Re: Stack limit error when creating job with DMT

2012-12-03 Thread Rod Harris
Hi Jason and Victor and others, One thing that I noticed about V8 is that I think the default for the maximum stack of filters is still a very high 10,000. The trouble with having such a high limit is that you can have your system just run out of resources eg. stack space, before that limit is

Re: Blue (new) license agreement issues...

2012-12-03 Thread Misi Mladoniczky
Hi, The misunderstanding as such has been sorted out. And both parties seems to have been correct. I was correct in that Service Desk User licenses can normally be used for custom applications. So no one needs to worry. In this specific case however, the customer had a special clause in their

Re: Possible virus?

2012-12-03 Thread Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC
Was anyone unlucky enough to click on the link to see what it was? -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Shellman, David Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 10:48 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Possible virus?

Re: ***Error: Number of tokens exceed the number of columns***

2012-12-03 Thread Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC
Simon, CSV is an interesting format...there are actually tons of different configurations for it...but if you remove Site and it works fine, can you investigate your data and tell me if there are around every comma separated element? Is there a , inside of the site data, is it possible that

Re: Blue (new) license agreement issues...

2012-12-03 Thread Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC
What a strange clause -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Misi Mladoniczky Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 4:56 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Blue (new) license agreement issues... Hi, The

Re: Blue (new) license agreement issues...

2012-12-03 Thread Tauf Chowdhury
What we learned: read the contract carefully before signing. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 3, 2012, at 9:06 AM, Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC lj.longwing@mda.mil wrote: What a strange clause -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)

Re: Remedy archiving methods

2012-12-03 Thread Vishal Navale
Thanks Vikrant. Vishal On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Kulkarni, Vikrant vkulka...@columnit.comwrote: And to find the relationship between objects we can always enable object relationships on the test servers and find out the relations of each form. Once that's done we can use this list of

Re: OFFLIST - Incident Submitter and License terms - Dear BMC have you mislead us?

2012-12-03 Thread Tanner, Doug
We do the same thing here with all our custom applications (15), when the submitter updates thier request (Either via email of via the Customer Portal (web), we notify the assigned the individual, if there is no individual we then update the group, based on their group preferences (Manager, all

Re: CMDB 7.6.04 Update Assets to In Inventory

2012-12-03 Thread Rick Trevino
Phil, the only way I found to automate the inventory process was to develop staging form and workflow, Rick it works great once you have it set up correctly, Rick On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Phil philip.bouc...@logica.com wrote: ** Hi, I'm looking for an automatic process to run an

AD: Version 5.20 of Meta-Update available

2012-12-03 Thread Ben Chernys
Hi Folks, A new version of Meta-Update is now available for download. Please login to our support area to pick up the new distribution. Meta-Update release 5.20 is a major enhancement over the current release. It now includes support or setting the archive properties of forms, a new

Re: ***Error: Number of tokens exceed the number of columns***

2012-12-03 Thread Tomasiewicz, Mike (Information Technology)
You may also want to try converting the file using the dos2unix command from within Linux. .: Mike T :. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Simon Ellis Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 7:13 PM To:

RRR|DefDiff new free tool published

2012-12-03 Thread Misi Mladoniczky
Hi, I have just added a new tool to the RRR|Commands section that can compare complete systems and create delta def-files and diff-lists for you. Sample command: rrrDefDiff.exe source.def target.def The above command will produce a diff-list and and these set of def-files: -

Re: RRR|DefDiff new free tool published

2012-12-03 Thread Murnane, Phil
Misi: You rock _so_ hard. :D Thanks! --Phil -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Misi Mladoniczky Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 13:35 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: RRR|DefDiff new free tool published

Re: ***Error: Number of tokens exceed the number of columns***

2012-12-03 Thread Simon Ellis
Hi there, Another interesting fact is that the site entry is identical for all records, so I'm importing say 100 CI's all for the same site and every other record is skipped. I did look and see if there was any extra characters or magic spaces, but nothing. Also with the dos2unix conversion

Re: ***Error: Number of tokens exceed the number of columns***

2012-12-03 Thread Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC
Does the converted file still import every other record? And I'm not entirely sure I understand what you mean by 'every separated element'...can you provide examples of pre conversion and post conversion? -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)

Re: ***Error: Number of tokens exceed the number of columns***

2012-12-03 Thread Jason Miller
You may want to check for extra characters and magic spaces (EC and MS). If somebody selected two cells in Excel to fill down and if one of those cells had EC/MS then it would have filled down every other cell differently. Jason On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Simon Ellis

Re: Stack limit error when creating job with DMT

2012-12-03 Thread Victor
Thank you all for your inputs. I set the filter stack limit to 100 and tried to create the job again. The process aborted with Too many levels in filter processing (ARERR 299) ARServer process did not crash nor there was any spike in memory or CPU usage. The arfilter.log however displayed a

View Access on Known Error Form in ITSM 7.6.04 SP2

2012-12-03 Thread Stroud, Natalie K
Hi Listers: I'm looking at the Known Error form (part of Problem Management) in ITSM 7.6.04 SP2 and am noticing that it has a field called View Access on the form itself. My familiarity with View Access is only with what appears in the Work Info. There, if it's set to Internal, it means that

Re: ***Error: Number of tokens exceed the number of columns***

2012-12-03 Thread Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC
I want to say you have one too many in each line -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Simon Ellis Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 1:30 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ***Error: Number of tokens

