[asterisk-users] Testing 911?
It seems that 911 is important enough that when setting up an Asterisk box, it should be tested. How do you go about testing 911 dialing without getting fined for calling for a non-emergency reason? Is there some circumstances where you can ask permission from the city ahead of time? I realize this may be a real stupid question but I have not seen this discussed and I am curious. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: 7970 SIP configs
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... Hi All Has anyone got an annotated SEPmac.cnf.xml they are using successfully with the 7970 (8.0.3 Sip) and Asterisk? The SEPmac.cnf.xml files on the wiki are not annotated and although I've managed to upgrade the phone firmware and get a partial registration better info could speed it up. Is there a separate 7970 SIP forum/list anywhere? Thanks in advance. From this page http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+phone+cisco+7970+SIP Use Another SEPmac.xml.cnf example - it works for sure (I have edited this part and I'm using it on my 2 7970 phone). P.S. If you find out how to make work something from Still need to configure: section, please send me e-mail -- Tomislav Parčina Lama Computers Split Stinice 12, 21000 Split Tel.: +385(21)495148 Mob.: +385(91)1212148 SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail: tparcina#lama.hr http://www.lama.hr ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk Database
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... Rushowr wrote: I'm not personally sure, but if I recall correctly, the astDB is cleared whenever the Asterisk server is stopped... This is not correct. Hi Doug, Where can I find information's about maximum data that I can store in internal * database? -- Tomislav Parčina Lama Computers Split Stinice 12, 21000 Split Tel.: +385(21)495148 Mob.: +385(91)1212148 SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail: tparcina#lama.hr http://www.lama.hr ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: Clearing variables in the dialplan?
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... Hello all, Wanted to toss out a question that I've been looking into for some time now with no real results. When a variable is given a value in the dialplan, that obviously will take up a little memory. If you're running a rather large/complex dialplan, you may end up with variables you don't need after a while. What do you think is the best way to clear these out and free up memory? Currently I use: Set(varname=) To tell asterisk to set it to a null value. Any thoughts? If those are channel variable, they should be cleared when you hang up. -- Tomislav Parčina Lama Computers Split Stinice 12, 21000 Split Tel.: +385(21)495148 Mob.: +385(91)1212148 SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail: tparcina#lama.hr http://www.lama.hr ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... If it was a .tar.gz download then you will need to reinstall. Hi Matt! If I upgrade to 1.2.10 and than decide to go back to some prior version, how will I do that (using tar.gz)? -- Tomislav Parčina Lama Computers Split Stinice 12, 21000 Split Tel.: +385(21)495148 Mob.: +385(91)1212148 SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail: tparcina#lama.hr http://www.lama.hr ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Testing 911?
I don't think it's a stupid question at all. Testing 911 routing is very important, and it would suck to find out it didn't work when you needed it to. When I tested 911 at my wife's small business (we're on ZAP channels), I first called the non-emergency number for our local police department. Depending on the size of the city your in, they may tell you to call a different policy department where the 911 center for your area is located. I then called their non-emergency number and explained to them that we were installing a new phone system and needed to test 911 functionality. They said No problem, let me transfer you to the radio room, I assume when they transfered me I was then talking to one of the 911 supervisors or something. I explained to them that I needed to make two test calls (one to 9,911 and one to 911 as I have our system setup) in order to test 911 functionality, and informed them that I would be calling back immediately after I hung up with them. They said Sure, no problem. When you do the actual do the deed, identify who you are (full name), where you are calling from (business name, etc), and that this is a test call on a new phone system. They will usually read back to you the address they have on file for your phone number, and possibly some other information. If you are using a T1, PRI they will also verify some E-911 information you are sending (ANI? Help me out here someone...) Also, I think it's important that you close by telling them that you're done testing, or that you have one (or two, or X) more test calls to make. I tried to test out as much as I could in advance, so that I was fairly certain I wouldn't have to call them more then twice -- even though they know it's a test call, they may still be a little short with you on call #2 since I'm sure they have plenty of real emergencies to deal with. :) Along those same lines, use some judgement as to when you perform your testing. For instance, testing during severe weather, or during a hurricane probably wouldn't be a good idea. Along those same lines (and some what less obvious ;), you may NOT want to test on a Friday or Saturday night if it could be avoided. I actually used 411 while I was doing the initial setting up and testing to make sure I got everything right, then when I was 99.99% sure it would work, I switched the 4 to a 9 and tested it for real. Hope that helps! Swannie On Jul 17, 2006, at 1:05 AM, voiplist wrote: It seems that 911 is important enough that when setting up an Asterisk box, it should be tested. How do you go about testing 911 dialing without getting fined for calling for a non-emergency reason? Is there some circumstances where you can ask permission from the city ahead of time? I realize this may be a real stupid question but I have not seen this discussed and I am curious. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Testing 911?
On Jul 16, 2006, at 11:05 PM, voiplist wrote: It seems that 911 is important enough that when setting up an Asterisk box, it should be tested. How do you go about testing 911 dialing without getting fined for calling for a non-emergency reason? Is there some circumstances where you can ask permission from the city ahead of time? I realize this may be a real stupid question but I have not seen this discussed and I am curious. Actually, not stupid at all. I know in one case I have configured 911 to dial on a 7 digit number for the local police, and I spoke to the police to let them know this is my setup. In other words, when I dial 911 from my house (shoreline, Washington state USA) I don't want it to dial 911 from my office (FXO is in Seattle) as that would be calling the wrong police to the wrong address. I requested from the Shoreline police that they make a record of the fact that calls to them from my seattle number are actually coming from my shoreline address. Hopefully I never need to test this under fire... ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Testing 911?
I call and immediately identify this as a test call. I state the following. My Nane, and the fact that I am the PBX tech, (engineer confuses them). I ask them to confirm my address and call back number I provide to them. If all is OK I thank them and hang up. I do not think it is a false call if you identify it as such and give the information. I once was almost charged with a false 911 call, I had added a daemon to call my pager with a server number followed by 911 when a particular server went down. It was a typo and not only did the server number NOT appear but it was dialing 911 instead of my pager. I get a call from the building security that my office door was open and that there were firemen and police inside. I rushed over, thinking the worst and while I was there trying to figure out why they were there they get another call from dispatch stating that the person was calling again. After asking the dispatcher the phone number (ANI) that was calling, I disco'ed the modem. Thank god I was using POTS at the time. I acted stupid and told them it must have been a virus or something. I until this day had kept quiet, I hope the statue of limitations has passed Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of voiplist Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 2:05 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Testing 911? It seems that 911 is important enough that when setting up an Asterisk box, it should be tested. How do you go about testing 911 dialing without getting fined for calling for a non-emergency reason? Is there some circumstances where you can ask permission from the city ahead of time? I realize this may be a real stupid question but I have not seen this discussed and I am curious. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!
On Jul 16, 2006, at 11:12 PM, Tomislav Parčina wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... If it was a .tar.gz download then you will need to reinstall. Hi Matt! If I upgrade to 1.2.10 and than decide to go back to some prior version, how will I do that (using tar.gz)? I think if you keep the older source in a separate directory, you can always cd back to it and do a make clean, make, make install. This is only what I have gleaned from the list, so hopefully more knowledgeable list members will chime in. This is also the reason I have avoided building from SVN, as I like the idea of being able to revert to an earlier working build if need be... ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] IVR DTMF
Thanks for your help but where is should put this bash script ,can you guide me please Regards ...receiving digits from IVR through dtmf and store it on a text file short idea: 1 IVR start 2 set(number=) 3 playback(press_digit_or_#_to_finish) 4 (pressed) set(number=${number}${digit_pressed}) 5 playback(press_another_digit_or_#_to_finish) 6 if digit pressed goto(pressed[point 44]) 7 if # pressed execute System(put_string_with_pressed_didgits_into_text_file.sh ${digit_pressed} ${calleridnum}) sh script #!/bin/bash digits=$1 number=$2 echo $1 $2.txt Dear I want to make a billing recharge through receiving digits from IVR through dtmf and store it on a text file , How can todo that ? Regards * No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written confirmation by an officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by an individual in this electronic message do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium or its subsidiaries and associates. This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed to the addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from disclosure belonging to Xplorium. If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message and its attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this message or attachment or disclose its content to any other person. Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic message and any of its attachments, or that they are free from computer viruses or other defects. * ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 23:57 -0700, Martin Joseph wrote: I think if you keep the older source in a separate directory, you can always cd back to it and do a make clean, make, make install. or if you are lazy, make takes multiple targets so you could do: make clean all install all on one like that way and if one target fails the others shouldnt proceed :) 'install' should have a dependancy on 'all' so if you just do make clean install it should work the same. It will use the newer zaptel if you dont do that as well, so if zaptel is the issue that causes you to want to go back then you will have to do a make clean all install there as well. This is also the reason I have avoided building from SVN, as I like the idea of being able to revert to an earlier working build if need be... you can have different SVN repositories on your local system as well, and still do that, or use a release tag to get a specific version, either way. -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel Belfast IE +44 28 9099 6461DE +49 801 777 555 3402 Utrecht NL +31 306 553058 US WA +1 360 207 0479 US NY +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 http://www.trxtel.com the VoIP provider that pays you! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] IVR DTMF
Dear I want to make a billing recharge through receiving digits from IVR through dtmf and store it on a text file , How can todo that ? Regards * No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written confirmation by an officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by an individual in this electronic message do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium or its subsidiaries and associates. This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed to the addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from disclosure belonging to Xplorium. If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message and its attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this message or attachment or disclose its content to any other person. Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic message and any of its attachments, or that they are free from computer viruses or other defects. * ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Joseph wrote: On Jul 16, 2006, at 11:12 PM, Tomislav Parčina wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... If it was a .tar.gz download then you will need to reinstall. Hi Matt! If I upgrade to 1.2.10 and than decide to go back to some prior version, how will I do that (using tar.gz)? I think if you keep the older source in a separate directory, you can always cd back to it and do a make clean, make, make install. This is only what I have gleaned from the list, so hopefully more knowledgeable list members will chime in. This is also the reason I have avoided building from SVN, as I like the idea of being able to revert to an earlier working build if need be... Also don't forget to pay close attention to the messages at the end of the make process when compiling and installing Asterisk. It will sometimes tell you that there are modules inside /var/lib/asterisk/modules which were not compiled for the version you are compiling. If these are not asterisk-addons modules you will likely need to remove them. - -- Cheers, Matt Riddell ___ http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html) http://freevoip.gedameurope.com (Free Asterisk Voip Community) http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEuzqBS6d5vy0jeVcRAqspAJ0enhDY0coXa2TjQOym25413CMotQCfb6+r e+s/AhF5yPREzBQmm6SnlOs= =sZVl -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Julian Varanini wrote: So I can just install it over 1.2.9? This is what I did and everything seems to be working fine. Yes as long as it doesn't complain there are modules which were not compiled for the running version i.e. app_math - -- Cheers, Matt Riddell ___ http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html) http://freevoip.gedameurope.com (Free Asterisk Voip Community) http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEuzs9S6d5vy0jeVcRAjsTAJ9vPYf14YAHwtZgO7JYxqqeYPYzoACfQm5f QdZ4fd8P1qhzjZyKEoUjMHA= =XBlw -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] SRTP enabling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Joseph wrote: On Jul 16, 2006, at 9:45 PM, Abdul wrote: Hello, In some countries i found that they are blocking SIP port 5060 so instead of this i change to another port 1221, and its work well. But in one country the are not blocking SIP but they are playing with RTP packets, if they filtered it is VoIP RTP they are doing something called party cannot hear or some time caller cannot hear but called party can hear well. So i cosider to use SRTP to make encryption. and i am using my asterisk in VPS so i have full control to manage the server. If you guys have better Idea to prevent such kind of issue, it will be good for us. Why not use IAX2? Then you only have one port to worry about reconfiguring Or alternatively run the whole thing over a OpenVPN UDP encrypted network (really simple to set up): http://openvpn.net/ - -- Cheers, Matt Riddell ___ http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html) http://freevoip.gedameurope.com (Free Asterisk Voip Community) http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEuzuhS6d5vy0jeVcRAuYvAJ0UTWw2nZK+DWH8a9BE0w/klT8VpQCfSqd/ 07NexDPcXZsJA/t0VGFqZMA= =BcfJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Injecting prerecorded audio into active call
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nick wrote: Yeah a bit messy I guess. I had been hoping for a simple solution, but knew there most likely wasn't! The one idea I did have would be to use some kind of SIP api on the web backend. Then bring the backend extension into a conference, then from the web api you would have to select the call to play audio in. This idea would work well I think, as it would mean the system can be use regardless of the training call being active on the asterisk box, as long as their system supported conference calls. This is where I fall down though, I'm no developer! Anyone know of an api that would allow this? If you don't mind the call centre staff member pressing some buttons to request help in the middle of the call you could use a featuremap using features.conf and the playback application. - -- Cheers, Matt Riddell ___ http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html) http://freevoip.gedameurope.com (Free Asterisk Voip Community) http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEuzwjS6d5vy0jeVcRAuOLAJ9xBWUKiuFN2yLqxnnsYIXqig2XMQCfchOu 0EiFfyGOgOTwGSWxl2PrFwU= =luuK -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 19:21 +1200, Matt Riddell (NZ) wrote: It will sometimes tell you that there are modules inside /var/lib/asterisk/modules which were not compiled for the version you are compiling. If these are not asterisk-addons modules you will likely need to remove them. or modules from others that arent allowed to contribute to asterisk-addons or the tree itself for whatever reason, of which I have a few of those that have been specifically rejected for inclusion even though disclaimers are on file :/ politics at its finest. At least they work and it appears that some of them take less ram and cpu than default asterisk stuffs :) -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel Belfast IE +44 28 9099 6461DE +49 801 777 555 3402 Utrecht NL +31 306 553058 US WA +1 360 207 0479 US NY +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 http://www.trxtel.com the VoIP provider that pays you! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Sphinx and Asterisk Integration, How?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zeeshan Zakaria wrote: After several hours of searching the Internet, couldn't understand how can I integrate Asterisk with Sphinx voice recognition system. The sphinx software itself I've installed on my server. I need help from those who have successfully done it and can guide me how to do it. Thanks :-) Top link on Google: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Sphinx - -- Cheers, Matt Riddell ___ http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html) http://freevoip.gedameurope.com (Free Asterisk Voip Community) http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEuzxpS6d5vy0jeVcRAmdwAKCJ+w19Tg+fbEacnymqhBCc+xDu4QCfY5SS Ksu18Wqeqt/eDVeWVpwDUSo= =Qhar -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] priority problem
I use include in an other way than you do. i use different extensions, not the same in each includet context, maybe that makes more sense (to you) [apps] include = emergency include = cfwd include = mailbox [emergency] exten = 911,1,do stuff here [cfwd] exten = *31,1, enable cfwd exten = *32,1, disable cfwd [mailbox] exten = *41,1, enable mailbox exten = *42,1, disable mailbox Thanks again. But I want to ask what is the usage of include if it is a continue-until-matched type of contruct. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Polycom IP301 and Queues
Do you have a soft button on the IP301? I use the 501 and it works fine, you do have to use the special asterisk code for it to work correctly. It lets me login, logout, make the agent available/unavailable. You can read about it at http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=6119 I found you must also use the trunk version of zaptel and libpri, and make sure you use auth on the phones in the config. Hope thats what you looking for, if so, any problems just ask, its just taken me 2 weeks to get it working great. Regards, Dean. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Julian Varanini Sent: 17 July 2006 00:15 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom IP301 and Queues Is there any way to use the polycom phones to log into and out of queues? So the polycom phone could show their current status in that queue? logged in / logged out for example. Thanks Julian Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] PRI dropouts From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 20:47:17 +1000 Hmm - I have had 2 bad PRI installs out of about 20, and both times it was faulty wiring from the Telco. But getting them to fix it can be a real struggle! Paul Hales Technical Manager www.asteriskit.com.au On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 12:23 +1000, James Sturges wrote: Have had L O T S of trouble like this, the settings zap config files seem to have to e exact, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I will send config files. Thanks James __ From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Withnall Sent: Saturday, 15 July 2006 11:05 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] PRI dropouts Recently we cut over to using asterisk (trixbox 1.1.1) for our production system. We are using a TE110P digium card (Primary rate) with a Telstra onramp 10. Sometimes when people call, on their end it doesn’t seem to connect. On our end, we get caller id, it passes ok to the sip phone but then no-one is there. Anyone have any similar problems and worked out how to solve it ? Thanks. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Snom 300 headset with static noise
Have a look at this document: http://www.snom.com/wiki/index.php/FAQs#Q:_Why_is_there_a_humming_noise_when_using_the_headset.3FMichielThanks Michiel, that was the second thing i do, phone was connected to a well powered/connected switch.I could understand a chep headset would do that, but a 30 euro headset maybe is not goingto be the best... but should perform quite better.Maybe is a design fault , because the same headset connected into another voIP phone runs fine. Snom maybe have gone too cheap and too bad for his snom 300 ? -- Adrià Vidal[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Clearing variables in the dialplan?
