Re: [Asterisk-Users] gxp-2000 tftp cfg
The VoIP Connection wrote: It's here: http://www.thevoipconnection.com/Downloads/GXP2000_1.0.1.9/gxp2000_config.txt Very interesting, it wasn't available at Grandstream's site :-) Thanks! I will adjust some things on the page now I have the new template.. http://voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=GXP-2000 Cheers ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] voip-info.org unreliable lately?
Damon Estep wrote: I assume the bandwidth is being donated or something, but surely someone would be willing to donate reliable bandwidth as the knowledge hosted on the site (which is also donated!) is worth way more than the bandwidth. Sure it's the bandwidth? If the wiki is loaded, I see Server load on the bottom of the page, the numbers sometimes go as high as 80-100..? Not sure if it's a Linux (guess so? :p) but if that represents the system load.. 80 is a 'bit' high indeed. Cheers ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] tdm400p not working after cvs-head update
I have the same problem. seems that tdm400b is not working on CVS HEAD On 6/18/05, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: did you udate first? - Original Message - From: David Romero To: Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 9:36 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] tdm400p not working after cvs-head update I hava tdm400p card on [EMAIL PROTECTED] box, this card works fine for weeks, today i did a CVS update to the latest head files and the card is not working. Zaptel Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) Channel 02: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 02) Channel 03: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 03) Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 04) 4 channels configured. ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6) HELP!. thanks David Romero ## ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream 100 pricing question
On Tue, June 21, 2005 23:07, Kristof Hardy said: Francesco Peeters wrote: I can get Grandstream 100 SIP phones for EUR 75. I'm not sure about the pricing for these in Europe, so I'd like to hear from people here whether that is a reasonable price for them? Prices I know are around 99 EUR, incl VAT. But if you ask me, depending on how many you need, you should take a look into the GXP-2000. (+- 125 EUR incl VAT) The difference in quality (and features) between these is big enough to justify the difference in price. Cheers.. Thanks for the info... I am considering getting these to experiment with, so I can do some testing *before* I actually get in to the real thing. The cheaper the test period, the better, so 2 of these (which later can be reused in less used area's) look pretty interesting... The shop I saw these also sells - pretty cheap - little devices (forgot the name, they look like a translucent blue ice-hockey puck) that do SIP conversion for analog telephones or PBX extensions. (I am thinking migration period here: first connect one of those to each of the two PBXs as an extension, so you can use it to 'dial' in to the * server. Then my migration plan - after initial testing - would then look like this: 1) Install * on both sites 2) IAX2 link 3) 'SIP-puck' on both PBX's and connect these to the * servers (at this point all users can talk to eachother over landlines *and* SIP) 4) Start migrating inidividual users to SIP * 5) retire old PBXs -- Francesco Peeters GPG Key = AA69 E7C6 1D8A F148 160C D5C4 9943 6E38 D5E3 7704 If your program doesn't recognize my signature, please visit http://www.CAcert.org/index.php?id=3 to retrieve the Root CA certificate. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] DID not working? + sendmail problems
I have a box running [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0 and I noticed today when I went to change some settings to do with the DIDs that it is no longer detecting the different lines. I have a Digium 4 port line card and Im pretty sure that the DIDs used to work when I used fxs_ks signaling on them. However I changed to fxs_ls signaling because the ks wasnt detecting when people were hanging up properly. Could changing the signaling be whats causing the DIDs not to function properly? My other problem is getting sendmail to work. I get the following error. - Transcript of session follows -... while talking to my smtp server, details removed: DATA 550-Verification failed for [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550-unrouteable mail domain asterisk1.local 550 Sender verify failed550 5.1.1 users email address, details removed... User unknown 503 valid RCPT command must precede DATA I cant find anywhere to change the login/pass info to change it to auth with a valid account from the mail server. Any help would be greatly appreciated. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] ASTERISK+SER+MWI
Hello, I wish to use asterisk as voicemail system with ser My phones are registered on SER and asterisk provide conference ivr and voicemail system. I want to use Asterisk Realtime Architecture to store voicemessages and configuration . Michael Shuler has written a patch for mwi. http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002980 I need help to set up voicemail storage and how to send mwi to clients registered on ser Regards Harry ___ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Help on installing h323
Hi, install oh323... see link for installation http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-April/100061.html --- craz sead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all could somebody help me how to install and setup H323 i would like to connect asterisk box with huawei/cisco, but i still dont understand about installing h323 on asterisk thaks __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Yahoo! Sports Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] 3-way conference using zap channels -- how is it done?
My configuration is one TDM31B for internal subscribers and one AVM B1 v.4 for incoming/outgoing calls. How do I: a) transfer a call to an internal subscriberb) commence a 3-way conference (two internal - one external subscribers) I've searched voip-info.org and google god but regarding to zap channels documentation is not clear, if any, especially about 3-way conference. Thank you -- Dimitris Kouimintzis ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] zeroconf help
hi, recently I installed zeroconf for asterisk... I've already followed the asterisk+zeroconf how to (which is too short), but it came with an error message... asterisk: relocation error: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/res_zeroconf.so: undefined symbol: DNSServiceRegister Ouch ... error while writing audio data: : Broken pipe it's weird since I've double checked the library and header from zeroconf and it seems that everything has been in the right place.. Is there anyone can help me? Well, it seems I hit another dead end this time... Best regards, Stevanus ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Core Dump
Hello, My asterisk crash from time to time, at least twice a day. Reomendation from a site is to do a gdb on core dump Below is what i get, but i have no idea what is going on Does anybody have any idea? (gdb)bt #0 0x00181aed in _int_malloc () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #1 0x00180dfd in malloc () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #2 0x00177b03 in vasprintf () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #3 0x0808b663 in ast_cli (fd=1, fmt=0x1 Address 0x1 out of bounds) at cli.c:54 #4 0x080a0725 in manager_event (category=2, event=0x80e812e Newexten, fmt=0x80e6da0 Channel: %s\r\nContext: %s\r\nExtension: %s\r\nPriority: %d\r\nApplication: %s\r\nAppData: %s\r\nUniqueid: %s\r\n) at manager.c:1420 #5 0x08089345 in pbx_extension_helper (c=0x9815758, con=0x1, context=0x98158a8 macro-hangupcall, exten=0x981599c s, priority=3, label=0x0, callerid=0x96bc008 Wait, action=159472384) at pbx.c:1609 #6 0x08087767 in ast_spawn_extension (c=0x1, context=0x1 Address 0x1 out of bounds, exten=0x1 Address 0x1 out of bounds, priority=1, callerid=0x1 Address 0x1 out of bounds) at pbx.c:2206 #7 0x008c96a4 in macro_exec (chan=0x9815758, data=0x200) at app_macro.c:173 #8 0x0808938b in pbx_extension_helper (c=0x9815758, con=0x1, context=0x98158a8 macro-hangupcall, exten=0x981599c s, priority=1, label=0x0, callerid=0x1cef1d0 hangupcall, action=0) at pbx.c:528 #9 0x08080c27 in ast_pbx_run (c=0x9815758) at pbx.c:2206 #10 0x00683d41 in ss_thread (data=0x9815758) at chan_zap.c:4975 #11 0x00669dac in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 #12 0x001eb9ea in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 thanks Regard CCF ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream 100 pricing question
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 08:35:58AM +0200, Francesco Peeters wrote: The shop I saw these also sells - pretty cheap - little devices (forgot the name, they look like a translucent blue ice-hockey puck) that do SIP conversion for analog telephones or PBX extensions. (I am thinking migration period here: first connect one of those to each of the two PBXs as an extension, so you can use it to 'dial' in to the * server. Is this a webshop in Europe? Care to share the URL? Regards Ming-Wei ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] 3month Internship between February end July 2006
Hello, I make a sawdwish course in network and software engeneering at CPE lyon and in my company I'm working on Asterisk from 1 year. So, I'm looking for a internship (3 month) in a english country on a Asterisk project. Thanks, Thomas DEILLON ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream 100 pricing question
On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:02, Ming-Wei Shih said: On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 08:35:58AM +0200, Francesco Peeters wrote: The shop I saw these also sells - pretty cheap - little devices (forgot the name, they look like a translucent blue ice-hockey puck) that do SIP conversion for analog telephones or PBX extensions. (I am thinking migration period here: first connect one of those to each of the two PBXs as an extension, so you can use it to 'dial' in to the * server. Is this a webshop in Europe? Care to share the URL? Regards Ming-Wei Sorry, it's a real shop in Zoetermeer, the Netherlands, I visit sometimes... They do have a website, but I doubt whether they have all their stuff on there (they often have these small lots of special kit in the store) and whether they have a webstore... http://www.telec.com -- Francesco Peeters GPG Key = AA69 E7C6 1D8A F148 160C D5C4 9943 6E38 D5E3 7704 If your program doesn't recognize my signature, please visit http://www.CAcert.org/index.php?id=3 to retrieve the Root CA certificate. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] using DBGet inside extensions.ael
Anyone know how you can use DBGet inside extensions.ael? Thanks Chris ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Sip client
Hello! If I want to build a Sip client application in Java . What kind of Java Api would I use to connect to the server and to implement the sip signaling? Thanks Ale ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk to NEC NEAX
Hi, How can I make calls from Asterisk client to NEC NEAX 2400 traditional phone ? Is it possible to have a connection between Asterisk and NEC NEAX 2400, since NEC-NEAX2400 is an IP-PBX and supports SIP. Please help me to find a solution ;;; Thanks Regards Ram Kumar Customer Support Engineer Barcode Gulf LLC Dubai , UAE Mobile : + 971 50 5594178 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] PPPD problem please help
After a big help from Peter Svensson, I got ISDN Data-calls up and running. But now when everything seems connected, pppd has been authorized by other peer and even got an IP address, the whole connection seems to stop working. Very unregulary, the PPPD's EchoReq's stop being answered, and of course all TCP/IP-traffic as well. It takes between 0-2 minutes till the connection breaks. I've setup 'lcp-echo-interval 30' and 'lcp-echo-failure 4' (something like that). And it could reply to 1-2 EchoReq's sometimes, sometimes none. BUT! The really strange thing is; when my pppd has determined that the serial link is closed (the ISDN connection), it will send an Terminate Request! And that Terminate Request are confirmed by other peer! How strange is that?! I've spoken to my ISP and even got their log from my call. And it all seems correct from their side. The EchoReq's doesn't seems to reach them though. But the Terminal Request does afterwards. I think this is a Nobel Prize issue. :) -- Daniel ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] call divert to TRUNK , if one number is unregistered?
I have a question. I have two numbers on Asterisk like 902121234567 and 902123645789 and i want to divert first numbers call to Trunk if second number is unregistered. Is it possible? İf yes, how? Flow Diagram: *Two numbers are registered on Asterisk 902121234567 registered to Asterisk 902123645789 registered to Asterisk *One number is registered, other one is not registered 902121234567 registered to Asterisk 902123645789-x not registered to Asterisk *So first number want to make a call second one (desired situation) 902121234567 Asterisk à Trunk Thanks for your interest. Erdem HAKI [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] GSM ISDN gateway to quadbri NT port under bristuffed Asterisk - where to set gain (I have unreliable inband dtmf recognition )?
