Hi all,
I've just being wondering if Dundi has the same purpose as ENUM. I
don't know much (actually almost nothing) about these technologies. As
far as I know they are a kind of DNS resolver used in the VoIP context.
For example, user [EMAIL PROTECTED] has the extension namber 1001. This
On 08:33, Wed 15 Aug 07, Ronaldo wrote:
Hi all,
I've just being wondering if Dundi has the same purpose as ENUM. I
don't know much (actually almost nothing) about these technologies. As
far as I know they are a kind of DNS resolver used in the VoIP context.
For example, user [EMAIL
Is there any way to set the targeting ip that is sent out in the
dundi answer (to my public ip or any other where i want to receive the
call)?
Change your mapping in dundi.conf to reflect your true public IP rather than
using ${IPADDRESS}.
Regards,
Chris
--
C.M. Bagnall, Director, Minotaur
Hi,
i'm having asterisk with sip working fine, including dundi lookups. The only
problem i'm having is that the dundi answer allways contains my internal,
private ip. Is there any way to set the targeting ip that is sent out in the
dundi answer (to my public ip or any other where i want to
Hi Andreas,
In dundi.conf, look for the line of yours that is similar to this:
e164 = dundi-e164-canonical,0,IAX2,dundi:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${NUMBER}
Change ${IPADDR} to your external IP address or hostname, like so:
e164 = dundi-e164-canonical,0,IAX2,dundi:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/${NUMBER}
Cheers,
hi all!
I have the following situation:
1 2
¦¦
¦¦
3--4
¦¦
¦¦
5--6
where 1 ... 6 are nodes and every direct neighbor is specified as a dundi peer
(in *). When I start a dundi request, every queried node is
I'm talking out my rear so someone please apply an attitude
adjustment if I'm way off base.
But, if you are using Dundi as a lookup engine it should know the
contact information both endpoints and how to reach them perhaps not
ONLY knowing how to comunicate via another asterisk box.
Much
I don't know if this is possible, and I can't quite get my head around
how to do it...
If I am using DUNDi for redundancy in a cluster, when Phone1 makes a
call to Phone2, both Asterisk A and B will be in the RTP stream:
+---+ +---+
| A |-| B |
/+---+ +---+\
On 6/7/07, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I am using DUNDi for redundancy in a cluster, when Phone1 makes a call to
Phone2, both Asterisk A and B will be in the RTP stream:
Correct so far... although once the call is made, it's no longer a
DUNDi question, and is simply a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jared Smith
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 10:26 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] DUNDi and reinvites...
On 6/7/07, Douglas
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jared Smith
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 10:26 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] DUNDi and reinvites...
On 6/7/07, Douglas
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Let's just say we only configured the originating phone with
canreinvite=yes, which hopefully means the originating phone would
reinvite with the second Asterisk server. That's all fine and good until
it becomes the receiving phone, and the other phone (as an
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric ManxPower Wieling
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 2:24 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] DUNDi and reinvites...
Douglas
On 6/7/07, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's all fine and good until
it becomes the receiving phone, and the other phone (as an originator)
also has canreinvite set to yes. Then, your back to both Asterisk
servers being completely taken out of the loop again!
While I haven't
Discussion
Objet: Re: [asterisk-users] dundi problem * 1.4.2
Asterisk [Submusic] wrote:
Hi,
I'm not working with Asterisk 1.4.X, but i think your Dundi.conf is not
correct.
well, things haven't changed in the dundi.conf going from 1.2 to 1.4, so
that should be ok.
If you want i can send you
Hi peeps,
I've been struggling with DUNDi for a few days now and I can't seem to
make call from Asterisk A to Asterisk B. If I do a dundi show peers,
it finds the other peer but I can't seem to make any calls. Can
anybody help me out here.
Here's the situation:
Machine 1: Debian with Asterisk
: Friday, May 11, 2007 7:55 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Dundi and unknown remote peers
Is it possible to allow remote peers to connect to your local DUNDi
Asterisk box, even if you don't have them listed in the dundi.conf?
I seem
Hi guys,
Is it possible to allow remote peers to connect to your local DUNDi
Asterisk box, even if you don't have them listed in the dundi.conf?
