On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 21:24 +0200, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
exten = s,n,Set(CALLERID(num)=${IF($[0${CALLERID(num)} 140] ?
${MAINSTUB}${CALLERID(num)}:${MAINNUMBER} )} )
^ ^
remove the trailing spaces
You'll also want
Jared Smith wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 21:24 +0200, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
exten = s,n,Set(CALLERID(num)=${IF($[0${CALLERID(num)} 140] ?
${MAINSTUB}${CALLERID(num)}:${MAINNUMBER} )} )
^ ^
remove the trailing spaces
sean darcy escribió:
Jared Smith wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 21:24 +0200, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
exten = s,n,Set(CALLERID(num)=${IF($[0${CALLERID(num)} 140] ?
${MAINSTUB}${CALLERID(num)}:${MAINNUMBER} )} )
^ ^
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
sean darcy schrieb:
I'm having trouble setting callerid with teliax. I use a simple dial-out
subroutine to set the callerid depending on the calling extension, and
then dial out. Teliax is saying they're not seeing any callerid info.
exten =
I'm having trouble setting callerid with teliax. I use a simple dial-out
subroutine to set the callerid depending on the calling extension, and
then dial out. Teliax is saying they're not seeing any callerid info.
[DialOut] ; subroutine for dialing out.
exten = s,1,NoOp(Context: DialOut called
sean darcy schrieb:
I'm having trouble setting callerid with teliax. I use a simple dial-out
subroutine to set the callerid depending on the calling extension, and
then dial out. Teliax is saying they're not seeing any callerid info.
exten = s,n,Set(CALLERID(num)=${IF($[0${CALLERID(num)}
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Yes, all the equipment was located at the same physical location. In
hindsight, we could have multi-homed our collocations. Why can't service
providers multi home their edge systems to accept incoming calls from
two physical locations? If a service provider did this,
Stephen Bosch wrote:
PSTN service still sets the standard.
With infrastructure paid for under a gracious guaranteed-profit monopoly
by ratepayers, now being used as a weapon to stifle competition from
VoIP, cable, and other emerging technologies.
b.
--
This message has been scanned for
Steve Totaro wrote:
What if a train derails and slices through the main fiber connections.
OK, so you have XO, Global Crossing, Verizon, and UCN all for
redundancy. Well guess what? They are all most likely running over
those strands of fiber. You better have a VSAT connection too!
Brian Capouch wrote:
Stephen Bosch wrote:
PSTN service still sets the standard.
With infrastructure paid for under a gracious guaranteed-profit monopoly by
ratepayers,
At least in the US, this hasn't been done for many a year.
There is no LEGAL monopoly. There is, in many
Douglas Garstang wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SIP
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 8:56 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Teliax Quality of Service
Mark Coccimiglio wrote:
Steve Totaro wrote:
What if a train derails and slices through the main fiber connections.
OK, so you have XO, Global Crossing, Verizon, and UCN all for
redundancy. Well guess what? They are all most likely running over
those strands of fiber. You better
Anthony Francis wrote:
Douglas Garstang wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SIP
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 8:56 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Francis
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 7:29 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Teliax Quality of Service
Douglas
Brian Capouch wrote:
Stephen Bosch wrote:
PSTN service still sets the standard.
With infrastructure paid for under a gracious guaranteed-profit monopoly
by ratepayers,
In a regulated marketplace with legislated minimum service levels.
In Canada, most of the phone systems were
Douglas Garstang wrote:
So you've never gotten a dropped call or dead air on a PSTN call? Put it
in a little perspective.
I can count on one hand the number of outages of this kind that I've had
on PSTN in my lifetime.
Your mileage may vary.
-Stephen-
Mark Coccimiglio wrote:
Single point of failure should NEVER completely disable your company.
Yes outages happen and backhoe's cut fibre all the time. From within
this stuff can make one's life rather difficult, but from the outside it
should be almost unnoticed. When was the last time
Stephen Bosch wrote:
Of course not -- but how many hundreds of millions have been invested in
their infrastructure?
You missed the point. The standard formula I use is 5 days out or
more precisely 2% of gross revenues each year. For google its still a
kings ransom, but for a small
Mark Coccimiglio wrote:
Stephen Bosch wrote:
Of course not -- but how many hundreds of millions have been invested in
their infrastructure?
