Michel Verbraak michel at verbraak.org writes:
Op 22-08-12 12:09, Shitian Long
schreef:
I am trying to setup TE110P wildcard on a PBX running ubuntu 12.04
server edition. I followed the procedure
from http://docs.digium.com/misc/ADL_quickstart.pdf
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 09:18:46PM +, ted wrote:
Michel Verbraak michel at verbraak.org writes:
Op 22-08-12 12:09, Shitian Long
I am trying to setup TE110P wildcard on a PBX running
ubuntu 12.04 server edition. I followed the procedure
from
Shaun Ruffell sruffell at digium.com writes:
Best guess based on what you said that the driver really isn't
installed for the current kernel.
Cheers,
Shaun
thanks much! this lead me to find this:
Op 22-08-12 12:09, Shitian Long schreef:
I am trying to setup TE110P wildcard on a PBX running ubuntu 12.04
server edition. I followed the procedure
from http://docs.digium.com/misc/ADL_quickstart.pdf step by step.
During the process of installing dahdi-linux-complete
I got following
I am trying to setup TE110P wildcard on a PBX running ubuntu 12.04 server
edition. I followed the procedure from
http://docs.digium.com/misc/ADL_quickstart.pdf step by step.
During the process of installing dahdi-linux-complete
I got following warnings:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:09:54PM +0200, Shitian Long wrote:
I am trying to setup TE110P wildcard on a PBX running ubuntu 12.04
server edition. I followed the procedure from
http://docs.digium.com/misc/ADL_quickstart.pdf step by step.
During the process of installing dahdi-linux-complete
Can someone tell me in simple words what the difference between these 2
cards are, and why I should buy a TE120P (more expensive) than a TE110P.
I've bought TE120P's recently just because my supplier was out of stock
on the TE110P's, but for a single board in a server, what's the
difference?
AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] TE110P or TE120P
Can someone tell me in simple words what the difference between these 2
cards are, and why I should buy a TE120P (more expensive) than a TE110P.
I've bought TE120P's recently just because my supplier
, Buffalo, NY
14225 USA.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gordon Henderson
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 10:47 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] TE110P or TE120P
Can someone tell me in simple words
PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos Chavez
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 1:31 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] TE110P with 40,000 IRQ missess
I have an Asterisk server that was running fine until Sunday. Monday
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 00:30 -0500, Carlos Chavez wrote:
I have an Asterisk server that was running fine until Sunday. Monday
there was a power outage and the server was off most of the day.
This server has a TE110P, two TDM04B and an Astribank 32. Today I
noticed that the TE110P
I have an Asterisk server that was running fine until Sunday. Monday
there was a power outage and the server was off most of the day.
This server has a TE110P, two TDM04B and an Astribank 32. Today I
noticed that the TE110P started having IRQ missess. Before today it only had
about
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos Chavez
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 1:31 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] TE110P with 40,000 IRQ missess
I have an Asterisk server that was running
Folks,
I installed a te110p to connect to an E-1. Ensured the jumper is on
for E-1, installed the card, and got the following from the phone
company:
hdb3 encoding (verbally confirmed ccs)
euroisdn switchtype
pri signalling
So I set up zaptel.conf:
span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3
bchan=1-15
unused=17-31
, 2007 12:01 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P: Error == Asterisk died with code
1.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:47:48AM -0500, Jeronimo Romero wrote:
Thank you all. Was a signaling issue.
And for the benefit of those who will read the archive: how have
Thank you all. Was a signaling issue.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir
Cohen
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:55 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P: Error == Asterisk died with code
1
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:47:48AM -0500, Jeronimo Romero wrote:
Thank you all. Was a signaling issue.
And for the benefit of those who will read the archive: how have you
debugged it? how have you resolved it?
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755
Running Asterisk 1.2.9. I just installed a TE110P card and configured
zaptel.conf zapata.conf. The config files look right to me but I'm
getting the following error when trying to start asterisk:
Asterisk died with code 1.