On Monday 17 July 2006 2:12 am, Tomislav Parčina wrote: If those are channel variable, they should be cleared when you hang up. Thanks for the input, but I was thinking more in terms of clearing the variable during the call. I use temporary variables in my dialplans. SKM ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Parked calls
Hello everybody, I is possible to manage multiple call parked per line . I mean a caller (agent) have to park more than two call . It is possible to retrieve caller one ,two ,three, ... with a aplliction which one display the calling parked to a PC screen or a screen phone . Regards Harry ___ Yahoo! Mail réinvente le mail ! Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface révolutionnaire. http://fr.mail.yahoo.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] DTMF in QUEUES dont work
Hi, when im using only peer to peer call without any queues, im able to dial any extension or send any digit thru dtmf durng a call. but whenever i use queues then no phone dials any extension during a call or a conference. i cant even hangup a call using * key. Any ideas how this problem can be solved. im using H323 and SIP channels and i have set both channels to use dtmf=rfc2033.-- RegardsRizwan HishamSoftware Engineer ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: call forwarding
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... Hi people. I want to know about call forwarding. I dial *72, and a message say me to dial the extension , I did, then the message said is forward is UNCONDITIONLA . But when I call , it doesn't work the forwarding. Who can help me please. Without your dialplan - nobody! -- Tomislav Parčina Lama Computers Split Stinice 12, 21000 Split Tel.: +385(21)495148 Mob.: +385(91)1212148 SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail: tparcina#lama.hr http://www.lama.hr ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] priority problem
According to your setting, below is meaningless. Am I right? [apps] include = emergency include = cfwd include = mailbox [emergency] exten = 911,1,do stuff here [cfwd] exten = *31,1, enable cfwd exten = *32,1, disable cfwd exten = 911,1, do stuff2 here exten = 911,1, do stuff3 here [mailbox] exten = *41,1, enable mailbox exten = *42,1, disable mailbox On 7/17/06, Kai Ober [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use include in an other way than you do. i use different extensions, not the same in each includet context, maybe that makes more sense (to you) [apps] include = emergency include = cfwd include = mailbox [emergency] exten = 911,1,do stuff here [cfwd] exten = *31,1, enable cfwd exten = *32,1, disable cfwd [mailbox] exten = *41,1, enable mailbox exten = *42,1, disable mailbox Thanks again. But I want to ask what is the usage of include if it is a continue-until-matched type of contruct. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Snom 300 headset with static noise
Title: FW: [asterisk-users] Snom 300 headset with static noise There is a difference in the biasing circuit for the microphones in the headsets. Unfortunately there is no standard on the market. The snom phones 190/320/360 (lets say: type A) behave different than snom 300 (type B). So there is always the need to have different headsets or different cables (Quick Disconnect). Some headsets are just working with one type (those with extra amplifier) and other devices seem to work in both environments, but thats not really true. The headsets are always working much better with just one type. So if someone has a headset designed for type A, hell have a bad quality while connecting it to type B phones although he is able to here something. Dont forget to have a connection to an earth-signal (e. g. shielded Ethernet cable to PC/switch or earth-grounded power supply). Hope this helps, CS -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Koopmann, Jan-PeterSent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 1:31 PMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: RE: [asterisk-users] Snom 300 headset with static noiseOn Freitag, 14. Juli 2006 10:13 Adrià Vidal wrote: Someone using these phone Snom 300 with his own headset ?We used to but the quality was horrifying. Since we changed to Plantronics Noise Cancelling headsets everything is wounderful. We got horrible static noise on them?Maybe the article Michiel pointed out helps you still the overall voice quality of their headsets (at least the ones they sold last year) is awful.Kind regards, JP___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] priority problem
On 7/17/06, unplug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: According to your setting, below is meaningless. Am I right? [apps] include = emergency include = cfwd include = mailbox [emergency] exten = 911,1,do stuff here [cfwd] exten = *31,1, enable cfwd exten = *32,1, disable cfwd exten = 911,1, do stuff2 here exten = 911,1, do stuff3 here [mailbox] exten = *41,1, enable mailbox exten = *42,1, disable mailbox Why would you want (or need) to do this? As you seem to realise already, the do stuff2/3 here lines will do nothing. If you were writing a shell-script, and put a comment at the start of a line it would also do nothing - Should we change that too? You seem to be un-necessarily trying to rewrite the structure provided in the extensions.conf file. Is there something _functional_ that you cannot do that you need to be able to do? Or is it just that you cannot lay out the file in the specific order that you want to? Perhaps if you gave a real-life example with details of what you are trying to do, it might be easier to offer a solution that suits your needs. Regards, Steve ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] problems to call brazil from germany
Hi, I have problems to call to brazil, frome here in germany. the asterisk is connected to the telephone system via a pri interface. I use a preselected provider here to call out. when I try to call a number in brazil, a mobile phone here in the germany in the afternoon, when it is moring in brazil, then the chances to reach that number are next to zero. taking a mobile phone and call that number works fine. when I try to call someone in brazil, taking numbers found by google, then i can reach a lot of these numbers. anybody has an explanation for this? could it be that both carriers have different ways to route the call to brazil and the preselection provider has not so many lines for overseas? kind regards Sebastian -- Sebastian ReitenbachTel.: ++49-(0)3381-8904-451 RapidEye AG Fax: ++49-(0)3381-8904-101 Molkenmarkt 30 e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] D-14776 Brandenburg web:http://www.rapideye.de ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] IVR DTMF
in asterisk.conf there is "astagidir = /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin" it can be used for storing any scripts/programs fo *, it is suggested for storiong AGI scripts there example: /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/dtmf2text.file.sh Thanks for your help but where is should put this bash script ,can you guide me please Regards "...receiving digits from IVR through dtmf and store it on a text file " short idea: 1 IVR start 2 set(number=) 3 playback(press_digit_or_#_to_finish) 4 (pressed) set(number=${number}${digit_pressed}) 5 playback(press_another_digit_or_#_to_finish) 6 if digit pressed goto(pressed[point 44]) 7 if # pressed execute System(put_string_with_pressed_didgits_into_text_file.sh ${digit_pressed} ${calleridnum}) sh script #!/bin/bash digits=$1 number=$2 echo "$1" $2.txt Dear I want to make a billing recharge through receiving digits from IVR through dtmf and store it on a text file , How can todo that ? Regards ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk Database
Tomislav Parčina wrote: Hi Doug, Where can I find information's about maximum data that I can store in internal * database? According to the Wiki: The Asterisk database uses version 1 of the Berkley DB So, you'd need to look up the information on the Berkeley website, to find it's limitations. Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] DUNDI / regcontext
Thanks for the reply Brad.The relevant section of sip.conf was posted:[general]regcontext=sipregistrationIf you mean extensions.conf, I wasn't creating the extension in there other than for testing. RegContext correctly creates the context on registration but does not create the extension. If I create the extension manually, the DUNDi lookup works just fine. SimonOn 7/16/06, Watkins, Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you possibly put up the relevant section(s) of your sip.conf?It sounds like the DUNDi portion is set up properly, and obviously it's not going to find an extension that doesn't exist.Regards,- Brad From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Simon WoodheadSent: Sat 7/15/2006 5:59 PMTo: asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [asterisk-users] DUNDI / regcontextHi folks,I've been having a go at getting DUNDI working this evening to enableusers to register to any Asterisk box and to look them up from another. The DUNDI part works just great (very impressed), as does the subsequentjoining of calls between the two servers but I'm struggling withregcontext and would be grateful for any input.sip.conf includes: [general]regcontext=sipregistrationWhen a user registers, I get the Added extension 'XX' priority 1 tosipregistration message. However, 'show dialplan' does not show theextension and a DUNDI lookup does not return it. The sipregistration context has been auto-created but is empty. If I manually create thesipregistration context and add the NoOp extension, then everythingworks as expected.I've tried this across multiple boxes, each running different versions right up to the latest stable but the behaviour is the same. It is alsothe same with both SIP and IAX registrations and doesn't make adifference if the peer is defined in the .conf file or Realtime. They do all have identical configurations though so I suspect there might besomething in our setup which is conflicting.Any input gratefully received.All the best,SimonThe contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] PRI dropouts - solution I hope...