Steve Underwood wrote: Robert Rozman wrote: Hi, I'm getting unreliable dtmf recognition (it works fine for 4-5 digits, errors (duplicates) on more), when transferred inband from gsm gateway to NT port of quadbri under bristuffed Asterisk. Since Asterisk is claimed to have good dtmf recognizer, I suspect there are some settings to workarouned... I've tried dtmf relax, but didn't help, so I suspect gain settings Is there any other possible cause of unreliable dtmf inband recognition ? Where can I set gain on voice channel (I guess majority of settings under bristuff in zaptel.conf are dummy) ? Any other advice on this problem or similar experience ? Thanks in advance, I kind of amazed if works at all when getting DTMF out of a GSM phone. You really shouldn't expect it to. We have sucessfully read incoming DTMF from: a) Nokia32 Analog GSM connected to TDM400 (had to use relaxdtmf with chan_zap) b) Ateus BRI ISDN GSM connected to AVM Fritz (had to patch chan_capi 0.3.5 to support relaxdtmf) Question (I'm from a software eng. background, not telco): What would be the reason for not receiving DTMF from a GSM phone/gateway? Do you have the time to explain why? (I'm really interested in learning :) Thanks, Leandro ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sip client
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! If I want to build a Sip client application in Java . What kind of Java Api would I use to connect to the server and to implement the sip signaling? Thanks Ale ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Have you tried JAIN? http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=sip+java+api ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Group/Broadcast Voicemail
Hi, I also changed as following sequences; app_voicemail.c 1. Line 3724 tmp[256] to tmp[4096] vm_exec 2. Line 3760 tmp[256] to tmp[4096] append_mailbox 3. Line 3796 tmp[256] to tmp[4096] vm_box_exists 4. Line 3290 tmp[256] to tmp[4096] vm_execmain 5. Line 80 tmp[256] to tmp[4096] #define BASEMAXLINE 6. Line 82 tmp[256] to tmp[4096] #define BASEMAXLINE I tried to copy to 99 mailboxes, but no luck, only could copy to 51 mailboxes. -- Executing VoiceMail(SIP/1021-6bd9, u010302030303040305030603 070308030903100311031203130314031503160317031803190320032103 220323032403250326032703280329033003310332033303340335033603 370338033903400341034203430344034503460347034803490350035103 520353035403550356035703580359036003610362036303640365036603 670368036903700371037203730374037503760377037803790380038103 820383038403850386038703880389039003910392039303940395039603 970398039903) in new stack (snip).. -- User ended message by pressing # -- Playing 'auth-thankyou' (language 'en') Jun 22 17:15:20 NOTICE[11044]: app_voicemail.c:1244 copy_message: Copying message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jun 22 17:15:25 WARNING[11044]: app.c:994 ast_lock_path: Failed to lock path '': File exists .(snip).. Jun 22 17:15:25 NOTICE[11044]: app_voicemail.c:1244 copy_message: Copying message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unable to create lock file: No such file or directory I would like to copy to 100-150 mailboxes for one CPU. I also need someone's help. Regards, Zen Kato I did change char tmp[4096], *ext; to 4096 but there's also the same line under vm_execmain but I really don't know anything about programming. I only saw the same line. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream 100 pricing question
I had gxp-2000 for testing some days, but features are (in current firmware) _very_ limited! phone does not have missed, dialed numbers, phone book, speakerphone is useless... phone have nice backlight display and in-line power :-) but if you like features, grandstream is not for you... PJ ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Variables to emailbody of voicemail
Hi, I am trying to send a variable to emailbody of voicemail.conf. That is to say, I try to send I number that it is entered by the numeric keypad of the telephone and arrives in the body of the mail with the recording of the message. In the single documentation they mark some variables that can be formed in voicemail.conf but encounter does not form to send a new variable. Try to replace the value of one of these variables with script AGI that gathers the numbers but it did not give result. Some idea? Thanks. -- Gabriel Perez S. System Network Development - RunSolutions Open Source It Consulting - email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel: 902 88 99 79 fax: 902 88 87 61 Paseo del Borne nº 15 - 6ª Planta 07012 - Palma de Mallorca Baleares España ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] ZapRAS
I'm trying to use ZapRAS to enable ppp connection through my E1. After the ZapRAS command is executed, all sound is crappy on all lines! The only solution is to reboot the machine (or halt it, and then power it on since Digium's hardware doesn't like reboots). Anyone know how this can happen?! I'm using * 1.0.6 on Dell PowerEdge 1850 which are told (too late though) not to work very well, but should that really be the problem with ZapRAS?! -- Daniel ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Dialplan Q: Dialing with Capi
Hello, I'm using asterisk 1.0.7. with a somewhat advanced setup with IAX and CAPI as channels. A call comes in via IAX2 and should be redirected to CAPI. So I wrote the following dialplan: [fromiax] exten = _8XXX,1,Answer exten = _8XXX,2,Dial(CAPI/265:B${EXTEN:1},,r) [fromcapi] exten = 265,1,Answer exten = 265,2,Dial(IAX2/PoC/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) exten = 265-BUSY,1,Busy exten = 265-NOANSWER,1,Busy [default] exten = s,1,Answer exten = s,2,Congestion The asterisk on the described side is connected to a classic company pbx (from Ericsson) and has local Extensions _XXX. The CAPI Interface gets signalled with MSN 260-265. Yesterday I rewrote the dialplan to allow calls from any company phone (_XXX) to 265 will be rerouted to PoC/11 (the IAX peer). This works fine, the IAX peer will be called with MSN 265 as callerid, so the called party can see the number for callback. I'm encountering the following problem with this setup, when the iax peer dials 8253, which should be redirected to CAPI/253 (8 is a extension prefix specific to the iax peer configuration). -- Accepting AUTHENTICATED call from xx.xx.xx.xx, requested format = 4, actual format = 4 -- Executing Answer(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3, ) in new stack -- Executing Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3, CAPI/265:B253||r) in new stack Jun 22 11:47:22 NOTICE[13337]: chan_capi.c:1173 capi_request: didn't find capi device with outgoing msn = 265. you should check your config! Jun 22 11:47:22 NOTICE[13337]: app_dial.c:746 dial_exec: Unable to create channel of type 'CAPI' == Everyone is busy/congested at this time -- Hungup 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3' When I change the dialplan to the outgoing MSN will be 260 than it works as expected: 253 will be called, but the called party gets 260 as callerid instead of the 265. My capi.conf looks like this: [general] nationalprefix=0 internationalprefix=00 rxgain=0.8 txgain=0.8 language=de [interfaces] msn=260 incomingmsn=* outgoingmsn=260,261,263,264,265 controller=1 softdtmf=1 context=fromcapi language=de echocancel=yes devices=2 Okay, I could also set msn=265; but in the future, more msns should be redirected to VoIP channels, so this is not a long term solution. Any help is very welcome! Thanks for asterisk! :wq! PoC ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Detecting the active queue agent...
Hello I need to know who's the agent that picks up a call in a queue, preferably in real-time so I can invoke a script that sends info to the agent's PC. It doesn't seem easy to do unless I use the info on asterisk's log file (using swatch or something? is this possible?) ... is there any other way? Anyone? NOTE: I've succesfully tried to use firefly as an IAX2 extension to make an URL popup appear on the agent BUT only using Dial ... Queue doesn't seem to do the same thing, even having a field for that purpose. Anyway, I would much prefer a more 'neutral' solution in order to use whichever softphone I choose. Guilherme ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] OT: Asterisk and Mambo - help wanted
Hello everyone, So, this isn't exactly what it seems. I am not looking to integrate Asterisk and Mambo. I am the maintainer/creator of AstLinux, and I have recently decided that I should really have a better web site for it. I would like to use Mambo so that I can do updates easily, from anywhere, without having to waste time learning PHP/HTML/etc. Mambo CMS seems the best and most powerful way to do this. It's not that easy, however, to go from the default Mambo site to a site suitable for an open source project such as AstLinux. I just need some help to get a layout, theme, etc. going. Updates and maintenance I can handle (probably). So, what I am looking for is someone who is familiar with Mambo (and preferably Asterisk, too) and would be willing to help me jump start astlinux.org/.com. Because AstLinux is an open source project, I will be unable to directly compensate anyone (monetarily) for their work at this time. However, any people that help out are more than welcome to plug their own projects, companies, names, etc. on the site (within reason). Interested? Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Drop me a line. Thanks! -- Kristian Kielhofner ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dialplan Q: Dialing with Capi
You could try the new chan_capi-cm-0.5.1 in which you dont need to have any msn defined in capi.conf On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:28:58 +0200 (MEST), Patrik Schindler wrote Hello, I'm using asterisk 1.0.7. with a somewhat advanced setup with IAX and CAPI as channels. A call comes in via IAX2 and should be redirected to CAPI. So I wrote the following dialplan: [fromiax] exten = _8XXX,1,Answer exten = _8XXX,2,Dial(CAPI/265:B${EXTEN:1},,r) [fromcapi] exten = 265,1,Answer exten = 265,2,Dial(IAX2/PoC/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) exten = 265-BUSY,1,Busy exten = 265-NOANSWER,1,Busy [default] exten = s,1,Answer exten = s,2,Congestion The asterisk on the described side is connected to a classic company pbx (from Ericsson) and has local Extensions _XXX. The CAPI Interface gets signalled with MSN 260-265. Yesterday I rewrote the dialplan to allow calls from any company phone (_XXX) to 265 will be rerouted to PoC/11 (the IAX peer). This works fine, the IAX peer will be called with MSN 265 as callerid, so the called party can see the number for callback. I'm encountering the following problem with this setup, when the iax peer dials 8253, which should be redirected to CAPI/253 (8 is a extension prefix specific to the iax peer configuration). -- Accepting AUTHENTICATED call from xx.xx.xx.xx, requested format = 4, actual format = 4 -- Executing Answer(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3, ) in new stack -- Executing Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3, CAPI/265:B253||r) in new stack Jun 22 11:47:22 NOTICE[13337]: chan_capi.c:1173 capi_request: didn't find capi device with outgoing msn = 265. you should check your config! Jun 22 11:47:22 NOTICE[13337]: app_dial.c:746 dial_exec: Unable to create channel of type 'CAPI' == Everyone is busy/congested at this time -- Hungup 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3' When I change the dialplan to the outgoing MSN will be 260 than it works as expected: 253 will be called, but the called party gets 260 as callerid instead of the 265. My capi.conf looks like this: [general] nationalprefix=0 internationalprefix=00 rxgain=0.8 txgain=0.8 language=de [interfaces] msn=260 incomingmsn=* outgoingmsn=260,261,263,264,265 controller=1 softdtmf=1 context=fromcapi language=de echocancel=yes devices=2 Okay, I could also set msn=265; but in the future, more msns should be redirected to VoIP channels, so this is not a long term solution. Any help is very welcome! Thanks for asterisk! :wq! PoC ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: app_changrab.c released on pbxfreeware.org
Hi ! Managed to fix app_changrab.c to compile and start working under 1.0.X. it is working on my installation, but is tested well enough. Regards, Nenad Here is diff -u : -- --- app_changrab.c.orig 2005-06-20 22:10:50.0 +0200 +++ app_changrab.c 2005-06-22 11:43:54.0 +0200 @@ -8,11 +8,12 @@ */ /*uncomment below or build with -DAST_10_COMPAT for 1.0 */ -//#define AST_10_COMPAT +#define AST_10_COMPAT #include asterisk/file.h #include asterisk/logger.h #include asterisk/channel.h +#include asterisk/channel_pvt.h #include asterisk/pbx.h #include asterisk/utils.h #include asterisk/musiconhold.h @@ -24,9 +25,11 @@ #include string.h #include pthread.h -#include asterisk.h +#include ../asterisk.h +#ifndef AST_10_COMPAT ASTERISK_FILE_VERSION(__FILE__, $Revision: 1.39 $) +#endif static char *tdesc = Take over an existing channel and bridge to it.; static char *app = ChanGrab; @@ -85,10 +88,13 @@ ast_log(LOG_WARNING, No Such Channel: %s\n,(char *) data); return -1; } - +#ifndef AST_10_COMPAT if(flags oldchan-_bridge strchr(flags,'b')) oldchan = oldchan-_bridge; - +#else + if(flags oldchan-bridge strchr(flags,'b')) + oldchan = oldchan-bridge; +#endif if(flags strchr(flags,'r') oldchan-_state == AST_STATE_UP) { return -1; } @@ -102,9 +108,10 @@ if((f = ast_read(newchan))) { ast_frfree(f); memset(config,0,sizeof(struct ast_bridge_config)); +#ifndef AST_10_COMPAT ast_set_flag((config.features_callee), AST_FEATURE_REDIRECT); ast_set_flag((config.features_caller), AST_FEATURE_REDIRECT); - +#endif if(oldchan !oldchan-pbx) ast_hangup(oldchan); Unfortunatly it won't compile under 1.0.7 :( I have uncommented #define AST_10_COMPAT but I don't see any usage of it in app_changrab.c. Complains about missing asterisk.h ( I think it should be #include ../asterisk.h ) It also complains about ASTERISK_FILE_VERSION() function, and about _bridge member of ast_channel structure and some othet things: Here is compile log: . ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream 100 pricing question
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Pavel Jezek wrote: I had gxp-2000 for testing some days, but features are (in current firmware) _very_ limited! phone does not have missed, dialed numbers, phone book, speakerphone is useless... Some of these features are in the 1.0.1.9 version that was released last week. Missed and dialed numgers are available, although not in a very good interface (press the left and right arrows while off-hook). They do have separate memories per configured account. Grandstream clains thay will address the speakerphone problems in an upcoming release. I think they need a more advanced echo canceler since the speaker and microphone are acoustically strongly coupled. Also expected in the near term is suppor for Subscribe/Notify. phone have nice backlight display and in-line power :-) but if you like features, grandstream is not for you... On the other hand Grandstream seem to care about what their users want, at least for minor features. Everything we asked for was included in the current release. They seem serious in their attempt to break into the higher end market. Peter ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] GSM ISDN gateway to quadbri NT port under bristuffed Asterisk - where to set gain (I have unreliable inband dtmf recognition )?
