On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Michael Giagnocavo wrote:
Yes, there is network support.
I tried it out, but the voice quality seemed quite choppy (local machine,
P4
3GHz). Not sure if it'd actually work for any near-production scenarios.
-Michael
Being partly responsible for AstWind, the
CoLinux works great for IAX to IAX or SIP to IAX where no Disk Access is
taking place.
Thanks for clearing that up. I had been using it for IVRs. So if I
created a
RAM disk for CoLinux and booted it from there... that might work?
You know, that would be an interesting project, and I'd bet
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Michael Giagnocavo wrote:
CoLinux works great for IAX to IAX or SIP to IAX where no Disk Access is
taking place.
Thanks for clearing that up. I had been using it for IVRs. So if I
created a
RAM disk for CoLinux and booted it from there... that might work?
You
I don't know why I bother feeding the trolls (either of them), but I do
think this conversation does actually have something to contribute to
the list. I think they are angry for a really important and relevant
reason.
Thus we begin the long and winding trek from off-topic to on-topic:
On Tue,
Jay Milk wrote:
I'm not sure why I'm even discussing the benefits of one operating
system over another with someone who can't even spell its name.
His name...not its name (especially following who).
:-)
--
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
___
-Users] Linux and Windows
Jay Milk wrote:
I'm not sure why I'm even discussing the benefits of one operating
system over another with someone who can't even spell its name.
His name...not its name (especially following who).
:-)
--
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
Jay Milk wrote:
its name -- as in, not being able to spell the name of the operating
system he's trashing.
Ah...
[FLAMEBAIT]
So it was a joke!
Who care winblows sux!
[/FLAMEBAIT]
:-)
--
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
___
http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily
On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 12:46, Karl J. Vesterling wrote:
At 06:51 PM 11/1/2004, you wrote:
[snip for brevity[
So the U.S. Govt has never used linux anywhere? Wow.
Not in most installations, and definitely not in DoD facilities.
The Office of Inspector General has deemed open source to be
Jay Milk [EMAIL PROTECTED] lazily top-posted:
I'm not sure why I'm even discussing the benefits of one operating
system over another
I don't know why you bother posting at all.
--
_/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/
_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/ K e v i n W
: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 12:46, Karl J. Vesterling wrote:
At 06:51 PM 11/1/2004, you wrote:
[snip for brevity[
So the U.S. Govt has never used linux anywhere? Wow.
Not in most installations, and definitely not in DoD facilities.
The Office of Inspector General has
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lazily top-posted:
Actually we have used RedHat Enterprise AS in the military has well.
Perhaps you should use Windows in the military. It likes to bomb
unexpectedly, and with no good reason, so the US military should feel
very much at home with it.
--
_/ _/ _/_/_/_/
But don't forget one important point, at this point there is absolutly
NO hardware support for running Asterisk under Windows. If you need
hardware support (TDM Cards, etc) you will need to run Asterisk on a
Linux based server.
Tim Donahue
On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 01:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01-Nov-2004, Tim Donahue wrote:
But don't forget one important point, at this point there is absolutly
NO hardware support for running Asterisk under Windows. If you need
hardware support (TDM Cards, etc) you will need to run Asterisk on a
Linux based server.
Or a FreeBSD based server.
for just the super geeks.
--
Start Your Own ISP!
http://www.YourOwnISP.com
- Original Message -
From: Tim Donahue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 8:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linux
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 09:12:15 -0500, Tim Donahue
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But don't forget one important point, at this point there is absolutly
NO hardware support for running Asterisk under Windows. If you need
hardware support (TDM Cards, etc) you will need to run Asterisk on a
Linux based
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 08:25:03 -0600, Me [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The thing is, why run it on Windows.. Even though there is a Windows version
now it's not really a Windows version is a Linux version running on a
version of Linux that will run on Windows.. YUCK.. That's like taking a
Cadillac
such.
Craig
- Original Message -
From: Me [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
The thing is, why run it on Windows.. Even though there is a Windows
: Monday, November 01, 2004 9:09 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
I haven't really looked into ASTWind too much but I assume there would be
network access available to it? It might be useful for the purpose of
providing
Graig,
What is ITSP???
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Guy
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 5:09 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
The trouble is innertia. Most Windoze folks are so much into their
Windoze routine, they won't even use a Linux or BSD box if you install
it for them. I have got a friend in the UK who is always complaining
about his Windoze box being down and having to rebuild it from scratch
because of
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 9:09 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
I haven't really looked into ASTWind too much but I assume there would be
network access available to it? It might be useful for the purpose
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 11:17 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
Graig,
What is ITSP???