My files were almost exactly the same. We only have 10 channels and the clid signaling was different. We are however still getting the same problems. I moved the box closer to the optomux (now we have 2m cable from the optomux to the asterisk box.) Any other ideas? We still are having the same problems and also, some dropouts in the middle of calls. Could the card be faulty ? I purchased it from ebay second hand. PS. What does the Transfer=yes do ? Thanks. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Sturges Sent: Saturday, 15 July 2006 10:23 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] PRI dropouts - solution I hope... Hi, had a few ask for this so thought may be of interest to the list. This is actually for the following setup: Telstra ISDN30 - Asterisk - BP250 PABX The ISDN10, 20, 30s are all the same physical link, but you may need to change the bchan and dchan settings for ISDN 10 or 20. We have had lot of issues over 12 months, including physical cable issues, etc. But this config has passed Telstra test equipment both on site and in the exchange. The calls dropping out (for us) are timing issues do to telling Asterisk to gets it synch from the Telstra line and providing synch to the PABX. Anyway, Here it is, does not look like much but have had experts working on it for a while. The system handles 1800 2000 calls per day. Thanks James ZAPATA.conf [channels] context=default musiconhold=default switchtype=euroisdn usecallerid=yes cidsignalling=v23 cidstart=polarity hidecallerid=no callwaiting=no usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes echotraining=800 rxgain=0.0 txgain=0.0 group=1 context=te405p-intelstra pridialplan=local signalling=pri_cpe callerid=asreceived channel=1-15, 17-31 group=4 context=te405p-frombp250 pridialplan=local signalling=pri_net overlapdial=yes callerid=asreceived channel=94-108, 110-124 ZAPTEL.conf # # Zaptel Configuration File # # This file is parsed by the Zaptel Configurator, ztcfg span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15 dchan=16 bchan=17-31 span=2,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=32-46 dchan=47 bchan=48-62 span=3,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=63-77 dchan=78 bchan=79-93 span=4,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=94-108 dchan=109 bchan=110-124 loadzone=au defaultzone=au From: James Sturges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 15 July 2006 12:24 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] PRI dropouts Have had L O T S of trouble like this, the settings zap config files seem to have to e exact, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I will send config files. Thanks James From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Withnall Sent: Saturday, 15 July 2006 11:05 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] PRI dropouts Recently we cut over to using asterisk (trixbox 1.1.1) for our production system. We are using aTE110P digium card (Primary rate) with a Telstra onramp 10. Sometimes when people call, on their end it doesnt seem to connect. On our end, we get caller id, it passes ok to the sip phone but then no-one is there. Anyone have any similar problems and worked out how to solve it ? Thanks. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] priority problem
Actually, for the exten 911, it flows through do stuff, then do stuff3 instead of do stuff2. I want to implement it because I can maintenance the dial plan easily. Say, My default context is [mycontext], and your default context is [yrcontext]. We have some common contexts but not all. So I can simple remark some include statement of it is not necessary. As I expect, I can go thro' do stuff, 2 3 stuff and you can go thro' 2 3 stuff. But I am wrong in the design. Someone here suggest to use macro to implement my design. As I want to use ARA in my design. If I use macro to here, ARA will be meaningless. [mycontext] include = context1 include = context2 include = context3 [yrcontext] include = context2 include = context3 [context1] exten = 911,1,do stuff here [context2] exten = *31,1, enable cfwd exten = *32,1, disable cfwd exten = 911,1, do stuff2 here exten = 911,2, do stuff3 here On 7/17/06, Steve Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/17/06, unplug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: According to your setting, below is meaningless. Am I right? [apps] include = emergency include = cfwd include = mailbox [emergency] exten = 911,1,do stuff here [cfwd] exten = *31,1, enable cfwd exten = *32,1, disable cfwd exten = 911,1, do stuff2 here exten = 911,2, do stuff3 here === my typo [mailbox] exten = *41,1, enable mailbox exten = *42,1, disable mailbox Why would you want (or need) to do this? As you seem to realise already, the do stuff2/3 here lines will do nothing. If you were writing a shell-script, and put a comment at the start of a line it would also do nothing - Should we change that too? You seem to be un-necessarily trying to rewrite the structure provided in the extensions.conf file. Is there something _functional_ that you cannot do that you need to be able to do? Or is it just that you cannot lay out the file in the specific order that you want to? Perhaps if you gave a real-life example with details of what you are trying to do, it might be easier to offer a solution that suits your needs. Regards, Steve ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] asterisk sending connects when it shouldn't
When asterisk receives those messages you hear when calling an unreacheable cellular phone it sends a 'connect' over the terminating PRI line (digium TE410P), making the call seen as billed from customer's perspective. I don't know if this behaviour is a bug or something I can resolve with some fine tuning, so I'm sending to both lists. Since the calls comes from a SIP connected GSM gateway, is there some SIP code which corresponds to the 'pass audio but don't connect' we want here ? that's roughly the extension : exten = _X.,1,AGI(agi://127.0.0.1:54321/SomeAgiHere?someArgumentsHere) exten = _X.,n,GotoIf($[${CALLABLE}=TRUE]?chkmax:hangup) exten = _X.,n(chkmax),Set(GROUP()=${TECH_PRE}) exten = _X.,n,GotoIf($[${GROUP_COUNT(${TECH_PRE})} = ${MAX_CALLS}]?hangup:dial) exten = _X.,n(dial),Dial(${STR_DIAL}) exten = _X.,n(hangup),Hangup exten = h,1,Set(CDR(userfield)=${USERFIELD}-${HANGUPCAUSE}) Here the provider's trace of a call answered by asterisk : /HDLU 4/Port === LAPD === --- ADDRESS --- SAPI : 0 = call control procedures CR : ..1. EA0: ...0 TEI: 0 = non-automatic TEI assignment user equipment EA1: ...1 --- CONTROL --- --- I FRAME --- I FORMAT : ...0 N(S) : 86 P : ...0 N(R) : 31 === ETSI ISDN === PROT DISC : 08h = Q.931 user-network call control message LEN CALL R : 2 SPARE : 0 FLAG : 1... = the message is sent to the side that originates the call reference CALL REF : 226 MESS TYPE : 07h = Connect Here the complete trace : /HDLU 4/Port 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 226 Setup '500' '[called number]' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 226 Setup acknowledge 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 226 Call proceeding 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 226 Connect == should not 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 226 Connect acknowledge 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 226 Disconnect 16 normal call clearing 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 226 Release 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 226 Release complete - Here a trace from a correctly functioning non-voip system : /HDLU 4/Port 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Setup '500' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Setup acknowledge 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'c' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'a' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'l' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'l' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'e' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'd' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'n' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'u' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'm' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'b' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Call proceeding 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Progress 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Progress 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Disconnect 16 normal call clearing 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Release 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Release complete -- Simone Cittadini 2K Elektronika Tel +39.02.26265583 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] question ast db
Hi, I want to know about the content of ast db. It is like a registry of the asterisk to store information about register users. The similar user register information will be stored in DB in ARA. I want to verify that when user sends a register request and it is valid, asterisk will capture the user information in ast db and also in rdbms. Then when the user makes a call request, asterisk will use ast db to form a request message. When there is a call to sip user, asterisk will use ast db to find the location of the user. Am I right? /SIP/Registry/871963596932: 221.126.25.138:5060:60:871963596932:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 /SIP/Registry/871966742968: 210.184.23.31:15060:180:871966742968:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 /SIP/Registry/871966760539: 210.184.23.31:5060:60:871966760539:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] priority problem
Did You try CLI show dialplan ? if You set up 911 extension in 2 diffrent context and both context are included in third .. only one 911 will be available. 911 first loaded to asterisk dialplan will be valid and second will be discarded. Loading dialplan (example below) [mycontext] should load [context1] first, 911 aplly then [context2] is loaded .. trying to apply second 911.. but ther is one alredy ! mayby that is a problem ? Actually, for the exten 911, it flows through do stuff, then do stuff3 instead of do stuff2. I want to implement it because I can maintenance the dial plan easily. Say, My default context is [mycontext], and your default context is [yrcontext]. We have some common contexts but not all. So I can simple remark some include statement of it is not necessary. As I expect, I can go thro' do stuff, 2 3 stuff and you can go thro' 2 3 stuff. But I am wrong in the design. Someone here suggest to use macro to implement my design. As I want to use ARA in my design. If I use macro to here, ARA will be meaningless. [mycontext] include = context1 include = context2 include = context3 [yrcontext] include = context2 include = context3 [context1] exten = 911,1,do stuff here [context2] exten = *31,1, enable cfwd exten = *32,1, disable cfwd exten = 911,1, do stuff2 here exten = 911,2, do stuff3 here ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Testing 911?
This is the tact that I take, and it's never been a problem for us. Regards, - Brad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Lopez Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 2:47 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Testing 911? I call and immediately identify this as a test call. I state the following. My Nane, and the fact that I am the PBX tech, (engineer confuses them). I ask them to confirm my address and call back number I provide to them. If all is OK I thank them and hang up. I do not think it is a false call if you identify it as such and give the information. I once was almost charged with a false 911 call, I had added a daemon to call my pager with a server number followed by 911 when a particular server went down. It was a typo and not only did the server number NOT appear but it was dialing 911 instead of my pager. I get a call from the building security that my office door was open and that there were firemen and police inside. I rushed over, thinking the worst and while I was there trying to figure out why they were there they get another call from dispatch stating that the person was calling again. After asking the dispatcher the phone number (ANI) that was calling, I disco'ed the modem. Thank god I was using POTS at the time. I acted stupid and told them it must have been a virus or something. I until this day had kept quiet, I hope the statue of limitations has passed Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of voiplist Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 2:05 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Testing 911? It seems that 911 is important enough that when setting up an Asterisk box, it should be tested. How do you go about testing 911 dialing without getting fined for calling for a non-emergency reason? Is there some circumstances where you can ask permission from the city ahead of time? I realize this may be a real stupid question but I have not seen this discussed and I am curious. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Bristuffed Asterisk: Hangup problems
Hello list, I have just tested the new Bristuff-0.3.0-Pre-1r (released this morning) but it seems that the hangup bug isn't resolved yet. I installed Bristuff the normal way (just run install.sh) but Asterisk still doesn't hangup properly. Investigation of the sourcecode revealed that the peercallstate/ourcallstate in q931.c is still wrong. But, for some reason I accidentally got it to work (hanging up correctly AND running the hangup context). Here's how: Install Bristuff the normal way (install.sh) Go into the libpri directory in the installation dir. edit q931.c with the proposed patch we discussed here on the board. run make clean all in the libpri dir. run make install in the libpri dir. For what I've tested this morning Asterisk now seems to hang up correctly AND runs the h-context (including DeadAgi scripts which we need). Maybe there is an easier way yo do this, but this seems to work for me. I will investigate this further, but first i'm going to test Asterisk 1.2.9.1 to see if it fits my needs. Regards, Jeroen Zwarts ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] priority problem
Someone here suggest to use macro to implement my design. As I want to use ARA in my design. If I use macro to here, ARA will be meaningless. Yes, I suggested macros. Sorry, what is ARA? Steve ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Testing 911?
voiplist wrote: It seems that 911 is important enough that when setting up an Asterisk box, it should be tested. How do you go about testing 911 dialing without getting fined for calling for a non-emergency reason? Is there some circumstances where you can ask permission from the city ahead of time? As others have posted, test calls are allowed but the 911 center would prefer they be completed during non-peak times. The only way to know what their non-peak periods are is to give them a call on the non-emergency number and ask. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] DTMF
Hi Guys, I need a little help in using DTMF settings. Im using SIP and H323 channels, both are set to use dtmf=rfc2833. 2 days ago it was working fine, it still works fine when im in conference, for example when i use the following extension: exten=1234,1,MeetMe(1234|X|) by using this extension im able to jump to any extension i want by dialing that extension. The problem occurs when i use the Dial() application: exten=1,1,Dial(SIP/200,,tT) when i press # nothing happens i have no idea how to solve this problem-- RegardsRizwan HishamSoftware Engineer ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Connect to 'agi://blablabla' failed: Operation now in progress
Moises Silva ha scritto: AFAIK operation now in progress is a common status when you open a socket connection. When you use blocking sockets usually you dont see this because the connect call does not return until the connection is done. But when using non-blocking sockets, the connect call returns immediatly and if you try to connect again, you will get the operation now in progress message. I have seen this in my PHP Manager Proxy, but not sure what implications may have in FastAGI. May be it only tells that the connection stablishment takes a little longer, network congestion may be? We have a 'non blocking father' which spawns a 'blocking child' for each connection. So this can be the case, but I don't think it's related to network congestion, it's local on 127.0.0.1 and I see the messages even on low load. Oh well, since it works ... Regards On 7/13/06, Simone Cittadini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get a lot of this warnings in my logs. Connect to 'agi://blablabla' failed: Operation now in progress What exactly 'operation now in progress means' ? is asterisk still trying so the call isn't lost ? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] news
-- Ita erat quando hic adveni news.rtf Description: RTF file ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] PRI dropouts - solution I hope...
I have had the exact opposite results. I have hooked Asterisk up with passthrough on many different systems and always initially had setup problems which were fixed with tweaking. Maybe Sangoma boards will give you less trouble? Thanks, Steve Totaro -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hales Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 9:23 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] PRI dropouts - solution I hope... In my experience PRI pass through setups have been false economy. They seem to save a few dollars, but you still have to spend the money to save it and they never run as well. Paul Hales -- Paul Hales Technical Manager AsteriskIT www.asteriskit.com.au bus: 03 8320 8100 mob: 0434 673 529 On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 22:22 +1000, James Sturges wrote: Hi, had a few ask for this so thought may be of interest to the list. This is actually for the following setup: Telstra ISDN30 - Asterisk - BP250 PABX The ISDN10, 20, 30's are all the same physical link, but you may need to change the bchan and dchan settings for ISDN 10 or 20. We have had lot of issues over 12 months, including physical cable issues, etc. But this config has passed Telstra test equipment both on site and in the exchange. The calls dropping out (for us) are timing issues do to telling Asterisk to gets it synch from the Telstra line and providing synch to the PABX. Anyway, Here it is, does not look like much but have had experts working on it for a while. The system handles 1800 - 2000 calls per day. Thanks James ZAPATA.conf [channels] context=default musiconhold=default switchtype=euroisdn usecallerid=yes cidsignalling=v23 cidstart=polarity hidecallerid=no callwaiting=no usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes echotraining=800 rxgain=0.0 txgain=0.0 group=1 context=te405p-intelstra pridialplan=local signalling=pri_cpe callerid=asreceived channel=1-15, 17-31 group=4 context=te405p-frombp250 pridialplan=local signalling=pri_net overlapdial=yes callerid=asreceived channel=94-108, 110-124 ZAPTEL.conf # # Zaptel Configuration File # # This file is parsed by the Zaptel Configurator, ztcfg span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15 dchan=16 bchan=17-31 span=2,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=32-46 dchan=47 bchan=48-62 span=3,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=63-77 dchan=78 bchan=79-93 span=4,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=94-108 dchan=109 bchan=110-124 loadzone=au defaultzone=au ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel on dual processor, How?