You missed the point. The standard formula I use is 5 days out or
more precisely 2% of gross revenues each year. For google its still a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Bosch
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 10:06 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Teliax Quality of Service
Brian Capouch
Steve Totaro wrote:
Setup those cell phones to use chan_mobile and you have a very nice
solution. Unless the phones are assigned to people who use them as
their own. You could possibly add some lines on a family plan $10/mo
extra w/T-Mobile and use those strictly as PSTN fialover lines.
On Aug 6, 2007, at 10:42 AM, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Let's assume for a moment that it's impossible. That does not
mean adding additional servers and additional networking
equipment does not add value, or is a worthless endeavour.
I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andres Paglayan
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 1:06 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Teliax Quality of Service
On Aug 6
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Stephen Bosch wrote:
In Canada, most of the phone systems were government-owned. It was a
good system, at least from the point of view of reliability. I don't
miss the surly (and often slow) service, but it's arguable whether
today's service -- in which everyone smiles
Tim Panton wrote:
On 5 Aug 2007, at 06:54, Douglas Garstang wrote:
I don't think creating a network without a single point of failure
is unreasonable.
It's impossible. I can't think of a single example where this
actually exists.
Getting even close is hideously expensive.
Douglas Garstang wrote:
I don't think creating a network without a single point of failure is
unreasonable.
How often have you built a network without a single point of failure?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Let's assume for a moment that it's impossible. That does not mean adding
additional servers and additional networking equipment does not add value, or
is a worthless endeavour.
I agree with that. At least two people that I know run ITSPs. Each
time they have an
Anthony Francis wrote:
Tim Panton wrote:
On 5 Aug 2007, at 06:54, Douglas Garstang wrote:
I don't think creating a network without a single point of failure
is unreasonable.
It's impossible. I can't think of a single example where this
actually exists.
Steve Totaro wrote:
Anthony Francis wrote:
Tim Panton wrote:
On 5 Aug 2007, at 06:54, Douglas Garstang wrote:
I don't think creating a network without a single point of failure
is unreasonable.
It's impossible. I can't think of a
Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Let's assume for a moment that it's impossible. That does not mean adding
additional servers and additional networking equipment does not add value,
or is a worthless endeavour.
I agree with that. At least two people that I know run
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SIP
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 8:56 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Teliax Quality of Service
Steve Totaro wrote
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Bosch
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 9:42 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Teliax Quality of Service
Eric ManxPower
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SIP
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 8:56 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Teliax Quality of Service
Steve Totaro wrote
Douglas Garstang wrote:
This might work for a web service, but people have a zero tolerance for
no phone service. They expect to be able to pick up their handset, and
get a functional dialtone immediately.
Adding additional servers, additional network components, and some
smarts into your
I don't think creating a network without a single point of failure is
unreasonable.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Stephen Bosch
Sent: Sat 8/4/2007 3:07 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Teliax Quality
On 5 Aug 2007, at 06:54, Douglas Garstang wrote:
I don't think creating a network without a single point of failure
is unreasonable.
It's impossible. I can't think of a single example where this
actually exists.
Getting even close is hideously expensive.
Tim, speaking for himself :-)
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Teliax Quality of Service
On 5 Aug 2007, at 06:54, Douglas Garstang wrote:
I don't think creating a network without a single point of failure
is unreasonable.
It's impossible. I can't think of a single example where
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tim Panton
Sent: Sun 8/5/2007 5:01 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Teliax Quality of Service
On 5 Aug 2007, at 06:54, Douglas Garstang wrote:
I don't think creating a network
You know the problem is that most consumers think that it is possible to get
the best and the most reliable for almost nothing.
They go out with this expectation and get the cheapest, then when it bites them
a few times, they scream why me.
-- Original Message
If the provider is selling the service and you are paying for the
service the provider should give you the best service.
If the provider can't give you the BEST service at that price then the
provider SHOULD charge more and not waste my time.