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Leandro Morgado wrote: Steve Underwood wrote: Robert Rozman wrote: I'm getting unreliable dtmf recognition (it works fine for 4-5 digits, errors (duplicates) on more), when transferred inband from gsm gateway to NT port of quadbri under bristuffed Asterisk. We get these quite often. If there is any line noise asterisk will interpret it as the end of a digit and then detect the same digit again. We are connected to the pstn via isdn. The problem is with calls where the dtmf tones are a bit unclean, i.e. too much energy is in the overtones. Clean dtmf tones seem to be much more resistant to line noise. Out other systems are more accepting of slightly off-spec dtmf tones. Peter ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] is sip:%2321 valid invite?
Hi, I tried to cable #21 with a thomson cable modem mta: -- SIP read from 192.168.153.100:5060: INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.153.100;branch=z9hG4bK1aa77a586 Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Length: 258 To: #21 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=da42eb89613306c Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 1084359157 INVITE Supported: timer Allow: NOTIFY Allow: REFER Allow: OPTIONS Allow: INVITE Allow: ACK Allow: CANCEL Allow: BYE Content-Type: application/sdp Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Supported: replaces User-Agent: Brcm Callctrl/1.5.1.2 MxSF/v3.2.6.26 and asterisk doesn't translate %23 to #. the grandstrem phones send it in this case: -- SIP read from 192.168.50.224:5060: INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.50.224;branch=z9hG4bKba695b72a347ad40 From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=33c0bbf7cfe3e083 To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Supported: replaces Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 4050 INVITE User-Agent: Grandstream BT100 1.0.6.6 Max-Forwards: 70 Allow: INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY,REFER,OPTIONS,INFO,SUBSCRIBE Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 336 Anybody knows what says about it rfc? Is it bug of mta or asterisk? Regards, Attila Domjan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Is this server sufficient?
I've tried to find some details on the wiki, but was unable to get a satisfactory result, so I am asking here: I have a Linux (FC3) box with these specs: vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 3 model name : AMD Duron(tm) Processor stepping: 1 cpu MHz : 797.388 cache size : 64 KB MEM: currently 256, looking to upgrade to 512/768 (depending on available sticks) HDD: 80 GB It is currently doing File/Printer serving. Ideally I'd want it to do Asterisk (2 ISDN BRI 8 phones), File/Printer server on a home network (3 clients) and some light SMTP ( 100 emails a day) Is this machine sufficient for the task? (Ignoring the fact it needs either a multi-BRI card or 2 single BRI cards to be able to connect to the PSTN G) TIA! -- Francesco Peeters GPG Key = AA69 E7C6 1D8A F148 160C D5C4 9943 6E38 D5E3 7704 If your program doesn't recognize my signature, please visit http://www.CAcert.org/index.php?id=3 to retrieve the Root CA certificate. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] call divert to TRUNK ,if one number is unregistered?
Hi Erdem, Can you try to put another dial command that points to the trunk afetr the dial command to the SIP? fro example: exten => XXX,1, dial(sip/,20,r) exten => XXX,2,dial(zap/) -> note here that I am not sure if the order number should be 2 or 102 but if this didn't work try the other one. Thx MAG Erdem HAKÝ wrote: I have a question. I have two numbers on Asterisk like 902121234567 and 902123645789 and i want to divert first number's call to Trunk if second number is unregistered. Is it possible? Ýf yes, how? Flow Diagram: *Two numbers are registered on Asterisk 902121234567 registered to Asterisk 902123645789 registered to Asterisk *One number is registered, other one is not registered 902121234567 registered to Asterisk 902123645789-x not registered to Asterisk *So first number want to make a call second one (desired situation) 902121234567> Asteriskà Trunk Thanks for your interest. Erdem HAKI - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Thx MAG ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Is this server sufficient?
As an asterisk server it is more than fine but asterisk prefers to be a standalone machine. You would have a lot less issues if you had 2 machines, one handling file serving, SMTP and one dedicate machine for asterisk. Voice isn't very tolerant of interrupts. Cheers, Dean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Francesco Peeters Sent: Wednesday, 22 June 2005 7:28 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Is this server sufficient? I've tried to find some details on the wiki, but was unable to get a satisfactory result, so I am asking here: I have a Linux (FC3) box with these specs: vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 3 model name : AMD Duron(tm) Processor stepping: 1 cpu MHz : 797.388 cache size : 64 KB MEM: currently 256, looking to upgrade to 512/768 (depending on available sticks) HDD: 80 GB It is currently doing File/Printer serving. Ideally I'd want it to do Asterisk (2 ISDN BRI 8 phones), File/Printer server on a home network (3 clients) and some light SMTP ( 100 emails a day) Is this machine sufficient for the task? (Ignoring the fact it needs either a multi-BRI card or 2 single BRI cards to be able to connect to the PSTN G) TIA! -- Francesco Peeters GPG Key = AA69 E7C6 1D8A F148 160C D5C4 9943 6E38 D5E3 7704 If your program doesn't recognize my signature, please visit http://www.CAcert.org/index.php?id=3 to retrieve the Root CA certificate. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Is this server sufficient?
On Wed, June 22, 2005 13:39, Dean Collins said: As an asterisk server it is more than fine but asterisk prefers to be a standalone machine. You would have a lot less issues if you had 2 machines, one handling file serving, SMTP and one dedicate machine for asterisk. Voice isn't very tolerant of interrupts. Cheers, Dean I am aware of that, but the server is doing nada 99.9% of the time right now, so I'd rather give up the other functionality and have it to * rather than the other way round! ;-) I thought I'd give it a try with * and see whether we have issues when the rare SMTP/SMB access occurs (and deal with it then!) I just wanted to be sure that the machine is sufficient to do * and then some... ;-) I think I'll use the upcoming vacation period to go play with it then! :-D Cheers! -- Francesco Peeters GPG Key = AA69 E7C6 1D8A F148 160C D5C4 9943 6E38 D5E3 7704 If your program doesn't recognize my signature, please visit http://www.CAcert.org/index.php?id=3 to retrieve the Root CA certificate. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Is this server sufficient?
This will work fine I have a traveling 700mhz duron that does great. CUPS should not be running but test it your self. Rule of thumb, if you are transcoding many channels then you need a bigger machine. If you are just switching then you can use a smaller machine. On 6/22/05, Francesco Peeters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, June 22, 2005 13:39, Dean Collins said: As an asterisk server it is more than fine but asterisk prefers to be a standalone machine. You would have a lot less issues if you had 2 machines, one handling file serving, SMTP and one dedicate machine for asterisk. Voice isn't very tolerant of interrupts. Cheers, Dean I am aware of that, but the server is doing nada 99.9% of the time right now, so I'd rather give up the other functionality and have it to * rather than the other way round! ;-) I thought I'd give it a try with * and see whether we have issues when the rare SMTP/SMB access occurs (and deal with it then!) I just wanted to be sure that the machine is sufficient to do * and then some... ;-) I think I'll use the upcoming vacation period to go play with it then! :-D Cheers! -- Francesco Peeters GPG Key = AA69 E7C6 1D8A F148 160C D5C4 9943 6E38 D5E3 7704 If your program doesn't recognize my signature, please visit http://www.CAcert.org/index.php?id=3 to retrieve the Root CA certificate. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- sig Andrew Latham - AKA: LATHAMA (lay-th-ham-eh) WWW: http://lathama.com Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] If any of the above are down we have bigger problems than my email! /sig ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] meetme problem
Hello, I seem to have a strange problem, which appeared out of nowhere. Did anyone see something like this? 2005-06-03 18:44:50 WARNING[10721] app_meetme.c: Unable to write frame to channel: Illegal seek 2005-06-03 18:44:50 WARNING[10721] app_meetme.c: Unable to write frame to channel: Illegal seek 2005-06-03 18:44:50 WARNING[10721] app_meetme.c: Unable to write frame to channel: Illegal seek 2005-06-03 18:44:50 WARNING[10721] app_meetme.c: Unable to write frame to channel: Illegal seek 2005-06-03 18:44:50 DEBUG[10721] res_agi.c: Zap/65-1 hungup 2005-06-03 18:44:50 DEBUG[10721] channel.c: Avoiding deadlock for 'Zap/63-1' 2005-06-03 18:44:50 WARNING[10721] app_meetme.c: Unable to write frame to channel: Success 2005-06-03 18:44:50 WARNING[10721] app_meetme.c: Unable to write frame to channel: Success 2005-06-03 18:44:50 WARNING[10721] app_meetme.c: Unable to write frame to channel: Success 2005-06-03 18:44:50 WARNING[10721] app_meetme.c: Unable to write frame to channel: Success 2005-06-03 18:44:50 WARNING[10721] app_meetme.c: Unable to write frame to channel: Success 2005-06-03 18:44:50 WARNING[10721] app_meetme.c: Unable to write frame to channel: Success 2005-06-03 18:44:50 WARNING[10721] app_meetme.c: Unable to write frame to channel: Success Once these messages start showing, I must stop my asterisk (stop now) because the load goes sky high. I'm using an Asterisk CVS-HEAD. Looking forward for your answer. Felix ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Is this server sufficient?
Il giorno mer, 22/06/2005 alle 07.39 -0400, Dean Collins ha scritto: As an asterisk server it is more than fine but asterisk prefers to be a standalone machine. You would have a lot less issues if you had 2 machines, one handling file serving, SMTP and one dedicate machine for asterisk. Voice isn't very tolerant of interrupts. In my case, before switching to dedicated hw, asterisk was running on a file/printer/ldap/web server, since we have an userbase of 10 people dialing out on 2 isdn lines the glitches in audio weren't a real problem because the probability of having an active call while the server is used for some other intensive task is really low with few users. If you're on budget imho you can start by implementing * on the hw you have, and eventually switch to a dedicated machine, just be sure X isn't running on the server. (of course the idea of putting * directly on a production machine and not on a test one isn't a good one, but this is another topic) ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Is this server sufficient?