Zeeshan Zakaria wrote: How to install kernel sources? On 7/17/06, *Dennis Gilmore* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 17 July 2006 12:05 am, Zeeshan Zakaria wrote: I am trying to install zaptel on dual Xeon processor but it gives error, saying 'You do not appear to have the kernel sources for your current kernel installed. make: *** [linux26] Error 1' Googled for many hours, but nothing, except to use non smp kernel. How can I build zaptel for smp. Install your kernel sources the process will vary depending on your distro -- Dennis Gilmore, RHCE Proud Australian ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com http://Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Zeeshan A Zakaria ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.17.6.tar.gz There's a README in the tarball that tells all.. :-) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom config file location
If you at least setup your ftp server, and point the phones to it, they will save a copy of their contact database so that will not be lost. Just edit and save an entry after server is ready and it will create the file. No too hard to use the web browser and look at each phone to get its current settings and manually create a config file. On Jul 16, 2006, at 5:04 PM, Avi Miller wrote: Stephen Murphy wrote: My question is: How do I get the current config files the phone is using off the phone? AFAIK, you can't. :( You can only provide new configuration files from your FTP/TFTP server. However, the Polycoms do strange things when they've been configured in multiple locations. You might find the phone overwriting the configuration files with its original configuration. That is not confirmed though. I've just seen my Polycoms do weird stuff in the wild. :) -- National Manager - Special Projects Melbourne / Sydney / Canberra / Hobart / London / 2/340 Gore StreetT: 1 300 SQUIZ (77859) Fitzroy, VIC T: 03 9235 5400 3065 F: 03 9235 5444 W: http://www.squiz.net/ . Open Source - Own it - Squiz.net ./ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom phone cycles between UNREACHABLE and REACHABLE
This will typically happen over internet connections. If the qualify message is lost, or takes too long the * server will stop sending calls. This is the normal function of qualify. I find that in most cases it is a matter of the end user saturating his connection on his end, assuming you are not overloading yours. On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:13 PM, Tong wrote: According to your console output it looks like there is some major latency. What is the average ping time from your asterisk machine to the polycom phone? - Original Message - From: Rana Dutt To: Asterisk Users Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 6:51 PM Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom phone cycles between UNREACHABLE and REACHABLE I have a customer with a Polycom 501 phone behind a NAT. His phone is connected to his Netgear router at home which in turn is connected to his cable modem. The phone is set up to register with our remote Asterisk server which is on a public, static IP address, with no NAT. If we set qualify=yes, our Asterisk console shows his extension becoming UNREACHABLE for a minute, then REACHABLE for a minute, then UNREACHABLE again, in an endless cycle. If we try to call the phone while it is UNREACHABLE, the phone never rings and the call goes straight to voice mail. This is very annoying. If we set qualify=no, then if we try to call the phone, the phone sometimes does not ring at all, and we hear silence. The call eventually goes to voice mail. This is equally annoying to the customer. What is the solution to this problem? We have other customers with Polycom phones behind NAT, and they don't have this problem. Will we have better luck if we replace the Polycom with a Linksys 942 phone? Here is some console output: Jul 16 21:44:24 NOTICE[19981]: chan_sip.c:11364 sip_poke_noanswer: Peer '280' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 174 Jul 16 21:45:33 NOTICE[19981]: chan_sip.c:9697 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer '280' is now REACHABLE! (3181ms / 5000ms) Jul 16 21:47:37 NOTICE[19981]: chan_sip.c:11364 sip_poke_noanswer: Peer '280' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 175 Here is the way the phone is set up in sip.conf: [280] type=peer username=280 secret=280 host=dynamic dtmfmode=rfc2833 callerid=John 280 context=company_x mailbox=280 nat=yes canreinvite=no qualify=5000 We are using Asterisk 1.2.5 with standard .conf files. We are not using realtime or databases. Any help would be highly appreciated. Rana Dutt Softel Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/389 - Release Date: 7/14/2006 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel on dual processor, How?
Zeeshan Zakaria a écrit : How to install kernel sources? As asked before : What distro are you using ? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] asterisk sending connects when it shouldn't (is there a q931-INFORMATION equivalent in IAX2 ?)
When asterisk receives those messages you hear when calling an unreacheable cellular phone it sends a 'connect' over the terminating PRI line (digium TE410P), making the call seen as billed from customer's perspective. I don't know if this behaviour is a bug or something I can resolve with some fine tuning, so I'm sending to both lists. this is the layout of machines : |gsm gateway| - sip - |asterisk client| - iax2 - |asterisk server| - zap - pri lines (nortel ?) that's roughly the extension on the server : exten = _X.,1,AGI(agi://127.0.0.1:54321/SomeAgiHere?someArgumentsHere) exten = _X.,n,GotoIf($[${CALLABLE}=TRUE]?chkmax:hangup) exten = _X.,n(chkmax),Set(GROUP()=${TECH_PRE}) exten = _X.,n,GotoIf($[${GROUP_COUNT(${TECH_PRE})} = ${MAX_CALLS}]?hangup:dial) exten = _X.,n(dial),Dial(${STR_DIAL}) exten = _X.,n(hangup),Hangup exten = h,1,Set(CDR(userfield)=${USERFIELD}-${HANGUPCAUSE}) Here the provider's trace of a call answered by asterisk : /HDLU 4/Port === LAPD === --- ADDRESS --- SAPI : 0 = call control procedures CR : ..1. EA0: ...0 TEI: 0 = non-automatic TEI assignment user equipment EA1: ...1 --- CONTROL --- --- I FRAME --- I FORMAT : ...0 N(S) : 86 P : ...0 N(R) : 31 === ETSI ISDN === PROT DISC : 08h = Q.931 user-network call control message LEN CALL R : 2 SPARE : 0 FLAG : 1... = the message is sent to the side that originates the call reference CALL REF : 226 MESS TYPE : 07h = Connect Here the complete trace : /HDLU 4/Port 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 226 Setup '500' '[called number]' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 226 Setup acknowledge 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 226 Call proceeding 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 226 Connect == should not 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 226 Connect acknowledge 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 226 Disconnect 16 normal call clearing 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 226 Release 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 226 Release complete - Here a trace from a correctly functioning non-voip system : /HDLU 4/Port 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Setup '500' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Setup acknowledge 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'c' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'a' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'l' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'l' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'e' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'd' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'n' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'u' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'm' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Information 'b' 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Call proceeding 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Progress 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Progress 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Disconnect 16 normal call clearing 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Release 0 TEI: 0 CALL REF: 246 Release complete On the asterisk client it seems that SIP correctly opens only a leg of the call : asterisk : 102 invite - 100 Trying - 200 OK asterisk : ACK (now I hear the audio) (I hangup) asterisk : BYE - 200 OK Destroying call 'blabla'@ip (with a normally answered call I see 183 Session progress instead of the first 200 while ringing, and the the destroyed calls are two) the iax debug : (still talking about the call that shouldn't send the connect on isdn line) -- Accepting AUTHENTICATED call from IP: requested format = alaw, requested prefs = (), actual format = alaw, host prefs = (alaw), priority = mine -- Executing Dial(IAX2/IP:4569-2, SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) in new stack -- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 002 Type: IAX Subclass: ACCEPT Timestamp: 00014ms SCall: 2 DCall: 00188 [IP:4569] FORMAT : 8 astegateway4*CLI Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 002 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK Timestamp: 00014ms SCall: 00188 DCall: 2 [IP:4569] Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 002 Type: VOICE Subclass: 8 Timestamp: 00090ms SCall: 00188 DCall: 2 [IP:4569] Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 003 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK Timestamp: 00090ms SCall: 2 DCall: 00188 [IP:4569] -- SIP/gateway4-20e0 answered IAX2/82.113.204.70:4569-2 Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 003 Type: CONTROL Subclass: ANSWER Timestamp: 04698ms SCall: 2 DCall: 00188 [IP:4569] Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 003 ISeqno: 003 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK Timestamp: 04698ms SCall: 00188 DCall: 2 [IP:4569] Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 003 ISeqno: 003 Type: VOICE Subclass: 8 Timestamp: 04764ms SCall: 2 DCall: 00188 [IP:4569] Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 003 ISeqno: 004 Type:
Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom config file location
Our 501's upload their configs to the server by themselves... Is this uncommon? Seems to me that if you had no config on the server at all but pointed the phones there anyways, they should upload their current set of files there and then default to using that set of configs until the server is updated. AlexOn 7/17/06, Jerry Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you at least setup your ftp server, and point the phones to it,they will save a copy of their contact database so that will not belost.Just edit and save an entry after server is ready and it will create the file.No too hard to use the web browser and look at each phone to get itscurrent settings and manually create a config file.On Jul 16, 2006, at 5:04 PM, Avi Miller wrote: Stephen Murphy wrote: My question is: How do I get the current config files the phone is using off the phone? AFAIK, you can't. :( You can only provide new configuration files from your FTP/TFTP server. However, the Polycoms do strange things when they've been configured in multiple locations. You might find the phone overwriting the configuration files with its original configuration. That is not confirmed though. I've just seen my Polycoms do weird stuff in the wild. :) -- National Manager - Special Projects Melbourne / Sydney / Canberra / Hobart / London / 2/340 Gore StreetT: 1 300 SQUIZ (77859) Fitzroy, VIC T: 03 9235 5400 3065 F: 03 9235 5444W: http://www.squiz.net/ . Open Source- Own it- Squiz.net ./ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- Alex Robar[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] PRI dropouts - solution I hope...
Is your dial plan very simple, ie bypass FREEPBX etc, to make sure no problems. There are also debug command in the CLI: pri debug span Enables PRI debugging on a span pri intense debug span Enables REALLY INTENSE PRI debugging pri no debug span Disables PRI debugging on a span pri show debug Displays current PRI debug settings pri show span Displays PRI Information maybe also set the debug and verbose and see what it says. Is your set the same, is Asterisk between the line and the PBX or just Asterisk? Have you tried just using Trixbox? Thanks James From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Withnall Sent: Monday, 17 July 2006 7:56 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] PRI dropouts - solution I hope... My files were almost exactly the same. We only have 10 channels and the clid signaling was different. We are however still getting the same problems. I moved the box closer to the optomux (now we have 2m cable from the optomux to the asterisk box.) Any other ideas? We still are having the same problems and also, some dropouts in the middle of calls. Could the card be faulty ? I purchased it from ebay second hand. PS. What does the Transfer=yes do ? Thanks. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Sturges Sent: Saturday, 15 July 2006 10:23 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] PRI dropouts - solution I hope... Hi, had a few ask for this so thought may be of interest to the list. This is actually for the following setup: Telstra ISDN30 - Asterisk - BP250 PABX The ISDN10, 20, 30s are all the same physical link, but you may need to change the bchan and dchan settings for ISDN 10 or 20. We have had lot of issues over 12 months, including physical cable issues, etc. But this config has passed Telstra test equipment both on site and in the exchange. The calls dropping out (for us) are timing issues do to telling Asterisk to gets it synch from the Telstra line and providing synch to the PABX. Anyway, Here it is, does not look like much but have had experts working on it for a while. The system handles 1800 2000 calls per day. Thanks James ZAPATA.conf [channels] context=default musiconhold=default switchtype=euroisdn usecallerid=yes cidsignalling=v23 cidstart=polarity hidecallerid=no callwaiting=no usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes echotraining=800 rxgain=0.0 txgain=0.0 group=1 context=te405p-intelstra pridialplan=local signalling=pri_cpe callerid=asreceived channel=1-15, 17-31 group=4 context=te405p-frombp250 pridialplan=local signalling=pri_net overlapdial=yes callerid=asreceived channel=94-108, 110-124 ZAPTEL.conf # # Zaptel Configuration File # # This file is parsed by the Zaptel Configurator, ztcfg span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15 dchan=16 bchan=17-31 span=2,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=32-46 dchan=47 bchan=48-62 span=3,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=63-77 dchan=78 bchan=79-93 span=4,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=94-108 dchan=109 bchan=110-124 loadzone=au defaultzone=au From: James Sturges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 15 July 2006 12:24 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] PRI dropouts Have had L O T S of trouble like this, the settings zap config files seem to have to e exact, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I will send config files. Thanks James From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Withnall Sent: Saturday, 15 July 2006 11:05 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] PRI dropouts Recently we cut over to using asterisk (trixbox 1.1.1) for our production system. We are using aTE110P digium card (Primary rate) with a Telstra onramp 10. Sometimes when people call, on their end it doesnt seem to connect. On our end, we get caller id, it passes ok to the sip phone but then no-one is there. Anyone have any similar problems and worked out how to solve it ? Thanks. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] [Fwd: where is the error?]
---BeginMessage--- Identifier 0, identifier_type 2 not found in identifier list given when sql query is : SELECT\ left(Customer.balance,instr(Customer.balance,'.')-1)\ FROM\ Customer\ Inner\ Join\ subscriber\ ON\ subscriber.customer_id\ =\ Customer.id\ WHERE\ subscriber.username\ =\ ${CALLERIDNAME} query works on Mysql... same error when I use Truncate... Any ideas are welcome :) Olivier begin:vcard fn:Olivier Taylor n:Taylor;Olivier email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;work:+3227470340 tel;fax:+3227470397 note;quoted-printable:MailScanner is like deodorant...=0D=0A= You hope everybody uses it, and=0D=0A= you notice quickly if they don't version:2.1 end:vcard ---End Message--- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel on dual processor, How?
