dima wrote:
I get
Best: 99.975586 -- Worst: 99.975586 -- Average: 99.975586
with zttest
Where do I have to start looking for hardware errors?
I would start with IRQ sharing. Make sure that your Zap hardware isn't
sharing an IRQ. Secondly, you want to have it with a fairly high
priority,
younss azzayani wrote:
zfter running zttool i got:
--- Results after 303 passes ---
Best: 100.00 -- Worst: 99.987793 -- Average: 99.994914
Okay. Then at this point you need to put record in your iaxmodem
config file, restart iaxmodem, attempt the call again, and afterwards
send me
That is going to depend upon your motherboard hardware, most likely.
Understand that in most cases the NIC and hard drives are usually going
to be the most demanding interrupt resource competitors to the Zap
hardware, and that the Zap hardware cannot often operate properly (i.e.
for fax)
Davis Sylvester III wrote:
Can someone tell me how to get faxing to work with an IAX2 remote client?
Wish upon a falling star, throw a penny into a fountain, find a
four-leaf clover, and pat your head and rub your stomach all at the same
time. :-)
Davis Sylvester III wrote:
Thanks for the quick response. But how do other VoIP Service
Providers like vonage provide fax capabilities?
Inevitably what I say here is going to be countered from some Vonage
customer saying, You're wrong! It always has worked for me. Vonage
even advertises
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
Steve Underwood and the other fine persons that have helped to develop
the software DSPs and other stuff required for FoIP support also have
no interest in writing any further faxing support for Asterisk (RxFax,
TxFax + the newest span_dsp
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 7:53 pm, Lee Howard wrote:
The problem, however, as we all know, is that the Asterisk maintainer,
Digium, requires undue retribution in the form of disclaimers before
it will accept any contribution into the code repository
Matt Riddell [NZ] wrote:
Does OpenPBX do a T.38 gateway then?
Yes, it does.
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
Zoilo Gomez wrote:
I really don't get it
From several emails in this list archive, I had clearly understood
that it is important to switch Echo Cancellation off for fax-channels,
or faxing would not work properly.
However, faxing (B410P ISDN bridged to TE410P PSTN) seems to work fine
Craig Guy wrote:
it wouldn't make business sense for Digium to have code in the free
distribution that can't be in their commercial distribution.
Yes, I do suspect that Digium sees things this way.
Maybe I'm too much of a free-thinker - too believing in the open-source
philosophy, but I
Ardjan Zwartjes wrote:
One thing that's important to mention here: We get unpredictable results
if the fax is transmitted entirely over VOIP, if the fax passes a
regular telephony channel once it works fine but if it's purely VOIP,
transmission errors occur. This is probably a timing problem,
Colin Anderson wrote:
When I have HylaFAX answer a call redirected to the fax extension in
Asterisk when it detects CNG, Asterisk hangs up:
Jan 30 14:32:59 VERBOSE[1098]: -- IAX2/ttyIAX0552/12 is ringing
Jan 30 14:32:59 VERBOSE[1098]: -- IAX2/ttyIAX0552/12 answered Zap/23-1
Jan 30
jeremij jerome wrote:
The problem is with the fax. We just want to send and receive faxes
from/to our fax machine connected to the Siemens (without needing any
interaction with our VoIP network, the faxes are sent to/received from
PSTN). Unfortunately we are experiencing a lot of problems:
Thomas Kenyon wrote:
Doug Lytle wrote:
iaxmodem is the component that will allow you to use all of your 8
ports on the ISDN card as software modems. It works very well.
It is worth noting that it works best if the asterisk server with the
linecard is the same machine as the hylafax
Anton Krall wrote:
after all, like you said, it is open
source..
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Moises Silva
|At the end, is open source/freesoftware, if you dont like it, nobody
|is stopping you from change it.
Barzilai Spinak wrote:
2) Why is it that Digium never gave a damn about E1/MFC/R2...
My guess would be because they don't have any E1/MFC/R2 hardware
products to market.
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Anton Krall wrote:
This is exactly one of the things that Steve and I discussed a bit ago...
when did asterisk turn from an open source project with very good developers
into a business that only focuses in $$$?