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 07:27, Francesco Peeters wrote: It is currently doing File/Printer serving. Ideally I'd want it to do Asterisk (2 ISDN BRI 8 phones), File/Printer server on a home network (3 clients) and some light SMTP ( 100 emails a day) Is this machine sufficient for the task? (Ignoring the fact it needs either a multi-BRI card or 2 single BRI cards to be able to connect to the PSTN G) I don't see a reason why it won't work. I have done the same on a 600MHz machine and as long as I did not have anything major going on it worked fine. Of course you will find that you can have potential problems with all sorts of h/w once you put some load on Asterisk. Another box I tried was a top of the line Intel w dual Xeon (also 600MHz) that once cost over $10,000. It did not work too well, even on single phone calls. Then I tried an IBM 600MHz single processor which does just fine. You will notice rather easily when your h/w cannot keep up. Ideally all you do on an Asterisk box is run Asterisk, but as I said you'll notice when it's not up to the task. When you use cpu intensive codecs you'll see when your machine is not up to it. Just dive in and try it. I think someone here got a 233MHz machine to handle single calls... As long as you use Linux you won't have any problems installing Asterisk just to test it. Unlike other O/S's it won't mess anything up. Good Luck! -- List Manager Network Voice Comunications, Inc. netwvcom.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Spanish doc
Hi: We have finished the translation of the FAQ of Digium to spanish. They are already (in Spanish) available for download (in http://ourproject.org/projects/asterix/): * FAQ Frequently Asked Questions * Features * Hardware compatibility list * Fast Installation Zaptel All the documentation is available for download Soon the following documents will be finished: Volume one and Asterisk Gateway Interface (AGI) Bye Leonardo Federico Bauchwitz Coordinator of Asterisk documentation in Spanish https://ourproject.org/projects/asterix/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ 1GB gratis, Antivirus y Antispam Correo Yahoo!, el mejor correo web del mundo http://correo.yahoo.com.ar ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] How can you check that eg TDM04B hardwareinstalled and drivers OK
If I try dmesg - no mention of a Wildcard TDM400. Sorry I am fairly new to Linux. In Windows I suppose I would run some hardware program which came with the card to see if I could manually set IRQ's etc. What should I be looking at now? Please feel free to point me to a good book or whatever you feel is appropriate. Could the card be faulty? My motherboard is an Intel D865GLC. I am running [EMAIL PROTECTED] version 1.0 Angus - Original Message - From: Mike M [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 3:14 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] How can you check that eg TDM04B hardwareinstalled and drivers OK On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 07:09:46AM -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: I am struggling to get my TDM04B working. Just to rule out a hardware problem how can I check that the hardware works? How can I then check that the drivers are loaded correctly? 1. from the linux command line, type 'dmesg' and look for Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV H (4 modules) if you see that, the TDM card is recognized by the OS. Here's what I get on a working system: [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# modprobe wctdm [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 01:0a.0 Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Freshmaker version: 71 Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Freshmaker passed register test Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Module 0: Installed -- AUTO FXS/DPO Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Module 1: Not installed Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Module 2: Not installed Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Module 3: Not installed Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV E/F (4 modules) Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 17893766 XT-PIC timer 1: 2 XT-PIC keyboard 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 4: 357411641 XT-PIC eth0, wanpipe1 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc 10:3381408 XT-PIC Intel ICH2 11: 178236906 XT-PIC wctdm 14: 50492 XT-PIC ide0 15: 0 XT-PIC ide1 NMI: 0 ERR: 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 17894203 XT-PIC timer 1: 2 XT-PIC keyboard 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 4: 357419974 XT-PIC eth0, wanpipe1 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc 10:3381408 XT-PIC Intel ICH2 11: 178241275 XT-PIC wctdm 14: 50494 XT-PIC ide0 15: 0 XT-PIC ide1 NMI: 0 ERR: 0 -- Mike ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] meetme mute status
hi, is there any way to figure out what the mute status is of the meetme conference participants? i personally can no see any difference on the output: kamikaze*CLI meetme Conf Num PartiesMarked Activity Creation 5000 0002 N/A00:00:40 Static * Total number of MeetMe users: 2 kamikaze*CLI kamikaze*CLI meetme list 5000 User #: 1 Channel: SIP/fizik-c4eb User #: 2 Channel: H323/ip$192.168.42.10:10659/14231 kamikaze*CLI kamikaze*CLI meetme mute 5000 1 kamikaze*CLI meetme list 5000 User #: 1 Channel: SIP/fizik-c4eb User #: 2 Channel: H323/ip$192.168.42.10:10659/14231 kamikaze*CLI i also can not see any mute/unmute event on the manager interface only the join/leave events come. any idea? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: [Serusers] ASTERISK+SER+MWI
What's wrong with ARA (asterisk realtime architecture) from voip-info: Asterisk, SER and MWI http://mail.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2004-December/013727.html Actually I wrote a patch for this and it supports ast_data too. What you do is tell asterisk that all of your phones IP addresses are your SER machine. Then when a message gets left Asterisk sends the NOTIFY to username at seripaddress:serport. SER gets it and since it knows what's up, it relays it to the phone. Tada! I gave my patch to Rob (who leads up the ast_data patch. If you need it let me know. Its for Asterisk 1.0.2 with the 1.0.2 ast_data patch. --- Iqbal [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Realtime with asterisk, and voicemail, #if you get i working let me know, I got voicemail from flatfile all working, but realtime, just doesnt seem to pull the info out of the database for some reason. MWI, if your phone is registered at SER, you will need to pass message back with externotify back to ser, and get ser to send the message to the phone, Paul(aka Java) had a working setup, but its not straightforward, alot of little scripts to implement in cron etc. Also add to this different ways in which the IP phones work, and you may as well not do it :-) Iqbal ___ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] DID not working? + sendmail problems
to work when I used fxs_ks signaling on them. However I changed to fxs_ls signaling because the ks wasn’t detecting when people were hanging up properly. Could changing the signaling be whats causing the I added the following to my zapata.conf in the [channels] section: busydetect=yes busycount=4 It helped to reduce the time to detect that the line was hang up. HTH Pascal. Rick a écrit : I have a box running [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0 and I noticed today when I went to change some settings to do with the DID’s that it is no longer detecting the different lines. I have a Digium 4 port line card and Im pretty sure that the DID’s used to work when I used fxs_ks signaling on them. However I changed to fxs_ls signaling because the ks wasn’t detecting when people were hanging up properly. Could changing the signaling be whats causing the DIDs not to function properly? My other problem is getting sendmail to work. I get the following error. - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to my smtp server, details removed: DATA 550-Verification failed for [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550-unrouteable mail domain asterisk1.local 550 Sender verify failed 550 5.1.1 users email address, details removed... User unknown 503 valid RCPT command must precede DATA I cant find anywhere to change the login/pass info to change it to auth with a valid account from the mail server. Any help would be greatly appreciated. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: [Serusers] ASTERISK+SER+MWI
nothing wrong with it, and ast_data and realtime are different unless I have misunderstood. Asterisk realtime and pulling Voicemail from a DB I have had problems with, if it works great if someone could let me know, ast_data does I believe work, so you could try that out, I just wanted to goto realtime, however maybe I'll give ast_data a go. Iqbal harry gaillac wrote: What's wrong with ARA (asterisk realtime architecture) from voip-info: Asterisk, SER and MWI http://mail.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2004-December/013727.html Actually I wrote a patch for this and it supports ast_data too. What you do is tell asterisk that all of your phones IP addresses are your SER machine. Then when a message gets left Asterisk sends the NOTIFY to username at seripaddress:serport. SER gets it and since it knows what's up, it relays it to the phone. Tada! I gave my patch to Rob (who leads up the ast_data patch. If you need it let me know. Its for Asterisk 1.0.2 with the 1.0.2 ast_data patch. --- Iqbal [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Realtime with asterisk, and voicemail, #if you get i working let me know, I got voicemail from flatfile all working, but realtime, just doesnt seem to pull the info out of the database for some reason. MWI, if your phone is registered at SER, you will need to pass message back with externotify back to ser, and get ser to send the message to the phone, Paul(aka Java) had a working setup, but its not straightforward, alot of little scripts to implement in cron etc. Also add to this different ways in which the IP phones work, and you may as well not do it :-) Iqbal ___ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com . ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] How can you check that eg TDM04B hardwareinstalled and drivers OK
Probably means that your perfectly good motherboard can't see the TDM card. There are many motherboards that this card doesn't seem to work with, Digium doesn't seem willing to address the issue or even acknowledge that is the case, and usually answers try another motherboard rather than 'fess up that there is a design problem with the PCI interface and correct it. PCI 2.2 is a stated requirement, but there is certainly more to the story than that. In addition, when the board CAN be seen, report rev E/F when the silkscreen reads Rev H, someone mentioned there is now a Rev I ( good luck getting an exchange ) and Digium 's answer is if we can see it through remote access then there is no reason to replace it, and if we can't, try another MB. Overall, if it works, lucky you, if not, Too bad. Hard to support Digium and suggest others purchase such a product. Best you look for other interfaces to Asterisk. John Novack Angus Comber wrote: If I try dmesg - no mention of a Wildcard TDM400. Sorry I am fairly new to Linux. In Windows I suppose I would run some hardware program which came with the card to see if I could manually set IRQ's etc. What should I be looking at now? Please feel free to point me to a good book or whatever you feel is appropriate. Could the card be faulty? My motherboard is an Intel D865GLC. I am running [EMAIL PROTECTED] version 1.0 Angus - Original Message - From: Mike M [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 3:14 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] How can you check that eg TDM04B hardwareinstalled and drivers OK On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 07:09:46AM -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: I am struggling to get my TDM04B working. Just to rule out a hardware problem how can I check that the hardware works? How can I then check that the drivers are loaded correctly? 1. from the linux command line, type 'dmesg' and look for Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV H (4 modules) if you see that, the TDM card is recognized by the OS. Here's what I get on a working system: [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# modprobe wctdm [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 01:0a.0 Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Freshmaker version: 71 Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Freshmaker passed register test Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Module 0: Installed -- AUTO FXS/DPO Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Module 1: Not installed Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Module 2: Not installed Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Module 3: Not installed Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV E/F (4 modules) Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 17893766 XT-PIC timer 1: 2 XT-PIC keyboard 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 4: 357411641 XT-PIC eth0, wanpipe1 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc 10:3381408 XT-PIC Intel ICH2 11: 178236906 XT-PIC wctdm 14: 50492 XT-PIC ide0 15: 0 XT-PIC ide1 NMI: 0 ERR: 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 17894203 XT-PIC timer 1: 2 XT-PIC keyboard 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 4: 357419974 XT-PIC eth0, wanpipe1 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc 10:3381408 XT-PIC Intel ICH2 11: 178241275 XT-PIC wctdm 14: 50494 XT-PIC ide0 15: 0 XT-PIC ide1 NMI: 0 ERR: 0 -- Mike ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] 403 forbidden on SIP register
Someone else just reported what appears to be the same problem and he narrowed it down to upper-lower case problem with sip digest. Don't know if a fix has been applied to cvs-head for that as yet. Might try an update. md5 instead of plaintext? Doesn't asterisk take care of this automatically with SIP? I have other providers that use md5 and they all respond with a 401 challenge and then asterisk generates the md5 and uses the realm given it in the 401. Also, I think I just seen a change in the last day or two that had something to do with 403's, and if I recall correctly, it also addressed upper/lower case something or another. Can you use ethereal or sip debug to determine the exact item that was sent that might be causing the 403? Either one should at least provide a hint. Here is a sip debug. All I get back is an immediate 403 forbidden. This is also what I get back on other providers if I had the wrong password. This is also cvs HEAD from yesterday, although jumping back to a version from a month ago didn't make any difference. Chris --- (10 headers 0 lines)--- Jun 21 15:42:52 NOTICE[34281]: chan_sip.c:4671 sip_reregister:-- Re-registration for [EMAIL PROTECTED] REGISTER 11 headers, 0 lines REGISTER attempt 1 to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reliably Transmitting (no NAT) to 208.139.204.228:5060: REGISTER sip:voip-co1.teliax.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.25.136.31:5060;branch=z9hG4bK027fe0e3 From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as737624ba To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 102 REGISTER User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Expires: 120 Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Event: registration Content-Length: 0 -- SIP read from 208.139.204.228:5060: SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.25.136.31:5060;branch=z9hG4bK027fe0e3 From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as737624ba To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as3201eb44 Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 102 REGISTER User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Length: 0 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ---End of Original Message- ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: meetme mute status
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], bdz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, is there any way to figure out what the mute status is of the meetme conference participants? i personally can no see any difference on the output: kamikaze*CLI meetme Conf Num PartiesMarked Activity Creation 5000 0002 N/A00:00:40 Static * Total number of MeetMe users: 2 kamikaze*CLI kamikaze*CLI meetme list 5000 User #: 1 Channel: SIP/fizik-c4eb User #: 2 Channel: H323/ip$192.168.42.10:10659/14231 kamikaze*CLI kamikaze*CLI meetme mute 5000 1 kamikaze*CLI meetme list 5000 User #: 1 Channel: SIP/fizik-c4eb User #: 2 Channel: H323/ip$192.168.42.10:10659/14231 kamikaze*CLI i also can not see any mute/unmute event on the manager interface only the join/leave events come. Neither of these features currently exists in MeetMe, although they are both on my ToDo list unless someone else beats me to it. Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TDM400P and Dell Poweredge 1750