The providers are charging LOW PRICES to get
Douglas Garstang wrote:
I confused by this. Don't ITSP's have redundancy? Don't they have
multiple edge systems for accepting incoming calls? Don't their multiple
edge systems have multiple interfaces, connected to multiple subnets,
via multiple switches? And, don't they have multiple upstream
Stephen Bosch wrote:
Douglas Garstang wrote:
I confused by this. Don't ITSP's have redundancy? Don't they have
multiple edge systems for accepting incoming calls? Don't their multiple
edge systems have multiple interfaces, connected to multiple subnets,
via multiple switches? And, don't
SIP wrote:
There are also lots of big carriers masquerading as big carriers. ;)
*lol*
If the ONLY people who could get into the business were the ones who
could, before offering any services to customers, afford to build out
multiple edge systems for accepting incoming calls, each with
Stephen Bosch wrote:
Douglas Garstang wrote:
I confused by this. Don't ITSP's have redundancy? Don't they have
multiple edge systems for accepting incoming calls? Don't their multiple
edge systems have multiple interfaces, connected to multiple subnets,
via multiple switches? And, don't they
From: SIP
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2007 2:57 PM
Stephen Bosch wrote:
Douglas Garstang wrote:
I confused by this. Don't ITSP's have redundancy? Don't they have
multiple edge systems for accepting incoming calls? Don't their multiple
edge systems have multiple interfaces, connected to
Trevor G. Hammonds wrote:
From: SIP
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2007 2:57 PM
Stephen Bosch wrote:
Douglas Garstang wrote:
I confused by this. Don't ITSP's have redundancy? Don't they have
multiple edge systems for accepting incoming calls? Don't their multiple
edge
On Aug 2 2007, John Meksavan wrote:
Asterisk Users,
I recently ran into some problems with the quality of service with
Teliax.
This occurred on August 1, 2007 with a dropped outbound call, audio
quality isse on the callee side- not hearing me well on callee side, and
sending DTMF tones
Haudy Kazemi wrote:
On Aug 2 2007, John Meksavan wrote:
Asterisk Users,
I recently ran into some problems with the quality of service with
Teliax.
This occurred on August 1, 2007 with a dropped outbound call, audio
quality isse on the callee side- not hearing me well on callee
Asterisk Users,
I recently ran into some problems with the quality of service with Teliax.
This occurred on August 1, 2007 with a dropped outbound call, audio
quality isse on the callee side- not hearing me well on callee side, and
sending DTMF tones (configured for RFC2833). Am I the only
There is a strong possibility that the problem is on your side. Are you
using a cable or dsl? What are your download and upload speeds? Are you
doing any kind of traffic shaping?
You will not get a guarantee of QoS from any provider. They cannot
control what is happening on your end or what
John Meksavan wrote:
Asterisk Users,
I recently ran into some problems with the quality of service with
Teliax. This occurred on August 1, 2007 with a dropped outbound call,
audio quality isse on the callee side- not hearing me well on callee
side, and sending DTMF tones (configured
At 09:23 AM 8/2/2007, you wrote:
I recently ran into some problems with the quality of service with
Teliax. This occurred on August 1, 2007 with a dropped outbound
call, audio quality isse on the callee side- not hearing me well on
callee side, and sending DTMF tones (configured for
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ira
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 10:01 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Teliax Quality of Service
At 09:23 AM 8/2/2007
On 8/2/07, John Meksavan wrote:
Asterisk Users,
I recently ran into some problems with the quality of service with Teliax.
This occurred on August 1, 2007 with a dropped outbound call, audio
quality isse on the callee side- not hearing me well on callee side, and
sending DTMF tones
]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Teliax Quality of Service
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 16:40:27 -0400
On 8/2/07, John Meksavan wrote:
Asterisk
Any good SIP providers out there?
It really depends where you are. We're serving pretty much only Los
Angeles and Seattle rather than the entire US, and thus by focusing
our efforts on those limited markets we can achieve pretty good
quality and reliability. Servers are 15 ms away, less
On 19 Mar 2007, at 20:51, Scott Plante wrote:
Raw Hangup
The code says:
/* A call arrived for a nonexistent destination.
Unless it's an inval
frame, reply with an inval */
If you can, produce a packet dump of a failing call with ethereal - or
with iax2
I really have lost loads of faith for IAX. No authority found and
Rejected connect attempt messages for no apparent reason. Sometimes
computability issues between asterisk versions. Fax/T.38 support?? But
I have no complaints about when it actually does work.
