I cannot imagine anyone being willing to implement an "RMODE MIN" whose only
purpose is to allow you to specify an RMODE statement multiple times in one
CSECT with different values.
Functionally, at the cost of 8 bytes (and it conceivably can be accomplished
with 0, but I have not tried),
That's it
Thank you all
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Assembler List Em nome de
Gary Weinhold
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 4 de dezembro de 2023 13:59
Para: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Assunto: Re: Reseting RMODE
I think I understand:
you wish the last RMODE in a CSECT
Yes, that's it
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Assembler List Em nome de
Gary Weinhold
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 4 de dezembro de 2023 13:59
Para: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Assunto: Re: Reseting RMODE
I think I understand:
you wish the last RMODE in a CSECT to override all
LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reseting RMODE
is there an RFE for an RMODE(MIN) option to accept multiple RMODE statements
and use the most restrictive?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁק
on behalf
of Paul Gilmartin <0014e0e4a59b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu>
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 10:48 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reseting RMODE
(Don't be greedy; don't set personal "Reply-to:")
On 12/4/23 07:28:51, João Reginato wrote:
>
END
GOT IT?
-Mensagem original-
De: Tom Harper
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 4 de dezembro de 2023 12:12
Para: jb.regin...@gmail.com
Cc: ASSEMBLER-LIST@listserv.uga.edu
Assunto: Re: RES: RES: Reseting RMODE
I think it does solve your problem. What doesn’t it solve?
Sent from my iPhone
Yes that solves it.
Thank you
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Assembler List Em nome de
Paul Gilmartin
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 4 de dezembro de 2023 12:48
Para: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Assunto: Re: Reseting RMODE
(Don't be greedy; don't set personal "
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 09:29, João Reginato wrote:
> As I've said before, I wasn't clear enough here.
> My intent is to change the RMODE during the compilation phase only.
> I have all CSECTS with RMODE ANY so, one of them, need to be RMODE 24, and
> I
> cannot change it because the HLASM doesn't
(Don't be greedy; don't set personal "Reply-to:")
On 12/4/23 07:28:51, João Reginato wrote:
As I've said before, I wasn't clear enough here.
My intent is to change the RMODE during the compilation phase only.
I have all CSECTS with RMODE ANY so, one of them, need to be RMODE 24, and I
cannot
ezembro de 2023 11:49
> Para: jb.regin...@gmail.com
> Cc: ASSEMBLER-LIST@listserv.uga.edu
> Assunto: Re: RES: Reseting RMODE
>
> João,
>
> What has been hinted at here is that all you need to do is to have two
> CSECTs, one which is RMODE(ANY) and a second one which is
Yes, I know that but it doesn't solve my problem
-Mensagem original-
De: Tom Harper
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 4 de dezembro de 2023 11:49
Para: jb.regin...@gmail.com
Cc: ASSEMBLER-LIST@listserv.uga.edu
Assunto: Re: RES: Reseting RMODE
João,
What has been hinted at here is that all
on
> Enviada em: domingo, 3 de dezembro de 2023 14:39
> Para: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Assunto: Re: Reseting RMODE
>
> The starting point regarding using a DCB (that does need to be below 16M) is
> that use of non-reentrant code is discouraged (if for potential performa
my csects, issuing the message reported
before.
João
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Assembler List Em nome
de Peter Relson
Enviada em: domingo, 3 de dezembro de 2023 14:39
Para: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Assunto: Re: Reseting RMODE
The starting point regarding using a DCB
The starting point regarding using a DCB (that does need to be below 16M) is
that use of non-reentrant code is discouraged (if for potential performance
issues if nothing else, if you have not well-separated the instruction and
static data from dynamic data).
Any reentrant module will
at section in the object output, before passing it to
the binder.
Anyway, thank you all for the answers.
Regards
João
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Assembler List Em nome de
Tony Harminc
Enviada em: sábado, 2 de dezembro de 2023 15:49
Para: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Assunto: Re: RES
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List on behalf
of Tony Harminc
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2023 1:49 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: RES: Reseting RMODE
On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 at 13:13, João Reginato wrote:
> Sorry guys
> my poor e
On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 at 13:13, João Reginato wrote:
> Sorry guys
> my poor english may be causing misunderstanding.