I installed a new Digium TDM400P in a Dell 1750 server. The system would not recognize the card. I took the FXS modules off of it and put them on another TDM400P card I already had. Old card worked fine with new modules. Old card is Rev. H and new card is Rev. I. Anyone else having any issues with TDM400P rev. I? Adam The contents of this email message and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. This transmission is sent in trust, for the sole purpose of delivery to the intended recipient. If you have received this transmission in error, any use, reproduction or dissemination of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply email and delete this message and its attachments, if any. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] How can you check that eg TDM04B hardwareinstalled and drivers OK
Hello Here is what I find. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Angus - Original Message - From: Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 2:09 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] How can you check that eg TDM04B hardwareinstalled and drivers OK I am struggling to get my TDM04B working. Just to rule out a hardware problem how can I check that the hardware works? How can I then check that the drivers are loaded correctly? You didn't mention which linux distro you're using, so translate the ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] version 1.0 on Centos OS. following into whatever your system expects. Try the following items: 1. from the linux command line, type 'dmesg' and look for Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV H (4 modules) if you see that, the TDM card is recognized by the OS. ** Did not find TDM! 2. from the linux command line, type 'cat /proc/interrupts and look for an entry with 'wctdm' in the list. If you don't see wctdm listed, the module is not loaded as yet. ** no wctdm in list 3. in /etc/zaptel.conf, ensure you have an entry like: fxsks=1-4 ** OK - but think a hardware issue needs to be resolved first 4. if you're using a linux v2.6 kernel, read /usr/src/zaptel/README.udev 5. with asterisk stopped and from the linux command line, try sysconfig zaptel start ** Command not found 6. What do you see if you run 'zttool' from the linux command line? ** ** Zaptel Tool loads and I see this: Zapata Telephony Interfaces Alarms Span nothing else If click on Select go to another screen: Current Alarms: No Alarms Sync Source: Internally clocked IRQ Misses: 0 Bipolar Viol: 0 Tx/Rx Levels: 0/ 0 Total/Conf/Act: 0/ 0/ 0 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dialplan Q: Dialing with Capi
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, jurczak wrote: You could try the new chan_capi-cm-0.5.1 in which you dont need to have any msn defined in capi.conf Thank you very much, this solved my problem! Do you know a solution for non-capi but i4l devices? It's not an error but a warning only, so it's not a real problem. :wq! PoC ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] gsm gateway
Hi, can you recommend cheap GSM Gateway which works with Asterisk? VoiceBlue solution is quite expensive. Thanks, -- - David ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk ended with exit status 139
What could be th reason for that? /usr/sbin/safe_asterisk: line 41: 4590 Segmentation fault (core dumped) asterisk ${CLIARGS} ${ASTARGS} /dev/${TTY} /dev/${TTY} Asterisk ended with exit status 139 Asterisk exited on signal 11. Automatically restarting Asterisk. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: New JAVA application server for Asterisk - OrderlyCalls
On Jun 21, 2005, at 5:05 PM, Adam Megacz wrote: Matt King [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am familiar with the OSI definitiion. I've read it again, but I can't work out exactly how asking for permission contravenes this definition. 2) OrderlyCalls MAY NOT be used to provide or augment call queuing without the prior written permission of Orderly Software. 6. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business... http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php Maybe I'm wrong here, but his restriction does not seem to be a restriction on a field of endeavor. His restriction is a restriction on using the software to implement a certain function. If he had said You may not use this software for commercial purposes or Individuals engaged in agricultural activities may not use this software, or This software cannot be used by commercial software vendors, THEN it would be a restriction based on a specific field of endeavor. Tom ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] FXS interfaces
Hi all, Does somebody know why no load modules to FXS? I used zaptel-1.0.7 version driver. [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.0.7]# modprobe wctdm ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 3: Invalid argument (22) Did you forget that FXS interfaces are configured with FXO signalling and that FXO interfaces use FXS signalling? /lib/modules/2.4.21-27.EL/misc/wcfxs.o: post-install wcfxs failed /lib/modules/2.4.21-27.EL/misc/wcfxs.o: insmod wctdm failed You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root /var/log/messages: ### Jun 21 19:06:15 darthvaden kernel: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 Jun 21 19:06:16 darthvaden kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 9 for device 02:09.0 Jun 21 19:06:16 darthvaden kernel: PCI: Sharing IRQ 9 with 00:1f.5 Jun 21 19:06:16 darthvaden kernel: Freshmaker version: 71 Jun 21 19:06:16 darthvaden kernel: Freshmaker passed register test Jun 21 19:06:16 darthvaden kernel: ProSLIC 3210 version 2 is too old Jun 21 19:06:16 darthvaden kernel: Module 0: Not installed Jun 21 19:06:16 darthvaden kernel: ProSLIC 3210 version 2 is too old Jun 21 19:06:16 darthvaden kernel: Module 1: Not installed Jun 21 19:06:16 darthvaden kernel: Module 2: Installed -- AUTO FXO (FCC mode) Jun 21 19:06:16 darthvaden kernel: Module 3: Installed -- AUTO FXO (FCC mode) Jun 21 19:06:16 darthvaden kernel: Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV E/F (4 modules) It's TDM22B device. - http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=product_detailcategory=hardwareproduct=TDM400Ptab=details See below zaptel.conf: # # Zaptel Configuration File # # This file is parsed by the Zaptel Configurator, ztcfg # # # First come the span definitions, in the format # span=span num,timing,line build out (LBO),framing,coding[,yellow] # # The timing parameter determines the selection of primary, secondary, and # so on sync sources. If this span should be considered a primary sync # source, then give it a value of 1. For a secondary, use 2, and so on. # To not use this as a sync source, just use 0 # # The line build-out (or LBO) is an integer, from the following table: # 0: 0 db (CSU) / 0-133 feet (DSX-1) # 1: 133-266 feet (DSX-1) # 2: 266-399 feet (DSX-1) # 3: 399-533 feet (DSX-1) # 4: 533-655 feet (DSX-1) # 5: -7.5db (CSU) # 6: -15db (CSU) # 7: -22.5db (CSU) # # The framing is one of d4 or esf for T1 or cas or ccs for E1 # # Note: d4 could be referred to as sf or superframe # # The coding is one of ami or b8zs for T1 or ami or hdb3 for E1 # # E1's may have the additional keyword crc4 to enable CRC4 checking # # If the keyword yellow follows, yellow alarm is transmitted when no # channels are open. # #span=1,0,0,esf,b8zs #span=2,1,0,esf,b8zs #span=3,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 # # Next come the dynamic span definitions, in the form: # dynamic=driver,address,numchans,timing # # Where driver is the name of the driver (e.g. eth), address is the # driver specific address (like a MAC for eth), numchans is the number # of channels, and timing is a timing priority, like for a normal span. # use 0 to not use this as a timing source, or prioritize them as # primary, secondard, etc. Note that you MUST have a REAL zaptel device # if you are not using external timing. # # dynamic=eth,eth0/00:02:b3:35:43:9c,24,0 # # Next come the definitions for using the channels. The format is: # device=channel list # # Valid devices are: # # em : Channel(s) are signalled using EM signalling (specific # implementation, such as Immediate, Wink, or Feature Group D # are handled by the userspace library). # fxsls : Channel(s) are signalled using FXS Loopstart protocol. # fxsgs : Channel(s) are signalled using FXS Groundstart protocol. # fxsks : Channel(s) are signalled using FXS Koolstart protocol. # fxols : Channel(s) are signalled using FXO Loopstart protocol. # fxogs : Channel(s) are signalled using FXO Groundstart protocol. # fxoks : Channel(s) are signalled using FXO Koolstart protocol. # sf : Channel(s) are signalled using in-band single freq tone. #Syntax as follows: # channel# = sf:rxfreq,rxbw,rxflag,txfreq,txlevel,txflag #rxfreq is rx tone freq in hz, rxbw is rx notch (and decode) #bandwith in hz (typically 10.0), rxflag is either 'normal' or #'inverted', txfreq is tx tone freq in hz, txlevel is tx tone #level in dbm, txflag is either 'normal' or 'inverted'. Set #rxfreq or txfreq to 0.0 if that tone is not desired. # unused : No signalling is performed, each channel in the list remains idle # clear : Channel(s) are bundled into a single span. No conversion or # signalling is performed, and raw data is available on the master. # indclear: Like clear except all channels are treated individually and # are not bundled. bchan is an alias for this. # rawhdlc : The zaptel driver performs HDLC encoding and decoding on the # bundle, and the resulting data is communicated via the master # device. # fcshdlc : The zapdel driver performs HDLC encoding and
RE: [Asterisk-Users] call divert to TRUNK , if one number is unregistered?
Yes it works :) but i need to add voicemail option, how can i do this? I want a configuration like this exten = XXX,1, Dial(sip/,20,r) exten = XXX,2,Dial(zap/) exten = XXX,3,Voicemail(u) exten = XXX,103,Voicemail(b) -what should order number be? exten = XXX,104,Hangup From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mohamed A. Gombolaty Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 2:27 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] call divert to TRUNK ,if one number is unregistered? Hi Erdem, Can you try to put another dial command that points to the trunk afetr the dial command to the SIP? fro example: exten = XXX,1, dial(sip/,20,r) exten = XXX,2,dial(zap/) - note here that I am not sure if the order number should be 2 or 102 but if this didn't work try the other one. Thx MAG Erdem HAK] wrote: I have a question. I have two numbers on Asterisk like 902121234567 and 902123645789 and i want to divert first number's call to Trunk if second number is unregistered. Is it possible? ]f yes, how? Flow Diagram: *Two numbers are registered on Asterisk 902121234567 registered to Asterisk 902123645789 registered to Asterisk *One number is registered, other one is not registered 902121234567 registered to Asterisk 902123645789-x not registered to Asterisk *So first number want to make a call second one (desired situation) 902121234567 Asterisk` Trunk Thanks for your interest. Erdem HAKI - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___Asterisk-Users mailing listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users --ThxMAG ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream 100 pricing question
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the info... I am considering getting these to experiment with, so I can do some testing *before* I actually get in to the real thing. The cheaper the test period, the better, so 2 of these (which later can be reused in less used area's) look pretty interesting... I have several Grandstream BT101's that are slightly used and I'm looking to sell, if you're interested. Barton ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Telrad + EM T1 Trunk
Hi, Please refer to my post here regarding a similar issue as you are trying to achieve, I am not sure how far you have gotten with your attempt, but I would appreciate if you can share your experience with me and help me get mine working. http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-June/113085.html thanks in advance, Karthik Natarajan InfoPro Corporation 732-283-2589 x 241 [EMAIL PROTECTED] attachment: winmail.dat___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] DID not working? + sendmail problems
Digium's analog cards do not support DID lines. Syed Akbar Alico Systems Inc www.alicosystems.com Tel: 562-436-1510 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pascal Mosimann Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 8:53 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] DID not working? + sendmail problems to work when I used fxs_ks signaling on them. However I changed to fxs_ls signaling because the ks wasnt detecting when people were hanging up properly. Could changing the signaling be whats causing the I added the following to my zapata.conf in the [channels] section: busydetect=yes busycount=4 It helped to reduce the time to detect that the line was hang up. HTH Pascal. Rick a écrit : I have a box running [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0 and I noticed today when I went to change some settings to do with the DIDs that it is no longer detecting the different lines. I have a Digium 4 port line card and Im pretty sure that the DIDs used to work when I used fxs_ks signaling on them. However I changed to fxs_ls signaling because the ks wasnt detecting when people were hanging up properly. Could changing the signaling be whats causing the DIDs not to function properly? My other problem is getting sendmail to work. I get the following error.. - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to my smtp server, details removed: DATA 550-Verification failed for [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550-unrouteable mail domain asterisk1.local 550 Sender verify failed 550 5.1.1 users email address, details removed... User unknown 503 valid RCPT command must precede DATA I cant find anywhere to change the login/pass info to change it to auth with a valid account from the mail server. Any help would be greatly appreciated. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Problem with Connecting PBX to Asterisk
As suggested by you, I have tried the timing parameter with 0 an 1 both but to no avail. Signalling I have tried are both em_w and featd (suggested by digium tech support). Zap show channels shows all 24 channels to be ok with no alarms. Zttool also confirms that. The problem is that the pbx (telrad) does not even seem to sense the T1 that is plugged in. No yellow and no green. Only the RED LED glows. But when I try a T1 loopback plugged into that the card turns green on telrad suggesting that the card is fine. (T1 loopback build using a small connector with 1 to 4 and 2 to 5 connected). Also regarding timing, I do have 2 X100Ps installed so I wonder if this needs to be primary source of timing? As I mentioned earlier I am getting a GREEN on asterisk side (TE405P card) while a red on the pbx side (TELRAD) Any thoughts? Clock source will be important here. For phase one, you should probably set asterisk to time from the PBX since the PBX is likely timing from the T1 circuit. At phase two, you will likely want to reverse this having your PBX clock from the Asterisk system and having Asterisk clock from the telco T1. This of course assumes that there is only 1 Telco T1 involved. Timing is the first most important consideration. After that, you want to verify that both ends are using the same signalling type (it appears that you are using CAS signalling). Check that your PBX is using CAS and find out exactly what type. Zapata will need to be configured to use the same type of signalling. Check both sides looking for any red alarms etc that might indicate a cable problem. From the CLI, 'zap show channels' or using zttool from the command line should help you determine the status of the link. Red alarms usually indicate that this end sees an out of frame condition while a yellow means that the opposite side sees and out of frame. A yellow on one side is a red on the other. Karthik Natarajan InfoPro Corporation 732-283-2589 x 241 [EMAIL PROTECTED] attachment: winmail.dat___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] FOP related questions
Hello, I have downloaded and installed Flash Operator Panel. version 0.21. It works pretty well and I have some questions about it. 1. The text label of the buttons are partially hidden by their icons. Is there a way to adjust right margin for the buttons? 2. I would like to have the fop brought in the front of screen whenever and extension rings. Sort of crm feature but with fop and not another url. Is there a way to do that? 3. This question is notre directly related to fop but you may have the answer. I would like to have fop panel in tis own windows (no toolbar, menu, title, ...) either with FireFox and Internet Explorer. Any Idea? Best regards, Daniel ANDRÉ ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom and CallerID
We have the following versions: App Version: 1.4.1.0040 (SIP) Bootrom: 2.6.1.0003 I also noticed that the polycom IP600 phones are Rev 3. --johann Chris Coulthurst wrote: Which software pack to you have for the IP600? Sip.ld, bootrom, etc... Chris Coulthurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] logged in agent make an outbound call?