It is CentOS 4.3 and kernel is 2.6.9-34.0.1-smp-i686 On 7/17/06, Olivier Picquenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Zeeshan Zakaria a écrit : How to install kernel sources?As asked before :What distro are you using ? ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- Zeeshan A Zakaria ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] [Fwd: where is the error?]
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 15:17 +0200, olivier.taylor wrote: email message attachment (where is the error?) SELECT\ left(Customer.balance,instr(Customer.balance,'.')-1)\ FROM\ Customer\ Inner\ Join\ subscriber\ ON\ subscriber.customer_id\ =\ Customer.id\ WHERE\ subscriber.username\ =\ ${CALLERIDNAME} asterisk translates , to | then processes it. try \, instead see if that cures your errors. -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel Belfast IE +44 28 9099 6461DE +49 801 777 555 3402 Utrecht NL +31 306 553058 US WA +1 360 207 0479 US NY +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 http://www.trxtel.com the VoIP provider that pays you! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Sphinx and Asterisk Integration, How?
I searched these pages already, but don't understand what is needed to be done. They are missing a few steps which are needed for people not very advanced in programming. On 7/17/06, Matt Riddell (NZ) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1Zeeshan Zakaria wrote: After several hours of searching the Internet, couldn't understand how can I integrate Asterisk with Sphinx voice recognition system. The sphinx software itself I've installed on my server. I need help from those who have successfully done it and can guide me how to do it. Thanks:-)Top link on Google:http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Sphinx- --Cheers,Matt Riddell ___http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)http://freevoip.gedameurope.com (Free Asterisk Voip Community)http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.orgiD8DBQFEuzxpS6d5vy0jeVcRAmdwAKCJ+w19Tg+fbEacnymqhBCc+xDu4QCfY5SSKsu18Wqeqt/eDVeWVpwDUSo==Qhar-END PGP SIGNATURE- ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- Zeeshan A Zakaria ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel on dual processor, How?
Zeeshan Zakaria a écrit : It is CentOS 4.3 and kernel is 2.6.9-34.0.1-smp-i686 Then you might want to use yum to install the apropriate package, the one that contains the kernel source, or at the very least the kernel headers . Or you might grab it on a Cent OS mirror, for exemple: ftp://ftp.dedibox.fr/centos/4.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-devel-2.6.9-34.0.1.EL.i686.rpm I'm no Cent OS expert, but that should be the right rpm . ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] problems to call brazil from germany
Callme stupid, but im not understanding your problem. Suggestions that may help others to answer: 1. A little bit more clear in your examples? :) 2. Try describing the Asterisk behaviour under every circumstance. Regards On 7/17/06, Sebastian Reitenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have problems to call to brazil, frome here in germany. the asterisk is connected to the telephone system via a pri interface. I use a preselected provider here to call out. when I try to call a number in brazil, a mobile phone here in the germany in the afternoon, when it is moring in brazil, then the chances to reach that number are next to zero. taking a mobile phone and call that number works fine. when I try to call someone in brazil, taking numbers found by google, then i can reach a lot of these numbers. anybody has an explanation for this? could it be that both carriers have different ways to route the call to brazil and the preselection provider has not so many lines for overseas? kind regards Sebastian -- Sebastian ReitenbachTel.: ++49-(0)3381-8904-451 RapidEye AG Fax: ++49-(0)3381-8904-101 Molkenmarkt 30 e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] D-14776 Brandenburg web:http://www.rapideye.de ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Su nombre es GNU/Linux, no solamente Linux, mas info en http://www.gnu.org; ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Hitting # to Transfer out of a Queue
I have dialled into a Queue, and an agent has answered the call with AgentcallbackLogin(). The agent hits #1, to transfer the call. Asterisk responds with 'Transfer', followed by dial tone. As soon as I enter a digit, Asterisk responds with 'I am sorry. That is not a valid extension' This is working for regular user-user dialling, not going through Queues. The queue app has Tt passed to it. Anyone got any ideas? Doug. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] What is ZapRas used for ?
Hi list, What is ZapRas used for ? I would like to use asterisk as a RAS server replacing a Cisco RAS server where users calls to a number directed to asterisk, and here, asterisk answer the data calls and assign an IP address via PPP to calling user. Is is possible ? Thanks. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] can no more compile zaptel !!!
Hi all, I was refreshing a running asterisk with last versions. I am no more able to compile zaptlel package; make hung on vpm450 I saw it was introduced last 7/7/2006 (http://ftp.digium.com/pub/telephony/zaptel/releases/ChangeLog-1.2.7) I don't know which is the purpose of this driver, but obviously something is missing im my box. first lines of error output /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:34:20: error: octdef.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:36:36: error: apilib/octapi_largmath.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:38:40: error: oct6100api/oct6100_defines.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:39:39: error: oct6100api/oct6100_errors.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:40:38: error: oct6100api/oct6100_apiud.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:42:33: error: apilib/octapi_llman.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:44:41: error: oct6100api/oct6100_tlv_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:45:47: error: oct6100api/oct6100_chip_open_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:46:48: error: oct6100api/oct6100_chip_stats_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:47:48: error: oct6100api/oct6100_interrupts_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:48:45: error: oct6100api/oct6100_channel_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:49:50: error: oct6100api/oct6100_remote_debug_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:50:43: error: oct6100api/oct6100_debug_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:51:41: error: oct6100api/oct6100_api_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:52:48: error: oct6100api/oct6100_adpcm_chan_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:54:47: error: oct6100api/oct6100_interrupts_pub.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:55:46: error: oct6100api/oct6100_chip_open_pub.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:56:44: error: oct6100api/oct6100_channel_pub.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:57:47: error: oct6100api/oct6100_adpcm_chan_pub.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:59:36: error: oct6100_chip_open_priv.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:60:40: error: oct6100_miscellaneous_priv.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:61:33: error: oct6100_memory_priv.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:62:31: error: oct6100_tsst_priv.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:63:34: error: oct6100_channel_priv.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:64:37: error: oct6100_adpcm_chan_priv.h: No such file or directory Actually I have no one of these files. Is it a svn problem ? svn checkout http://svn.digium.com/svn/zaptel/branches/1.2 zaptel-1.2 thanks in advance, Andrea Chi ricevesse questa mail per errore e' gentilmente pregato di cancellarla. Visitate il sito http://www.frameweb.it ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Hitting # to Transfer out of a Queue
Douglas Garstang ha scritto: I have dialled into a Queue, and an agent has answered the call with AgentcallbackLogin(). The agent hits #1, to transfer the call. Asterisk responds with 'Transfer', followed by dial tone. As soon as I enter a digit, Asterisk responds with 'I am sorry. That is not a valid extension' This is working for regular user-user dialling, not going through Queues. The queue app has Tt passed to it. Anyone got any ideas? In the queue configuration there is a context used when dialing (also in this case). Also, check the console, something like unable to find XY extension in KZ context must come out with the error. Byez. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] What is ZapRas used for ?
Angel Diaz wrote: Hi list, What is ZapRas used for ? I would like to use asterisk as a RAS server replacing a Cisco RAS server where users calls to a number directed to asterisk, and here, asterisk answer the data calls and assign an IP address via PPP to calling user. ZapRAS allows Asterisk to act as a dialup server for ISDN DATA calls only. It does not support modem calls. -- Now accepting new clients in Birmingham, Atlanta, Huntsville, Chattanooga, and Montgomery. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] can no more compile zaptel !!!
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=7536 Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 July 2006 15:25 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] can no more compile zaptel !!! Hi all, I was refreshing a running asterisk with last versions. I am no more able to compile zaptlel package; make hung on vpm450 I saw it was introduced last 7/7/2006 (http://ftp.digium.com/pub/telephony/zaptel/releases/ChangeLog-1.2.7) I don't know which is the purpose of this driver, but obviously something is missing im my box. first lines of error output /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:34:20: error: octdef.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:36:36: error: apilib/octapi_largmath.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:38:40: error: oct6100api/oct6100_defines.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:39:39: error: oct6100api/oct6100_errors.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:40:38: error: oct6100api/oct6100_apiud.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:42:33: error: apilib/octapi_llman.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:44:41: error: oct6100api/oct6100_tlv_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:45:47: error: oct6100api/oct6100_chip_open_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:46:48: error: oct6100api/oct6100_chip_stats_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:47:48: error: oct6100api/oct6100_interrupts_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:48:45: error: oct6100api/oct6100_channel_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:49:50: error: oct6100api/oct6100_remote_debug_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:50:43: error: oct6100api/oct6100_debug_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:51:41: error: oct6100api/oct6100_api_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:52:48: error: oct6100api/oct6100_adpcm_chan_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:54:47: error: oct6100api/oct6100_interrupts_pub.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:55:46: error: oct6100api/oct6100_chip_open_pub.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:56:44: error: oct6100api/oct6100_channel_pub.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:57:47: error: oct6100api/oct6100_adpcm_chan_pub.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:59:36: error: oct6100_chip_open_priv.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:60:40: error: oct6100_miscellaneous_priv.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:61:33: error: oct6100_memory_priv.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:62:31: error: oct6100_tsst_priv.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:63:34: error: oct6100_channel_priv.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:64:37: error: oct6100_adpcm_chan_priv.h: No such file or directory Actually I have no one of these files. Is it a svn problem ? svn checkout http://svn.digium.com/svn/zaptel/branches/1.2 zaptel-1.2 thanks in advance, Andrea Chi ricevesse questa mail per errore e' gentilmente pregato di cancellarla. Visitate il sito http://www.frameweb.it ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] can no more compile zaptel !!!
Ok, I found it is an open bug. http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=7536 so I will follow that bug there thanks , Andrea [EMAIL PROTECTED] .it Sent by: To asterisk-users-bo asterisk-users@lists.digium.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc m.com Subject [asterisk-users] can no more 17/07/2006 16.25 compile zaptel !!! Please respond to Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] ists.digium.com Hi all, I was refreshing a running asterisk with last versions. I am no more able to compile zaptlel package; make hung on vpm450 I saw it was introduced last 7/7/2006 (http://ftp.digium.com/pub/telephony/zaptel/releases/ChangeLog-1.2.7) I don't know which is the purpose of this driver, but obviously something is missing im my box. first lines of error output /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:34:20: error: octdef.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:36:36: error: apilib/octapi_largmath.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:38:40: error: oct6100api/oct6100_defines.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:39:39: error: oct6100api/oct6100_errors.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:40:38: error: oct6100api/oct6100_apiud.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:42:33: error: apilib/octapi_llman.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:44:41: error: oct6100api/oct6100_tlv_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:45:47: error: oct6100api/oct6100_chip_open_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:46:48: error: oct6100api/oct6100_chip_stats_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:47:48: error: oct6100api/oct6100_interrupts_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:48:45: error: oct6100api/oct6100_channel_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:49:50: error: oct6100api/oct6100_remote_debug_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:50:43: error: oct6100api/oct6100_debug_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:51:41: error: oct6100api/oct6100_api_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:52:48: error: oct6100api/oct6100_adpcm_chan_inst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:54:47: error: oct6100api/oct6100_interrupts_pub.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:55:46: error: oct6100api/oct6100_chip_open_pub.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:56:44: error: oct6100api/oct6100_channel_pub.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:57:47: error: oct6100api/oct6100_adpcm_chan_pub.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:59:36: error: oct6100_chip_open_priv.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:60:40: error: oct6100_miscellaneous_priv.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:61:33: error: oct6100_memory_priv.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:62:31: error: oct6100_tsst_priv.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:63:34: error: oct6100_channel_priv.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/zaptel-1.2/vpm450m.c:64:37: error: oct6100_adpcm_chan_priv.h: No such file or directory Actually I have no one of these files. Is it a svn problem ? svn checkout http://svn.digium.com/svn/zaptel/branches/1.2 zaptel-1.2 thanks in advance, Andrea Chi ricevesse questa mail per errore e' gentilmente pregato di cancellarla. Visitate il sito http://www.frameweb.it ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!
You can use svn export to grab a copy of the source and then archive that directory. Roughly the same difference. -jwb Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless -Original Message- From: Matt Riddell (NZ) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:21:37 To:Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released! -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Joseph wrote: On Jul 16, 2006, at 11:12 PM, Tomislav Parčina wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... If it was a .tar.gz download then you will need to reinstall. Hi Matt! If I upgrade to 1.2.10 and than decide to go back to some prior version, how will I do that (using tar.gz)? I think if you keep the older source in a separate directory, you can always cd back to it and do a make clean, make, make install. This is only what I have gleaned from the list, so hopefully more knowledgeable list members will chime in. This is also the reason I have avoided building from SVN, as I like the idea of being able to revert to an earlier working build if need be... Also don't forget to pay close attention to the messages at the end of the make process when compiling and installing Asterisk. It will sometimes tell you that there are modules inside /var/lib/asterisk/modules which were not compiled for the version you are compiling. If these are not asterisk-addons modules you will likely need to remove them. - -- Cheers, Matt Riddell ___ http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html) http://freevoip.gedameurope.com (Free Asterisk Voip Community) http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEuzqBS6d5vy0jeVcRAqspAJ0enhDY0coXa2TjQOym25413CMotQCfb6+r e+s/AhF5yPREzBQmm6SnlOs= =sZVl -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!