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL
james wrote:
The trouble is innertia. Most Windoze folks are so much into their
Windoze routine, they won't even use a Linux or BSD box if you install
it for them. I have got a friend in the UK who is always complaining
about his Windoze box being down and having to rebuild it from scratch
because
On 01 Nov 2004 11:16:31 -0500, james [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
all very easily. When I started with Asterisk, there was finally
something that got him interested because he's a telephone junkie.
Well then, how did you expect your win-weenies to admin a hardware based
phone system then? It
Asterisk is working only in Linux? Can not work in Windows 2000?
I'm an unashamed windows user. So I like to game, sue me ;)
I'm surprised no one has mentioned VMware or virtualPC. I setup my first
Asterisk system in VMware and when I wanted to drop a generic line card in
an old 500mhz system
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of public
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 12:06 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
Asterisk is working only in Linux? Can not work in Windows 2000?
I'm an unashamed
invaluable for testing
and development.
Sam
-Original Message-
From: Michael Giagnocavo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 November 2004 18:13
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
You might also want to consider MS Virtual
: Monday, November 01, 2004 12:31 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
Does MS Virtual server support running linux? Thought you could only run
windows on it?
Vmware's server products are apparently very good
I use VMware + (Generic linux flavor) + Asterisk, for testing. Works
great, sound and mic work even. Kind of a bloated aproach seeing you
need ~128meg ram to even boot the OS but still it's fun to play with..
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Michael Giagnocavo [mailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 9:06 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
The trouble is innertia. Most Windoze folks are so much into
their Windoze routine, they won't even use a Linux or BSD box
Not true
You might also want to consider MS Virtual Server, as it is geared more to
running as a service. VMware workstation / VirtualPC are more like desktop
tools (although I think they have some higher-end server-like products,
but
I haven't used them).
Regarding VMware's workstation product,
Does MS Virtual server support running linux? Thought you could only run
windows on it?
Vmware's server products are apparently very good. Their Workstation
product
is really good, and has seamless support for many different OS's. We have
used it here for almost two years now and its been
Does MS Virtual server support running linux? Thought you could only run
windows on it?
Vmware's server products are apparently very good. Their Workstation
product
is really good, and has seamless support for many different OS's. We
have
used it here for almost two years now and
VxWorks?
- Original Message -
From: public [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
Does MS Virtual server support running linux? Thought you
I run both VMware GSX and ESX servers.
It should be noted that though asterisk runs under VMware, none of
Digim's cards (or any other telephony cards) are available inside
VMwares's virtual machines.
It's just my opinion, but I don't think MS's virtual products currently
conpare to GSX and ESX
Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote:
In this respect, something like CoLinux and Astwind is definitely a
good thing because it lowers that entry hurdle, even if only the
perception thereof.
rgds
benjk
When NT40 first came out, the company I worked for ported all of it's
management
VxWorks?
Apparently,
http://www.computing.net/solaris/wwwboard/forum/3923.html
-Bryan
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 11:06:28 -0700, public [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm an unashamed windows user.
Nobody is. It's like alcoholics, they don't admit that they have a
drinking problem, because they can stop any time they like, right?
So I like to game, sue me ;)
Very good point.
Leading right
] On Behalf Of Benjamin on
Asterisk Mailing Lists
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 4:35 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 11:06:28 -0700, public [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm an unashamed windows user.
Nobody
Very good point.
Leading right to the only reason why Windoze even exists in the
workplace: People who abuse their employers and waste their time at
work with entertainment instead of doing their jobs.
You can play with your toys at home, but there is absolutely no reason
why your
ON WITH OUR LIVES.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 4:35 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 11:06:28
Jay Milk wrote:
Why are you so angry?
At the risk of throwing oil on the fire, I would submit that Benjamin
was *kidding* at the beginning of that mail, and trolling at the end.
I agree with him about the quit anytime I want, but I digress. . .
It does appear his flamebait was eagerly pounced
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
Jay Milk wrote:
Why are you so angry?
At the risk of throwing oil on the fire, I would submit that Benjamin
was *kidding* at the beginning of that mail, and trolling at the end.
I agree with him about
You can play with your toys at home, but there is absolutely no reason
why your employer should provide you toys at work simply because you
have them at home.
[rest of sermon snipped]
This is a joke right? While I'm amazed at your enlightenment of how a
computer is supposed to be used, in my
As far as I understand, corporation, and Govt's like commercial products
because of the issue of liability. That is why the Commercial
market and Govt market don't accept open source solutions.