Yes, I know. In this case the agent is logging in from a remote phone (pots line) and staying logged in. If they used agentcallbacklogin they could make outbound calls, but the long distance bill would hit their line, not the * box... You could use Agentcallbacklogin instead - the queue will call them when a call comes in, but they are free to make outbound calls in the meantime. Julian. Damon Estep wrote: Is there a way for a logged in agent (hearing music on hold) to initiate an outbound call without logging out of the queue? We want sales agents to be able to make outcalls when there is no callers in queue, but still be logged in to get new inbound calls if they come in. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] meetme mute status
In my little experience with Meetme, i have not found how to know if certain user is muted or not, so im keeping track of the commands i execute from the web interface, so i know if its muted or not. Its not so hard to add a manager event, check manager.c to know how to add events. On 6/22/05, bdz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, is there any way to figure out what the mute status is of the meetme conference participants? i personally can no see any difference on the output: kamikaze*CLI meetme Conf Num PartiesMarked Activity Creation 5000 0002 N/A00:00:40 Static * Total number of MeetMe users: 2 kamikaze*CLI kamikaze*CLI meetme list 5000 User #: 1 Channel: SIP/fizik-c4eb User #: 2 Channel: H323/ip$192.168.42.10:10659/14231 kamikaze*CLI kamikaze*CLI meetme mute 5000 1 kamikaze*CLI meetme list 5000 User #: 1 Channel: SIP/fizik-c4eb User #: 2 Channel: H323/ip$192.168.42.10:10659/14231 kamikaze*CLI i also can not see any mute/unmute event on the manager interface only the join/leave events come. any idea? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Su nombre es GNU/Linux, no solamente Linux, mas info en http://www.gnu.org; ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Spanish doc
404 - Not Found :( On 6/22/05, Leonardo F. Bauchwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi: We have finished the translation of the FAQ of Digium to spanish. They are already (in Spanish) available for download (in http://ourproject.org/projects/asterix/): * FAQ Frequently Asked Questions * Features * Hardware compatibility list * Fast Installation Zaptel All the documentation is available for download Soon the following documents will be finished: Volume one and Asterisk Gateway Interface (AGI) Bye Leonardo Federico Bauchwitz Coordinator of Asterisk documentation in Spanish https://ourproject.org/projects/asterix/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ 1GB gratis, Antivirus y Antispam Correo Yahoo!, el mejor correo web del mundo http://correo.yahoo.com.ar ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Su nombre es GNU/Linux, no solamente Linux, mas info en http://www.gnu.org; ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem with Connecting PBX to Asterisk
What about framing? ESF/B8ZS vs D4/AMI? -Original Message- From: Karthik Natarajan Sent: Wed, June 22, 2005 10:01 am As suggested by you, I have tried the timing parameter with 0 an 1 both but to no avail. Signalling I have tried are both em_w and featd (suggested by digium tech support). Zap show channels shows all 24 channels to be ok with no alarms. Zttool also confirms that. The problem is that the pbx (telrad) does not even seem to sense the T1 that is plugged in. No yellow and no green. Only the RED LED glows. But when I try a T1 loopback plugged into that the card turns green on telrad suggesting that the card is fine. (T1 loopback build using a small connector with 1 to 4 and 2 to 5 connected). Also regarding timing, I do have 2 X100Ps installed so I wonder if this needs to be primary source of timing? As I mentioned earlier I am getting a GREEN on asterisk side (TE405P card) while a red on the pbx side (TELRAD) Any thoughts? Clock source will be important here. For phase one, you should probably set asterisk to time from the PBX since the PBX is likely timing from the T1 circuit. At phase two, you will likely want to reverse this having your PBX clock from the Asterisk system and having Asterisk clock from the telco T1. This of course assumes that there is only 1 Telco T1 involved. Timing is the first most important consideration. After that, you want to verify that both ends are using the same signalling type (it appears that you are using CAS signalling). Check that your PBX is using CAS and find out exactly what type. Zapata will need to be configured to use the same type of signalling. Check both sides looking for any red alarms etc that might indicate a cable problem. From the CLI, 'zap show channels' or using zttool from the command line should help you determine the status of the link. Red alarms usually indicate that this end sees an out of frame condition while a yellow means that the opposite side sees and out of frame. A yellow on one side is a red on the other. Karthik Natarajan InfoPro Corporation 732-283-2589 x 241 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] voip-info.org unreliable lately?
Damon Estep wrote: I assume the bandwidth is being donated or something, but surely someone would be willing to donate reliable bandwidth as the knowledge hosted on the site (which is also donated!) is worth way more than the bandwidth. Sure it's the bandwidth? If the wiki is loaded, I see Server load on the bottom of the page, the numbers sometimes go as high as 80-100..? Not sure if it's a Linux (guess so? :p) but if that represents the system load.. 80 is a 'bit' high indeed. Cheers 80-100 might be a lot for the current environment, but given the number of * users it is very small. Point is the server and bandwidth should be able to handle a lot more users if we are all going to rely on it as the (un)official repository for * guides. I have seen many posts from users willing to pitch in, but still have no idea where the site is now or what the arrangement is. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] logged in agent make an outbound call?
What type of connection are you using to link their pots with * ? For the inbound part, * would be calling them to connect the call. For their outbound, could you not use the same mechanism that you are currently using to login, but dial the outbound number instead (so it is * doing the dialling) ? I would have thought that if they can call * to login, then they can call * to make an outbound call . Julian. Damon Estep wrote: Yes, I know. In this case the agent is logging in from a remote phone (pots line) and staying logged in. If they used agentcallbacklogin they could make outbound calls, but the long distance bill would hit their line, not the * box... You could use Agentcallbacklogin instead - the queue will call them when a call comes in, but they are free to make outbound calls in the meantime. Julian. Damon Estep wrote: Is there a way for a logged in agent (hearing music on hold) to initiate an outbound call without logging out of the queue? We want sales agents to be able to make outcalls when there is no callers in queue, but still be logged in to get new inbound calls if they come in. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Fwd:protocol TCP/UDP question
can you help me to configure lcs2005 with asterisk... I use SER to resolve the problem that there is for communication protocol...LCS uses tcp, Asterik UDP. Someone, knows how to do the configuration beetwen LCS and SER , SER and Asterisk? the function of asterisk is SIP-PSTN Gateway for the LCS PC-phone communicationù? or there is a way to configure asterisk to accept tcp communication from a server like LCS? thanks Navighi a 4 MEGA e i primi 3 mesi sono GRATIS. Scegli Libero Adsl Flat senza limiti su http://www.libero.it ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Extension Configuration Best Practice
On 21 de jun de 2005, at 17:20, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: How would you have asterisk know which IP to ring if nobody is registered until the phone rings?? You're right Andrew. I didn't thought about the ring... Honestly -- what's wrong with SIP/location1SIP/location2SIP/location3 ? For me, nothing. I would use some AGIs to solve that, or the serial rings like you told. Denis. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Manager Api
Hi One question for you! Which operation are allows by Asterisk Manager API? Can I connect to Asterisk server, create a new Channel,add channel on Asterisk server,specify a Voip protocol like SIP and generate Sip signaling? Thanks Ale ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] MeetMe Problems
Absolutely. Here is the CLI output. I made two attempts. First, I dialed inbound into an extension and then tried using meetme room 0201 from Server B, which didn't work. Then I dialed inbound into the same extension and then tried using meetme room 0215 which resides in Server A. Note that all inbound calls come into Server A, for it has the Digium card. SERVER A = gateway0:~# aa == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf': Found == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/extconfig.conf': Found Asterisk CVS-Nv1-0-7-06/01/05-01:27:25, Copyright (C) 1999-2004 Digium. Written by Mark Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Connected to Asterisk CVS-Nv1-0-7-06/01/05-01:27:25 currently running on gateway0 (pid = 2653) Verbosity is at least 10 -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/1-1' -- Executing NoOp(Zap/1-1, Inbound Call - 3211 - ) in new stack -- Executing Dial(Zap/1-1, IAX2/corona/3211||r) in new stack -- Called corona/3211 -- Call accepted by 10.0.10.13 (format ulaw) -- Format for call is ulaw -- IAX2/corona/16386 is ringing -- IAX2/corona/16386 answered Zap/1-1 -- Hungup 'IAX2/corona/16386' == Spawn extension (inbound, 3211, 2) exited non-zero on 'Zap/1-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1' -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/1-1' -- Executing NoOp(Zap/1-1, Inbound Call - 3211 - ) in new stack -- Executing Dial(Zap/1-1, IAX2/corona/3211||r) in new stack -- Called corona/3211 -- Call accepted by 10.0.10.13 (format ulaw) -- Format for call is ulaw -- IAX2/corona/16388 is ringing -- IAX2/corona/16388 answered Zap/1-1 == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/meetme.conf': Found -- Created MeetMe conference 1023 for conference '0215' -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on IAX2/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]/16390 -- Hungup 'Zap/31-1' -- Hungup 'IAX2/corona/16388' == Spawn extension (inbound, 3211, 2) exited non-zero on 'Zap/1-1' -- Stopped music on hold on IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16390 -- Hungup 'Zap/pseudo-1262753463' == Spawn extension (meetme, 0215, 1) exited non-zero on 'IAX2/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]/16390' -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1' -- Hungup 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16390' Here are the relevant sections in the .conf files: meetme.conf: [rooms] conf = 0215 extensions.conf: [meetme] exten = 0215,1,MeetMe(0215|qM) exten = 0215,2,Hangup SERVER B = corona root # aa == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf': Found == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/extconfig.conf': Found Asterisk 1.0.7, Copyright (C) 1999-2004 Digium. Written by Mark Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Connected to Asterisk 1.0.7 currently running on corona (pid = 5105) Verbosity is at least 10 -- Remote UNIX connection -- Call accepted by 10.0.10.9 (format ulaw) -- Format for call is ulaw -- Accepting unauthenticated call from 10.0.10.9, requested format = 4, actual format = 4 -- Executing Goto(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16395, 211|1) in new stack -- Goto (client,211,1) -- Executing Macro(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16395, stdexten|211|SIP/ 3211) in new stack -- Executing Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16395, SIP/3211|20|t) in new stack -- Called 3211 -- SIP/3211-3c74 is ringing -- SIP/3211-3c74 answered IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16395 -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16395 -- Executing MeetMe(SIP/3211-4ed5, 0201|qM) in new stack == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/meetme.conf': Found -- Created MeetMe conference 1023 for conference '0201' -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on SIP/3211-4ed5 -- Stopped music on hold on SIP/3211-4ed5 -- Stopped music on hold on IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16395 Jun 21 18:57:41 WARNING[8254]: app_meetme.c:667 conf_run: Error getting conference -- Hungup 'Zap/pseudo-510190782' == Spawn extension (client_INT, 0201, 1) exited non-zero on 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16395' -- Executing Hangup(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16395, ) in new stack == Spawn extension (client_INT, h, 1) exited non-zero on 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16395' == Spawn extension (macro-stdexten, s, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/ 3211-4ed5ZOMBIE' in macro 'stdexten' == Spawn extension (client, 211, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/ 3211-4ed5ZOMBIE' -- Executing Hangup(SIP/3211-4ed5ZOMBIE, ) in new stack == Spawn extension (client, h, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/ 3211-4ed5ZOMBIE' -- Hungup 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16395' -- Hungup 'IAX2/gateway0/16384' -- Accepting unauthenticated call from 10.0.10.9, requested format = 4, actual format = 4 -- Executing Goto(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16386, 211|1) in new stack -- Goto (client,211,1) -- Executing Macro(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16386, stdexten|211|SIP/ 3211) in new stack -- Executing Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16386, SIP/3211|20|t) in new stack -- Called
