If you have restarted all of your arservers, without the right settings,
all of your mid-tiers might be still connecting to just the first ARServer
you started up. one way to trigger a rebalance is to click on 'Balance Now'
from the mid-tier config pages.
May I ask how are you determining an even
Thank you all for your valuable contributions!
We asked to remove the persistence on the LB and we no see an even distribution
of users on all AR Server.
https://docs.bmc.com/docs/display/public/ars81/Configuring+a+load+balancer+with+a+firewall%2C+web+servers%2C+a+second+load+balancer%2C+and+mul
Jason,
You are correct, Jetty running on port 8008, or whatever port they are on
certainly needs it's own LB depending on the need of the client in place.
If HA is needed, LB makes sense. Regardless of if you are talking about
Remedy Restful services or CMDB Restful services...depending on the HA
But you can see in the screenshot that the maximum for each is in the 30's,
so from that it seems to me that the LB is able to recognize unique
individuals coming across and not treating the Mid-Tier server as a whole
as a single userbut I do agree with you that there is 0 reason to have
the 3
Hi,
So if you have say 4 mid-tiers and 4 remedy-servers and 100 users.
The first load balancer will dirstribute the 100 users to something like 25 per
mid-tier server.
The load balancer between mid-tiers and the remedy-servers will see only 4
"users", which is the 4 mid-tiers. It is not inposs
netstat.
KR Conny
Von: ARSList [mailto:arslist-boun...@arslist.org] Im Auftrag von Thomas
Miskiewicz
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Februar 2018 18:17
An: ARSList
Betreff: Re: Loadbalancer traffic distribution question
They don’t have logging running because of the massive data load. But the LB
guy
Node 3 seems to be used 50% more than node 1, but agreed that everything
seems like it's getting traffic
You still haven't identified what sort of monitor is in use, and if node 1
goes down/offline at any point...I'll give you a scenario
all 3 getting normal load, but node 1 goes offline, eit
I'll also use this thread as an opportunity for a new discussion related to
load balancing.
Is anybody aware of any docs that pertain to load balancing Jetty on AR
Server? The REST API has been hosed here for a few years but that wasn't
user-facing (but should be able to setup redundancy). The new
They don’t have logging running because of the massive data load. But the LB
guy sent me the attached screenshot saying that it shows that all three nodes
get an equal amount of requests.
If they really do, the I wonder why on one of the nodes I only see 2, 3 users
and and on the others an equa
n page instead of the SAML
> redirect until we clear cache.
>
>
>
> Perhaps a problem with apptier load balancing?
>
>
> --
> *From:* ARSList on behalf of Randeep Atwal <
> ratwals...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 1, 2018 11
authentication page instead of the SAML redirect
until we clear cache.
Perhaps a problem with apptier load balancing?
From: ARSList on behalf of Randeep Atwal
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 11:43 AM
To: ARSList
Subject: Re: Loadbalancer traffic
I reviewed that info before posting here but don’t really see room for change.
Do you?
> On Feb 1, 2018, at 5:43 PM, Randeep Atwal wrote:
>
> From the Mid-Tier side, you also might want to review your setttings as
> described here to work with the load balancer settings:
>
> https://docs.bmc.
>From the Mid-Tier side, you also might want to review your setttings as
described here to work with the load balancer settings:
https://docs.bmc.com/docs/display/public/ars81/Configuring+the+mid+tier+connection+pool
https://docs.bmc.com/docs/brid91/en/configuring-the-mid-tier-connection-pool-610
There isn't much can be done in mid tier.this is purely LB team need to
analyse what is going wrong . Need to sit with them and see why all the
connections are going to one server in reality with the help of logs.. we
had strange problem recently that on 2 AR servers we used to see same set
of user
I've always preferred to use least connections personally, but from what
I've read of the docs they recommend round robinbut round robin doesn't
explain how your LB would be putting everyone on one node...it should
literally go 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3 for new connections, and as you discussed,
keep yo
Hey LJ and thank you for the prompt reply.
Talked to them already. We’re using round robin. I’m not an expert on LB but my
understanding was that we would have about an equal amount of users on all AR
Servers using it.
The guy explained that once you connect there is a time out of 180 seconds.
Thomas,
You'll need to work with the LB team to identify what distribution method
they are usingcommon options are 'round robin' in which it just simply
points everything at each server in turn, 'least connections' where it
tries to analyze how many are 'currently' connected to each node and se
Hi Listers,
we got a physical load balancer before the Mid-Tier servers and a logical load
balancer between the Mid Tier and our AR Servers.
We noticed that on some days all the users land on only one AR Server. On other
days two. What’s the reason behind it? What do we need to configure and to
18 matches
Mail list logo