Re: [asterisk-users] odd audio problem

2007-10-02 Thread Matt Riddell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter wrote: When I upgraded the 1st asterisk box to 1.4.11. A call comes in, relays to the 2nd asterisk box. The AA answers the call and the audio is good. Once the call is forwarded to an agent. The agent hears everything no problem, but the

Re: [asterisk-users] callerids in UTF8 on SPA9x1? (was: Non-USASCII chars in sip.conf?)

2007-10-02 Thread Per Jessen
Stefan Tichy wrote: On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 03:40:09PM +0200, Per Jessen wrote: This must have been asked before, but googling didn't help much. How do I define a callerid that contains non-USASCII characters? E.g. ä, ö, ü, å, ø, æ etc. ? Use UTF-8 Encoding. Thanks, why didn't I think

Re: [asterisk-users] Supermicro PDSME+ and TE110P [ ref:00D36mPe.50033qy57:ref ] NEW CASE 22828

2007-10-02 Thread Olivier
Hello Matt, Do you mean this comes from (lack of) e1000 network card driver support in Linux ? From memory, Supermicro systems are sold as Linux compliant. Then, providing Linux compliant drivers should be Supermicro's problem. Anyway, how can you check in advance these compliance issues ?

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Setup problem

2007-10-02 Thread Alvin Austin
Thanks for all of the good suggestions. I've been able to get things working. I had been trying to use zaptel svn in order to get past error messages with compiling ztdummy.ko for the 2.6.22 kernel (http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10426 which has been apparently been solved in svn). Too

[asterisk-users] zaptel upgrade trouble (1.2.10 - 1.2.20.1)

2007-10-02 Thread Artifex Maximus
Hello! I have been trying upgrade zaptel from 1.2.10 to 1.2.20.1. I am using asterisk 1.2.10 with one TDM2400P (all 6 module in use) and one TE405P. When I upgrade to 1.2.20.1 the order of cards mess up and therefore zaptel.conf is unusable and gives error. Why is it happen and what do I need to

Re: [asterisk-users] Anyone use the Linksys phones?

2007-10-02 Thread jan de coster
in the office we use 4 IP Phone SPA942 from linksys and i must say that they are great ;) easy to install and maintain ... some stuff is missing but it works great ... Greatings, Jan De Coster Robert Webb wrote: Is anyone out there using any of the newer linksys phones since Cisco took

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Setup problem

2007-10-02 Thread Doug Lytle
Alvin Austin wrote: Thanks for all of the good suggestions. I've been able to get things working. I had been trying to use zaptel svn in order to get past error messages with compiling ztdummy.ko for the 2.6.22 kernel The newest kernel that I've been able to use with the current

Re: [asterisk-users] Anyone use the Linksys phones?

2007-10-02 Thread Steve Davies
On 9/24/07, Erik Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/24/07, Steve Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The phones can send a parameter to the provisioning server to indicate that they want an Update if they do this, and you send no network or other major config parameters, the phone does

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel upgrade trouble (1.2.10 - 1.2.20.1)

2007-10-02 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 10:06:06AM +0200, Artifex Maximus wrote: Hello! I have been trying upgrade zaptel from 1.2.10 to 1.2.20.1. I am using asterisk 1.2.10 with one TDM2400P (all 6 module in use) and one TE405P. When I upgrade to 1.2.20.1 the order of cards mess up and therefore

Re: [asterisk-users] How To Transfer Asterisk Installation to a Different Machine

2007-10-02 Thread lenz
This asrticle was meant as a backup, but I guess it's basically the same thing as what you are looking for: http://astrecipes.net/index.php?n=93 I hope this helps l. In data Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:08:20 +0200, Robert DeVries [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: I am having some hardware problems

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel upgrade trouble (1.2.10 - 1.2.20.1)

2007-10-02 Thread Artifex Maximus
On 10/2/07, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 10:06:06AM +0200, Artifex Maximus wrote: Hello! I have been trying upgrade zaptel from 1.2.10 to 1.2.20.1. I am using asterisk 1.2.10 with one TDM2400P (all 6 module in use) and one TE405P. When I upgrade to

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel upgrade trouble (1.2.10 - 1.2.20.1)

2007-10-02 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 12:47:55PM +0200, Artifex Maximus wrote: On 10/2/07, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 10:06:06AM +0200, Artifex Maximus wrote: Hello! I have been trying upgrade zaptel from 1.2.10 to 1.2.20.1. I am using asterisk 1.2.10 with one

[asterisk-users] Announcement file is unavailable?????

2007-10-02 Thread Carlos Alberto Hastenreiter Assumpção
Folks, please, take a look at this asterisk log message: [Oct 2 08:55:13] WARNING[10290] app_queue.c: Announcement file 'atcert' is unavailable, continuing anyway... [Oct 2 08:55:13] WARNING[10290] app_queue.c: Agent on Agent/1001002 hungup on the customer. but: -bash-3.1$ whoami asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] Selecting a specific line from Zap/g And secondary dial tone

2007-10-02 Thread bilal ghayyad
Dear List; Thanks alot for the help. But how can I let the second dial tone (after pressing the extension to select that FXO port) to be difference than normal dial tone? Regards Bilal Ghayad -- Correction, on FXO port not FXS, second, read his email first: Also, how it

Re: [asterisk-users] Anyone use the Linksys phones?

