fc25.x86_64
...
2016-09-21 20:47 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton :
> On 09/15/2016 08:15 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
>>
>> Hello All!
>>
>> 2016-09-14 23:59 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton :
>>
>>> js185:
>>> couchdb-0:1.6.1-16.fc25.x86_64
>>
>> ...
>>>
>>>
On 09/21/2016 02:47 PM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> On 09/15/2016 08:15 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
>> Hello All!
>>
>> 2016-09-14 23:59 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton :
>>
>>> js185:
>>> couchdb-0:1.6.1-16.fc25.x86_64
>> ...
>>> erlang-js-0:1.3.0-7.fc25.x86_64
>>
>> I've got patches
On 09/15/2016 08:15 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
2016-09-14 23:59 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton :
js185:
couchdb-0:1.6.1-16.fc25.x86_64
...
erlang-js-0:1.3.0-7.fc25.x86_64
I've got patches (mostly untested) for building erlang-js with mozjs170.
Hello All!
2016-09-14 23:59 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton :
> js185:
> couchdb-0:1.6.1-16.fc25.x86_64
...
> erlang-js-0:1.3.0-7.fc25.x86_64
I've got patches (mostly untested) for building erlang-js with mozjs170.
Hi,
On 09/14/2016 02:55 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
Hi Jeremy, all,
(trimming)
Perhaps Jeremy can update us on the status, and then he and others can
help drive this forward (someone should nominate themselves as the ring
leader too). I spoke with Cavium earlier today, and I know they'll be
keen
Great - that was my preference just didn't want to overkill it. But this sounds
like good test run of doing the process the right way...
--
Computer Architect | Sent from my 64-bit #ARM Powered phone
> On Sep 14, 2016, at 17:13, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> Hi Jeremy, all,
>
> I was just catching up with some folks and we discussed the status of
> 48-bit VA support. It seems to me that it would make most sense to have
> an official coordination effort between those
11 matches
Mail list logo