Automatically restarting Asterisk.
Does anyone have any idea what is
Jeronimo Romero wrote:
Running Asterisk 1.2.9. I just installed a TE110P card and configured
zaptel.conf zapata.conf. The config files look right to me but I'm
getting the following error when trying to start asterisk:
Asterisk died with code 1.
Automatically restarting Asterisk.
Does anyone
: [asterisk-users] TE110P: Error == Asterisk died with code 1.
Jeronimo Romero wrote:
Running Asterisk 1.2.9. I just installed a TE110P card and configured
zaptel.conf zapata.conf. The config files look right to me but I'm
getting the following error when trying to start asterisk:
Asterisk died
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:01:41PM -0500, Jeronimo Romero wrote:
Running Asterisk 1.2.9. I just installed a TE110P card and configured
zaptel.conf zapata.conf. The config files look right to me but I'm
getting the following error when trying to start asterisk:
Asterisk died with code 1.
Helo,
I have a troubles getting to stable work of Digium TE110P card (mailed some
time earlier in the list) - I can't get 100% pseudo zap interface accuracy
(zttest), so getting HDLC aborts and call drops. I tried number
motherboards, hardware and software configs according to info in wiki, thisl
] On Behalf Of Matthew
Fredrickson
Sent: 25 January 2007 20:58
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P and HDLC problems
There was a recent driver fix that *might* help you. It's not in an official
1.x.x release yet, but if you check out 1.2
Thanks for your answers :)
I use another server to test digium board and my config, and it works
well, so... I think the problem is between chipset, Intel 5000P and
digium card. I will try to put the digium board in other PCI-X slots,
and change some timing PCI parameters in the BIOS.
Problem solved :) :)
I change the OS, I install a Debian Etch x86_32bits and it works
perfectly with the following software versions:
asterisk 1.2.13
zaptel 1.2.12
so... I don't understand where was the problem. TE110P driver
version
The previus OS was a Ubuntu 6.10 (codename
Hi!,
this issue makes me crazy. I read a lot of docs, also * mailling list
and I try a lot of things without success.
Any help will be appreciated. Here is the info:
Hardware:
Supermicro Server with motherboard X7DB8, chipset Intel 5000P, Xeon
There was a recent driver fix that *might* help you. It's not in an
official 1.x.x release yet, but if you check out 1.2 from svn, you
should get the latest version of the driver with the fix.
Matthew Fredrickson
On Jan 25, 2007, at 9:15 AM, Marc Patino Gómez wrote:
Hi!,
this issue
Josué
Conti
Envoyé : vendredi 29 décembre 2006 23:27
À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P with Qsig
Hi Matthew thank's will be attention.
I believe that the configurations are correct, I changed of server, one
another hardware
It sounds like it isn't configured correctly. Are you sure that your
cabling is ok and that your span= line is correct?
Matthew Fredrickson
On Dec 28, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Josué Conti wrote:
Hi all, as good?
I am trying to go up a board TE110P with link E1 ISDN PRI to establish
connection
Hi Matthew thank's will be attention.
I believe that the configurations are correct, I changed of server, one
another hardware and the problem remains the same. :(
Changing of protocol, for euroisdn the problem remains.
Stranger, does not find?
Best Regards
Josue
zaptel.conf
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Josué Conti
Envoyé : vendredi 29 décembre 2006 23:27
À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P with Qsig
Hi Matthew thank's will be attention.
I believe that the configurations are correct, I changed
.
And recheck ztcfg -vvv.
Best Regards,
Francois BERGERET,
France.
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Josué Conti
Envoyé : vendredi 29 décembre 2006 23:27
À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Objet : Re: [asterisk-users
Hi all, as good?
I am trying to go up a board TE110P with link E1 ISDN PRI to establish
connection with a central office Siemens HiPath 4000. But I am having the
following errors:
Server1:~ # asterisk -r
Asterisk 1.2.10, Copyright (C) 1999 - 2006 Digium, Inc. and others.
