Title: Re: [ASN.1] Asn.1 and ROSE problems
Thank you Rajul, I'm looking into it.
Hello All,
In case any other information please forward to me.
Warm regards,
Vasa
-Original Message-From: Rajul Gupta
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 9:21
PMTo: [EMAIL
Title: Re: [ASN.1] Asn.1 and ROSE problems
hello,
Can any bodyexplain what is canonical-encoding(0) and
distinguished-encoding(1)
What is the difference between them? Both the above encodings are derived
forms of
BER ( http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/en/oid/root/joint-iso-itu-t/asn1/ber-derived
You better extract the ASN.1 descriptions using an extractor tool then there
should not be any problem ! In some cases the errors can be in-side the
descriptions in that case tool also would not help u !!
Warm regards,
Vasa
-Original Message-
From: Bernard Kufluk [mailto:[EMAIL
I will let Olivier reply more fully, as he maintains the database, but
there is an ITU-T database (free access) of many ASN.1 modules that I am
sure includes X.219 and X.229. Specs in the database have been checked
and are pretty-well guaranteed to be legal ASN.1.
John L
Bernard Kufluk wrote:
Title: Re: [ASN.1] Asn.1 and ROSE problems
Bernard Kufluk wrote:
Hi
I am at the early stages in a project involving ASN.1 and ROSE.
I have obtained the X.219, 229 etc specs from the ITU and cut and pasted
You seem to be using old versions of ROSE. The ASN.1 modules
It is normal, if you take any specs they have small errors in them.
3G specs for GSMMAP is as an example, around 1300 pages, it is hard
to have it error free. But the ASN1 definitions should not or have
few errors. In some cases you can download only the ASN1 specs and not
the hole standart,
