Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video

2018-04-17 Thread Joshua Colp
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, at 11:56 AM, Benjamin Marty wrote: > The current behaviour is that Earlymedia video isn't working when NAT's in > between are involved. The source/destination IP's are correct. So the > client is sending Early media video + Early media audio to the Asterisk > Server "in the

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video

2018-04-13 Thread Benjamin Marty
The current behaviour is that Earlymedia video isn't working when NAT's in between are involved. The source/destination IP's are correct. So the client is sending Early media video + Early media audio to the Asterisk Server "in the cloud" and the Asterisk Server "in the cloud" is sending both to

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video

2018-04-11 Thread Joshua Colp
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, at 4:33 AM, Benjamin Marty wrote: > I added the bind_rtp_to_media_address=yes on all endpoints but still the > same behaviour. The funny thing is that the G711 audio early media works > and doesn't have that Private IP issue. I was also able to cross check with > chan_sip on

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video

2018-04-11 Thread Benjamin Marty
> > *Von:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > boun...@lists.digium.com] *Im Auftrag von *Benjamin Marty > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 11. April 2018 08:55 > *An:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion < > asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video

2018-04-11 Thread Floimair Florian
, 11. April 2018 08:55 An: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Betreff: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video I think I found the root cause. The H264 Early Media video is received successfully on the Asterisk Serve

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video

2018-04-11 Thread Benjamin Marty
t; >>> >>> >>> >>> With best regards >>> >>> Florian Floimair >>> Innovation - Software-Development - VoIP & DevOps >>> >>> COMMEND INTERNATIONAL GMBH >>> A-5020 Salzburg, Saalachstraße 51 >>> Tel:

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video

2018-04-10 Thread Benjamin Marty
ONAL GMBH >> A-5020 Salzburg, Saalachstraße 51 >> Tel: +43-662-85 62 25 >> Fax: +43-662-85 62 26 >> http://www.commend.com >> >> Security and Communication by Commend >> >> FN 178618z | LG Salzburg >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >> Von

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video

2018-04-10 Thread Benjamin Marty
Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > boun...@lists.digium.com] Im Auftrag von Joshua Colp > Gesendet: Montag, 9. April 2018 18:15 > An: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Betreff: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Vi

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video

2018-04-10 Thread Benjamin Marty
I applied the patch to my Asterisk 13.20. But it seems that it still doesn't forward the early media video stream. Do I need to put something special into the extensions.conf? I basically just make a Dial. The calling Client sends the 183 protocol. [public] exten => 6001,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN})

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video

2018-04-10 Thread Floimair Florian
: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, at 1:05 PM, Benjamin Marty wrote: > wohoo, so if I unterstand it correctly with that patch early media > video works over the Asterisk server? In other words the Asterisk > server get's able to (process/)forward th

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video

2018-04-09 Thread Joshua Colp
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, at 1:05 PM, Benjamin Marty wrote: > wohoo, so if I unterstand it correctly with that patch early media video > works over the Asterisk server? In other words the Asterisk server get's > able to (process/)forward the early media video stream with that patch? The patch forwards

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video

2018-04-09 Thread Benjamin Marty
wohoo, so if I unterstand it correctly with that patch early media video works over the Asterisk server? In other words the Asterisk server get's able to (process/)forward the early media video stream with that patch? 2018-04-09 17:57 GMT+02:00 Joshua Colp : > On Mon, Apr 9,

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video

2018-04-09 Thread Joshua Colp
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, at 12:04 PM, Benjamin Marty wrote: > My understanding based on Wireshark analysis is that the signaling works > (also the recipent phone is displaying the video frame before accepting the > call), also the calling phone send video (i see that also via Wireshark) > but the

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video

2018-04-09 Thread Benjamin Marty
My understanding based on Wireshark analysis is that the signaling works (also the recipent phone is displaying the video frame before accepting the call), also the calling phone send video (i see that also via Wireshark) but the recipent phone doesn't get any video from the Asterisk before the

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video

2018-04-09 Thread Joshua Colp
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, at 11:53 AM, Benjamin Marty wrote: > Yes, media is flowing through Asterisk because both client's are behind > different NAT's. This doesn't answer the question of what is ACTUALLY happening in the scenario you describe which is very important. > Do I need to do something