Created by Mark Spencer
On 12/6/06, Klaverstyn, David C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just installed Asterisk wit a TE110P card. I have configured 30
channels which seems to be recognised by staff and zap show channels.
I can make outbound calls with exceptional call quality but inbound
(receiving) calls the
I have just installed Asterisk wit a TE110P card. I have configured 30
channels which seems to be recognised by staff and zap show channels.
I can make outbound calls with exceptional call quality but inbound
(receiving) calls the caller get a message saying Your call could not be
connected,
30 Channels on Verizon? Is this in the US? T1 (24 channels) or E1(30
channels)? Are you dialing from the top (g1) of the group or bottom
(G1)?
On 12/5/06, Klaverstyn, David C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just installed Asterisk wit a TE110P card. I have configured 30
channels which
:* Wednesday, November 22, 2006 4:08 PM
*Subject:* RE: [asterisk-users] TE110P and TDM400P
I think that you are loading the drivers in the wrong order. You can
change the order of loading are first define the E1 followed by the TDM400
Hope this helps,
Henk
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 11:49:50AM +, Marco Mouta wrote:
try this, pls give some feedback
This one is evidently false:
###
/etc/zaptel.conf
span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
It claims that the T1 span is the first one. However:
fxsks=1-4
The analog span is the first one. Which is generally
Thanks a lot Henk !
- Original Message -
From: Henk Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Lincoln Zuljewic Silva' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Asterisk Users
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 5:03 PM
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] TE110P
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 12:47:27PM -0300, Lincoln Zuljewic Silva wrote:
Ok, now it works:
ideiafix:~# modprobe zaptel
ideiafix:~# modprobe wcte11xp
ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 32: No such device or address (6)
FATAL: Error running install command for wcte11xp
ideiafix:~# modprobe wctdm
Hello all. I have here a TE110P (configured as E1) and a TDM400P (with four
X100P - FXS). Both boards are recognized by the operating system as showed
above:
:08:00.0 Communication controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX
Modem/ISDN interface
Subsystem: Unknown device b1d9:0003
november 2006 20:51
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] TE110P and TDM400P
Hello all. I have here a TE110P (configured as E1) and a TDM400P (with four
X100P - FXS). Both boards are recognized by the operating system as showed
above:
:08:00.0 Communication
-Commercial
Discussion'
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 4:08 PM
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] TE110P and TDM400P
I think that you are loading the drivers in the wrong order. You can change
the order of loading are first define the E1 followed by the TDM400
Hope this helps
I would suggest the following
- remove the drivers
- load them manually (zaptel, wcte11xp, wctdm)
Run:
Zttools - should show unconfigured cards.
Take:
/etc/zaptel.conf
span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
bchan=1-15,17-31
dchan=16
fxsks=32-35
loadzone = us
defaultzone=us
run:
ztcfg -vv
See what it is
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:51:24PM -0300, Lincoln Zuljewic Silva wrote:
Hello all. I have here a TE110P (configured as E1) and a TDM400P (with four
X100P - FXS). Both boards are recognized by the operating system as showed
above:
:08:00.0 Communication controller: Tiger Jet Network
is. Better yet several sites that list some kind of walk through are completely different from each other. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Julian
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.comDate: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:45:50 +Subject: [asterisk-users] TE110P Card
Hi
Hi Groupies,I am sort of new to the whole asterisk thing, especially when it comes to the Digium TE110P card. Does anyone have experience setting this up? If so can you help me out? The provider for the PRI is going to be ATT/SBC.ThanksJulian
___
I'm running both these cards in different boxes. MB chipset is the
same. I see consistently zero IRQ misses on the 205p and 9/10 timing
samples at 100%.
the te110p is a different story. No amount of optimisation can get the
timing up to 100% consistently. 1 out of 15 zttest samples will come
Read my post in this last April [Asterisk-Users] R2 protocol error you can
find some guide from
the Unicall creator. Goodluck!
Also I think the subject wont attract Asterisk-MFC-R2 user, since its a kind of
zaptel
configuration issue.