Well, I think that there can be no doubt that there still are some very
good
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sure in an small office you can use iaxmodem/hylafax to receive faxes
- we use it for sending faxes, but would you try to set up about 100
iaxmodems inside hylafax if you can handle it directly inside asterisk
with rx_fax and a small script ?
Yes, I would, actually
Colin Anderson wrote:
AFAIC, Hylafax + IAXmodem is the way to go for anything serious, unless we
are talking about thousands of users and thousands of faxes per day. I don't
even know what could be scaled to that scenario and not be unmanageable.
For the thousands and thousands scenario you
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
I don't see why rxfax would be less reliable than iaxmodem/hylafax as
it's using the same spandsp to receive fax.
spandsp is a dsp library with lots of pieces to it. IAXmodem uses the
T.31 portion (the Class 1 modem) which uses the actual DSP parts of
V.21, V.29,
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
What are the advantages of T31 over T30 ?
T.30 is the spec for fax protocol. T.31 is the spec for a Class 1 fax
modem.
So T.31 is a layer that allows something else to perform fax protocol
(T.30) through it.
There may be some intrinsic value to handling faxing
This thread seems like an awfully crazy amount of work to get fax
working when using IAXmodem and HylaFAX would do it without the
headache, most likely.
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hi
On 12/20/06, Lee Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This thread seems like an awfully crazy amount of work to get fax
working when using IAXmodem and HylaFAX would do it without the
headache, most likely.
Does IAXmodem allows you to receive faxes with any
Noc Phibee wrote:
déc 13 13:47:21.12: [13725]: -- [15:ATDT0426690268\r]
déc 13 13:47:21.12: [13725]: -- [11:NO DIALTONE]
Getting NO DIALTONE from iaxmodem means that the call was rejected.
Double-check your setup. Make sure that iaxmodem can register. Then
make sure that the context
Marco Mouta wrote:
Dec 13 11:28:07.51: [ 9242]: DIAL 2079^M
Dec 13 11:28:07.51: [ 9242]: -- [9:ATDT2079\r]
Dec 13 11:28:16.70: [ 9242]: -- [4:BUSY]
Dec 13 11:28:46.70: [ 9242]: MODEM TIMEOUT: reading line from modem
Dec 13 11:28:46.71: [ 9242]: MODEM Timeout
Dec 13 11:28:46.71: [ 9242]: SEND
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my company a have a 100% IP Telephony implemented (Cisco Phones, Routers,
Switches, etc).
We are connected to our operator by two E1 lines. The PBX is on operator
side (a H.323 Gateway is configured on call manager).
I study the possibility to implement a Hylafax
James Harper wrote:
I always wished that a fax machine could detect someone yelling F**K
OFF down the phone line, and register that it probably isn't a fax
machine at the other end :)
They can. For example a fax modem report of no carrier detected
means, if you trust the modem, exactly
Olivier wrote:
... or shall I use Sangoma boards for that ?
Works with Sangoma.
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
Thomas Winter wrote:
I have to set up an Asterisk with an 4-port BRI card.
Hylafax should send and receive fax.
Will this work reliable?
If the BRI channel driver works correctly, yes, you should be fine to
use iaxmodem.
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth
Brian Candler wrote:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 08:23:12PM -0700, Lee Howard wrote:
If you don't mind saying, what is missing for full t.38 support?
Steve giving Digium a royalty-free license to his GPL software or a
pure-GPL branch of the Asterisk codebase, take your pick.
Why
Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
But if we have asterisk and add on Steve's code wouldn't it (suppor to
recieve a t.38 fax call and have spandsp decode it) work? What does
Steve granting a license to Digium have to do with it? I don't care if
Asterisk and the fax support don't come from the same
Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
On 10/23/06, *Steve Underwood* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest test versions of the spandsp support both ECM and T.38. The
T.38 functionality may not be available with Asterisk, though.
Is there any other software it would work
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:33:38AM -0400, Steve Glaus wrote:
I thought I'd ask this, just in case I'm wrong. We're trying to set up
'remote' users via asterisk. Basically all there is to this is asterisk
forwarding a DID to a cell phone. My question is this: Is there
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
My personal experience is that I've never seen a consumer-grade fax
machine with send-CNG turned off, and I don't *think* I've ever seen
one on which there was a knob *to* turn it off; I would be less sure
about fax modems -- those may have a knob, but I would expect it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It all boils down to this: If they don't send a tone I won't get the fax.
