RE: patent paper and bepress

2002-10-13 Thread Michael Etchison
William Dickens: Anyone have any idea why the norm in economics allows referees so much time to do a report? Why its so different from other fields? Is this one of those soft vs. hard field things? Its my impression that the physical science journals all want fast turn around on their referee

RE: The Popularity of Nonprice Rationing

2002-08-31 Thread Michael Etchison
Asa Janney: It appears to me that price rationing is not allowed, unless the situation becomes permanent. Why is this? It is a matter of a moment for a city council, or governor, to declare that rationing is over. Changing the price is likely to take much longer -- or never happen.

Breakup value WAS Nations as Corporations

2002-08-16 Thread Michael Etchison
Eric Crampton: The break-up value shouldn't be less than the value of the assets in the country Only if the New Institutionlaists are all wet about asset specificity. Me, I think that the value of individual assets is _embedded_ in specific locations, relations, uses, contracts, plans, etc.

RE: charlatanism

2002-08-14 Thread Michael Etchison
fabio guillermo rojas: Similarly, I find that these articles that trash economics because it is psuedoscientific do the same - they obsess over the wording (the use of math) rather than think real hard about the intuitions behind things. Of course, there is always bad research hiding behind

RE: taxi transitional gains trap

2002-08-04 Thread Michael Etchison
Bryan Caplan: If a majority of NYers seriously wanted free entry in cabs, wouldn't it happen regardless of the opinions of cab companies? Sure it would -- if your definition of seriously includes are willing and able to put enough pressure on the relevant city officials to both persuade them and

RE: efficient markets ...

2002-08-03 Thread Michael Etchison
Chris MACRAE: Whilst this fundamental contextual bias in what corporate performance is defined to be rules, the chances of markets being efficient dwindles absolutely below zero. I used to do criminal defense work, so I have some experience with people whose time horizon is very, very short, and

RE: The Public Believes in Mean Reversion

2002-07-23 Thread Michael Etchison
Subject: The Public Believes in Mean Reversion Gee, so do I. The question, as Mr. Dumpty might have put it, is to which mean are we reverting? Makes a couple of hundred (or more) points' -- and a direction - difference. Michael

RE: Why are the simple folk so wrong WAS Republican Reversal

2002-07-18 Thread Michael Etchison
Alex Tabarrok: Yes, this is precisely my point. It is not a pleasant experience to genuinely consider the possibility that the reason one is not persuasive is that one is mistaken. I try to limit my doing so to only two or three times a year, or I'd never get anything done. g Michael Michael

RE: Republican Reversal

2002-07-17 Thread Michael Etchison
--- Alex wrote: Yes, I believe that the majority of the American public supports farm subsidies. to which Fred Foldvary replied: Why do corporations, lawyers, unions, and other interests provide candidates and elected representatives with millions of dollars of funds and favors if they

Why are the simple folk so wrong WAS Republican Reversal

2002-07-17 Thread Michael Etchison
Alex Tabarrok: The evidence is even stronger in other fields that information per-se often does not change people's minds. . . . If information doesn't change people's minds - what does? You do notice, I trust, that just as there are those, including some who appear to be well-educated and

RE: Republican Reversal

2002-07-16 Thread Michael Etchison
Fred Foldvary: Does the typical American agree, for example, that it is good policy to spend billions on farm subsidies, or are they just ignorant and apathetic? But that is not an example of anything that happens in the real world. In the real world we have almost 600 in Congress, dealing

It's not bad accounting, it's art

2002-07-10 Thread Michael Etchison
http://www.satirewire.com/news/june02/worldcom.shtml Michael E. Etchison Texas Wholesale Power Report MLE Consulting www.mleconsulting.com 1423 Jackson Road Kerrville, TX 78028 (830) 895-4005

RE: fantastically entertaining paper

2002-06-21 Thread Michael Etchison
Robin Hanson: Michael E. Etchison wrote: an industry (academic journals) where . . . entry is cheap As a non-academic, I have to wonder -- if getting in is so cheap, why is getting a copy so expensive? Standard armchair econ question, really. Yes, I know, and I know what we'd suspect. I

RE: In Praise of Pay Toilets

2002-05-29 Thread Michael Etchison
John Hull: Of course Michael Etchison may be right as well (if I read him correctly), in that firms engage in hueristic pricing and just toss bathroom maintenance into the mix. What firms think they do, and what they actually do, are neither identical nor even coextensive, of course. A firm may

Prices and costs WAS In Praise of Pay Toilets

2002-05-28 Thread Michael Etchison
(Yes, I know, the Austrians on the list would kill me for assuming cost dictates price, rather than the other way around. But it's just awkward to state it the right way. :) ) This Austrian has no difficulty with that way of putting it _in the context of this discussion_. What we are talking

RE: In Praise of Pay Toilets

2002-05-28 Thread Michael Etchison
William Sjostrom Not at all obvious. Two goods, A and B, with marginal cost CA and CB, Within what may be a narrow range, the approximate marginal cost of two goods may actually be knowable by an experienced person of good judgment. and independent marginal value VA and VB Neither we nor the

RE: In Praise of Pay Toilets

2002-05-27 Thread Michael Etchison
John Perich: why do some public restrooms in . . . bookstores require either coins OR free tokens to use? Starting with the observation that bookstore customers can be very odd indeed, and adding in what appears to be an observed propensity no less than average to do weird things in

RE: In Praise of Pay Toilets

2002-05-27 Thread Michael Etchison
john hull: Serious question: If the firm is already charging a profit maximizing price, how can it pass the cost of bathroom maintenance to customers as a whole? 1. There is no a priori reason to think that either * he is in fact charging a profit-maximizing price, or * he believes that he is

RE: Me and the eminent econometrician Dr. Joyce

2002-05-13 Thread Michael Etchison
Christopher Auld: I can state for the record that correlation does not imply causation is far too advanced a concept for most reporters, even those who are supposed to have a technical bent. That may well be so, but the story you pointed us to does not support it (speaking of unwarranted

RE: Emotions and Entrepeneurship

2002-04-12 Thread Michael Etchison
Fred Foldvary: Economic rationality consists of just two things: 1. Economizing: minimize costs and maximize benefits. 2. Consistency: if A is preferred to B and B to C, then A is preferred to C. This transitivity applies only at a moment in time. Economic rationality does not judge ends. It

RE: Grade Inflation

2002-04-09 Thread Michael Etchison
Gustavo Lacerda: You would think that smart employers would know to rate a B+ student from a tough-grading school more favorably than an A- student from an easy-grading school. But there are too many schools, and most employers aren't using a national database of with statistics about each

RE: Ph.D. proliferation

2002-04-06 Thread Michael Etchison
This is very ominous news indeed: fabio guillermo rojas: A consistent findng in the college major selection literature is that family background has a positive effect on choosing usless majors like philosophy or history, controlling for ability and vocational orientation. Thus, as we become

RE: Securities analysis

2002-04-04 Thread Michael Etchison
The (stock) market might, at least as a matter of initial heuristics, be assumed to be efficient. But only insofar as _risk_ is concerned. One can imagine, that is, that the price of a share of GM not only has in mind all the known data about GM -- including what to make of all the