Dennis
Hi,
I wonder if anyone is using Digium's TE110P card on an E1 connection.
I have been try to, but so far it wasn't much of a success.
It only works more or less in EuroISDN as PRI CPE.
And even that config gives me some trouble with channel negotiation.
My current config:
zaptel.conf:
For BT in the UK I use :-
zaptel.conf
loadzone = uk
defaultzone=uk
span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
bchan=1-15
dchan=16
bchan=17-31
zapata.conf
[trunkgroups]
[channels]
language=en
context=did
priindication = outofband
usecallerid=yes
cidsignalling=v23
usecallingpres=yes
sendcalleridafter=1
switchtype =
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the message!
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Paul Hewlett wrote:
[...]
I am curious..
Have you tried disabling CPU1 by setting isolcpus=1 on the kernel
command line ?
This will make the kernel ignore the second CPU - you can then run
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
|Begumisa Gerald M
|Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 5:13 AM
|To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
|
|Hi Paul,
|
|Thanks for the message!
|
| On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Paul Hewlett wrote
On 4/11/06, Begumisa Gerald M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, if the IO-APIC is reporting that the card is on its own IRQ,
it really, truly, honestly *IS* on its own IRQ. The reason that it
is suggested to disable the IO-APIC is that on many low-end systems,
Allow me to comment
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, stoffell wrote:
Interesting. Now 'why' do they suggest it, is it because older
IO-APIC are 'broken' on some boards? I'm very curious as to 'why',
[...]
Most likely this is why.
Regards,
Gerald
___
--Bandwidth
Gerald M
|Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 5:13 AM
|To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
|
|Hi Paul,
|
|Thanks for the message!
|
| On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Paul Hewlett wrote:
| [...]
|
| I am curious
PM
|To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
|
|On Monday 17 April 2006 12:39, Anton Krall wrote:
| I don't know if this only works with multiple cpus but I have HT
| enabled and it shows cpu0 and cpu1 .. I tried the first part of this
| email
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 21:45, Begumisa Gerald M wrote:
Hi,
I've been battling with a similar issue:
a) I wrote a script to periodically run the command cat
/proc/interrupts and figure out the interrupts per second. I run this
script for over 24 hours and never once did the difference
On Monday 10 April 2006 19:20, Mojo with Horan Company, LLC wrote:
Try booting with apic off, I think it's noapic kernel option. Notice
this is APIC and not ACPI, which you referred to. Then get your
boards on different REAL irqs.
Please do not open your mouth to spout nonsense if you do
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 19:25 -0500, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
Anton Krall wrote:
I will try that and see what happens...
This server is a supermicro one.. Anybody else had issues like this on
supermicro? Any hints on how to resolv them?
If I remember correctly, supermicro bios does
-Users] te110p and interrupts
|
|On Monday 10 April 2006 19:20, Mojo with Horan Company, LLC wrote:
| Try booting with apic off, I think it's noapic kernel
|option. Notice
| this is APIC and not ACPI, which you referred to. Then get your
| boards on different REAL irqs.
|
|Please do not open
Zttool shows no irqmisses on the te110p card?
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
|Kenneth Lussier
|Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 7:05 AM
|To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p
and supermicro.
Simone
-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Anton Krall
Inviato: martedì 11 aprile 2006 5.28
A: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Oggetto: RE: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
Damn :) any others
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
Please do not open your mouth to spout nonsense if you do not know
what you're talking about.
[...]
Again, if the IO-APIC is reporting that the card is on its own IRQ,
it really, truly, honestly *IS* on its own IRQ. The
Hi,
I've been battling with a similar issue:
a) I wrote a script to periodically run the command cat
/proc/interrupts and figure out the interrupts per second. I run this
script for over 24 hours and never once did the difference between the
preceeding and succeeding interrupt counts go below
Guys. I have an issue with a te110p card and also some tdm04b cards on the
same system:
Zttest returns this for the tdm04b cards:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 38 -v
Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy...