And I certainly understand this approach. However, there are some
situations where this is simply not suitable - where missing a fax costs
money. Take, for example, the real estate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having trouble detecting faxes reliably. I'm using one analog line for
both voice and fax. Sometimes this works but a lot of the time it doesn't
and I was wondering if anyone knew why.
Well, fax detection isn't entirely reliable anyway. Even if you assume
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 02:58:37PM -0700, Lee Howard wrote:
Well, fax detection isn't entirely reliable anyway. Even if you assume
that your fax detection feature and operation is flawless in properly
detecting fax tones (and that most likely would be a specious
Artifex Maximus wrote:
zttest is often on 99.975586% with final result:
--- Results after 67 passes ---
Best: 99.987793 -- Worst: 99.951172 -- Average: 99.973764
This is unacceptable for faxing, and it is evidence of the underlying
problem also causing your faxes to come through with poor
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 01:58:21PM -0700, Christopher Corn wrote:
A couple of faxing methods im confused about.
The pass through method, sending fax data over G711 codec
versus
Relay method, t30 to t38 conversion
Can someone explain to me why the pass through method doesn't
Christopher Corn wrote:
May I ask, from your own personal experience. is it not necessaritly
worth (the headaches) of investing mytime into setting up SPANDSP into
my asterisk system, but rather invest it into going to a company, like
packet8 that offers t38 conversion?
I am not really in
Artifex Maximus wrote:
Everything is fine when caller use ECM but when ECM isn't in use I
often got unusable incoming faxes (much often that it should be). But
when I switch back to fax machine that receive faxes perfectly (at
least no visible error).
The fax machine itself uses ECM,
Artifex Maximus wrote:
using a modem emulator connected
through a virtual device to a fax software. It's sound as a very
bizarre way to me. :-)
Funny how it seemed to be a very straight-forward approach to me.
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Or wait for free-switch (http://www.freeswitch.org) :)
I don't see any docs on the web site. That's a great start.
Unless I missed them somewhere.
Huh? Tony writes lots and lots and heaps of documentation.
http://www.freeswitch.org/docs/
Lee.
Giedrius Augys wrote:
And when I make ./build , I get this:
/tmp/cckNRgf3.o(.text+0xfc): In function `cleanup':
/home/eryx/hylafax/iaxmodem-0.1.14/iaxmodem.c:165: undefined reference
to `iax_destroy'
You probably have a conflicting version of libiax2.
try doing:
./build static
instead.
Colin Anderson wrote:
The only thing that keeps me from ditching Zetafax is it has a slick
client that people like to use, unlike the barebones / kooky /
barely-working assortment of clients available for Hylafax (Yes, I
looked at Cypheus. It's crap. Yes I looked at WinHFC. It's good, but
Damon Estep wrote:
According to the wiki page
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+IAXmodem
There are a couple of ways to integrate Asterisk and HylaFax with
IAXmodem;
* IAXmodem as HylaFax modem, both HylaFax and Asterisk on the same
machine
In my opinion this
Colin Anderson wrote:
The Zetafax client essentially uses port 139 and submits the .tif to a
Windows share so I don;t think it would be really possible to modify it,
interesting idea though.
I wasn't talking about modifying the client, but rather working *with*
the client.
So if the
JR Richardson wrote:
Is there any of you Hylafax guru's out there who may have a few
minutes to help me get up to speed with the Hylafax setup and
configuration conventions.
You'll do well to look for help in HylaFAX forums/communities/archives
rather than in an Asterisk one.
That said,
Jerry Jones wrote:
Also if possible turn off ECM on the FAX machines
This is unsound advice. Why do you think this could possily help?
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or
Maxim Vexler wrote:
Check the paragraph on ECM at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+fax
Everything that you read on a wiki must be considered potentially bogus
or otherwise misinformed.
Let me rewrite that paragraph for you...