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video

2018-04-09 Thread Benjamin Marty
Yes, media is flowing through Asterisk because both client's are behind different NAT's. Do I need to do something special in the Call Flow? Or anything additional to the pjsip.conf? 2018-04-09 16:50 GMT+02:00 Joshua Colp : > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, at 11:42 AM, Benjamin Marty

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video

2018-04-09 Thread Joshua Colp
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, at 11:42 AM, Benjamin Marty wrote: > Hello, > > I have an Asterisk 15 with PJSIP behind NAT (Amazon EC2). > > Now I would like to get Early Media Video working between clients in > different NATed networks. The 183 signalling goes trough perfectly, but > asterisk doesn't

[asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video

2018-04-09 Thread Benjamin Marty
Hello, I have an Asterisk 15 with PJSIP behind NAT (Amazon EC2). Now I would like to get Early Media Video working between clients in different NATed networks. The 183 signalling goes trough perfectly, but asterisk doesn't forward the Early Media RTP stream from the caller to the recipent. I

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk ignoring nat settings

2014-01-16 Thread Ishfaq Malik
Is directmedia set to no? On 15 January 2014 23:11, Leandro Dardini ldard...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have an asterisk box with a peer configured with nat=force_rport,comedia, but asterisk keeps sending the audio to the private IP address and ignoring the client peer nat settings. If I

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk ignoring nat settings

2014-01-16 Thread Leandro Dardini
Yes, thank you. Maybe I have found the problem. The asterisk server is behind a nat and the RTP port range was not redirected to the asterisk box, so the Symmetric RTP cannot work because the asterisk is not receiving any RTP packet from the remote phone. Leandro 2014/1/16 Ishfaq Malik

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk ignoring nat settings

2014-01-16 Thread Michael L. Young
- Original Message - From: Andres and...@telesip.net To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 7:51:28 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk ignoring nat settings Why don't you try with nat

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk ignoring nat settings

2014-01-16 Thread Andres
On 1/16/14, 2:23 PM, Michael L. Young wrote: - Original Message - From: Andres and...@telesip.net To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 7:51:28 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk ignoring nat

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk ignoring nat settings

2014-01-16 Thread Michael L. Young
- Original Message - From: Andres and...@telesip.net To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:17:53 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk ignoring nat settings I am curious why you would say

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk ignoring nat settings

2014-01-16 Thread Richard Mudgett
15, 2014 7:51:28 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk ignoring nat settings Why don't you try with nat=yes. It should be equivalent to what you have but who knows. It might just work. I am curious why you would say that nat=yes might work over nat=force_rport,comedia? As you stated

[asterisk-users] Asterisk ignoring nat settings

2014-01-15 Thread Leandro Dardini
Hello, I have an asterisk box with a peer configured with nat=force_rport,comedia, but asterisk keeps sending the audio to the private IP address and ignoring the client peer nat settings. If I check the sip show peer extension, I see both symmetric RTP and Force Rport are set to yes, but

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk ignoring nat settings

2014-01-15 Thread Andres
On 1/15/14, 6:11 PM, Leandro Dardini wrote: Hello, I have an asterisk box with a peer configured with nat=force_rport,comedia, but asterisk keeps sending the audio to the private IP address and ignoring the client peer nat settings. Why don't you try with nat=yes. It should be equivalent to

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11.6 nat problem

2013-10-11 Thread Matthew J. Roth
Jeremy Kister wrote: using asterisk 11.6.0-rc1 i just converted my nat=yes to nat=auto_force_rport,auto_comedia I have my asterisk box on the same subnet as a cisco 1760 (vgw1). a few times per day, Asterisk thinks vgw1 is dead (by qualify/options). A 'sip reload' always fixes the

[asterisk-users] asterisk 11.6 nat problem

2013-10-10 Thread Jeremy Kister
using asterisk 11.6.0-rc1 i just converted my nat=yes to nat=auto_force_rport,auto_comedia I have my asterisk box on the same subnet as a cisco 1760 (vgw1). a few times per day, Asterisk thinks vgw1 is dead (by qualify/options). A 'sip reload' always fixes the problem. i left 'sip set

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT and Kamailio -- Internal IP in SDP and not externip