8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%
8192
use lspci -vb for detecting interrupt conflicts..On 4/10/06, Anton Krall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Guys. I have an issue with a te110p card and also some tdm04b cards on the
same system:Zttest returns this for the tdm04b cards:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 38 -vOpened pseudo
PeruSent: Monday, April 10, 2006 5:47 PMTo: Asterisk
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re:
[Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
use lspci -vb for detecting interrupt conflicts..
On 4/10/06, Anton
Krall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Guys.
I have an issue
... :(
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
*Infobox Peru
*Sent:* Monday, April 10, 2006 5:47 PM
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
use lspci -vb
Is this dual CPU/Core or just P4 with HT enabled?
If it is P4, I would recommend to disable HT.
Try changing PCI slots for one of the cards (if you have spare PCI slots).
CPU0 CPU1
0: 17697848 17714488IO-APIC-edge timer
___
: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
|
|Try booting with apic off, I think it's noapic kernel option.
|Notice this is APIC and not ACPI, which you referred to.
|Then get your boards on different REAL irqs.
|
|Moj
|
|Anton Krall wrote:
| This system has acpi enabled. This is how the cards looks like
]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
|Boris Bakchiev
|Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 6:26 PM
|To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
|
|Is this dual CPU/Core or just P4 with HT enabled?
|If it is P4, I would recommend to disable
-Users] te110p and interrupts
|
|Is this dual CPU/Core or just P4 with HT enabled?
|If it is P4, I would recommend to disable HT.
|
|Try changing PCI slots for one of the cards (if you have spare
|PCI slots).
|
| CPU0 CPU1
| 0: 17697848 17714488IO-APIC-edge timer
Anton Krall wrote:
I will try that and see what happens...
This server is a supermicro one.. Anybody else had issues like this on
supermicro? Any hints on how to resolv them?
If I remember correctly, supermicro bios does let you assign irq to certain
pci ports right? Will that help?
Also, is
Damn :) any others?
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
|Eric ManxPower Wieling
|Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 7:25 PM
|To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
Hi All
I have a TE110P card connected to a PRI line. In my zaptel.conf I have:
span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs
bchan=1-23
dchan=24
loadzone = us
defaultzone=us
and my zapata.conf is:
[channels]
context=inbound-pri
switchtype = national
pridialplan=unknown
;pridialplan=international
signalling = pri_cpe
You need to have an extension defined for each number comig in. They
may be 4 digit if that is how your circuit is ordered. You then need
to create a dialplan to tell the call what to do.
Yes you could create a group in zapata to use for outdial
The pri will automatically allow up to 23
Dan Sully wrote:
We've been given a block of 23 numbers for the PRI. If I explictly set
the
incoming extension in extensions.conf like:
exten = 1153,1,Answer
or:
exten = _,1,Answer
I can get the incoming call. If I try and do:
exten = s,1,Answer
Why would an incoming call have a
* Doug Lytle shaped the electrons to say...
exten = 1153,1,Answer
I can get the incoming call. If I try and do:
exten = s,1,Answer
Why would an incoming call have a destination of 1153? My incoming
don't have a destination until the end user selects something from and
IVR or and operator
Sully
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 10:53 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P + PRI incoming +
outgoing extensionsquestion
* Doug Lytle shaped the electrons to say...
exten = 1153,1,Answer
I can get the incoming call. If I
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:32:26 -0500
Doug Lytle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why would an incoming call have a destination of 1153?
On my asterisk, when a call comes from E1 the default destination is the last 4
digits.
--
Iuri Gomes Diniz adm.iuri (at) digi.com.br
Network Admin and Programmer
* Alexander Lopez shaped the electrons to say...
Relax your PRI is fine. What Xo is sending you is 4 digits os DID.
If for example you have 1130-1153 as the last 4 digits of your Number
you can use this to rout your calls.
exten = 1130,1,Goto(ivr,s,1)
Exten = 1140,1,Goto(extensionss,100,1)
I just got a TE110P up on an XO PRI - everything looks good so far.