ECM -
Jerry Jones wrote:
without ecm -
line errors will cause slight imperfections (dots) on transmitted
image
with ecm -
retry, retry, retry, fail
In the ECM retransmissions only the frames that were not received
properly are resent. Once the data to send is assembled by the sender
Steve Davies wrote:
Hmmm... I just switched to iaxmodem on a loopback interface as
documented, and tried both Hylafax and efax. Both seemed to drop out
on any fax larger than 3 pages.
Then it's time to consider that your problems are not with spandsp,
iaxmodem, or HylaFAX.
My suggestion
Zeeshan Zakaria wrote:
I am trying to setup fax on my phone system. Which fax-to-email and
email-to-fax solution really works on IAX and SIP?
Due to the way that your question has been asked I assume that you're
talking about IAX or SIP over a latent internet connection to some VoIP
Paul A. Pringle wrote:
I thought it might be an inadvertent button press, but none of the keys
(on my phone at least) are recognized by Asterisk as fax tones. This
has happened to two different users getting calls from different people
using different equipment. Does anyone else see this
Colin Anderson wrote:
I have 200 IAXModem's running on my HylaFAX server, no problem.
Are you running an iaxmodem for every user?
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or
Okay, if that's easiest for you. Most people would have run enough
iaxmodems to handle the load and then use the DID for routing the faxes,
rather than the device.
Lee.
Colin Anderson wrote:
yes. works fine.
-Original Message-
From: Lee Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
).
Then HylaFAX passes that through as a $CALLID variable to your
FaxDispatch script. And there you use it to determine your $SENDTO setting.
Lee.
Colin Anderson wrote:
example config, please?
-Original Message-
From: Lee Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 5
Warren wrote:
Am I best off using Hylafax?
Yes.
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Brian C. Fertig wrote:
Don't cheat digium out of money.. pay the $10 per license.
Yes, be a good colonist and don't dump any more tea into the harbor.
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To
On Friday 02 June 2006 11:39, Lee Howard wrote:
Don't cheat digium out of money.. pay the $10 per license.
Yes, be a good colonist and don't dump any more tea into the harbor.
Oh please. Brian's got the reasoning for paying for the license
entirely
wrong but at least his
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Friday 02 June 2006 13:00, Lee Howard wrote:
The GPL very clearly defines the method of expressing deserved
gratitude, and it is not in monetary support.
What's this got to do with the GPL? the g729 codec code is *not* GPLd, and in
fact can't be due
Alejandro Vargas wrote:
2006/6/2, Lee Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The messed-up reasoning was that Digium deserves monetary gratitude
because they GPLd Asterisk... and you even said that the reasoning was
wrong.
Digium deserves all money they can win.
I agree entirely.
Note, however
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 14:18 -0700, Lee Howard wrote:
Andrew took issue with my initial sarcastic comment because this thread
involves the G.729 codec - but remember that if someone does ultimately
choose to obtain a license illegally that they're
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
If you did not mean to say they should have bought from Y
but instead they might have bought from Y then you are correct that Y
has no loss claim.
That's what I meant, of course.
But I cant make that determination because I can
only go by what you did
Rene Nelson wrote:
I want to accept faxes via SIP/IAX2 (yes I've read the posts that it
isnt reccomended). My PBX is 100% Virtual with the exception of one
IAX connection to bring in the calls from another * box, I have no
phone hardware. I am interested in doing autodetect fax to email. I
Tom Christensen wrote:
IAXmodem uses spandsp the same way rxfax does right?
Not entirely true, but yes it is partially true.
spandsp is a library, iaxmodem uses part of it, and rxfax uses part of
it, and there is an overlap, but it's not an identical overlap.
Lee.
Olivier Krief wrote:
For example, it seems that Brother 8360P uses Super G3 mode.
Is there a fax-modem offering such capability so that I could easily
check if I still cannot hangup when I enable or disable Super G3 mode ?
MultiTech 5634-series and MainPine RockForce fax modems (Agere
Olivier Krief wrote:
Would you use such modems to run a batch script to check various fax
protocols ( V.34, super G3, ...) ?
You could, yes.
Would it be easy with Hylafax to change modem settings so that first
attempt is made in V.34, second attempt with ECM, third without ECM
etc.. and
Olivier Krief wrote:
1. Does using iaxmodem imply that, for example, incoming fax calls are
processed that way ?
- PSTN calls are terminated on TDM board (Digium, Sangoma, ...)
