> I tried it again with ASDF 3.3 + SBCL 2.1.1, and I can load adg
> successfully, with a couple of (push "path/to/adg/"
> asdf:*central-registry*) to help it along.
I strongly recommend using the ASDF2-era source-registry instead.
> However, when I try to run
> the unit tests, I get an error from
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 2:25 PM Faré wrote:
> sbcl --eval "'(#.(require :asdf) #.(in-package :asdf) #.(upgrade-asdf)
> #.(load-system :asdf-dependency-grovel))" --quit
> No error.
I tried it again with ASDF 3.3 + SBCL 2.1.1, and I can load adg
successfully, with a couple of (push "path/to/adg/"
> I tried a later version (3.2 or 3.3, I forget which) and adg fails to
> load. I think I'll stick w/ the last known working version until I
> sort out getting it to run ...
>
It loads perfectly for me:
sbcl --eval "'(#.(require :asdf) #.(in-package :asdf) #.(upgrade-asdf)
#.(load-system
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 3:07 AM Faré wrote:
> Or later. I recommend testing with the latest ASDF.
I tried a later version (3.2 or 3.3, I forget which) and adg fails to
load. I think I'll stick w/ the last known working version until I
sort out getting it to run ...
> This output doesn't help
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 2:08 AM Robert Dodier wrote:
>
> I've managed to get asdf-dependency-grovel to load. There is a comment
> in adg/tests/grovel-test.lisp that ASDF 3.1 is required. Okay, I have
> ASDF 3.1.5 laying around so I loaded that. Now SBCL can load adg.
>
Or later. I recommend
