discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL
> PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jarl Grøneng
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 10:29 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: Q: Server Configuration Recommendations
>
> Is not 24 fast and 40 list an overkill with 80-100 users?
>
> --
> Jarl
&
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jarl Grøneng
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 10:29 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Q: Server Configuration Recommendations
Is not 24 fast and 40 list an overkill with 80-100 users
ction Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Opela, Gary L Contr
OC-ALC/ITMA
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 6:20 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Resolved: Server Configuration Recommendations
Bravo Craig. Thanks for posting the solution to the &#x
ction Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Murnane
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 5:00 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Resolved: Server Configuration Recommendations
Thanks, Craig!
- Original Message
From: Craig Carter <[EMAIL P
Is not 24 fast and 40 list an overkill with 80-100 users?
--
Jarl
On Jan 15, 2008 3:41 PM, Craig Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> **
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> We're running into some performance problems recently. I upgraded the
> server a few days ago (operating system, database, CPUs, memory, qu
Thanks, Craig!
- Original Message
From: Craig Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 3:26:19 PM
Subject: Resolved: Server Configuration Recommendations
I wanted to follow-up and provide some changes I made that had a HUGE
impact on perfo
I wanted to follow-up and provide some changes I made that had a HUGE
impact on performance and resolved the majority of our problem.
Although we had 16GB on the system, the majority of it was not being
used and performance monitor showed everything was waiting for disk.
Average disk queue length
m: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of Axton
Sent: Tue 01/15/08 3:12 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: FW: Server Configuration Recommendations
Funny thing about Windows, why does it even use the page file when physical
memory is available. Solaris and BSD do not do this.
o: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: FW: Server Configuration Recommendations
** Funny thing about Windows, why does it even use the page file when
physical memory is available. Solaris and BSD do not do this. The only
time the page file is used on these OS's is when physical memory is
exhausted.
Isn't the page file the system swap file? I think it displays it's size,
but doesn't actually use it, until the available RAM has been all used up.
Rick
On 1/15/08, Axton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ** Funny thing about Windows, why does it even use the page file when
> physical memory is ava
Funny thing about Windows, why does it even use the page file when physical
memory is available. Solaris and BSD do not do this. The only time the
page file is used on these OS's is when physical memory is exhausted.
Looking at my desktop right now:
Total Physical: 2086928k
Physical Available: 7
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 12:30 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: RES: Server Configuration Recommendations
Hi,
I have a question about this subject...
How can I measure the memory consumption of my environment production???
It's through ARS logs? Database logs? Or exist a specif
There are tools for this, but you can use task manager (in Windows) to
do this:
Here's an excerpt from an article:
Tip One - OK...I want to pump some life into my old computer. How much
RAM should I buy?
In a recent installment of TOTW, I imparted a few ideas on how to
breathe new life in
January 15, 2008 12:27 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Server Configuration Recommendations
**
Hi Phil,
I believe it is RAID 5 and there is a lot of disk I/O but it doesn't
seem to be excessive. What tools do you recommend to evaluate that
other than Task Manager?
It'
o: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Server Configuration Recommendations
Hi Phil,
I believe it is RAID 5 and there is a lot of disk I/O but it doesn't
seem to be excessive. What tools do you recommend to evaluate that
other than Task Manager?
It's a progressive thing-the more that log i
dade em T.I.
De: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) em nome de Craig Carter
Enviada: ter 15/1/2008 16:18
Para: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Assunto: Re: Server Configuration Recommendations
Thanks Misi. I've already read the whitepaper and verified all the
&q
MAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Murnane
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 11:08 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Server Configuration Recommendations
Craig:
What does the server resource utilization look like when you go from 80
to 100 users? Is there lots of paging or some heavy d
r
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Misi Mladoniczky
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 9:27 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Server Configuration Recommendations
Hi Craig,
I would suggest looking at your appl
anuary 15, 2008 8:36:33 AM
Subject: Re: Server Configuration Recommendations
** On Jan 15, 2008 10:22 AM, Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96 CS/SCCE <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
I personally tend to disagree with the notion of putting the DB on its
own server. I prefer to put ARS and the DB on the same
-2650
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axton
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 9:37 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Server Configuration Recommendations
** On Jan 15, 2008 10:22 AM, Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96 CS/SCCE
<[EMAIL P
t; AR Server almost all of our bottlenecks were in the database, and mainly
> with disk contention.
>
>
>
> Chad Hall
> (501) 342-2650
>
>
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Car
9:13 AM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: Server Configuration Recommendations
>
> **
>
> Thanks Chad-that is my impression as well. There should be no reason we
> should be having these performance problems based on the server we just
> set up. We generate a l
stem discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Carter
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 9:13 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Server Configuration Recommendations
**
Thanks Chad-that is my impression as well. There should be no reason we
should be having th
)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Carter
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 9:13 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Server Configuration Recommendations
**
Thanks Chad-that is my impression as well. There should be no reason we
should be having these performance problems based on the
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hall Chad - chahal
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 7:58 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Server Configuration Recommendations
We've ran over 600 concurrent users on a 2x1.4 GHz w
SList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Carter
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 8:41 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Q: Server Configuration Recommendations
All,
We're running into some performance problems recently. I upgraded the
server a few days ago (operating sy
All,
We're running into some performance problems recently. I upgraded the
server a few days ago (operating system, database, CPUs, memory, queues,
etc, and it hasn't helped much. Basically, it takes longer to search
and create tickets as more and more people log in (as expected) but the
serv
27 matches
Mail list logo