Yes. The PSTN call terminates there and (usually) takes a short IAX2
hop over the loopback adapter to iaxmodem.
Pimjai Wesnarat wrote:
Or does IAXModem not work with Asterisk 1.2.7.1?
IAXmodem works just fine with Asterisk 1.2.7.1.
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options
Doug Lytle wrote:
Steve Underwood wrote:
Doug Lytle wrote:
Nicholas Kathmann wrote:
If you need to tweak gains something is seriously wrong.
The 2 fax machines that I was having problem with were failing to
train at 9600bps, they would then try at 7200 and finally train at
4800.
Rich Adamson wrote:
I don't believe you will ever get POTS - FXO-TDM400P-to-anything to
work properly due to TDM card limitations. So, move all of those to
the bottom of your list.
If you pay close attention to those postings from the last two years
in which users say fax works, the
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Monday 17 April 2006 08:21, Lee Howard wrote:
I and other iaxmodem users can say fax works with analog PSTN
connections. In my case, as well as those others of which I am aware,
an X100P (clone, er winmodem) is being used.
Interesting. Do you have more
Tony ROBIN wrote:
Now we want to receive fax ( 20/day) on it and
guess what ? Since April 2006 (again a few months after we bought
our brand new card), officially, fax communications is not
supported with Digium cards ( http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+fax ).
Of course, I should have
Carlos Chavez wrote:
I just installed Hylafax with Iaxmodem and I am not getting good
results when receiving faxes. I can see that the modem is reporting the
following:
Mar 31 16:19:08 pbxoficina FaxGetty[5377]: MODEM Supports 2400 bit/s
Mar 31 16:19:08 pbxoficina FaxGetty[5377]:
Adolfo R. Brandes wrote:
After combing these lists for clues, we began experimenting
extensively with Asterisk and its software DSP and fax capabilities in
most of their incarnations, such as Rxfax or Iaxmodem/Hylafax,
together with Digium's E1 cards in server-grade Intel motherboards,
Adolfo R. Brandes wrote:
Lee Howard wrote:
The concurrent calls really isn't that big of a deal, either, if
those are your thoughts. The bigger issue seems to be the quality of
the audio as it is delivered to the fax application/modem.
Interesting. The little information I've found
Don Pobanz wrote:
Adolfo R. Brandes wrote:
Lee Howard wrote:
However, based on the comments you give I'd suspect that you're
having what people seem to be calling frame slipping. There seem
to be some motherboards that react poorly with Zap cards (or their
respective drivers) and cause
Mike wrote:
I thought I'd check in with people here. Lets say I wanted to put
together a Hylafax server, and an Asterisk server on the same box.
And, for the sake of making things simple, I wanted to use a single T1
board for both
Is this possible?
Yes. I've not investigated the
Olivier Krief wrote:
What would be an acceptable zttest result to avoid fax frame slippings ?
A result of 100% would be acceptable. :-)
I believe that 99.8% seems to be also acceptable... at least according
to popular concensus. However, 92% is very bad, and at that result you
would
Michael Sampson wrote:
Your best bet is to just not use fax machines. They are outdated
technology.
It is older technology, true... but certainly it's not useless
technology. Certainly there is nothing yet to replace it properly. And
I could argue this on a technological standpoint, and
Anton Krall wrote:
Well, I have the same effect on my TDM as in the E1 using unicall... Faxes
get here as garbage :(
I really would like to see sometime some audio recordings made by
IAXmodem for people that had problems with TDMs and faxing with rxfax/txfax.
Not that I have some hope of
Anton Krall wrote:
Any modification made to zapata as far as echo and gains?
As a rule, don't let anything manipulate the audio at all... even echo
cancellation. That said, I have seen situations where gain had to be
increased.
Should echocancel be on or off?
Off, most definitely
Carey Mould wrote:
How can I get asterisk to work with faxes in my configuration? I have
a WAN with Asterisk at the centre and Mediatrix 1104 gateways at the
end nodes providing tone to legacy PBX's and fax machines. The
Asterisk is connected to the PSTN via a Digium single port t1.
The end
Phil Blundell wrote:
I suspect that the
datapath through our regular network switches is probably close enough
to lossless for this purpose as well.