Last week I had asked about which * version to use. The response was that if using queues, 1.2.4 was stable and another response stated that 1.2.9 was stable with queues as long as CallBackLogin was not used. Has this been addressed in 1.2.10? Is it even accurate or should I be looking to deploy 1.2.4 for stability? W ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] One extension can transfer internal calls, can't transfer incoming external calls
Greetings list, I've been bashing my head against a brick wall for a couple of weeks now to try and get this sorted, have been scouring google/the asterisk-users list archives to no avail. The problem I am having is that one extension (an off-site iaxy) cannot transfer incoming calls from our IAX provider, but can transfer internal calls. We can transfer incoming external calls on site using our cisco 7960's, just not remotely with the iaxy. I thought I had cracked it this morning when I found out about the notransfer=yes option for the IAX2 peers, to prevent the call from being reinvited by the iaxy, and not going through the asterisk server, but although the call is staying through the asterisk box, it's still not possible to transfer an incoming call from the iaxy to one of the cisco phones. Basically, this is what works and doesn't Iax provider - asterisk server - iaxy = iaxy cannot transfer the call Iax provider - asterisk server - cisco 7960 = 7960 can transfer the call Cisco 7960 - asterisk server - iaxy = whoever makes the call, both users can transfer. The blind transfer is being done by using the # key, we're using asterisk 1.0.9 (downgraded after trying a higher version (think it was .23ish) that dropped external calls after 3 minutes). The (I think) relevant bits from extensions.conf, sip.conf, and iax.conf (suitably munged for public distribution ;) ) are below. I've tried adding Tt to the end of every dial string I can, and even tried it on the end of the GotoIfTime line of the [iaxprovider-in] section of extensions.conf, which I doubt will make any difference if it's there or not. The DTMF detection is working fine for both the iaxy and the cisco phone, both users can use the voicemail application fine, and dtmf tones get passed through to call centres etc. Has anybody come across anything like this in the past, where certain extensions can only sometimes forward calls? I have noticed that in the iaxy provisioning it's possible to disable call transfer, does this mean that the iaxy has it's own key combination for call transfer? Cheers in advance, Mat extensions.conf [default] exten = 23,1,dial(SIP/sipuser,12,Tt) exten = 23,2,Voicemail(su23) exten = sipuser,1,goto(23,1) exten = 34,1,dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED],20,Tt) exten = 34,2,Voicemail(su34) [iaxprovider-in] exten = incomingiaxprovidernumber,1,Answer exten = incomingiaxprovidernumber,2,Wait,1 exten = incomingiaxprovidernumber,3,NoOp(--- ${CALLERID} calling on INCOMING IAX PROVIDER (${EXTEN}) ---) exten = incomingiaxprovidernumber,4,Wait,1 exten = incomingiaxprovidernumber,5,GotoIfTime(9:00-17:00|mon-fri|*|*?office-hours,s ,1,Tt) exten = incomingiaxprovidernumber,6,Background(officeclosed) exten = incomingiaxprovidernumber,7,Voicemail(s01) exten = incomingiaxprovidernumber,8,Hangup [office-hours] exten = s,1,NoOp() exten = s,2,NoOp() exten = s,3,NoOp() exten = s,4,Dial(SIP/sipuserIAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED],18,Tt) exten = s,5,Answer exten = s,6,Wait,1 exten = s,7,Voicemail(su01) exten = s,8,Hangup iax.conf: [iaxy1] type=friend accountcode=iaxy host=dynamic notransfer=yes username=iaxy1 secret=secret context=default disallow=all allow=ulaw callerid=IAXy 1 34 trunk=no sip.conf [sipuser] type=friend host=dynamic dtmfmode=inband username=ciscophone secret=ciscophone qualify=200 reinvite=no canreinvite=no disallow=all allow=ulaw allow=alaw nat=yes mailbox=23,01 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 callerid=Mat 23 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Polycom config file location
Been working with Polycom 301/501/601 for almost a year now and I've _never_ seen that behaviour! I'd love to see ngrep output of the communication between the phone and the FTP server for this. -Original Message-From: Alex Robar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 6:48 AMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom config file locationOur 501's upload their configs to the server by themselves... Is this uncommon? Seems to me that if you had no config on the server at all but pointed the phones there anyways, they should upload their current set of files there and then default to using that set of configs until the server is updated. Alex On 7/17/06, Jerry Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you at least setup your ftp server, and point the phones to it,they will save a copy of their contact database so that will not belost.Just edit and save an entry after server is ready and it will create the file.No too hard to use the web browser and look at each phone to get itscurrent settings and manually create a config file.On Jul 16, 2006, at 5:04 PM, Avi Miller wrote: Stephen Murphy wrote: My question is: How do I get the current config files the phone is using off the phone? AFAIK, you can't. :( You can only provide new configuration files from your FTP/TFTP server. However, the Polycoms do strange things when they've been configured in multiple locations. You might find the phone overwriting the configuration files with its original configuration. That is not confirmed though. I've just seen my Polycoms do weird stuff in the wild. :) -- National Manager - Special Projects Melbourne / Sydney / Canberra / Hobart / London / 2/340 Gore StreetT: 1 300 SQUIZ (77859) Fitzroy, VIC T: 03 9235 5400 3065 F: 03 9235 5444W: http://www.squiz.net/ . Open Source- Own it- Squiz.net ./ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- Alex Robar[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Current radius patches
I would like to setup asterisk with Realtime and radius authentication, but the radius patches are either outdated ( they support a version of asterisk before realtime was mature ) or they dont patch right. I tried this, but the version it is for is really old. PortaOne Radius auth - voip-info.org http://lnk4.us/pZfq I tried this here 0005424: [branch] SIP peer authentication on an external database (RADIUS - LDAP) - Mantis http://lnk4.us/Ky7h But those patches seem to line up with a Revision 36170, which isnt in the SVN server. So before I be dumb and just apply the patches by hand. Anyone know where I can get current patches for radius authentication for asterisk 1.2.x? Thanks. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Queue RoundRobin
Hi Kevin, thanks for answering. From the problem you are having it sounds like the agent whose phone keeps ringing is in a lower penalty then the other agent. Are both agents in the same group? Yes, both agents are in the same group. If you make the one agent busy does it ring to the next phone? Nope If not, what does the CLI say when it tries to connect the next call to the second phone? Here's the URL with complete IVR procedure with 2 agents online: http://pastebin.com/750304 Regards, Santiago On 7/17/06, Kevin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Santiago, Unless it is a typo on the wiki, I think you want your queue.conf to be like this: member = Agent/@1 member = Agent/:2,1 That way you include group 1, and then include group 2 with consideration of penalty. From the problem you are having it sounds like the agent whose phone keeps ringing is in a lower penalty then the other agent. Are both agents in the same group? If you make the one agent busy does it ring to the next phone? If not, what does the CLI say when it tries to connect the next call to the second phone? Kevin Santiago del Castillo wrote: Hi, I'm setting up a new asterisk for an ecommerce company with cust sup dept. The problem I'm having is with Roundrobin (and rrmemory also): Let's suppose that I have 2 agents logged in into a queue. When a client calls, and both agents are available. It rings the first one, but it doesn't answer the phone. The timeout takes effect and it should start ringing the second agent. But it doesn't. It keeps ringing the first one until it answers the phone Here's my queue.conf: [general] [QueueEN] announce = ann-english strategy = rrmemory timeout = 5 retry = 1 wrapuptime=0 maxlen = 0 announce-frequency = 20 announce-holdtime = once queue-youarenext = queue-youarenext queue-thereare = queue-thereare queue-callswaiting = queue-callswaiting queue-thankyou = queue-thankyou member = Agent/@1 member = Agent/@2,1 [QueueES] strategy = rrmemory timeout = 5 retry = 5 wrapuptime=0 maxlen = 0 announce = ann-spanish announce-frequency = 10 announce-holdtime = once queue-youarenext = queue-youarenext queue-thereare = queue-thereare queue-callswaiting = queue-callswaiting queue-thankyou = queue-thankyou member = Agent/@1 member = Agent/@2,1 The timeout is set too low so the test is faster. Cheers, Santiago ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] MOH With Asterisk Controlled Transfers
I've finally worked out how to use Asterisk assisted transfers, from features.conf, with # and *. Question: With an attended transfer, while the the transferring party is announcing the original caller to the new party, the original party does not hear music on hold. How can we enable this? Doug. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Queue Transfers
It's become apparent that Asterisk does not support the ability of queue agents to transfer callers in the queue, out of the queue. When we tried to do this, the Queue application would completely hang. Subsequent calls into the queue would also then hang, and the system got screwed in general. I saw some posts in various places from other people having similar issues. I'd like to know if this is a widely known issue, and if there is a roadmap to fix it. Given that queues are a great part of Asterisk, it would be nice if they supported call transfers. Doug. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Cisco 7960 SIP 8-3-0 getting Got SIP response 400
After upgrading my phones I now see routine error messages: -- Got SIP response 400 Bad Request back from 10.5.1.94 Asterisk SVN-trunk-r7230 Cisco 7960 SIP version 8-3-0. Sip show peer: * Name : 14012 Secret : Set MD5Secret: Not set Context : labcm33 Subscr.Cont. : Not set Language : AMA flags: Unknown CallingPres : Presentation Allowed, Not Screened Callgroup: Pickupgroup : Mailbox : 14012 VM Extension : asterisk LastMsgsSent : 0 Call limit : 0 Dynamic : Yes Callerid : removed Expire : 272931 Insecure : no Nat : Always ACL : No CanReinvite : Yes PromiscRedir : No User=Phone : No Trust RPID : No Send RPID: No DTMFmode : rfc2833 LastMsg : 0 ToHost : Addr-IP : 10.5.1.94 Port 5060 Defaddr-IP : 0.0.0.0 Port 5060 Def. Username: 14012 SIP Options : (none) Codecs : 0x8000e (gsm|ulaw|alaw|h263) Codec Order : (ulaw,alaw,gsm) Status : Unmonitored Useragent: Cisco-CP7960G/8.0 Reg. Contact : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;transport=udp Any ideas? The phones seem to work fine other than the annoying console message. Is there some secret setting I can add to my config to stop this? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
R: R: [asterisk-users] Called number on ISDN
Thanks, i set immediate=no and configured the incoming extensions. The ISDN line has through selection (direct selection) and sometimes the network does not send me the extensions and stop to the last digit of root number. Normally i get the dialed number by ${DNID} variable, but in this case the dnid do not contain the extension, so i'm not able to route it to the internal phone. This is what happen at isdn layer, then i got the dialed and dialer number, the B-chan goes hup, and i got the exten :| In my zapta.conf, I have immediate=no and overlapdial=yes [X] Calling Number (len=13) [ Ext: 0 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) Presentation: Presentation permitted, user number passed network screening (1) '123456789' ] [X] Called Number (len=10) [ Ext: 1 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) 'root_of_numebr_without_the_exten' ] [7c 03 90 90 a3] IE: Low-layer Compatibility (len = 5) -- Making new call for cr 97 -- Processing Q.931 Call Setup -- Processing IE 4 (cs0, Bearer Capability) -- Processing IE 24 (cs0, Channel Identification) -- Processing IE 30 (cs0, Progress Indicator) -- Processing IE 108 (cs0, Calling Party Number) -- Processing IE 112 (cs0, Called Party Number) -- Processing IE 124 (cs0, Low-layer Compatibility) -- Going to extension s|1 because of immediate=yes Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=11 Call Ref: len= 1 (reference 225/0xE1) (Terminator) Message type: SETUP ACKNOWLEDGE (13) [18 01 89] Channel ID (len= 3) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit, Other Spare: 0, Exclusive Dchan: 0 ChanSel: B1 channel ] [1e 02 81 82] Progress Indicator (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) 0: 0 Location: Private network serving the local user (1) Ext: 1 Progress Description: Called equipment is non-ISDN. (2) ] -- Executing DigitTimeout(Zap/4-1, 2) in new stack -- Set Digit Timeout to 2 -- Executing ResponseTimeout(Zap/4-1, 3) in new stack -- Set Response Timeout to 3 -- Accepting voice call from '123456789' to 's' on channel 0/1, span 2 Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=10 Call Ref: len= 1 (reference 97/0x61) (Originator) Message type: INFORMATION (123) [a1] Sending Complete (len= 1) [70 03 a1 32 38] Called Number (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) '28' ] -- Processing IE 161 (cs0, Sending Complete) -- Processing IE 112 (cs0, Called Party Number) == CDR updated on Zap/4-1 Anyone can explain me how can i solve ? Thanks very much in advance Giordano -Messaggio originale- Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Tzafrir Cohen Inviato: venerdì 14 luglio 2006 16.10 A: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Oggetto: Re: R: [asterisk-users] Called number on ISDN On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 03:34:04PM +0200, Giordano Grandis wrote: I cannot use it, I have the immediate=yes in my zapata, the extension will be always 's' Why would you set immediate=yes ? -- Tzafrir Cohen sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq#16849755 iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Cisco 7960 SIP 8-3-0
Looks like the MWI broke on 8-3 also... ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] [Fwd: where is the error?]