2013-07-02 Thread Johan Wilfer
2013-07-01 15:04, Daniel-Constantin Mierla skrev: Hello, On 6/28/13 4:29 PM, Johan Wilfer wrote: Hi, We have some Asterisk servers that we are moving behind a NAT to preserve public addresses and make room for growth. This is Asterisk 1.4 NAT works very good with the

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT and Kamailio -- Internal IP in SDP and not externip

2013-07-01 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 6/28/13 4:29 PM, Johan Wilfer wrote: Hi, We have some Asterisk servers that we are moving behind a NAT to preserve public addresses and make room for growth. This is Asterisk 1.4 NAT works very good with the externip/localnet-setting when we are connected directly to our teleco.

[asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT and Kamailio -- Internal IP in SDP and not externip

2013-06-28 Thread Johan Wilfer
Hi, We have some Asterisk servers that we are moving behind a NAT to preserve public addresses and make room for growth. This is Asterisk 1.4 NAT works very good with the externip/localnet-setting when we are connected directly to our teleco. But when I try to use NAT and put them behind

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk behind nat

2011-03-03 Thread Leif Neland
Den 02-03-2011 16:12, Jeremy Kister skrev: On 3/2/2011 9:46 AM, Leif Neland wrote: Some of the phones are being disconnected with Asterisk saying no reply to critical packet What kind of phones are they? I might have nothing to do with your network configuration; try adding to sip.conf

[asterisk-users] asterisk behind nat

2011-03-02 Thread Leif Neland
I'm running asterisk on a Freebsd with 2 Nic's. Inside NIC is 192.168.5.x where the phones are. Outside NIC used to be a public IP with the ISP's device set to bridging, but the new WiMAX router only offers me the public ip 94.18.x.x on the outside, and forwarding everything to 192.168.1.50

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk behind nat

2011-03-02 Thread Jeremy Kister
On 3/2/2011 9:46 AM, Leif Neland wrote: Some of the phones are being disconnected with Asterisk saying no reply to critical packet What kind of phones are they? I might have nothing to do with your network configuration; try adding to sip.conf [general]: session-timers=refuse -- Jeremy

[asterisk-users] Asterisk and NAT one way audio

2008-12-17 Thread Silvia Menendez
Hello may situation is the next: Asterisk -- NAT1 (router)--- internet -- NAT2 (router) -- x-lite ^ | ip phone (cisco) Asterisk and de cisco phone are in the same LAN. I want to make a call between the x-lite and the

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and NAT one way audio

2008-12-17 Thread Godson Gera
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Silvia Menendez silvia.menen...@gmail.com wrote: Hello may situation is the next: Asterisk -- NAT1 (router)--- internet -- NAT2 (router) -- x-lite ^ | ip phone (cisco)

[asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT, Polycom behind NAT (SIP), how to work?

2008-07-14 Thread bilal ghayyad
Hi All; I succeeded to have a success call from Polycom behind NAT while Asterisk has public IP address, but I was not able to have a succeed call (it was established, but no voice running, and then the call disconnected) if Asterisk behind NAT and Polycom behind NAT. When Asterisk behind NAT

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT, Polycom behind NAT (SIP), how to work?

2008-07-14 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, bilal ghayyad wrote: Hi All; I succeeded to have a success call from Polycom behind NAT while Asterisk has public IP address, but I was not able to have a succeed call (it was established, but no voice running, and then the call disconnected) if Asterisk behind NAT

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT, Polycom behind NAT (SIP), how to work?

2008-07-14 Thread Noah Miller
Hi Bilal - When Asterisk behind NAT and Polycom behind NAT, I forwarded the 5060 UDP to asterisk (at asterisk router) and to Polycom IP Phone at polycomg router site, but the problem stayed. Also I was use nat=yes in the sip.conf Also I forwarded the udp rtp ports (that configured in

[asterisk-users] Asterisk and NAT

2007-12-11 Thread bilal ghayyad
Hi All; My Asterisk has a public IP address, how can we let two IP Phones in different site and both are behind NAT (each one has a private IP address) to call each other? In other words, Assuming Asterisk IP Address is 193.111.194.111 IP Phone (A): 192.168.0.1 and its default gateway is:

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and NAT

2007-12-11 Thread Carlos Chavez
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 00:14 -0800, bilal ghayyad wrote: Hi All; My Asterisk has a public IP address, how can we let two IP Phones in different site and both are behind NAT (each one has a private IP address) to call each other? In other words, Assuming Asterisk IP Address is

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and NAT

2007-12-11 Thread Vincent
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:05:24 -0600, Carlos Chavez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only thing you need to do is set nat=yes when you configure the phones in Asterisk. You may need to use a STUN server in case the phones do not properly see the outside address. Once the phones register they

[asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT

2007-05-23 Thread Nitesh Divecha
Hello All, Has anyone implemented Asterisk behind D-Link Router? Got one pain in butt customer who wants to setup * system behind D-Link router model DI-624? Can anyone share their conf? Thanks, Nitesh ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT

2007-05-23 Thread Anthony Francis
and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users just use nat=yes and make sure the other side's configuration is expecting NAT and then forward the porper ports throught the firewall

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT and without portforwarding forrtp

2006-10-29 Thread Thomas Winter
Am Sunday 29 October 2006 01:31 schrieb Dovid B: Half asleep. Sorry for my last post. I believe you still need port forwarding for IAX. Time to keep to my bed time. If works as long as you have notransfer=no at both ends. Iam concerned that with SIP Asterisk is bridging up and I do not receive

[asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT and without portforwarding for rtp

2006-10-28 Thread Thomas Winter
Hi, I have an Asterisk behind NAT. NAT=yes and canreinvite=no in globals and for the peer. I call an peer. The peer advice to use another IP for the audio and my Asterisk is sending audio stream to the Audio server. Because of missing port forwarding I will not receive the audio stream and hear

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT and without portforwarding forrtp

2006-10-28 Thread Dovid B
yup. use IAX - Original Message - From: Thomas Winter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 1:26 AM Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT and without portforwarding forrtp Hi, I have an Asterisk behind NAT. NAT=yes

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind NAT and without portforwarding forrtp

2006-10-28 Thread Dovid B
Half asleep. Sorry for my last post. I believe you still need port forwarding for IAX. Time to keep to my bed time. - Original Message - From: Thomas Winter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 1:26 AM Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and NAT ?

2006-09-08 Thread Bob Chiodini
Does the Linksys know it should be using port 5070? It would seem to me that port forwarding would be required as the phones are behind a NAT'd firewall. How would asterisk know how to get there since it's not on the same subnet (outside the firewall). If the asterisk box has physical access to

[asterisk-users] Asterisk and NAT ?

2006-09-07 Thread Noc Phibee
Hi I am search a small information - i use Asterisk on official IP without Nat - My first VoIP phone are a Thomson 2030 on a NAT Network. That's work very good. But now, i want add a second phone, a Linksys SPA-941 on the same network of the Thomson 2030 ... My problems that i don't see

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and NAT ?

2006-09-07 Thread yusuf
Noc Phibee wrote: Hi I am search a small information - i use Asterisk on official IP without Nat - My first VoIP phone are a Thomson 2030 on a NAT Network. That's work very good. But now, i want add a second phone, a Linksys SPA-941 on the same network of the Thomson 2030 ... My

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and NAT ?

2006-09-07 Thread Noc Phibee
yusuf a écrit : Hi, you dont have to/should'nt be using different SIP ports for each phone. Its completely not needed. Also, you dont have/need to port forward. Just open ports 5060 and 1000-2, on the box that asterisk is running, and on your NAT router. Dont port forward. Then in

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and NAT ?

2006-09-07 Thread William Piper
Does the phone have stun settings? If so, try using stun.fwdnet.net and take out the port forwards and see if it works. bp On 9/7/06, Noc Phibee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yusuf a écrit : Hi, you dont have to/should'nt be using different SIP ports for each phone.Its completely not needed.Also, you

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT

2006-04-06 Thread Joao Pereira
Hello to all Can we put Asterisk in a company that has an ADSL connection with just one public IP address? Because with just one public IP, Asterisk must have a private (NATed) IP... but the idea is to make him dial other SIP domains. Can Asterisk work behing NAT, and still route calls to

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT

2006-04-06 Thread Kerry Garrison
-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT Hello to all Can we put Asterisk in a company that has an ADSL connection with just one public IP address? Because with just one public IP, Asterisk must have a private (NATed) IP... but the idea is to make him dial