Not that Asterisk has the best SIP
We have a Teliax IAX trunk that we use as an overflow for our four
regular business lines into our local Asterisk PBX (Trixbox). We have
our Teliax account set up so that it goes to a Teliax voicemail box if
it cannot reach our Asterisk server, and we have the channel set up for
5 simultaneous
On 3/19/07, Scott Plante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
work better in general. Is it the general experience on the list that
SIP is more mature and reliable than IAX? We like the fact that we don't
have to open inbound ranges of ports for IAX to work. We are in Atlanta
I've switched to using SIP on
Scott Plante wrote:
We have a Teliax IAX trunk that we use as an overflow for our four
regular business lines into our local Asterisk PBX (Trixbox). We have
our Teliax account set up so that it goes to a Teliax voicemail box if
it cannot reach our Asterisk server, and we have the channel set
Brent,I had this same problem with Teliax (atleast it sounds the same). I had wanted to use g729 over IAX, so I set that on the Teliax website, but it would not connect. After weeks of asking for resolution, I just gave up and used g726 which was working. Then, about a month later, I moved my *
I have found that it takes a certain amount of time for the codec
preferences that I enter on Teliax's website to actually take effect.
The amount of time has varied from 5 minutes to several hours in my
experience, although I have not changed the settings in some time.
I have also found that if
Has anyone had problems getting their preffered codecs on the Teliax web
interface taking effect?
I have two accounts, two separate yet similarly configured * servers. On one
account the settings took right away - on another server I am getting no
result. In fact, no matter what I change the
a dumb one)
-ross
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent Torrenga
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 3:20 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Teliax - Codec Preference effective?
Has anyone had problems getting
: [Asterisk-Users] Teliax - Codec Preference effective?
Has anyone had problems getting their preffered codecs on the Teliax web
interface taking effect?
I have two accounts, two separate yet similarly configured * servers. On
one
account the settings took right away - on another server I am getting
On Jan 31, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Brent Torrenga wrote:
Has anyone had problems getting their preffered codecs on the Teliax
web
interface taking effect?
I have two accounts, two separate yet similarly configured * servers.
On one
account the settings took right away - on another server I am
from other Teliax users regarding the
problem.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross C
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006
8:40 PM
To: 'Asterisk
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users]
Teliax Down?
I was having trouble
: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Teliax Down?
I was having trouble too. I had trouble yesterday as well. I called and David said it was a "massive DDOS". Seems to get fixed pretty quickly when it does happen (5 minutes or so
Is anyone else experiencing trouble with Teliax? I can only intermittently register to, and am not able to place any outgoing calls through my assigned gateway; voip-co3.teliax.com.
-Rusty
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
acceptable IMO.
Also on co3. I couldnt even access
their website during that time
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rusty Dekema
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006
5:42 PM
To: Asterisk
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Teliax
Teliax users,
I have a couple questions about Teliax, just
hopeing some current customers might shed some light on them.
How reliable is a toll-free number from Teliax? Has
anyone had any problems with it?
The Pay as you go plan has a Billing of 60/1, what
does that mean? My guess is 60
I have a couple questions about Teliax, just hopeing some current customers
might
shed some light on them.
How reliable is a toll-free number from Teliax? Has anyone had any problems
with it?
They have been very reliable for me. Once in a great while they'll have
a problem, but then
Howdy - This is my first post on the list, and from what I've seen of * I'm
very impressed. I had a question regarding everybodys experience with Teliax
or Broadvoice. I setup a Teliax trunk this morning, and had calls going out
it in about 5 minutes(Had to get more coffee). Has anybody had any
Howdy - This is my first post on the list, and from what I've seen of * I'm
very impressed. I had a question regarding everybodys experience with Teliax
or Broadvoice. I setup a Teliax trunk this morning, and had calls going out
it in about 5 minutes(Had to get more coffee). Has anybody had
I use Teliax. I think the sound quality is really very good. I get
about an 80ms ping with them, but a 20ms ping to Junction Networks.
Some how calls to/form Teliax sound better.
With Junction Networks I get great customer service, with Teliax I get
Okay to good customer service (depending on who
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 9:16 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Teliax experiences
Howdy - This is my first post on the list, and from what I've seen of *
I'm
very impressed. I had a question regarding everybodys
ISP. I get two calls going at the sametime and the ISP boggs down.Regards,Chris- Original Message -From: Rolf Brusletto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 9:16 AMSubject: [Asterisk-Users
I've been with Teliax for 6 months or so. Very easy to work with
interface. iax2 or sip termination with g729, ulaw, gsm (and a few
other) codecs supported. If you do run into problems, give them a call
and it will be resolved promptly. I'm in the process of porting my main
8xx number to
yes i got my mainstream * with teliax
no problem..
keep it ,ulaw,alaw, no jitter and ,open your ports, all good for 9 months !
On 10/19/05, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those on the list using iax with teliax.com, the intermitant one-wayaudio problem that I reported to them
hey 1.2 b2 hs bugs.