thx mate, but also ' must be escaped ' has to become \' I got it, thanks for the help, u got me to the right way :) Olivier trixter aka Bret McDanel a crit: On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 15:17 +0200, olivier.taylor wrote: email message attachment (where is the error?) SELECT\ left(Customer.balance,instr(Customer.balance,'.')-1)\ FROM\ Customer\ Inner\ Join\ subscriber\ ON\ subscriber.customer_id\ =\ Customer.id\ WHERE\ subscriber.username\ =\ ${CALLERIDNAME} asterisk translates , to | then processes it. try \, instead see if that cures your errors. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation
I have two polycom phones. One on a slow link, and one on a fast one. I'm trying to set the phone on the slow link to use G729 as it's first preference, and the phone on the fast link to use G711 as it's first preference. sip.conf has: [general] allow=ulaw allow=g729 [slow-link] ; Override codecs for slow link phone. allow = g729 allow = ulaw When the slow link phone dialls the fast link phone, it sends G729 as it's first preference in the INVITE to Asterisk. Asterisk then sends G729 as the first preference in the INVITE to the fast link phone. Why doesn't Asterisk send G711 instead? This raises an interesting question. If one phone uses G729, and one G711, then Asterisk is going to have to transcode, and I am going to use up a G729 license. It would seem more beneficial for it to work the way it is now. That is, both legs are using G729. Why is this better? It doesn't chew up a G729 license as there is no transcoding, and heck, if one of your call legs is G729, then the G711 party isn't going to hear anything better anyway. Thoughts? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] DUNDI / regcontext
I'm expecting regcontext to create a context of regcontext and an priority 1 extension for either the value of regexten or the peer name. The context is created, the extension says it is created but isn't. It works fine with a staticaly defined extension of the same name as defined for regexten or the peer name. SimonOn 7/17/06, Watkins, Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So you are relying on the behavior of regexten to default to peer name? Is that what you are expecting? And if so, could you test with a statically defined extension for the per-peer regexten parameter? Regards, - Brad From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] On Behalf Of Simon WoodheadSent: Monday, July 17, 2006 5:53 AMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re: [asterisk-users] DUNDI / regcontext Thanks for the reply Brad.The relevant section of sip.conf was posted:[general]regcontext=sipregistrationIf you mean extensions.conf, I wasn't creating the extension in there other than for testing. RegContext correctly creates the context on registration but does not create the extension. If I create the extension manually, the DUNDi lookup works just fine. Simon On 7/16/06, Watkins, Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you possibly put up the relevant section(s) of your sip.conf?It sounds like the DUNDi portion is set up properly, and obviously it's not going to find an extension that doesn't exist.Regards,- BradFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Simon WoodheadSent: Sat 7/15/2006 5:59 PMTo: asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [asterisk-users] DUNDI / regcontextHi folks,I've been having a go at getting DUNDI working this evening to enableusers to register to any Asterisk box and to look them up from another. The DUNDI part works just great (very impressed), as does the subsequentjoining of calls between the two servers but I'm struggling withregcontext and would be grateful for any input.sip.conf includes: [general]regcontext=sipregistrationWhen a user registers, I get the Added extension 'XX' priority 1 tosipregistration message. However, 'show dialplan' does not show theextension and a DUNDI lookup does not return it. The sipregistration context has been auto-created but is empty. If I manually create thesipregistration context and add the NoOp extension, then everythingworks as expected.I've tried this across multiple boxes, each running different versions right up to the latest stable but the behaviour is the same. It is alsothe same with both SIP and IAX registrations and doesn't make adifference if the peer is defined in the .conf file or Realtime. They doall have identical configurations though so I suspect there might besomething in our setup which is conflicting.Any input gratefully received.All the best,SimonThe contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Testing 911?
I do it all the time, after I finish installing a PBX (asterisk or other PBX) I dial 911 and say: Hi this is a test call, I'm a PBX tech, just finished an installation and just wanted to make sure that 911 works. Then I ask the operator on the other end of the line to confirm the e911 info he has with me, to make sure that it matches the Address and phone number that I am realy calling from. On 7/17/06, voiplist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems that 911 is important enough that when setting up an Asterisk box, it should be tested. How do you go about testing 911 dialing without getting fined for calling for a non-emergency reason? Is there some circumstances where you can ask permission from the city ahead of time? I realize this may be a real stupid question but I have not seen this discussed and I am curious. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] How many users on an asterisk box behind a dsl can you have
I have been trying to read up and understand Asterisk. I have a small office of 25 people growing to 50 and have a dedicated DSL for Asterisk and another DSL for computer use and was wondering using gsm primarily how many users I could put on the asterisk box on a single dsl. Average calls is probably going to be 25-35 at any given time. Any help or suggestions would be appreciated.Ted See the all-new, redesigned Yahoo.com. Check it out. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] How many users on an asterisk box behind a dsl can you have
ted jones wrote: I have been trying to read up and understand Asterisk. I have a small office of 25 people growing to 50 and have a dedicated DSL for Asterisk and another DSL for computer use and was wondering using gsm primarily how many users I could put on the asterisk box on a single dsl. Average calls is probably going to be 25-35 at any given time. Any help or suggestions would be appreciated. Ted See the all-new, redesigned Yahoo.com. Check it out. http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=40762/*http://www.yahoo.com/preview ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Much would depend on the specs of your DSL line and the hardware you plan to run your * server on. -- VoIP Street Origination/Termination with SUPERIOR customer service! http://www.VoIPstreet.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] How many users on an asterisk box behind a dsl canyou have
On Montag, 17. Juli 2006 6:40 ted jones wrote: I have been trying to read up and understand Asterisk. I have a small office of 25 people growing to 50 and have a dedicated DSL for Asterisk What kind of DSL? Synchronous, Async? What speed? and another DSL for computer use and was wondering using gsm primarily how many users I could put on the asterisk box on a single dsl. What kind of box? E.g. 50 concurrent calls on a small VIA might be a problem. Do you plan to have the calls go through Asterisk or use it only to connect the SIP endpoints? Are you planning on monitoring/recording calls? Average calls is probably going to be 25-35 at any given time. You are talking about concurrent calls? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!
Well, I'm still having problems using 1.2.10 with AgentCallBackLogin: - Local channels failing to bridge to zap chans: (Ex: Jul 17 18:56:59 WARNING[27284]: res_features.c:1381 ast_bridge_call: Bridge failed on channels Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED],2 and Zap/72-1 ) - Zap channels shown in use but not used ... ( Jul 17 18:32:16 WARNING[2275] chan_zap.c: Got restart ack on channel 0/6 span 3 with owner ) I'm currently trying to find the reason of these issues ... Warren (mailing lists) a écrit : Last week I had asked about which * version to use. The response was that if using queues, 1.2.4 was stable and another response stated that 1.2.9 was stable with queues as long as CallBackLogin was not used. Has this been addressed in 1.2.10? Is it even accurate or should I be looking to deploy 1.2.4 for stability? W ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] ooh323c - cdr
I have a problem: when i make i call from a device h323 to sip, i have no cdr, and i don't see cdr variables for the channnel ooh323. Anyone can help me ?? Thanx ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Testing 911?
The place answering the calls is generally known as the PSAP (public safety answering point). As others noted, test calls are fine as long as you call the non-emergency number first to let them know you're about to do it. I'll admit I don't always call in advance though. Anyway, calling the fire department or police department may not get you in contact with the right person. Asking for the PSAP number should get you to the right person. --- Brian Vincent Copper Mountain Telecom [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 5:05 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Testing 911? voiplist wrote: It seems that 911 is important enough that when setting up an Asterisk box, it should be tested. How do you go about testing 911 dialing without getting fined for calling for a non-emergency reason? Is there some circumstances where you can ask permission from the city ahead of time? As others have posted, test calls are allowed but the 911 center would prefer they be completed during non-peak times. The only way to know what their non-peak periods are is to give them a call on the non-emergency number and ask. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users __ Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments from your system. Thank you. __ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Setvar=var=val in sip.conf
sip.conf: [2944093] type = friend context = one_start username = 2944093 accountcode = 2944093 subscribecontext = one_blf qualify = no canreinvite = no host = dynamic callgroup = 1 pickupgroup = 1 dtmfmode = rfc2833 nat = no mailbox = [EMAIL PROTECTED] callerid = Doug 2944093 setvar = cid_agent = 80014054 ; This should set variable cid_agent to 80014054 extensions.conf: exten = 4001,1,Answer exten = 4001,2,NoOp(${cid_agent}) When I dial 4001, the console displays: -- Executing Answer(SIP/2944093-956b, ) in new stack -- Executing NoOp(SIP/2944093-956b, ) in new stack It seems that setvar= in sip.conf is not working. I've used it before. What am I missing? Doug. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Call information on blind transfers
We need to bill the outbound call of a blind transfer using an AGI program. We can do this at present by: 1. Accessing ${BLINDTRANSFER}. This does not give us the user to bill to, as users are registered on a remote SER server, but it does give us a channel name of the form SIP/ser-random characters. 2. Use the manager API to look up the details of this channel. This gives us the called number of the inbound call and hence the user to bill. However, this is not very efficient. What we'd like to do is get the called number of the inbound call directly from the AGI program without using the manager interface. Doing some testing, it looks like the agi_dnid field passed to the AGI holds the correct value. Can anyone confirm how this field is set on blind transferred calls? Is there another neat way to do it? One area we explored, and which would be a useful feature for future versions of Asterisk, would be a way to run CLI or manager commands directly from an AGI script without having to run system( 'asterisk -rx ...' ) or connecting to the manager interface. -- Alistair Cunningham, Integrics Ltd, +44 20 799 39 799 http://integrics.com/ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] NuFone, please send the log file
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 00:18, Michael Workman wrote: Well that Make me Note that I will never do Biz with you That is if you personally vouch for Greg I have personally done non-trivial work for Nufone on several occasions and have always been paid promptly. I personally vouch for them, both for Greg Merriweather (possibly spelled wrong) and also for Jeremy McNamara. In fact, pretty much all of my non-Unlimitel LD goes through Nufone with nary a blip. I have no problem giving them my money for services rendered, and they don't seem to have trouble giving me money for the same. I joke around with them on IRC and MSN and at the end of the day everyone's happy. I've done some (minor) work with you as well in the past, and with the dialup provider you work with in southwestern Ontario (I helped start that particular ISP, but am no longer affiliated with them). Seriously, you are looking like a complete fool here. There are proper channels to go through to get money refunded (Paypal has them), and there is always small claims court. Beyond that, you can always contact your local police department or RCMP office in order to get fraud charges laid. Nufone's in Michigan, and Greg in particular I believe is in Windsor. You're in Ontario. This isn't rocket science, and these two countries work very well together, especially if you can figure a way to work the word 'terrorist' into the problem. I get quite fed up with people such as yourself and that other fellow who recently decided he'd post once an hour to this list until he got what he wanted. You guys seem to think that we're poor defenseless list-lurkers and that it is your duty to air your dirty laundry on public mailing lists as some kind of public service announcement. We don't need this kind of traffic, and we certainly do not need your sense of self-importance. I have watched your business grow over the past year or two, and I congratulate you. Obviously you have technical skill and SOMEONE there has business savvy and customer relations know-how. Based on the way you post here, I do not believe that person is you, but that's beside the point. The point is that we have our own troubles that we are working on solving, and if we are curious about a provider, we ask in -biz. We do not need these HEAR YE HEAR YE I GOT IT UP THE ARSE FROM NUFONE, THEY WEREN'T CONSIDERATE ENOUGH TO USE LUBE AND THEY DIDN'T EVEN CALL THE NEXT DAY posts. Please... If you don't like these guys then don't play with them. My 6-year-old daughter knows this much. If you think these guys screwed you then go through the right channels to receive justice. -users is not your personal soapbox, and it's not ever the right channel. -A. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] an ATA with lamp support
Anyone know of an ATA that supports lamping the message waiting lamp on a phone? We did an install with a bunch of Sipura 2002s. According to the product info they have message waiting indicator support and I took that to mean lamp support. Nope stutter tone only. Bonus points for anyone who can solve this issue in a way that doesnt involve me buying new ATAs. --- Brian Vincent Copper Mountain Telecom [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ ConfidentialityWarning:Thismessageandanyattachmentsareintendedonlyfortheuseoftheintendedrecipient(s), areconfidential,andmaybeprivileged.Ifyouarenottheintendedrecipient,youareherebynotifiedthatanyreview, retransmission,conversiontohardcopy,copying,circulationorotheruseofthismessageandanyattachmentsisstrictly prohibited.Ifyouarenottheintendedrecipient,pleasenotifythesenderimmediatelybyreturne-mail,anddeletethis messageandanyattachmentsfromyoursystem.Thankyou. __ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation
On Jul 17, 2006, at 9:25 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote: I have two polycom phones. One on a slow link, and one on a fast one. I'm trying to set the phone on the slow link to use G729 as it's first preference, and the phone on the fast link to use G711 as it's first preference. sip.conf has: [general] allow=ulaw allow=g729 [slow-link] ; Override codecs for slow link phone. allow = g729 allow = ulaw When the slow link phone dialls the fast link phone, it sends G729 as it's first preference in the INVITE to Asterisk. Asterisk then sends G729 as the first preference in the INVITE to the fast link phone. Why doesn't Asterisk send G711 instead? Because you set the calling to prefer g729? What did you expect? This raises an interesting question. If one phone uses G729, and one G711, then Asterisk is going to have to transcode, and I am going to use up a G729 license. It would seem more beneficial for it to work the way it is now. Exactly. In fact I would generally force g729 in that case (ie disallow all but g729). That is, both legs are using G729. Why is this better? It doesn't chew up a G729 license as there is no transcoding, and heck, if one of your call legs is G729, then the G711 party isn't going to hear anything better anyway. Yes this is clearly a win. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Legacy analog data modems and Asterisk