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT

2006-04-06 Thread Giridhar Reddy Bandi
IT works fine behind firewall .enable NAT in sip.conf and it works fine.Giridhar BandiOn 4/6/06, Joao Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hello to allCan we put Asterisk in a company that has an ADSL connection with just one public IP address? Because with just one public IP, Asterisk musthave a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT

2006-04-06 Thread Joao Pereira
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joao Pereira Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 8:05 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT Hello to all Can we put Asterisk in a company that has an ADSL connection with just one public IP address? Because with just one public

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT

2006-04-06 Thread hgaillac-sip
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joao Pereira Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 8:05 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT Hello to all Can we put Asterisk in a company that has an ADSL

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT

2006-04-06 Thread Andre Ruiz
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT Hello to all Can we put Asterisk in a company that has an ADSL connection with just one public IP address? Because with just one public IP, Asterisk must have a private (NATed) IP... but the idea is to make him dial other SIP domains. Can

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT

2006-04-06 Thread Giridhar Reddy Bandi
so that means that a sip client can access asterisk server which is behind NAT ( assuming that SIP and RTP ports are properly farwarded ) even is nat=no in sip.conf thanks,Giridhar Bandi. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind nat

2005-10-05 Thread Thameem Ansari
As for the current release asterisk will not support STUN. You will have problems when you run asterisk behind NAT and try to configure a remote extension. Refer voxilla.com forums for more details. On 10/4/05, Anders Svensson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! How do I configure my *

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and NAT

2005-10-04 Thread René Enskat [Teamware GmbH]
Hey guys. I have to put my * behind a Firewall through nat on the firewall. The asterisk is running, but for example a register to an outside PSTN provider won't work. I enabled nat for the register but i only get Code 120 Send request. The other problem is, when i try to register with a sip

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and NAT

2005-10-04 Thread Olle E. Johansson
René Enskat [Teamware GmbH] wrote: Hey guys. I have to put my * behind a Firewall through nat on the firewall. The asterisk is running, but for example a register to an outside PSTN provider won't work. I enabled nat for the register but i only get Code 120 Send request. The other problem

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and NAT

2005-10-04 Thread Alex Lake
You've not said much about your firewall setup. I presume you've opened up 5060 and RTP ports? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com

AW: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and NAT

2005-10-04 Thread René Enskat [Teamware GmbH]
Alex Lake Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2005 11:47 An: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Betreff: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and NAT You've not said much about your firewall setup. I presume you've opened up 5060 and RTP ports

Re: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and NAT

2005-10-04 Thread Alex Lake
I guess you could post your config files here and hope that someone feels inclined to look them over! ;-) ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and NAT

2005-10-04 Thread Mark Phillips
As well as entered externip=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx in your SIP.conf file? Alex Lake wrote: You've not said much about your firewall setup. I presume you've opened up 5060 and RTP ports? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind nat

2005-10-04 Thread Anders Svensson
Hi! How do I configure my * to have a remote extension if the asterisk is behind a nat? Regards Anders Svensson ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and NAT

2005-10-04 Thread Bartosz Wegrzyn - asterisk
Not all firewalls handle sip correctly. What is the firewall that u have? Basically I would set everything like this: extenip = static ip or DDNS ip localnet = you local network the same the asterisk is on On the firewall forward ports 5060 and ports in rtp.conf file to you asterisk box, if

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - Firewall/Nat - Internet - Firewall/Nat - Softphone/hardphone

2005-08-05 Thread Alex
what is the upload speed on B? Looks to me as you have bandwidth problem! Martin Kronstad wrote: Hi! Problem: I can’t hear what the people at Location B i saying, they hear me but I do not hear them. They can call, I can call. Just no sound. My current setup is:

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - Firewall/Nat - Internet - Firewall/Nat - Softphone/hardphone

2005-08-05 Thread Martin Kronstad
Hi! The bandwith is not the problem, uploadspeed is about 400 kbits. I think I found the solution, I need to have a Proxy in the middle, or set up a IAX2 client and server at each end I will be testng this next week. BR Martin Kronstad What is the upload speed on B? Looks

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - Firewall/Nat - Internet - Firewall/Nat - Softphone/hardphone