What is perplexing about the whole situation is that the licensing
agreements with commercial
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karl J. Vesterling
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 5:24 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
As far as I understand, corporation, and Govt's like commercial products because of
the issue
As far as I understand, corporation, and Govt's like
commercial products because of the issue of liability. That is why the
Commercial market and Govt market don't accept open source solutions.
Both governments (Germany anyone?) and commercial
entities (quite a few people have made
Jay Milk wrote:
I make six figures from Windows. I have yet to earn a penny with Linux.
That hardly makes your opinion unbiased. You are obviously a windows
shop or you suggest windows. There are many of us who make our money
mainly from Linux.
--
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
At 06:41 PM 11/1/2004, you wrote:
[ snip for brevity ]
If I only ran linux, I'd not even be able to connect to the Internet,
since
all I have is an EVDO/CDMA PCMCIA modem that barely has working drivers
for
Windows.
I wouldn't attempt to get on the highway riding a rusty old tricycle, nor
If
I only ran linux, I'd not even be able to connect to the Internet, since
all I have is
an EVDO/CDMA PCMCIA modem that barely has working drivers for
Windows.
I wouldn't attempt
to get on the highway riding a rusty old tricycle, nor would I entrust my penguin to such a
device. Perhaps
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 13:32:03 -0600, Jay Milk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe we could keep the religious Windows vs. Linux discussions out of
here? I think they're hardly productive, nor do they make people who
argue for one or the other look very intelligent...
Go back and read the entire
Karl J. Vesterling wrote:
At 06:41 PM 11/1/2004, you wrote:
[ snip for brevity ]
If I only ran linux, I'd not even be able to connect to the Internet,
since
all I have is an EVDO/CDMA PCMCIA modem that barely has working
drivers for
Windows.
I wouldn't attempt to get on the highway riding a
At 06:51 PM 11/1/2004, you wrote:
[snip for brevity[
So the U.S. Govt has never used linux anywhere? Wow.
Not in most installations, and definitely not in DoD facilities.
The Office of Inspector General has deemed open source to be
Verboten.
That's going to become an interesting situation when
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Karl J. Vesterling
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 5:24 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
As far as I understand, corporation, and Govt's like commercial products
because
Its hard to get to the bottom of this. I've seen things on the internet
saying open source in all forms is banned. I've also seem lots of things
about deployments in the US government in general and the DoD in
particular. I guess like most things the left hand never knows what the
right hand
At 08:23 PM 11/1/2004, you wrote:
Try reading what people say
before ranting. He has a *CDMA* modem. Can you offer him good modem
support for a CDMA modem? If not, try to avoid making yourself look so
foolish.
Oh good gawd... I thought he was rambling some obscure sort of part
number from some
There are exceptions to the rule...
For instance, if an RFP contained requirements that only an open-source
solution, or a solution written from scratch would provide the open
source solution may be accepted on the grounds that it is the least cost
solution.
HOWEVER!
One may have to file
: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
This has nothing to do with anger, but it has all to do with
truthfulness.
How many times have you had discussions with Windoze folks
trying to give you good reasongs why Windoze should
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karl J. Vesterling
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 7:46 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
At 06:51 PM 11/1/2004, you wrote:
[snip for brevity[
So the U.S. Govt has never used linux anywhere? Wow
Jay Milk wrote:
I'm not sure why I'm even discussing the benefits of one operating
system over another with someone who can't even spell its name.
Um, because he's an intelligent and insightful commentatator on the
various aspects of VoIP in general and Asterisk in particular?
People are
-Users] Linux and Windows
Jay Milk wrote:
I make six figures from Windows. I have yet to earn a penny with
Linux.
That hardly makes your opinion unbiased. You are obviously a windows
shop or you suggest windows. There are many of us who make our money
mainly from Linux
Jay Milk wrote:
I'm not sure why I'm even discussing the benefits of one operating
system over another with someone who can't even spell its name.
Um, because he's an intelligent and insightful commentatator on the
various aspects of VoIP in general and Asterisk in particular?
Asterisk is working only in Linux? Can not work in
Windows 2000?
Please advise.
Regards
Bilal
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
I saw something on the Digium site a few days ago that Asterisk was available
for MS based platforms. Its called AstWind.
http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=astwind
Cheers,
Sahil
Quoting Bilal Ghayad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Asterisk is working only in Linux? Can not work in Windows 2000?
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 09:46:46 +0300, Bilal Ghayad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Asterisk is working only in Linux? Can not work in Windows 2000?
You can have Asterisk on any operating system you like, as long as it
is a proper operating system that actually deserves the name, that is
to say a system
65 matches
Mail list logo