I think an easy solution for you might be along the lines of #3 but using something like one of these devices: http://www.command-comm.com/products.html The ComSwitch 3.0, 5500, and 7500 are all exclusionary devices. If you're dialing outbound through it, Asterisk won't be allowed to pick up the line. It sounds like you're in a small office and something like that would work. --- Brian Vincent Copper Mountain Telecom [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Jacobs Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 9:07 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Legacy analog data modems and Asterisk I did some poking around on the Googleweb and was unable to find a concise answer to my situation. I have some guesses and some theories about what will work and what might not work, but I'm sure that others have followed this path before. Currently we have a large number of customers that we support via analog modem. To make a long story short, it's very difficult for these customers to be able to provide VPN access into their networks of our hardware due to various security and large-company bureaucracy issues. Therefore, the modem connections remain. We are considering an Asterisk-based PBX for an upgrade to our existing Panasonic DBS72, which is a fine system but simply doesn't cut it for the things we need to do. However, this poses the problem of what to do with the modems. Preface the following with this: We have *0* desire to terminate calls via IP. We're using Asterisk for the ease of adding phones locally and remotely, not because we want to save money via IP calling (which would be improbable, as our 6 PSTNs have unlimited local and long distance + DSL). Options (in no particular order): 1) Connect Asterisk to existing 6 PSTN lines using FXO. Connect existing modems to Asterisk using FXS. Data speeds will probably be sub 14.4k, which is not acceptable. 2) Upgrade PSTN to PRI. Connect Asterisk to PRI and connect modems to FXS. Anyone have an idea about the potential data speeds here? 3) Connect Asterisk *AND* modems to PSTN using splitters. Does anyone know what happens if someone is using a PSTN with the modem and Asterisk tries to use an FXO? Is Asterisk smart enough to detect that the PSTN is currently in use? Or is it like your little sister and it will pick up the phone while you're dialed into a BBS and knock you offline (ahh, those were the days). 4) We make PPP connections to our customers with the existing modems (for the most part), so I'm not sure that there would be any way to somehow hook the modems up to the Asterisk box and have the Asterisk make the connection. This would very likely involve some extraordinarily complex routing tasks and, as we're looking to a 3rd party Asterisk PBX provider, I don't think we'll have the access to the guts of the hardware to do this. 5) The most simple and least elegant -- unplug the phone line you want to use for modem from the FXO and plug it into your modem. Que sera, sera. Sorry that my first post is a huge plop, but it's an interesting situation that I've been going back and forth about for a while. Plus, Asterisk sure beats a $20k Altigen setup. Erik Jacobs Project Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users __ Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments from your system. Thank you. __ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Polycom IP301 and Queues
I have been unable to get this branch of asterisk to work properly. I can not get any SIP phone, Polycom or X-Lite, to register with the server. If, on the same server, I recompile and install Trunk the phones register properly. In doing this I made no changes to the conf files at all. I simply recompiled and reinstalled. Is there a trick to getting the phones to register? I made sure that the phone SIP config and the agent config did no overlap. The phone will register if I comment out the secret line. I have not tried getting the ACD functionality to work at this point in time...one issue at a time. Although this will be a big leap forward if it works and I would be willing to put up a bounty to move this forward. Thanks, Michael -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean @ INKnBITs Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 3:38 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Polycom IP301 and Queues Do you have a soft button on the IP301? I use the 501 and it works fine, you do have to use the special asterisk code for it to work correctly. It lets me login, logout, make the agent available/unavailable. You can read about it at http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=6119 I found you must also use the trunk version of zaptel and libpri, and make sure you use auth on the phones in the config. Hope thats what you looking for, if so, any problems just ask, its just taken me 2 weeks to get it working great. Regards, Dean. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Julian Varanini Sent: 17 July 2006 00:15 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom IP301 and Queues Is there any way to use the polycom phones to log into and out of queues? So the polycom phone could show their current status in that queue? logged in / logged out for example. Thanks Julian Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] PRI dropouts From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 20:47:17 +1000 Hmm - I have had 2 bad PRI installs out of about 20, and both times it was faulty wiring from the Telco. But getting them to fix it can be a real struggle! Paul Hales Technical Manager www.asteriskit.com.au On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 12:23 +1000, James Sturges wrote: Have had L O T S of trouble like this, the settings zap config files seem to have to e exact, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I will send config files. Thanks James __ From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Withnall Sent: Saturday, 15 July 2006 11:05 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] PRI dropouts Recently we cut over to using asterisk (trixbox 1.1.1) for our production system. We are using a TE110P digium card (Primary rate) with a Telstra onramp 10. Sometimes when people call, on their end it doesn't seem to connect. On our end, we get caller id, it passes ok to the sip phone but then no-one is there. Anyone have any similar problems and worked out how to solve it ? Thanks. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Queue RoundRobin
The only way i figured out to fix this problem was by setting autologoff lower than Dial timeout. This way if the agent doesn't answer, it will log off before de Dial timeout So the next phone to ring will be the next available agent. Cheers, Santiago On 7/17/06, Delca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Kevin, thanks for answering. From the problem you are having it sounds like the agent whose phone keeps ringing is in a lower penalty then the other agent. Are both agents in the same group? Yes, both agents are in the same group. If you make the one agent busy does it ring to the next phone? Nope If not, what does the CLI say when it tries to connect the next call to the second phone? Here's the URL with complete IVR procedure with 2 agents online: http://pastebin.com/750304 Regards, Santiago On 7/17/06, Kevin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Santiago, Unless it is a typo on the wiki, I think you want your queue.conf to be like this: member = Agent/@1 member = Agent/:2,1 That way you include group 1, and then include group 2 with consideration of penalty. From the problem you are having it sounds like the agent whose phone keeps ringing is in a lower penalty then the other agent. Are both agents in the same group? If you make the one agent busy does it ring to the next phone? If not, what does the CLI say when it tries to connect the next call to the second phone? Kevin Santiago del Castillo wrote: Hi, I'm setting up a new asterisk for an ecommerce company with cust sup dept. The problem I'm having is with Roundrobin (and rrmemory also): Let's suppose that I have 2 agents logged in into a queue. When a client calls, and both agents are available. It rings the first one, but it doesn't answer the phone. The timeout takes effect and it should start ringing the second agent. But it doesn't. It keeps ringing the first one until it answers the phone Here's my queue.conf: [general] [QueueEN] announce = ann-english strategy = rrmemory timeout = 5 retry = 1 wrapuptime=0 maxlen = 0 announce-frequency = 20 announce-holdtime = once queue-youarenext = queue-youarenext queue-thereare = queue-thereare queue-callswaiting = queue-callswaiting queue-thankyou = queue-thankyou member = Agent/@1 member = Agent/@2,1 [QueueES] strategy = rrmemory timeout = 5 retry = 5 wrapuptime=0 maxlen = 0 announce = ann-spanish announce-frequency = 10 announce-holdtime = once queue-youarenext = queue-youarenext queue-thereare = queue-thereare queue-callswaiting = queue-callswaiting queue-thankyou = queue-thankyou member = Agent/@1 member = Agent/@2,1 The timeout is set too low so the test is faster. Cheers, Santiago ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation
-Original Message- From: Martin Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 11:40 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation On Jul 17, 2006, at 9:25 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote: I have two polycom phones. One on a slow link, and one on a fast one. I'm trying to set the phone on the slow link to use G729 as it's first preference, and the phone on the fast link to use G711 as it's first preference. sip.conf has: [general] allow=ulaw allow=g729 [slow-link] ; Override codecs for slow link phone. allow = g729 allow = ulaw When the slow link phone dialls the fast link phone, it sends G729 as it's first preference in the INVITE to Asterisk. Asterisk then sends G729 as the first preference in the INVITE to the fast link phone. Why doesn't Asterisk send G711 instead? Because you set the calling to prefer g729? What did you expect? I expected Asterisk to send G711 instead, as that's what is set in [general] in sip.conf ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Legacy analog data modems and Asterisk
I have had mixed results with Modems the pass through Asterisk. I can recommend a solution that will always work however. We purchased an Atlas 550 from Adtran, It 'splits' our PRIs into T1, PRI, BRI, and or POTS. It is NOT a trivial purchase but it is a great product. We also use it to provide incoming call failover in case of Server failure and/or management. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Vincent (C) Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 1:54 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Legacy analog data modems and Asterisk I think an easy solution for you might be along the lines of #3 but using something like one of these devices: http://www.command-comm.com/products.html The ComSwitch 3.0, 5500, and 7500 are all exclusionary devices. If you're dialing outbound through it, Asterisk won't be allowed to pick up the line. It sounds like you're in a small office and something like that would work. --- Brian Vincent Copper Mountain Telecom [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Jacobs Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 9:07 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Legacy analog data modems and Asterisk I did some poking around on the Googleweb and was unable to find a concise answer to my situation. I have some guesses and some theories about what will work and what might not work, but I'm sure that others have followed this path before. Currently we have a large number of customers that we support via analog modem. To make a long story short, it's very difficult for these customers to be able to provide VPN access into their networks of our hardware due to various security and large-company bureaucracy issues. Therefore, the modem connections remain. We are considering an Asterisk-based PBX for an upgrade to our existing Panasonic DBS72, which is a fine system but simply doesn't cut it for the things we need to do. However, this poses the problem of what to do with the modems. Preface the following with this: We have *0* desire to terminate calls via IP. We're using Asterisk for the ease of adding phones locally and remotely, not because we want to save money via IP calling (which would be improbable, as our 6 PSTNs have unlimited local and long distance + DSL). Options (in no particular order): 1) Connect Asterisk to existing 6 PSTN lines using FXO. Connect existing modems to Asterisk using FXS. Data speeds will probably be sub 14.4k, which is not acceptable. 2) Upgrade PSTN to PRI. Connect Asterisk to PRI and connect modems to FXS. Anyone have an idea about the potential data speeds here? 3) Connect Asterisk *AND* modems to PSTN using splitters. Does anyone know what happens if someone is using a PSTN with the modem and Asterisk tries to use an FXO? Is Asterisk smart enough to detect that the PSTN is currently in use? Or is it like your little sister and it will pick up the phone while you're dialed into a BBS and knock you offline (ahh, those were the days). 4) We make PPP connections to our customers with the existing modems (for the most part), so I'm not sure that there would be any way to somehow hook the modems up to the Asterisk box and have the Asterisk make the connection. This would very likely involve some extraordinarily complex routing tasks and, as we're looking to a 3rd party Asterisk PBX provider, I don't think we'll have the access to the guts of the hardware to do this. 5) The most simple and least elegant -- unplug the phone line you want to use for modem from the FXO and plug it into your modem. Que sera, sera. Sorry that my first post is a huge plop, but it's an interesting situation that I've been going back and forth about for a while. Plus, Asterisk sure beats a $20k Altigen setup. Erik Jacobs Project Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users __ Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments from your system. Thank you. __
Re: [asterisk-users] Setvar=var=val in sip.conf
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 11:10 -0600, Douglas Garstang wrote: [snip] setvar = cid_agent = 80014054 ; This should set variable cid_agent to 80014054 Did you check the samples? All the lines in the samples use: foo=bar You have everywhere: foo = bar Did you try removing all those spaces and use: setvar=cid_agent=80014054 Don't want to be picky but if the samples say setvar I would use setvar and not Setvar as in the subject. No idea if it makes a difference but this is Asterisk so you never know (unless you are fluent in Asterisk code I guess). Regards, Patrick ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel on dual processor, How?
Olivier Picquenot wrote: Zeeshan Zakaria a écrit : It is CentOS 4.3 and kernel is 2.6.9-34.0.1-smp-i686 Then you might want to use yum to install the apropriate package, the one that contains the kernel source, or at the very least the kernel headers . Or you might grab it on a Cent OS mirror, for exemple: ftp://ftp.dedibox.fr/centos/4.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-devel-2.6.9-34.0.1.EL.i686.rpm I'm no Cent OS expert, but that should be the right rpm . The proper method is, as root, type: yum install kernel-devel Regards, Warren ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] show channels
hi, i have problem with showing actual channels asteriskshow chanels SIP/123456789-b6c4b2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Up Busy() (last 2 chars are NOT showed) but the name of channel is longer asterisk show channel SIP/123456789-b6c4b290 how can i get full name of channel with asterisk -rqnx ? thanks --- Marek Cervenka === ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Setvar=var=val in sip.conf
-Original Message- From: Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 12:13 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Setvar=var=val in sip.conf On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 11:10 -0600, Douglas Garstang wrote: [snip] setvar = cid_agent = 80014054 ; This should set variable cid_agent to 80014054 Did you check the samples? All the lines in the samples use: foo=bar You have everywhere: foo = bar Did you try removing all those spaces and use: setvar=cid_agent=80014054 Don't want to be picky but if the samples say setvar I would use setvar and not Setvar as in the subject. No idea if it makes a difference but this is Asterisk so you never know (unless you are fluent in Asterisk code I guess). Turns out you can't have spaces between setvar and the '='. I'm going to open a bug on this, because all other sip.conf settings are ok with a space. Doug. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users