Upgrade AR server 6.3 o/s to 2008

2012-12-03 Thread Drew Shuller
Good afternoon everyone! Time marches on and we need to upgrade the Windows 2003 operating system that our 6.3 Remedy system runs on. We need to upgrade to a minimum of 2008 Enterprise. R2 would be nice. I haven't found anything yet in the archives that says anyone is running a 6.3 server on

Re: Upgrade AR server 6.3 o/s to 2008

2012-12-03 Thread Misi Mladoniczky
Hi, I would suggest that you install a fresh 7.6.04 or 8 on Win 2008, and then transfer your application and data using for example RRR|Chive and some other tools you will find at our web site. For example RRR|DefFieldDiff for your AR* forms and RRR|DefHideExpandBox. Best Regards - Misi,

Re: Stack limit error when creating job with DMT

2012-12-03 Thread Jason Miller
Looking at our ITSM 7.6.04 install the following are set and I am pretty these are still the default: Maximum Filters for an Operation: 9 Maximum Stack of Filter: 1 I wonder how appropriate these settings are for a 32-bit AR Server though? I am figuring a 64-bit system with 6gb and

Re: Upgrade AR server 6.3 o/s to 2008

2012-12-03 Thread Jason Miller
I agree with Misi. You probably could upgrade using the path you mention but a fresh install is a great time to do clean up. So many things are laid down over the year and system get cluttered over time (especially Windows and registry). I am willing to bet that 6.3 can run on 2008 but probably

Re: Problem comparing date/time field to $DATE$ in a filter

2012-12-03 Thread Jason Miller
Although if you are validating a business rule you do not want that functionality to reside only in the client. It is appropriate as a filter if it is enforcing a rule. Maybe you have an AL to catch it in the UIbecause it is friendlier and a filter to back it up in case the UI rule ever gets

Re: Problem comparing date/time field to $DATE$ in a filter

2012-12-03 Thread Jason Miller
I was just about to submit an Idea on BMC Communities to change the UI of the Date field. Just for fun I thought I would check in Mid Tier to make sure it behaves the same as WUT and what do you know it displays as a calendar. Since WUT is no longer shipped I guess the issue is as resolved as it

'field' != 'DB.field'

2012-12-03 Thread Raj
Hi, I have gone through various discussions on 'field' != 'DB.field' on the forum here but still little confused. Currently, we have a code 'field' != 'DB.field' and looks like it tracks all changes to the field. It is even tracking null value change as well. For Example, I am updating Audit log

Re: 'field' != 'DB.field'

2012-12-03 Thread Dale Jones
Try 'TR.field' != 'DB.field' AND 'TR.field' != $NULL$ Dale Jones DCS Raleigh, NC 919-523-6034 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] on behalf of Raj [ravi6...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 7:26 PM To:

Re: Stack limit error when creating job with DMT

2012-12-03 Thread Rod Harris
Hi Jason, Well the 1 is not appropriate for Victor. Whatever process he has running looks like it would have chewed up all available memory before crashing the server. I'd say that the 100 is probably fine - at least now he has trapped what I think is likely to be an error before crashing the

Re: 'field' != 'DB.field'

2012-12-03 Thread Rod Harris
Hi Raj, Your understanding of field != DB.field is correct. It should not be capturing a change from NULL to NULL. You have something else going on here. Maybe the way you are displaying the value isn't capturing the difference? I have used this condition on all versions of ARS from 4.5 to 8 and

Re: 'field' != 'DB.field'

2012-12-03 Thread Chintan Shah
Hi Raj, Can you turn on filter logging to see if there is any other workflow firing after that audit filter has fired which then sets that field to NULL? Thanks Chintan. --- On Mon, 12/3/12, Raj ravi6...@gmail.com wrote: From: Raj ravi6...@gmail.com Subject: 'field' != 'DB.field' To:

Re: 'field' != 'DB.field'

2012-12-03 Thread Raj
Thanks Chintan for your reply. Yup, I already tried that but I do not see any other workflow firing after this filter and setting the field to NULL. On Monday, December 3, 2012 8:03:40 PM UTC-8, Chintan Shah wrote: ** Hi Raj, Can you turn on filter logging to see if there is any other

Re: 'field' != 'DB.field'

2012-12-03 Thread Raj
Thanks Dale. Based on lot of discussions on this topic, I decided not to involve TR to avoid any complexities.(In-spite of benefits of using TR) but looks like I would have to give that a try. Also, I was thinking to try something like below: ('field' != 'DB.field') AND ('field' != ) On

Re: 'field' != 'DB.field'

2012-12-03 Thread Raj
Thanks Rod. Workflow is pretty straight forward, I have a tmp field and setting the new value to this tmp field. Firing this filter on modify with RUN IF as 'field' != 'DB.field', three sets fields, 1st set fields - setting the new value to tmp field. 2nd set fields - entry in Audit log - Value

Re: 'field' != 'DB.field'

2012-12-03 Thread Raj
Dale, I think this would not capture if I am setting the field from a some value to NULL value. As, I still want this entry in the Audit Log - Value changed from A to .(BLANK) Just that, I want to avoid capturing NULL to NULL which is not relevant for me. On Monday, December 3, 2012

Re: 'field' != 'DB.field'

2012-12-03 Thread Chintan Shah
Hi Raj, Try this. 'Field!=DB.Field' and 'TR.Field!=$NULL$ See if it resolves ur issue. Thanks Chintan. --- On Mon, 12/3/12, Raj ravi6...@gmail.com wrote: From: Raj ravi6...@gmail.com Subject: Re: 'field' != 'DB.field' To: arsl...@googlegroups.com Cc: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG, arslist@ARSLIST.ORG,