Alex
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To
Is it possible to allow remote peers to connect to your local DUNDi
Asterisk box, even if you don't have them listed in the dundi.conf?
I seem to remember something in the sample config file about a [*] entry being
possible...
One would assume that would cover connections from undefined DUNDi
Asterisk [Submusic] wrote:
entityid=00:00:F8:04:C4:51
ok, thanks, found it. The setting is entityid, not entity... easy to mis
I guess ;-) Maybe some more verbose parsing would have helped ;-)
--
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Remco Post
SARA - Reken- en Netwerkdiensten
Hi All,
I've been banging my head on a small dundi problem...
I have two * servers setup, both have almost identical dundi.conf files:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/opt/asterisk/etc# cat dundi.conf
[general]
department=thuis
organization=pipsworld
locality=Amsterdam
stateprov=NH
country=NL
[EMAIL
Remco Post
Envoyé : mardi, 24. avril 2007 23:15
À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Objet : [asterisk-users] dundi problem * 1.4.2
Hi All,
I've been banging my head on a small dundi problem...
I have two * servers setup, both have almost identical dundi.conf files:
[EMAIL
Asterisk [Submusic] wrote:
Hi,
I'm not working with Asterisk 1.4.X, but i think your Dundi.conf is not
correct.
well, things haven't changed in the dundi.conf going from 1.2 to 1.4, so
that should be ok.
If you want i can send you my complete working exemple with Asterisk 1.2.x
(I think
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Remco Post
Envoyé : mercredi, 25. avril 2007 00:26
À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] dundi problem * 1.4.2
Asterisk [Submusic] wrote:
Hi,
I'm not working with Asterisk 1.4.X, but i think your
hi list,
i have the same problem as mentioned here:
http://forums.digium.com/viewtopic.php?t=2678view=nextsid=bd94cefd823b23156c5748843febb3ab
my asterisk version is 1.2.12.1
any ideas?
___
Der frühe Vogel
Hi Ramon,
Please post your peer details from dundi.conf so we can see what your setup
is.
Also, have you tried regenerating your keys? I wound up generating my keys
twice, they just didn't work the first time, I'm not sure why.
Alex
On 1/10/07, Ramon Schönborn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
We use only IP connections to our asterisk boxes. Given this our
origination/termination providers
usually send/receive traffic to/from our network on a single IP or
limited number of IPs.
In a DUNDi Asterisk Cluster, would each of the boxes need to be able
to connect to our
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 13:09 -0700, David Thomas wrote:
We use only IP connections to our asterisk boxes. Given this our
origination/termination providers
usually send/receive traffic to/from our network on a single IP or
limited number of IPs.
In a DUNDi Asterisk Cluster, would each of the
Does anyone have any information on how to use DUNDi precaching?
Mark Spencer made a post 2 years ago where he hinted it may be possible to
configure DUNDi such that you could centralise your DUNDi registration info by
using precaching, instead of having each DUNDi peer meshed with every other
Doug,
This may help you out a little. It's a whitepaper that JR wrote on how
to get a DUNDi cluster working with two redundant primary servers that
handle all the DUNDi legwork. Read through it, you might get some
information you can use out of it.
servers.
Doug.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 9:55 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] DUNDi precache
Doug,
This may help you out a little. It's
. -Original Message- From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 9:55 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] DUNDi precache Doug, This may help you out a little.It's a whitepaper that JR wrote on how to get
On 10:16, Thu 09 Nov 06, Douglas Garstang wrote:
Aaron.
Thanks. JR sent me that article before it was published. He's not precaching
registrations. He's doing something different. In his configuration, when a
registration server gets a request for the location of a phone, it queries
the
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 9:55 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] DUNDi precache
Doug,
This may help you out a little. It's a whitepaper that JR
wrote on how
to get a DUNDi cluster
the peers on
remote sites.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 11:04 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] DUNDi precache
Why would you want to do that? Defeats
asterisk box, only between every Asterisk box and
the central DUNDi cache server.
Doug.
-Original Message-From: Bruce Reeves
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, November 09,
2006 10:56 AMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
DiscussionSubject: Re: [asterisk-users
: RE: [asterisk-users] DUNDi precache
Why would you want to do that? Defeats the purpose of *having* the
DUNDi protocol. Why not just program the extensions in at regular
intervals or something?
