: Somebody please run this ITSM 7 report for me
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 5:55 AM
Hello Rabi,
I don't see your report file, however, do you have any
diary fields in it?
(worklog, Audit trail, etc)
We have noticed that these type of fields (CLOB) are
killing
...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Rabi Tripathi
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 7:38 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Somebody please run this ITSM 7 report for me
Wow, that puts my system to shame. How many pages did you
get in the report?
Can you please confirm that you waited until
worth having a look at.
Regards
Jiri Pospisil
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Rabi Tripathi
Sent: 10 February 2009 01:16
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Somebody please run this ITSM 7 report for me
://www.nabble.com/Somebody-please-run-this-ITSM-7-report-for-me-tp21919656p21931329.html
Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives
Hi all,
I have complaints of slow or never-ending reporting in ITSM 7. After a lot of
looking around, I am wondering if the inherent design of the reports is a big
factor. Such as a Join done in the report (with a subreport), ODBC overhead etc.
Can somebody run this report for me and tell me
Hi Rabi. I am running this now. Over 8 minutes have passed. I will
post again once it completes.. if it completes.
James
On Feb 9, 2:04 pm, Rabi Tripathi ars_l...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have complaints of slow or never-ending reporting in ITSM 7. After a lot of
looking around, I
I gave up. It returned an error about Failed to retrieve data from
the database I ran it agian and it should have reported back about
1100 records. I let that run for 15 minutes. I had to stop my
aruser.exe process. I have not had much luck with these canned
reports either. Sorry I couldn't
@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Somebody please run this ITSM 7 report for me
Hi all,
I have complaints of slow or never-ending reporting in ITSM 7. After a lot of
looking around, I am wondering if the inherent design of the reports is a big
factor. Such as a Join done in the report (with a subreport), ODBC
part of the report slowness here?
Thanks a lot for trying this out for me.
--- On Mon, 2/9/09, Chowdhury, Tauf tauf.chowdh...@frx.com wrote:
From: Chowdhury, Tauf tauf.chowdh...@frx.com
Subject: Re: Somebody please run this ITSM 7 report for me
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Date: Monday, February 9
@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Somebody please run this ITSM 7 report for me
Wow, that puts my system to shame. How many pages did you get in the report?
Can you please confirm that you waited until info about all the incidents were
loaded on the Report Preview screen and that the page counter
James,
Thank you for the info. You and I are on the same boat. But I can't fault the
report design, because another lister is getting pretty good performance.
--- On Mon, 2/9/09, jham36 jha...@gmail.com wrote:
From: jham36 jha...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Somebody please run this ITSM 7
11 matches
Mail list logo