>
Perhaps, but it's a lot better than my Portuguese. I think we can
understand it pretty well. :-)
> You're right, TPUT doesn't use DCB and doesn't need RMODE 24 neither.
> I
iada em: sábado, 2 de dezembro de 2023 12:00
Para: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Assunto: Re: RES: Reseting RMODE
This conversation is making less and less sense. Since when does TPUT use
a DCB?
On the original question: RMODE sets a flag on the module that ultimately
tells program fetch to lo
On 12/2/2023 7:19 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
In the RMODE=SPLIT case you can end up with one part of the executable in one
RMODE and the other part in another RMODE and V-Con's between the two parts are
resolved at module fetch time.
Which is BTW ultra-cool functionality! (Too bad they don't
It sounds like the OP might not fully understand RMODE.
RMODE is a directive to the binder and loader of where in storage to place a
module.
As was mentioned, the granularity is on a section basis, and the directive is
applied at module fetch time when store is acquired into which to place the
This conversation is making less and less sense. Since when does TPUT use
a DCB?
On the original question: RMODE sets a flag on the module that ultimately
tells program fetch to load your program above or below the line (or bar,
these days). Once loaded, what do you expect to happen on an RMODE
Ok but it could be changed. Why not?
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Assembler List Em nome de
Ed Jaffe
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 1 de dezembro de 2023 17:01
Para: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Assunto: Re: Reseting RMODE
On 12/1/2023 11:27 AM, Jon Perryman wrote:
> On Fri
de 2023 19:42
Para: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Assunto: Re: Reseting RMODE
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 at 16:07, João Reginato wrote:
> Depending on the situation, yes, it does make sense during a compilation
> phase
>
I don't think it does. Could you give a code example? Are you possibly
that need to change it.
I'll read more about RMODE(SPLIT).
thanks
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Assembler List Em nome de
Ed Jaffe
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 1 de dezembro de 2023 19:57
Para: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Assunto: Re: RES: Reseting RMODE
On 12/1/2023 1:06 PM, João
On 12/1/2023 1:06 PM, João Reginato wrote:
But I have a program that can or not call TPUT.
If it calls, so I'd like to set RMODE 24, otherwise 31.
We issue TPUT all over the place in 31-bit mode (AMODE/RMODE).
If I did have a function that required RMODE(24), I would not force an
entire
?
Tony H.
-Mensagem original-
> De: IBM Mainframe Assembler List Em
> nome de Ed Jaffe
> Enviada em: sexta-feira, 1 de dezembro de 2023 17:01
> Para: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Assunto: Re: Reseting RMODE
>
> On 12/1/2023 11:27 AM, Jon Perryman wrote:
> &g
Depending on the situation, yes, it does make sense during a compilation phase
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Assembler List Em nome de
Ed Jaffe
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 1 de dezembro de 2023 17:01
Para: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Assunto: Re: Reseting RMODE
On 12/1/2023 11
uld simply cancel the previous RMODE and set the new one.
Just a suggestion.
Have a nice weekend
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Assembler List Em nome de
Jon Perryman
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 1 de dezembro de 2023 16:27
Para: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Assunto: Re: Rese
On 12/1/2023 11:27 AM, Jon Perryman wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 11:06:16 -0300, João Reginato wrote:
How can I reset RMODE without receive
ASMA186E AMODE/RMODE already set for this ESD item
Once set, such attributes cannot be changed. It makes no sense to change
them.
--
Phoenix Software
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 11:06:16 -0300, João Reginato wrote:
>How can I reset RMODE without receive
>ASMA186E AMODE/RMODE already set for this ESD item
What do you mean by "receive"?
RMODE is not a machine instruction (e.g. MVC). Instead, the linkage editor
verifies where you want this CSECT to
Hi
How can I reset RMODE without receive
ASMA186E AMODE/RMODE already set for this ESD item
Why cannot I do it?
TIA
João
31 matches
Mail list logo