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 10:16 -0700, Douglas Garstang wrote:
Aaron.
Thanks. JR sent me
to the DUNDi precache server, and thus calls would not fail for an hour.
Douglas. -Original Message- From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 11:04 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] DUNDi
, November 09, 2006 11:04 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] DUNDi precache
Why would you want to do that? Defeats the purpose of *having* the
DUNDi protocol. Why not just program the extensions in at regular
intervals
I'm trying to configure DUNDi in a tiered arrangement where 3 servers take care
of registrations and then push those registrations up to a pair of location
servers. Subsequent queries for the location of a phone will be direcected to
the location servers.
I think it's possible, but you do
Lets say you have a cluster of, say, 10 Asterisk servers. After doing a local
lookup to see if a number is available locally, in order to find out if the
number is available on one of the other 9 servers, this peer has to query all 9
remaining peers.
Is that true?
Is there a way to have
Hi Doug,On 9/25/06, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lets say you have a cluster of, say, 10 Asterisk servers. After doing a local lookup to see if a number is available locally, in order to find out if the number is available on one of the other 9 servers, this peer has to query all 9
On 16:38, Tue 01 Aug 06, Douglas Garstang wrote:
I suggest you use an AGI for it.
That gives you way more options
How does AGI help? Your still calling DUNDILOOKUP inside the AGI script, and
not matter how many times you call it, your still always going to get the
lowest priority path
I've trying to use DUNDi with SIP to see if it works around some limitations of
IAX2.
I do a DUNDi lookup, get my SIP path, and try to dial it. Asterisk immediately
says 'No such host', eventhough that's the path is just returned!
[Aug 2 13:07:05] == Spawn extension (global_vmdeposit,
Using the SECRET variable for sip doesn't work.
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 13:11 -0600, Douglas Garstang wrote:
I've trying to use DUNDi with SIP to see if it works around some limitations
of IAX2.
I do a DUNDi lookup, get my SIP path, and try to dial it. Asterisk
immediately says 'No such
Secret? Do you mean sbsecret in sip.conf?
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 1:33 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] DUNDi with SIP
Using the SECRET variable
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 1:33 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] DUNDi with SIP
Using the SECRET variable for sip doesn't work.
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 13:11 -0600, Douglas Garstang wrote:
I've trying to use
So what are the options?
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 2:03 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] DUNDi with SIP
I'm talking about the rotating DUNDi secret
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] DUNDi with SIP
I'm talking about the rotating DUNDi secret that is stored in dbsecret in iax.conf.It doesn't exist in the SIP channel. On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 13:43 -0600, Douglas Garstang wrote:
Secret? Do you mean
on the client side.
Doug.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 2:03 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] DUNDi with SIP
I'm talking about the rotating DUNDi secret
ug.
-Original Message-From: Alex Robar
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 2:17
PMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
DiscussionSubject: Re: [asterisk-users] DUNDi with
SIPYou can use an unchanging password. It's not as
secure, but it wi
PMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
DiscussionSubject: Re: [asterisk-users] DUNDi with
SIPYou can use an unchanging password. It's not as
secure, but it will provide functionality.Alex
On 8/2/06, Douglas
Garstang
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So
what
: [asterisk-users] DUNDi with
SIP
Doug,Two
things: If you try to place that call manually (either via dialling it from a
phone that supports SP URIs or by making an ext. for it in your dialplan and
calling that extension), does it work properly? Are you able to place the
call
Dundi question:
Is there a way to pass dial arguments to switch = DUNDi as if you were
dialing using Dial(${DUNDILOOKUP(${EXTEN})},,tTwW)?
We were going to impliment DUNDi, but realized we lost the ability to
use the Dial features.