On 10/18/05, Adam Moffett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message - *From:* Rob Fugina mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com *Sent:* Monday, October 17, 2005 5:14 PM *Subject:* [Asterisk-Users
- Original Message -
*From:* Rob Fugina mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*To:* asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
*Sent:* Monday, October 17, 2005 5:14 PM
*Subject:* [Asterisk-Users] Teliax IAX problems -- Asterisk
doesn't see answer
For those on the list using iax with teliax.com, the intermitant one-way
audio problem that I reported to them received the following response:
We currently use our own version of 1.2 with our own patches on our boxes
and the iax code is updated. You cannot use jitterbuffers with g729 or gsm
as
I think I ran in to this problem a while back as well. I'm also running
a CVS version of Asterisk. I talked to David and he switched me to SIP
from their gateway to their Asterisk proxy which solved the issue.
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 22:05 -0500, Rob Fugina wrote:
On 10/17/05, Rich Adamson [EMAIL
Try this
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+Teliax
- Original Message -
From:
Rob
Fugina
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 5:14
PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Teliax IAX
problems -- Asterisk doesn't see answer
this happend with me too.
they also switched me from iax to sip, which fixed the problem.
Icalled them back a few days ago to get more info and to see if i could switch back to iax.
he said that they had narrowed it down to their ISP as being the cause of the problems and that they were actively
Not to point the finger at Teliax, but I'm having some unique problems with their service that are as yet unexplained.
Incoming calls are fine.
Outgoing calls don't work, though they did at one time. As of today, I'm running the latest code from CVS.
-- Called teliax/1314321
-- Call
I've been trying to diagnose the same problem with teliax, and it seems
to be a jitterbuffer problem. Since turning it off, we've not had a problem.
My guess is that teliax servers are not current code, or they've modified
the code for some reason.
The tech that I corresponded with suggested
On 10/17/05, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying to diagnose the same problem with teliax, and it seemsto be a jitterbuffer problem. Since turning it off, we've not had a problem.My guess is that teliax servers are not current code, or they've modified
the code for some
On 10/8/05, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using Teliax to terminate my calls, and I have 3 licenses' for
g729 from Digium. show translations verifies that the registration
took place.
When I place a call, having allow=g729 as the only allow option in
iax.conf, I get the
Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Teliax users, g729 question
I am using Teliax to terminate my calls, and I have 3 licenses' for
g729 from Digium. show translations verifies that the registration
took place.
When I place
I am using Teliax to terminate my calls, and I have 3 licenses' for
g729 from Digium. show translations verifies that the registration
took place.
When I place a call, having allow=g729 as the only allow option in
iax.conf, I get the following error:
WARNING[361]:
PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk-users-list asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Teliax users, g729 question
I am using Teliax to terminate my calls, and I have 3 licenses' for
g729 from Digium. show translations verifies
I am using Teliax to terminate my calls, and I have 3 licenses' for
g729 from Digium. show translations verifies that the registration
took place.
When I place a call, having allow=g729 as the only allow option in
iax.conf, I get the following error:
WARNING[361]: chan_iax2.c:6017
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Teliax users, g729 question
I am using Teliax to terminate my calls, and I have 3 licenses' for
g729 from Digium. show translations verifies that the registration
took place.
When I place a call, having
I am using Teliax to terminate my calls, and I have 3 licenses' for
g729 from Digium. show translations verifies that the registration
took place.
When I place a call, having allow=g729 as the only allow option in
iax.conf, I get the following error:
WARNING[361]: chan_iax2.c:6017 socket_read:
Does anyone have any experience with Teliax for inbound IAX?
Been working fine for me for over six months with multiple did's
over iax.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Jason Schafer wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with Teliax for inbound IAX?
Yes, have many accounts. Very good service and support.
--
Chris Mason
NetConcepts
(264) 497-5670 Fax: (264) 497-8463
Int: (305) 704-7249 Fax: (815)301-9759
Cell: 264-235-5670
Yahoo IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: [Asterisk-Users] Teliax
Jason Schafer wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with Teliax for inbound IAX?
Yes, have many accounts. Very good service and support.
--
Chris Mason
NetConcepts
(264) 497-5670 Fax: (264) 497-8463
Int: (305) 704-7249 Fax: (815)301-9759
Cell: 264-235-5670
Does anyone have any experience with Teliax for inbound IAX?
Jason
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