[Asterisk-Users] New Asterisk Implementation
Hello, I've been planning to replace my aging CENTREX switch with a new PBX and am seriously considering Asterisk as my solution. I work at a college, and we currently support just under 300 regular analog lines to the offices and whatnot. I was wondering.. Is asterisk ready for such a job? Would I be making a mistake to deploy this across the campus at this time? It seems that Asterisk is extremely powerful and I absoultly love the way it appears to integrate into almost any existing system, so it would be fantastic if I could deploy it successfully. I do understand that I would need to replace all of my existing telephones with VoIP-capable phones, and that I'll need to re-wire most of the campus telephone infrastructure (it's still all cat-3) -- these arent problems. I just want to be sure that it's possible to do this, and that im not wasting my time. Thanks for any insight provided! - Don Brearley HCC Computer Services ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TDM400P DevKit Problem
I installed the TDM400P and installed it on a system running on Fedora Core1, please refer to the steps below. I connected an analogue phone to the FXS port. When I pick up the speaker I don't hear the dialtone although when I press a number key I hear a DTMF generated. What could be the problem? I appreciate your help 1- First I installed the TDM400P in the PCI slot and connected the power socket, no problems found 2- I compiled zaptel 1.0.4: cd /usr/src/zaptel/ make clean make install 3- Configured etc/zaptel.conf fxoks=1; this is the location of my fxs port fxsks=4; this is the location of my fxo port loadzone=us defaultzone=us 4-Compiled asterisk 1.0.5 make clean make install 5- Created Sample configuration files make samples 6- Modified zapata.conf, now it looks like this language=en context=incoming switchtype=national signalling=fxo_ks channel = 1 ; this is the location of my fxs port signalling=fxs_ks channel = 4; this is the location of my fxo port 7- Modified extensions.conf [general] [incoming] exten = s,1,Answer() exten = s,2,Playback(goodbye) exten = s,3,Hangup() 8- Loaded the Zaptel Drivers modprobe zaptel 9- Loaded the xcfxs driver modprobe wcfxs THE RESULT IS: Freshmaker version: 71 Freshmaker passed register test Module 0: Installed -- AUTO FXS/DPO Module 1: Not Installed Module 2: Not Installed Module 3: Installed -- AUTO FXO (FCC mode) Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV E/F (4 modules) 10- Configured the signalling using ztcfg ztcfg -vv THE RESULT IS: Channel map: Channel 01: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 04) 2 channels configured. 11- Start asterisk asterisk -cvvv cli* Debarko ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TDM400P DevKit Problem
I installed the TDM400P and installed it on a system running on Fedora Core1, please refer to the steps below. I connected an analogue phone to the FXS port. When I pick up the speaker I don't hear the dialtone although when I press a number key I hear a DTMF generated. What could be the problem? I appreciate your help 1- First I installed the TDM400P in the PCI slot and connected the power socket, no problems found 2- I compiled zaptel 1.0.4: cd /usr/src/zaptel/ make clean make install 3- Configured etc/zaptel.conf fxoks=1; this is the location of my fxs port fxsks=4; this is the location of my fxo port loadzone=us defaultzone=us 4-Compiled asterisk 1.0.5 make clean make install 5- Created Sample configuration files make samples 6- Modified zapata.conf, now it looks like this language=en context=incoming switchtype=national signalling=fxo_ks channel = 1 ; this is the location of my fxs port signalling=fxs_ks channel = 4; this is the location of my fxo port 7- Modified extensions.conf [general] [incoming] exten = s,1,Answer() exten = s,2,Playback(goodbye) exten = s,3,Hangup() 8- Loaded the Zaptel Drivers modprobe zaptel 9- Loaded the xcfxs driver modprobe wcfxs THE RESULT IS: Freshmaker version: 71 Freshmaker passed register test Module 0: Installed -- AUTO FXS/DPO Module 1: Not Installed Module 2: Not Installed Module 3: Installed -- AUTO FXO (FCC mode) Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV E/F (4 modules) 10- Configured the signalling using ztcfg ztcfg -vv THE RESULT IS: Channel map: Channel 01: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 04) 2 channels configured. 11- Start asterisk asterisk -cvvv cli* Debarko ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: New JAVA application server for Asterisk - OrderlyCalls
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 09:36 -0400, Tom Rymes wrote: On Jun 21, 2005, at 5:05 PM, Adam Megacz wrote: Matt King [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am familiar with the OSI definitiion. I've read it again, but I can't work out exactly how asking for permission contravenes this definition. 2) OrderlyCalls MAY NOT be used to provide or augment call queuing without the prior written permission of Orderly Software. Maybe I'm wrong here, but his restriction does not seem to be a restriction on a field of endeavor. His restriction is a restriction on using the software to implement a certain function. If he had said You may not use this software for commercial purposes or Individuals engaged in agricultural activities may not use this software, or This software cannot be used by commercial software vendors, THEN it would be a restriction based on a specific field of endeavor. So what is different between these two: Individuals engaged in agricultural activities may not use this software AND Individuals or companies engaged in tele-marketing/cold calling activities may not use this software IMHO, that kind of exclusion does not allow this application to be called 'free' since it restricts your freedom to use it however you want... While I might agree with the philosophy, I don't agree with the restriction being placed. Also, I really don't agree with the other restriction saying that you can't use this software in order to derive some other function (eg, the equivalent of their other queue product). That definitely reeks of non-free Again, that might be their specific business model, but I don't think the 'free' software community will be bothered with their applications if they are so encumbered. Either they will be re-written (re-invented if you like) or else they really aren't important to anyone anyway Just my 0.02c worth PS, why would you need to host it on sourceforge anyway, why not just stick it on your own website ?? Regards, Adam Regards, Adam -- -- Adam Goryachev Website Managers Ph: +61 2 9345 4395[EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +61 2 9345 4396www.websitemanagers.com.au ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] (no subject)
can you help me to configure lcs2005 with asterisk... I use SER to resolve the problem that there is for communication protocol...LCS uses tcp, Asterik UDP. Someone, knows how to do the configuration beetwen LCS and SER , SER and Asterisk? the function of asterisk is SIP-PSTN Gateway for the LCS PC-phone communication thanks Navighi a 4 MEGA e i primi 3 mesi sono GRATIS. Scegli Libero Adsl Flat senza limiti su http://www.libero.it ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Manager Api
Hi One question for you! Which operation are allows by Asterisk Manager API? Can I connect to Asterisk server, create a new Channel,add channel on Asterisk server,specify a Voip protocol like SIP and generate Sip signaling? Thanks Ale ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream 100 pricing question
On Wed, June 22, 2005 17:17, Francesco Peeters said: On Wed, June 22, 2005 15:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the info... I am considering getting these to experiment with, so I can do some testing *before* I actually get in to the real thing. The cheaper the test period, the better, so 2 of these (which later can be reused in less used area's) look pretty interesting... I have several Grandstream BT101's that are slightly used and I'm looking to sell, if you're interested. Barton Where are you located? What price? Shipping? (Always interested in deals!) ;-) -- Francesco Peeters GPG Key = AA69 E7C6 1D8A F148 160C D5C4 9943 6E38 D5E3 7704 If your program doesn't recognize my signature, please visit http://www.CAcert.org/index.php?id=3 to retrieve the Root CA certificate. Ehrm... Perhaps you'd better respond off-list though! ;-) --FP ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk to NEC NEAX
although it has been announced, to my knowledge, the NEC pure SIP fone has not yet been released as of this date Ramkumar wrote: Hi, How can I make calls from Asterisk client to NEC NEAX 2400 traditional phone ? Is it possible to have a connection between Asterisk and NEC NEAX 2400, since NEC-NEAX2400 is an IP-PBX and supports SIP. Please help me to find a solution ;;; Thanks Regards *Ram Kumar* *Customer Support Engineer* *Barcode Gulf LLC* *Dubai** , UAE* *Mobile** : + 971 50 5594178* *Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Allen Niven GlobalFone 350 Fifth Avenue #6206 Empire State Building New York, NY 10118 +1-212-678-4381 office http://www.GlobalFone.biz ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream 100 pricing question
On Wed, June 22, 2005 15:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the info... I am considering getting these to experiment with, so I can do some testing *before* I actually get in to the real thing. The cheaper the test period, the better, so 2 of these (which later can be reused in less used area's) look pretty interesting... I have several Grandstream BT101's that are slightly used and I'm looking to sell, if you're interested. Barton Where are you located? What price? Shipping? (Always interested in deals!) ;-) -- Francesco Peeters GPG Key = AA69 E7C6 1D8A F148 160C D5C4 9943 6E38 D5E3 7704 If your program doesn't recognize my signature, please visit http://www.CAcert.org/index.php?id=3 to retrieve the Root CA certificate. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FXS interfaces
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 10:41:18AM -0300, Alessandro wrote: Does somebody know why no load modules to FXS? I used zaptel-1.0.7 version driver. [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.0.7]# modprobe wctdm Here's a clue: ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 3: Invalid argument (22) Did you forget that FXS interfaces are configured with FXO signalling and that FXO interfaces use FXS signalling? /lib/modules/2.4.21-27.EL/misc/wcfxs.o: post-install wcfxs failed /lib/modules/2.4.21-27.EL/misc/wcfxs.o: insmod wctdm failed You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root snip It's TDM22B device. It's got 4 modules. What color are the modules in positions 1, 2, 3, 4 on the TDM400P card? Don't be confused by the 0-3 numbering, just add 1. See below zaptel.conf: Just the relevant sections next time :). (The lines not starting with '#'.) Think opposite. Green modules are fxs and should be handled with the fxo signaling. Red modules are fxo and should be handled with fxs signaling. Note the red and green colors here: http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=fxsvfxo fxsks=1,2 fxoks=3,4 For TDM22B: fxsks=(position of red module)(position of red module) fxoks=(position of green module)(position of green module) _Don't_ plug a phone into a red module jack. _Don't_ plug a PSTN line into a green module jack. -- Mike ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
SV: [Asterisk-Users] voip-info.org unreliable lately?
I think he was referring to load measurements on the server, not the amount of * users. A guideline of how high load should be can be taken from the amount of CPUs on the server we're talking about. If the server runs on a single CPU, then ideal load is up to 1, it it's two CPUs, then up to 2 etc. Now, these are just guidelines. I am not saying that a server cannot handle higher load, but if it exceeds these guidelines, then it'll slow the server down. Therefore, unless voip-info.org is running on monster servers, a load of 80 is extremely high. Regards, Bjorn -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Damon Estep Sendt: 22. juni 2005 16:28 Til: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Emne: RE: [Asterisk-Users] voip-info.org unreliable lately? Damon Estep wrote: I assume the bandwidth is being donated or something, but surely someone would be willing to donate reliable bandwidth as the knowledge hosted on the site (which is also donated!) is worth way more than the bandwidth. Sure it's the bandwidth? If the wiki is loaded, I see Server load on the bottom of the page, the numbers sometimes go as high as 80-100..? Not sure if it's a Linux (guess so? :p) but if that represents the system load.. 80 is a 'bit' high indeed. Cheers 80-100 might be a lot for the current environment, but given the number of * users it is very small. Point is the server and bandwidth should be able to handle a lot more users if we are all going to rely on it as the (un)official repository for * guides. I have seen many posts from users willing to pitch in, but still have no idea where the site is now or what the arrangement is. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] logged in agent make an outbound call?