I could just use the DUNDILOOKUP function, but that keeps
-Original Message-
From: Mitch Sharp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 3:06 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Dundi and Dial Arguments
Dundi question:
Is there a way to pass dial arguments to switch = DUNDi as
if you
On 15:39, Tue 01 Aug 06, Douglas Garstang wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mitch Sharp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 3:06 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Dundi and Dial Arguments
Dundi question
-Original Message-
From: Michiel van Baak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 3:57 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Dundi and Dial Arguments
On 15:39, Tue 01 Aug 06, Douglas Garstang wrote:
-Original Message
that doesn't exist.Regards,- Brad
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Simon WoodheadSent: Sat 7/15/2006 5:59 PMTo:
asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [asterisk-users] DUNDI / regcontextHi folks,I've been having a go at getting DUNDI working this evening to enableusers
,
- Brad
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
] On Behalf Of Simon
WoodheadSent: Monday, July 17, 2006 5:53 AMTo: Asterisk
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re:
[asterisk-users] DUNDI / regcontext
Thanks for the reply Brad.The relevant section of sip.conf
Sent: Sat 7/15/2006 5:59 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] DUNDI / regcontext
Hi folks,
I've been having a go at getting DUNDI working this evening to enable
users to register to any Asterisk box and to look them up from another.
The DUNDI part works just great
Hi, I got this also and actually I still get this message. But i did realise the setup you ar trying to realise now. I wrote a little document on how to achieve this with trixbox. You can find it here:
http://kneh.xs4all.nl/tijmen/asterisk/Using%20DUNDi%20with%20Trixbox.pdfNote that you should
Hi folks,
I've been having a go at getting DUNDI working this evening to enable
users to register to any Asterisk box and to look them up from another.
The DUNDI part works just great (very impressed), as does the subsequent
joining of calls between the two servers but I'm struggling with
I'm trying to trunk calls from one asterisk box to another with DUNDi.
The following is appearing in my /var/log/asterisk/messages file:
Jul 13 17:29:59 DEBUG[25674] db.c: Unable to find key
'000E0CA1926F/oe_tech/180app/e' in family 'dundi/cache'
Jul 13 17:29:59 DEBUG[25674] db.c: Unable
-Original Message-
From: Michael Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 4:34 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to
HandleComplexFailoverSituations
I get annoyed Stephen when Digium
I get annoyed Stephen when Digium goes around calling Asterisk
'enterprise grade', which in my opinion it really isn't. I'd consider
distributed ACD queues to be a requirement for an enterprise grade
product, but it's becoming apparent that there is no mechanism for
implementing this. I'm
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 15:33 -0700, Michael Collins wrote:
I get annoyed Stephen when Digium goes around calling Asterisk
'enterprise grade', which in my opinion it really isn't. I'd consider
distributed ACD queues to be a requirement for an enterprise grade
product, but it's becoming
On 6/15/06, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get annoyed Stephen when Digium goes around calling Asterisk 'enterprise
grade', which in my opinion it really isn't. I'd consider distributed ACD
queues to be a requirement for an enterprise grade product, but it's becoming
apparent
Leif Madsen wrote:
On 6/15/06, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get annoyed Stephen when Digium goes around calling Asterisk
'enterprise grade', which in my opinion it really isn't. I'd consider
distributed ACD queues to be a requirement for an enterprise grade
product, but it's
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 05:20 -0400, Leif Madsen wrote:
On 6/15/06, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get annoyed Stephen when Digium goes around calling Asterisk 'enterprise
grade', which in my opinion it really isn't. I'd consider distributed ACD
queues to be a requirement for
On Jun 25, 2006, at 3:29 AM, Patrick wrote:
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 05:20 -0400, Leif Madsen wrote:
On 6/15/06, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get annoyed Stephen when Digium goes around calling Asterisk
'enterprise grade', which in my opinion it really isn't. I'd
consider
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Aaron Daniel
Sent: Wed 6/14/2006 9:09 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle Complex
FailoverSituations
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 7:10 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle Complex
FailoverSituations
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Douglas
-Original Message-
From: Watkins, Bradley
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Watkins,
Bradley
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 2:41 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle Complex
FailoverSituations
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote:
It isn't as simple as that. When a failure occurs, we only want to use a DUNDi
route when it's the primary for a queue.
Then don't use DUNDi for queues, use it just for the phones. Seriously,
you obviously know exactly which servers you want to
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote:
DUNDi does not handle the situation of phone failover as well as static numbers
(ie queues), which is what we are trying to acheive.
I'm confused, explain the phone failover not working to me.