2005-08-05 Thread Wiley Siler
Switch to IAXCOMM and use an IAX extension. Problem solved. W From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin KronstadSent: Friday, August 05, 2005 7:03 AMTo: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - Firewall

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - Firewall/Nat - Internet - Firewall/Nat - Softphone/hardphone

2005-08-05 Thread Robert Goodyear
On Aug 4, 2005, at 10:37 PM, Martin Kronstad wrote: Hi!Problem:I can’t hear what the people at Location B i saying, they hear me but I do not hear them. They can call, I can call. Just no sound.My current setup is:Softphones/Hardphones(Location A) - Asterisk - Firewall/Nat - Internet -

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - Firewall/Nat - Internet - Firewall/Nat - Softphone/hardphone

2005-08-04 Thread Martin Kronstad
Hi! Problem: I cant hear what the people at Location B i saying, they hear me but I do not hear them. They can call, I can call. Just no sound. My current setup is: Softphones/Hardphones(Location A) - Asterisk - Firewall/Nat - Internet - Firewall/Nat -

[Asterisk-Users] asterisk xlite nat problem

2005-04-26 Thread Mostafa
Dear All, I am new to this mailing list , I have bought some digium cards to play with , Installed it and configured asterisk . I was able to test voicemail IVR , I succeeded also to use xlite from a windows machine to call another phone through a PSTN line. and call the xlite client from a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT

2005-04-16 Thread Mark Phillips
sees the private IP. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Vishnev Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 9:05 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT Try setting externip

Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk + OH323 + NAT + gnomemeeting

2005-04-16 Thread Karl J. Vesterling
H.323 will not traverse NAT. Sorry... I know, I was a big proponent of it when H.323 was the only standard VoIP protocol out there. Probably because when it came out NAT wasn't even thought of. The problem is that the control channel in H.323 discloses the internal IP address, and the various

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT

2005-04-15 Thread Alex Vishnev
Try setting externip=(asterisk public ip address) Hth Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oswaldo Arratia Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 12:56 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: [Asterisk-Users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT

2005-04-15 Thread Oswaldo Arratia
- Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT Try setting externip=(asterisk public ip address) Hth Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oswaldo Arratia Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 12:56 AM To: 'Asterisk

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT

2005-04-15 Thread Alex Vishnev
-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT I have... Externip=x.x.x.xand nothing... Does not seem to help in anything. Still my provider sees the private IP. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Vishnev

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT

2005-04-15 Thread Jim Sturtevant
Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT Can you show your outbound peer configuration? If you are registering, please include that as well. Thanks Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oswaldo Arratia Sent: Friday, April

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT

2005-04-15 Thread Oswaldo Arratia
-Users] Asterisk behind NAT Can you show your outbound peer configuration? If you are registering, please include that as well. Thanks Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oswaldo Arratia Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 9:44 AM To: 'Asterisk

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT

2005-04-15 Thread Oswaldo Arratia
: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT Do you have any phones connected to your * on the internal subnet? Can they make outbound calls? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Vishnev Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 10:15 AM To: 'Asterisk

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT

2005-04-15 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 13:45, Fri 15 Apr 05, Oswaldo Arratia wrote: [gw2] type=peer port=5060 host=2.4.6.8 disallow=all defaultip=2.4.6.8 allow=g729 Hi, Put this line in there: canreinvite=no That fixed a lot of nat issues for me. -- Michiel van Baak http://lunteren.vanbaak.info [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT

2005-04-15 Thread Oswaldo Arratia
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 2:01 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT On 13:45, Fri 15 Apr 05, Oswaldo Arratia wrote: [gw2] type=peer port=5060 host=2.4.6.8 disallow=all defaultip=2.4.6.8 allow=g729 Hi, Put this line

[Asterisk-Users] asterisk + OH323 + NAT + gnomemeeting

2005-04-14 Thread Jesse Guardiani
Hello, I've been working a lot with asterisk lately. I've had a LOT of positive experience with various SIP clients (grandstream hardware phones ATAs, X-Lite, SJPhone, etc...), and I've had no trouble getting asterisk behind a NAT to talk SIP to clients across the internet behind another NAT