You could be surprised. I know that I have been suprised by how easy it
is for a UDP packet to get dropped or lost. I've had a few customers
Jerry Jones wrote:
Turning ECM seems to cause most of my issues with FAX. Most newer
machines have this on by default. However if there is any packet
loss, then when ECM tries to resend and there is additional loss,
then it gets in a loop and everything just fails. Whereas with ECM
off,
Phil Blundell wrote:
1. Connect the fax machine to an ATA and have it speak SIP or IAX to *
This will work provided that you can create a near-lossless
communication path between the ATA and the PSTN gateway (which is the
Asterisk box, I assume).
One way of creating that, I would
J Poz wrote:
Using an analog line is not an option for my service. My application
runs on a ROOT SERVER of an ASP. So I can do anything I want to the
server but I can't connect to or get external analog lines. So my
options are doing faxing via the Internet (VOIP/SIP) or use a faxing
Steve Underwood wrote:
When you are truly aware how non-optimal faxing over a VoIP channel
is, you will give up. :-) This isn't a joke. Its the best advice I can
give. Some people will tell you they have something that works. Well,
lucky old them. Its not a reliably reproducible phenomenon.
Allan Gee wrote:
I wonder if anyone can tell me which version of spandsp is used in iaxmodem?
IAXmodem version 0.0.8 uses spandsp development snapshot 20051220... so
it's 0.0.3, more recent than pre6.
I would like to use the app_rxfax application WITH iaxmodem.
This will be possible
James Armstrong wrote:
Has anyone been able to get the original DID number when a fax comes
in and is detected using the Zap fax detect?
In your incoming call context where fax calls come in you need to Set
some user variable to ${EXTEN} before the dialplan continues, because
once the fax
James Armstrong wrote:
Ok, I got the number called in DNID, but now I need to pass it to the
IAXModem so Hylafax can use it to route the email. The use CALLID1-4.
It looks like CALLID 1 2 are the caller and CALLID3 is the
Extension at the time the call is made to the IAXModem extension,
Alexander Lopez wrote:
1 Try disabling faxdetection on your lines
The sad thing is that I believe faxdetect is suppost to automagically
disable itself after the first several seconds of a call passes.
However, in my experience faxdetect seems to kick in at any time during
a call if
Frank Liu wrote:
I've seen there are spandsp, iaxmodem to simulate a modem for
receiving faxes under asterisk. Hylafax can be tricked to think it
is a real modem.
Can I create a dialup/access server with the same method? Can ppp run
on top of this software modem?
IAXmodem and spandsp
Ben Fried wrote:
On 1/9/06, Adam Goryachev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd strongly suggest that people having problems, and who are interested
in marketing this as a solution, do some testing with different
motherboards/systems/etc and find a combination that works. Once you
have that, simply
andrutto wrote:
Yeah, but to traditional PBX central you can plug fax machine hassle free.
Well, in theory you should be able to do the same with Asterisk: plug
fax machines into FXS ports on the box.
I say in theory because I've not done that myself, and I've heard
rumors of past
Rich Adamson wrote:
I'm certainly not the expert on this topic, but I believe the issue has
to do with the pci bus and probably relates to the TigerJet chip used on
the card. Until that's addressed, any analog modem use through the card
will be marginal at best. (Same issue as with the older
Rich Adamson wrote:
I'm certainly not the expert on this topic, but I believe the issue has
to do with the pci bus and probably relates to the TigerJet chip used on
the card. Until that's addressed, any analog modem use through the card
will be marginal at best. (Same issue as with the older
Colin Anderson wrote:
faxguy, maybe you can tell me why
As I've noted in previous posts I'm evaluating HylaFax with IAXModem. When I
run iaxmodem and faxgetty through a console the modem works 100% I have yet
to find a fax that it won't tie up with. When I run IAXmodem and faxgetty in
Colin Anderson wrote:
good tips ill try that out thanks ps is there a recommended runlevel or 2345
is ok?
Runlevels indicate in which runlevels you want init to run the entry.
0 is halt, 1 is single-user mode, 2 is multiuser without NFS, 3 is
multiuser, 4 is unused, 5 is X11, 6 is reboot.
101 - 200 of 318 matches
Mail list logo