Calls into the asterisk box, including non-VoIP remote agents, are via a ISDN/PRI on a Digium T1 card. It is the same PRI that inbound and outbound calls come in on and go out through, there are no IP dial tone providers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Asterisk Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 8:41 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] logged in agent make an outbound call? What type of connection are you using to link their pots with * ? For the inbound part, * would be calling them to connect the call. For their outbound, could you not use the same mechanism that you are currently using to login, but dial the outbound number instead (so it is * doing the dialling) ? I would have thought that if they can call * to login, then they can call * to make an outbound call . Julian. Damon Estep wrote: Yes, I know. In this case the agent is logging in from a remote phone (pots line) and staying logged in. If they used agentcallbacklogin they could make outbound calls, but the long distance bill would hit their line, not the * box... You could use Agentcallbacklogin instead - the queue will call them when a call comes in, but they are free to make outbound calls in the meantime. Julian. Damon Estep wrote: Is there a way for a logged in agent (hearing music on hold) to initiate an outbound call without logging out of the queue? We want sales agents to be able to make outcalls when there is no callers in queue, but still be logged in to get new inbound calls if they come in. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Manager Api
asterisk2*CLI show manager commands Action Privilege Synopsis AbsoluteTimeout callSet Absolute Timeout ChangeMonitorcallChange monitoring filename of a channel Command command Execute Command Events Contol Event Flow ExtensionState callCheck Extension Status Getvar callGets a Channel Variable Hangup callHangup Channel IAXpeers List IAX Peers ListCommands List available manager commands Logoff Logoff Manager MailboxCount callCheck Mailbox Message Count MailboxStatuscallCheck Mailbox Monitor callMonitor a channel OriginatecallOriginate Call ParkedCalls List parked calls Ping Ping QueueAdd agent Add interface to queue. QueueRemove agent Remove interface from queue. Queues Queues QueueStatus Queue Status Redirect callRedirect SetCDRUserField callSet the CDR UserField Setvar callSet Channel Variable Status callStatus StopMonitor callStop monitoring a channel ZapDialOffhook Dial over Zap channel while offhook ZapDNDoffToggle Zap channel Do Not Disturb status OFF ZapDNDon Toggle Zap channel Do Not Disturb status ON ZapHangupHangup Zap Channel ZapShowChannels Show status zapata channels ZapTransfer Transfer Zap Channel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 10:49 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Manager Api Hi One question for you! Which operation are allows by Asterisk Manager API? Can I connect to Asterisk server, create a new Channel,add channel on Asterisk server,specify a Voip protocol like SIP and generate Sip signaling? Thanks Ale ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fwd:protocol TCP/UDP question
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: can you help me to configure lcs2005 with asterisk... I use SER to resolve the problem that there is for communication protocol...LCS uses tcp, Asterik UDP. prova http://www.winton.org.uk/zebedee/ It should proxy udp over tcp, but I didn't try it yet Sergio ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] New Asterisk Implementation
look at ser projects: asterisk is limited to 250 channels You need cat 5e and manage qos if you setup ip phones Harry --- Don Brearley [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Hello, I've been planning to replace my aging CENTREX switch with a new PBX and am seriously considering Asterisk as my solution. I work at a college, and we currently support just under 300 regular analog lines to the offices and whatnot. I was wondering.. Is asterisk ready for such a job? Would I be making a mistake to deploy this across the campus at this time? It seems that Asterisk is extremely powerful and I absoultly love the way it appears to integrate into almost any existing system, so it would be fantastic if I could deploy it successfully. I do understand that I would need to replace all of my existing telephones with VoIP-capable phones, and that I'll need to re-wire most of the campus telephone infrastructure (it's still all cat-3) -- these arent problems. I just want to be sure that it's possible to do this, and that im not wasting my time. Thanks for any insight provided! - Don Brearley HCC Computer Services ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] volume fading in and out
I've had several users today inform me that whilst they were on a call, the volume kept fading in and out to such an extent that they thought the caller had hung up. I would dismiss this if it were a single person mentioning it, but it isn't .. Has anyone else seen anything like this ? We haven't, and we've been running for nearly a year ... CVS head as of 3 days ago, TE410p ISDN32 EuroISDN Julian. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] New Asterisk Implementation
300 phones should not be a problem if you design the system correctly. If they are all analog sets with no transcoding your should fine. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Brearley Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 10:51 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] New Asterisk Implementation Hello, I've been planning to replace my aging CENTREX switch with a new PBX and am seriously considering Asterisk as my solution. I work at a college, and we currently support just under 300 regular analog lines to the offices and whatnot. I was wondering.. Is asterisk ready for such a job? Would I be making a mistake to deploy this across the campus at this time? It seems that Asterisk is extremely powerful and I absoultly love the way it appears to integrate into almost any existing system, so it would be fantastic if I could deploy it successfully. I do understand that I would need to replace all of my existing telephones with VoIP-capable phones, and that I'll need to re-wire most of the campus telephone infrastructure (it's still all cat-3) -- these arent problems. I just want to be sure that it's possible to do this, and that im not wasting my time. Thanks for any insight provided! - Don Brearley HCC Computer Services ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Asterisk Implementation
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 09:50:42AM -0500, Don Brearley wrote: I've been planning to replace my aging CENTREX switch with a new PBX and am seriously considering Asterisk as my solution. You have a CENTREX switch? I'm confused. Do you have a PBX? Do you pay for Centrex services from your phone company? Do you have a Class 5 swith with Centrex features? Why not take a cautious approach? Leave what you have in place. Install Asterisk and investigate the various line interface options. Enlist early adopters on your campus to participate in the trial. Connect Asterisk to your existing system with PRI. Gradually ramp up the Asterisk system and ramp down the existing system. -- Mike ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] How can you check that egTDM04B hardwareinstalled and drivers OK
Digium logged in and fixed the problem. It seems they had to fix the zaptel source code - so not really something I could easily have done. something about adding the subvendors ID to the cards source. So I assume a bug. I personally feel a little indebted to Digium for sorting the problem and obviously making the Asterisk available. But would like them even more if I didn't have to go through these problems ;) Angus - Original Message - From: John Novack [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 2:08 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] How can you check that egTDM04B hardwareinstalled and drivers OK Probably means that your perfectly good motherboard can't see the TDM card. There are many motherboards that this card doesn't seem to work with, Digium doesn't seem willing to address the issue or even acknowledge that is the case, and usually answers try another motherboard rather than 'fess up that there is a design problem with the PCI interface and correct it. PCI 2.2 is a stated requirement, but there is certainly more to the story than that. In addition, when the board CAN be seen, report rev E/F when the silkscreen reads Rev H, someone mentioned there is now a Rev I ( good luck getting an exchange ) and Digium 's answer is if we can see it through remote access then there is no reason to replace it, and if we can't, try another MB. Overall, if it works, lucky you, if not, Too bad. Hard to support Digium and suggest others purchase such a product. Best you look for other interfaces to Asterisk. John Novack Angus Comber wrote: If I try dmesg - no mention of a Wildcard TDM400. Sorry I am fairly new to Linux. In Windows I suppose I would run some hardware program which came with the card to see if I could manually set IRQ's etc. What should I be looking at now? Please feel free to point me to a good book or whatever you feel is appropriate. Could the card be faulty? My motherboard is an Intel D865GLC. I am running [EMAIL PROTECTED] version 1.0 Angus - Original Message - From: Mike M [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 3:14 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] How can you check that eg TDM04B hardwareinstalled and drivers OK On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 07:09:46AM -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: I am struggling to get my TDM04B working. Just to rule out a hardware problem how can I check that the hardware works? How can I then check that the drivers are loaded correctly? 1. from the linux command line, type 'dmesg' and look for Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV H (4 modules) if you see that, the TDM card is recognized by the OS. Here's what I get on a working system: [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# modprobe wctdm [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 01:0a.0 Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Freshmaker version: 71 Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Freshmaker passed register test Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Module 0: Installed -- AUTO FXS/DPO Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Module 1: Not installed Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Module 2: Not installed Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Module 3: Not installed Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV E/F (4 modules) Jun 21 10:10:55 b2 kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 17893766 XT-PIC timer 1: 2 XT-PIC keyboard 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 4: 357411641 XT-PIC eth0, wanpipe1 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc 10:3381408 XT-PIC Intel ICH2 11: 178236906 XT-PIC wctdm 14: 50492 XT-PIC ide0 15: 0 XT-PIC ide1 NMI: 0 ERR: 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 17894203 XT-PIC timer 1: 2 XT-PIC keyboard 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 4: 357419974 XT-PIC eth0, wanpipe1 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc 10:3381408 XT-PIC Intel ICH2 11: 178241275 XT-PIC wctdm 14: 50494 XT-PIC ide0 15: 0 XT-PIC ide1 NMI: 0 ERR: 0 -- Mike ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TE110P Card
Hi everybody ! I'm trying to setup a TE110P card. But i'm facind this error... and * cannot start. [chan_zap.so]Jun 22 11:50:33 WARNING[16384]: loader.c:248 ast_load_resource: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_zap.so: undefined symbol: pri_dump_infoJun 22 11:50:33 WARNING[16384]: loader.c:429 load_modules: Loading module chan_zap.so failed! Does someone already experience this case... Waiting for u'r help THANX MSEYE ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream 100 pricing question
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, June 22, 2005 15:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the info... I am considering getting these to experiment with, so I can do some testing *before* I actually get in to the real thing. The cheaper the test period, the better, so 2 of these (which later can be reused in less used area's) look pretty interesting... I have several Grandstream BT101's that are slightly used and I'm looking to sell, if you're interested. Where are you located? What price? Shipping? (Always interested in deals!) ;-) I'm in Arkansas, USA. $50 each + shipping? I'd prefer to ship via UPS ground if that's possible. If that's too much, then make me an offer. I just counted, and I have 6 (4 black, 2 white). They work fine, we just replaced them recently. I have some Grandstream HandyTone 286 ATAs for sale too http://tinyurl.com/8srg5 Taking this off-list might be appropriate. Email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Barton ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Channel Group
I installed a TDM400P with 4 FXO modules. Before moving all of my office phone lines to it, I decided to move only one for testing. I plugged it into port 4 on the card. In zaptel.conf I have: fxsks=1-4 And zapata.conf: context=incoming signalling=fxs_ks busydetect=yes callprogress=no musiconhold=default usecallerid=yes callerid=asreceived group=1 channel = 1-4 When I launch an outbound call as ZAP/g1/${EXTEN}, Asterisk goes to Zap/1 and I hear dead air because there is no line attached to that port. Shouldn't it be smart enough to go to Zap/4 as the only available port in the group? Thanks, Adam The contents of this email message and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. This transmission is sent in trust, for the sole purpose of delivery to the intended recipient. If you have received this transmission in error, any use, reproduction or dissemination of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply email and delete this message and its attachments, if any. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] automated response
I will be out of the office until Friday June 24th. If this is an emergency please call our office and ask for customer service. Thank you. Steve Hearst Accent Communication Services Inc. 740-548-7378 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] ISDN (PRI) in the US and Redirect?
Hello, I have read about using redirect on a sip channel to get * to step out of the voice path. Is this possible with ISDN or maybe a US T-1? I would like to have the * box answer a call, do some niffty IVR/AGI stuff, and then redirect that call back to the originating switch to be passed on to a dialed number or straight to a dialed number and then step out of the voice path to free up bandwidth. Is this possible or do I need to get involved in SS7 stuff? I have seen a lot of talk on the wiki about redirect but nothing that I understand as what I need. I have seen the manager API redirect to place 2 calls into a meetme but this is not what I need, also not looking for call deflect. Thank you for any sugestions, John M ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Asterisk and Mambo - help wanted
We do mambo projects all the time, contact me off lists and we can get you rolling. JD Kristian Kielhofner wrote: Hello everyone, So, this isn't exactly what it seems. I am not looking to integrate Asterisk and Mambo. I am the maintainer/creator of AstLinux, and I have recently decided that I should really have a better web site for it. I would like to use Mambo so that I can do updates easily, from anywhere, without having to waste time learning PHP/HTML/etc. Mambo CMS seems the best and most powerful way to do this. It's not that easy, however, to go from the default Mambo site to a site suitable for an open source project such as AstLinux. I just need some help to get a layout, theme, etc. going. Updates and maintenance I can handle (probably). So, what I am looking for is someone who is familiar with Mambo (and preferably Asterisk, too) and would be willing to help me jump start astlinux.org/.com. Because AstLinux is an open source project, I will be unable to directly compensate anyone (monetarily) for their work at this time. However, any people that help out are more than welcome to plug their own projects, companies, names, etc. on the site (within reason). Interested? Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Drop me a line. Thanks! -- JD Austin Twin Geckos Technology Services LLC email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.twingeckos.com phone/fax: 480.288.8195 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Garbled one-way audio only with ulaw
For some reason a couple weeks ago users began experiencing garbled audio in one direction when dialing out via our VoIP provider. This happened at multiple sites simultaneously. The VoIP provider doesn't think it's their problem. If I switch to another codec so that Asterisk transcodes everything is fine. On conference calls (where Asterisk gets in the middle to relay ulaw to all channels) everything is fine. Calls between sites via ulaw are excellent. We have plenty of bandwidth, and QoS in place. I've monitored and our QoS box never drops a VoIP packet (4569 UDP). Phones are Polycom IP500s. We're running 1_0_7 stable. Plenty of CPU horsepower (P4 northwood, 2x256 dual channel DDR, 3ware RAID for mirroring) to handle maybe 6 calls simultaneously. This problem occurs even when there's only 1 call on the line. We're now running GSM with decent quality, but I would love to get them back to ulaw. Any ideas? TIA, -Ron ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Performance Monitoring.
Hi All, Does the T1 PCI cards supported by Digium support Performance Moinitoring. If so are they in compliance with any of GR or ANSI standards of T1. Thanks, Somesh ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users