[fedora-arm] Re: 48-bit support in F26?

2017-01-25 Thread Peter Lemenkov
2016-09-15 15:15 GMT+02:00 Peter Lemenkov : > Hello All! > > 2016-09-14 23:59 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton : > >> js185: >> couchdb-0:1.6.1-16.fc25.x86_64 > ... >> erlang-js-0:1.3.0-7.fc25.x86_64 > > I've got patches (mostly untested) for building erlang-js

[fedora-arm] Re: 48-bit support in F26?

2016-10-28 Thread Jeremy Linton
On 10/19/2016 12:29 PM, Robert Richter wrote: Jeremy, On 21.09.16 14:57:45, Jon Masters wrote: Going forward, I would /also/ like to be 52-bit VA tolerant. are current fixes for 48 bits sufficient to later extend it to 52 bits? It would be good if userland can already support 52 bits to

[fedora-arm] Re: 48-bit support in F26?

2016-10-28 Thread Jeremy Linton
On 10/19/2016 12:29 PM, Robert Richter wrote: Jeremy, On 21.09.16 14:57:45, Jon Masters wrote: Going forward, I would /also/ like to be 52-bit VA tolerant. are current fixes for 48 bits sufficient to later extend it to 52 bits? It would be good if userland can already support 52 bits to

[fedora-arm] Re: 48-bit support in F26?

2016-09-22 Thread Jeremy Linton
Hi, On 09/22/2016 04:58 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: 2016-09-21 20:47 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton : On 09/15/2016 08:15 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: Hello All! 2016-09-14 23:59 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton : js185: couchdb-0:1.6.1-16.fc25.x86_64 ...

[fedora-arm] Re: 48-bit support in F26?

2016-09-22 Thread Peter Lemenkov
2016-09-21 20:47 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton : > On 09/15/2016 08:15 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >> >> Hello All! >> >> 2016-09-14 23:59 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton : >> >>> js185: >>> couchdb-0:1.6.1-16.fc25.x86_64 >> >> ... >>> >>>

[fedora-arm] Re: 48-bit support in F26?

2016-09-21 Thread Jon Masters
On 09/21/2016 02:47 PM, Jeremy Linton wrote: > On 09/15/2016 08:15 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >> Hello All! >> >> 2016-09-14 23:59 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton : >> >>> js185: >>> couchdb-0:1.6.1-16.fc25.x86_64 >> ... >>> erlang-js-0:1.3.0-7.fc25.x86_64 >> >> I've got patches

[fedora-arm] Re: 48-bit support in F26?

2016-09-21 Thread Jeremy Linton
On 09/15/2016 08:15 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: Hello All! 2016-09-14 23:59 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton : js185: couchdb-0:1.6.1-16.fc25.x86_64 ... erlang-js-0:1.3.0-7.fc25.x86_64 I've got patches (mostly untested) for building erlang-js with mozjs170.

[fedora-arm] Re: 48-bit support in F26?

2016-09-15 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello All! 2016-09-14 23:59 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton : > js185: > couchdb-0:1.6.1-16.fc25.x86_64 ... > erlang-js-0:1.3.0-7.fc25.x86_64 I've got patches (mostly untested) for building erlang-js with mozjs170.

[fedora-arm] Re: 48-bit support in F26?

2016-09-14 Thread Jeremy Linton
Hi, On 09/14/2016 02:55 PM, Jon Masters wrote: Hi Jeremy, all, (trimming) Perhaps Jeremy can update us on the status, and then he and others can help drive this forward (someone should nominate themselves as the ring leader too). I spoke with Cavium earlier today, and I know they'll be keen

[fedora-arm] Re: 48-bit support in F26?

2016-09-14 Thread Jon Masters
Great - that was my preference just didn't want to overkill it. But this sounds like good test run of doing the process the right way... -- Computer Architect | Sent from my 64-bit #ARM Powered phone > On Sep 14, 2016, at 17:13, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep

[fedora-arm] Re: 48-bit support in F26?

2016-09-14 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > Hi Jeremy, all, > > I was just catching up with some folks and we discussed the status of > 48-bit VA support. It seems to me that it would make most sense to have > an official coordination effort between those