We've been given a block of 23 numbers for the PRI. If I explictly set the
incoming extension in extensions.conf like:
exten = 1153,1,Answer
or:
exten = _,1,Answer
I can get the incoming call. If I try and do:
exten =
bchan=1-5,7-15,17-31
dchan=16
Why are you excluding channel 6?
jvb
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
Hi guys,
I've been installing and configuring a TE110p card. The compile and
install went very well. I'm using this on FC4 and I compile with
linux26 as well checked I on the udev configs.
zttool and ztcfg both indicate that the card is ready.
But when I try to load chan_zap.so then I get
Hi,
I think you didn't install the libpri.
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 22:48 +0100, Arnar Gestsson wrote:
Hi guys,
I've been installing and configuring a TE110p card. The compile and
install went very well. I'm using this on FC4 and I compile with
linux26 as well checked I on the udev configs.
Hi there,
well supposedly I've compiled and installed libpri and it actually
resides in /usr/lib. I've installed /usr/lib in the /etc/ld.so.conf
explicitly but without a luck. But I'll check this path anyhow more
thoroughly.
Thanks for the advice.
BR. Arnar
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 23:01
Hi,
did you compile the asterisk after the libpri install?
check it!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ldd /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_zap.so
libpri.so.1 = /usr/lib/libpri.so.1 (0x2ac3)
libtonezone.so.1 = /usr/lib/libtonezone.so.1
(0x2ad58000)
libc.so.6 =
I had this problem and while not 100% sure. I think the solution was
whitespace at the end of the lines in the conf file. Opened the file with
vi, went to each line and hit end to make sure there were no extra spaces,
there were, removed them, rebooted and issue went away.
Hi guys,
I've
Good guess,
I recompiled asterisk and now things are falling in place. Thanks for
the pointers.
BR. Arnar
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 23:12 +0100, Domjan Attila wrote:
Hi,
did you compile the asterisk after the libpri install?
check it!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ldd
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110p and pri_cpe signalling not recognized
I had this problem and while not 100% sure. I think the solution was
whitespace at the end of the lines in the conf file. Opened the file with
vi
I have a TE110P that I
will be connecting to a T1 PRI. This seems pretty standard, but I am only using
7 channels for voice. Its a shared voice/data T1; 7 channels voice, 16
channels data and 1 D-chan, it comes into a telco router and is split into a
voice PRI and an Ethernet connection.
I'm getting unstable behavior with my newly installed TE110P T1 card. It
hangs up any incoming call anywhere from 20 seconds to 6 minutes.
Frequently, when you call back on our incoming T1 there'll be an
automated announcement (maybe from the telco?) stating we are unable to
complete your
Hello hopefully someone can answer this :)
We currently have an asterisk pbx connected to a FXO channel bank to 10 pots lines. Works great. But due to increasing costs and business load, we have ordered a dedicated T1. We plan on transfering the service to the T1 and cancelling the POTlines.
t=incoming---end
zapata.conf
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Robert
WagnerSent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 10:46 AMTo:
asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P -
Title: TE110P - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Install Problems
I am having problems sending and receiving calls over the T1. They never seem to connect - outbound keeps ringing, inbound gets busy. The T1 looks ok - no errors on the line. Any ideas on what is wrong? I have tried a variety of fxsks and
Thank you for all
Sorry my English
Jmoura
- Original Message -
From: Jason Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 21:40
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P reset
You
]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P reset
Thank you for all
Sorry my English
Jmoura
- Original Message -
From: Jason Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Asterisk
My TE110P reset some times in the day. E this cause an interruption in the
service. How I decide this problem?
my zaptel.conf
span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs
bchan=1-23 # set this to 1-15,17-31 for E1
dchan=24 # set this to 16 for E1
defaultzone=us
loadzone=us
my zapata.conf
[channels]
language=en
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JOAO CARLOS
MOURA
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 3:14 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P reset
My TE110P reset some times in the day. E this cause an interruption
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