--
Aaron Daniel
Computer Systems Technician
Sam
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Garstang
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 10:50 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle ComplexFailoverSituations
-Original Message
On 15/06/06, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who said I was a C programmer?
Speaking for myself, I just assumed that you understood that the
behaviour of an open-source application was the result of contributed
code. Your message read to me like something of a demand that
someone
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 9:54 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle
ComplexFailoverSituations
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Douglas
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 9:57 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle
ComplexFailoverSituations
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Douglas
-Original Message-
From: Watkins, Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 10:36 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to
HandleComplexFailoverSituations
Is it possible for you
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 11:41 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle
ComplexFailoverSituations
On 15/06/06, Douglas Garstang
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote:
We need our queue application to follow the primary pbx server for a set of
phones within a company. See my 'ACD Distributed Scenario' post made a little
earlier for a full explanation.
OK, let me get this straight.
You want the phones on the
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Garstang
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 12:51 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle
ComplexFailoverSituations
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Davies
: Thursday, June 15, 2006 2:16 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to
HandleComplexFailoverSituations
-Original Message-
From: Watkins, Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 10:36 AM
To: Asterisk
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 12:59 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to
HandleComplexFailoverSituations
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Douglas
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Garstang
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:23 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to
HandleComplexFailoverSituations
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Daniel [mailto
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote:
No... this last bit doesnt. My dundi.conf has:
180q = global_dundi_q_pbx1,100,IAX,dundi1:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${NUMBER},nopartial
180q = global_dundi_q_pbx2,200,IAX,dundi2:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${NUMBER},nopartial
180q =
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote:
Ahh this reminds me too. If I am going to be getting the local system first
always, then I need to be able to return ALL the Dundi paths with the
DUNDILOOKUP function. It only returns one. How can I get DUNDILookup to return
every single path? It'd
Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to
HandleComplexFailoverSituations
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote:
No... this last bit doesnt. My dundi.conf has:
180q =
global_dundi_q_pbx1,100,IAX,dundi1:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${NUMBE
R},nopartial
180q
Does anyone know where I can find some good DUNDi docs?
The ones are dundi.org are absolutely horrible.
The examples in dundi.conf are pretty much useless.
I still can't figure out why Digium can't write some good documentation. It's
their 'baby' after all. This really drives me nuts and pisses
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote:
The examples in dundi.conf are pretty much useless.
I still can't figure out why Digium can't write some good documentation. It's
their 'baby' after all. This really drives me nuts and pisses people off in
general. I've been dicking around with
, 14. juin 2006 17:09
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Docs
Does anyone know where I can find some good DUNDi docs?
The ones are dundi.org are absolutely horrible.
The examples in dundi.conf are pretty much useless.
I still can't figure out
, 2006 11:34 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Docs
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote:
The examples in dundi.conf are pretty much useless.
I still can't figure out why Digium can't write some good
documentation. It's
I have three Asterisk boxes.
Each has the following in dundi.conf:
180net = dundi_local,0,IAX,dundi:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${NUMBER},nopartial
180q = dundi_q_pbx1,1,IAX,dundi:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${NUMBER},nopartial
180q = dundi_q_pbx2,2,IAX,dundi:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${NUMBER},nopartial
180q =
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 9:34 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Docs
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote:
The examples in dundi.conf
-Original Message-
From: Watkins, Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 10:17 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Docs
Yes, what is it you attempting? I use DUNDi extensively,
though you
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Users
I have three Asterisk boxes.
Each has the following in dundi.conf:
180net =
dundi_local,0,IAX,dundi:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${NUMBER},nopartial
180q =
dundi_q_pbx1,1,IAX,dundi:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${NUMBER},nopartial
180q
that a 'reload' does not
always reload the DUNDi configuation.
How can I reload DUNDi without stopping/starting Asterisk?
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Garstang
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 11:00 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 12:54 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Users
If you do a reload pbx_dundi.so, it'll reload the dundi
configuration
This is driving me nuts.
Why doesn't the DUNDILOOKUP function return the weight of a path to a number?
The CLI 'dundi lookup' command does. What about the mac address and expiry
period? The CLI command returns those, but the DUNDILOOKUP function does not.
Why?
We absolutely need this in order
101 - 200 of 269 matches
Mail list logo