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT

2005-04-14 Thread Oswaldo Arratia
Hi List, I've spent hours researching on this topic, found tons of info, so far it doesn't work yet. Here's the scenario Asterisk box connected to a router (DMZ enabled to Asterisk) and trying to send calls to an outside provider. My SIP phones (outside * NAT) are able to register with no

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, SER, NAT, STUN and the whole debate

2005-03-29 Thread Anton Krall
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Fielding Sent: Martes, 29 de Marzo de 2005 12:52 a.m. To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, SER, NAT, STUN and the whole debate - Original Message - From: Anton Krall [EMAIL PROTECTED] would

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, SER, NAT, STUN and the whole debate

2005-03-29 Thread Paul Fielding
- From: Anton Krall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 5:28 AM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, SER, NAT, STUN and the whole debate Thank you for your story Paul, nice work

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, SER, NAT, STUN and the whole debate

2005-03-29 Thread Anton Krall
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Fielding Sent: Martes, 29 de Marzo de 2005 08:27 a.m. To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, SER, NAT, STUN and the whole debate Basically, I'm forwarding the standard Asterisk ports: tcp 5060 udp 5060 udp

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, SER, NAT, STUN and the whole debate

2005-03-29 Thread Eric Wieling aka ManxPower
Anton Krall wrote: Any problems with RTP or voice just on one side? So as long as you use some STUN server, the RTP packets have the right IP. Did you install your own stund or are you using a public one? You didn't have to use SER at all right? Setting nat=yes does pretty much the same as a STUN

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, SER, NAT, STUN and the whole debate

2005-03-29 Thread Anton Krall
ManxPower Sent: Martes, 29 de Marzo de 2005 10:28 a.m. To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, SER, NAT, STUN and the whole debate Anton Krall wrote: Any problems with RTP or voice just on one side? So as long as you use some STUN

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, SER, NAT, STUN and the whole debate

2005-03-28 Thread Anton Krall
Guys. Im reading a lot about ser, nat, stun, etc. And I noticed there are a lot of ways to get around nat but I would like to hear some success stories about handling nat users with multiple voip phones behind nat. I have my asterisk box behind but ports are forwarded (5060 5004 1-2 for

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, SER, NAT, STUN and the whole debate

2005-03-28 Thread Paul Fielding
- Original Message - From: Anton Krall [EMAIL PROTECTED] would like to hear some actual setups and how people are solving the nat issue within scenarios like: Asterisk - nat (ports forwarded) - internet - nat - multiple voup phones I've been playing with this with my friends for awhile

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT -- SIP config file

2005-03-05 Thread David J Carter
Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT -- SIP config file The VPN approach might resolv a lot of nat issues I guess... Depending on the scenario I guess.. You could put another * box inside the second nat and interconnect using IAX, or if using a single phone, just use your

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT -- SIP config file

2005-03-05 Thread Anton Krall
: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT -- SIP config file I have used the Draytek 2600V router in a few locations where only 1 or 2 phones are required. The router has 2 FXS ports and can be used locally to an * box or via the VPN to a remote * box. The VPN built into the routers just works

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + SIP + NAT - seriously, what's the secret?

2005-03-04 Thread Mark Farver
Stuart Ford wrote: Seriously, this has to be the simplest NAT problem there is with Asterisk. What's the secret? How do I learn the dark art? What am I missing? I'm guessing here, but the NAT'd grandstream does not have the correct external IP configured. The phones are trying to establish a

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT -- SIP config file

2005-03-04 Thread Rudolf Ladyzhenskii
Hi, all This is the souktion that worked for me. Here is my config again PHONE 1 -- * BOX | NAT/Firewall | | NAT/Firewall | | PHONE 2 Firewall on

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT -- SIP config file

2005-03-04 Thread Anton Krall
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rudolf Ladyzhenskii Sent: Viernes, 04 de Marzo de 2005 08:41 p.m. To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT -- SIP config file Hi, all This is the souktion

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk behind NAT -- SIP config file

2005-03-04 Thread Rudolf Ladyzhenskii
Why are the sip.conf extensions mentioned twice each? I am using Polycom SP300 phones. You have to separate 'user' and 'peer' part of it to get it working. Search the wiki for description of the problem. Also, if you * box is behind another firewall, by forward ports 5060 and 1-2 and

  1   2   >