workflow.
http://www.softwaretoolhouse.com/ http://www.softwaretoolhouse.com/
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of pritch
Sent: June-26-12 21:36
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
that
(Crystal, SAP, etc)?
- Original Message -
From: Ben Chernys ben.cher...@softwaretoolhouse.com
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 4:51:20 AM
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
In any software, the version number is not decided on any logical or code based
reason
@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
Thanks for the info. Can you give examples of non-BMC software that issues
major updates with only bumping the minor (or release) version - ie Has MS
Windows released a major update that went to 6.1 rather than 7. I know that's
an OS vs an app system, but do
as in this most recent restricted release of 8.0...
Joe
From: Susan Palmer
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 9:04 PM
Newsgroups: public.remedy.arsystem.general
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
** What does it really matter what the number is? The content is what matters.
We'll be told when
...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Monday, June 25, 2012 9:04 PM
*Newsgroups:* public.remedy.arsystem.general
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: Next ARS version
** What does it really matter what the number is? The content is what
matters. We'll be told when they want us to know. That's been the mantra
could be
wrong.
Thanks,
Shawn Pierson
Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of pritch
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 7:25 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of pritch
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 7:25 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
Thanks for the info. Can you give examples of non-BMC software that
issues major updates
discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of pritch
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 7:25 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
Thanks for the info. Can you give examples of non-BMC software that
issues major updates with only bumping the minor (or release
,
Shawn Pierson
Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of pritch
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 7:25 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
Thanks
...@sm2baleares.es
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 10:59:41 AM
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
** In case of other products, version numbering is normally related to
licensing. So when you buy a license, the upgrades inside a major version are
included (that was the case of windows server
: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 12:55 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
**
You don't happen to know if there is an SP3 in the works for Atrium Core,
ITSM, and RKM 7.6.04, do you? All of my apps are stuck at 7.6.04 SP1 since the
ITSM SP2 installer was dead on arrival. My server and other
: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 10:59:41 AM
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
** In case of other products, version numbering is normally related to
licensing. So when you buy a license, the upgrades inside a major version are
included (that was the case of windows server 2008 and R2). But when you
Hello
JSS is guilty of releasing major versions using the following revisions:
3.1, 3.2, 3.3, etc. And we denote minor revisions as follows, 3.5.14.
I'd considered falling in line with BMC version numbers, but I concluded
that (a) we supply the product for Kinetic, HP Service Manager, and
an 'incidental' release.
- Original Message -
From: Susan Palmer suzanpal...@gmail.com
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 9:04:16 PM
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
** What does it really matter what the number is? The content is what
matters. We'll be told when they want us to know
Of Ron Tavares
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 3:53 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
**
Is there an ETA?
.ron
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Joe Martin D'Souza
jdso...@shyle.netmailto:jdso...@shyle.net wrote:
**
It is technically Christened as 8.0
9:04:16 PM
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
** What does it really matter what the number is? The content is what
matters. We'll be told when they want us to know. That's been the mantra
since I started using Remedy in 1995, don't bother asking ...we're not
telling.
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012
...@blueturtle.co.za
*Sent:* Sunday, June 24, 2012 1:30 PM
*Newsgroups:* public.remedy.arsystem.general
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: Next ARS version
**
Hi All,
I really hope this version is a *stable* version that will win back
customer trust in the remedy applications. “*Loads
California www.wwrug12.com
Daniel
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of praveen kumar
Sent: June 24, 2012 11:12 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: [SPAM]Re: Next ARS version
**
Yes..! next ARS release will be 8.0 confirmed by BMC. Loads
Tavares
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 3:53 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
**
Is there an ETA?
.ron
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Joe Martin D'Souza
jdso...@shyle.netmailto:jdso...@shyle.net wrote:
**
It is technically Christened as 8.0 although it was formally scheduled
Personally, I think BMC needs to redefine its versioning criteria after
seeing what happened with 7.6.03 to 7.6.04. I still can't make sense of how
04 was a maintenance release.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 24, 2012, at 11:11 AM, praveen kumar prawin_ku...@hotmail.com
wrote:
**
Yes..! next ARS
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
**
Personally, I think BMC needs to redefine its versioning criteria after seeing
what happened with 7.6.03 to 7.6.04. I still can't make sense of how 04 was a
maintenance release.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 24, 2012, at 11:11 AM, praveen
Newsgroups: public.remedy.arsystem.general
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
**
Personally, I think BMC needs to redefine its versioning criteria after seeing
what happened with 7.6.03 to 7.6.04. I still can't make sense of how 04 was a
maintenance release.
Sent from my
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
**
That’s weird.. did they call it a maintenance release? No way it wasn’t..
With the introduction of something so foreign to the ARS as the overlays,
it can’t be considered a maintenance release.. It was a major release..
In my opinion, any release that changes
I'm a bit confused about next version.
Some people told me that it will be 7.7, but others say 8.0. I'm sure that
you'll have the correct answer.
Regards,
Jose Huerta
http://theremedyforit.com/
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or
I think it was to be 7.7, but then BMC decided there are enough new
feature to call it 8.0.
On 24/06/2012 12:22, Jose Huerta wrote:
** I'm a bit confused about next version.
Some people told me that it will be 7.7, but others say 8.0. I'm sure
that you'll have the correct answer.
Regards,
Yes..! next ARS release will be 8.0 confirmed by BMC. Loads of new features and
expectations. Fingers crossed for the upcoming release.
Cheers.!prawin
I think it was to be 7.7, but then BMC decided there are enough new
feature to call it 8.0.
On 24/06/2012 12:22, Jose Huerta wrote:
**
platforms is the
most important.
Francois
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of praveen kumar
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 5:12 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
**
Yes..! next ARS release will be 8.0 confirmed
that stability across platforms is the
most important.
Francois
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of praveen kumar
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 5:12 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Next ARS version
**
Yes..! next ARS release
28 matches
Mail list logo