2007-10-02 Thread Chris Mason (Lists)
Chris Bagnall wrote: The 4 line limitation has never been a problem for the vast majority of people. I can't imagine what an office worker would do with four line appearances. I use a 6 line Polycom but I register different line appearances to different customer PBX's that I am working

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium acquires Switchvox

2007-10-02 Thread Jared Smith
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 10:25 -0500, Jared Smith wrote: We're also planning an audio conference next Tuesday in which you'll be able to dial in and ask any questions you may have concerning the acquisition. (I'll post the exact time and details as soon as I have them.) The dial-in number for

[asterisk-users] Hey

2007-10-02 Thread Ken Williams
Just a quick thanks for all being here. I started to type up a message and realized my problem, so instead I'm saying thanks for all the good information you all pass through my mailbox every day and giving me a place to realize my error before I even ask the question.

[asterisk-users] EM Wink and T4xxP losing ability to dial

2007-10-02 Thread Whit Thiele
Hey folks, I'm pulling my hair out on this situation and would welcome some advice: I'm using the AMI Manager to Originate calls onto 2 EM wink T1 circuits via a T4XXP card from Digium. Everything works fine for about 600(+/- 50) calls then the Manager is suddenly unable to launch calls. Using

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP Panel?

2007-10-02 Thread Walt Joyce
Matt - I'd like the sourcecode for the SIP panel. - Walt Matt Riddell wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Terry Giufre-Sweetser wrote: Dear List, Has anyone found or written a status panel application, windows or linux, that uses SIP notifies and subscriptions, to

Re: [asterisk-users] Announcement file is unavailable?????

2007-10-02 Thread Mark Michelson
Carlos Alberto Hastenreiter Assumpção wrote: Folks, please, take a look at this asterisk log message: [Oct 2 08:55:13] WARNING[10290] app_queue.c: Announcement file 'atcert' is unavailable, continuing anyway... [Oct 2 08:55:13] WARNING[10290] app_queue.c: Agent on Agent/1001002 hungup on

Re: [asterisk-users] Selecting a specific line from Zap/g

2007-10-02 Thread Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling
No, ignorepat is for FXS ports (FXS ports use FXO signaling). Also, ignorepat does not apply to SIP phones, because SIP phones provide their own dialtone, not a dialtone provided by Asterisk. Al lists wrote: Correction, on FXO port not FXS, second, read his email first: Also, how it will be

[asterisk-users] app_conference

2007-10-02 Thread Wai Wu
Hi list, Has anyone use app_conference? I want to hear what your opinions are. Thnx. attachment: winmail.dat___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

[asterisk-users] issues with rtsavesysname

2007-10-02 Thread lance sykes
I am currently struggling to implement this feature in realtime asterisk. I have configured realtime asterisk and it works great, however I can not get regserver to update via the rtsavesysname in sip.conf. Heres my configs.. sip.conf [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# more sip.conf [general]

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Setup problem

2007-10-02 Thread Stephen Bosch
Doug Lytle wrote: Alvin Austin wrote: Thanks for all of the good suggestions. I've been able to get things working. I had been trying to use zaptel svn in order to get past error messages with compiling ztdummy.ko for the 2.6.22 kernel The newest kernel that I've been able to use

[asterisk-users] Supervised call transfer problem

2007-10-02 Thread Midiclorian
Hi all, I am running Asterisk in conjunction with a Sip proxy. Asterisk is registered to an external SIP carrier (sip.uni.it) If a call reachs Asterisk through the SIP carrier, then it is forwarded to the external SIP proxy extension ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), when the extension 530 that

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Setup problem

2007-10-02 Thread Doug Lytle
Stephen Bosch wrote: He's using the beta wanpipe, which works with the newer kernels. So am I. wanpipe-3.1.4.tgz ftp://ftp.sangoma.com/linux/current_wanpipe/wanpipe-3.1.4.tgz I guess I'll give it another go. Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: Those who would give up Essential Liberty to

Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel upgrade trouble (1.2.10 - 1.2.20.1)

2007-10-02 Thread Artifex Maximus
On 10/2/07, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 12:47:55PM +0200, Artifex Maximus wrote: On 10/2/07, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 10:06:06AM +0200, Artifex Maximus wrote: Hello! I have been trying upgrade zaptel from

[asterisk-users] Queue members, URI.

2007-10-02 Thread Thomas Kenyon
Is there an advantage to having a Queue members URI in the form: SIP/User (or indeed IAX2/User) Over Local/number@context ? I know that the latter will allow you to do things like set counting logic etc. through dialplan operations, but the former appears to be a more direct route to calling

[asterisk-users] Zaptel slow dial out - TDM400P

2007-10-02 Thread Ken Williams
Below is a copy of my log, zapata.conf extensions.conf that relate to the ZAP lines. Basically when we dial out it takes on 10-12 seconds before the ZAP line actaully picks up. I'm hoping to find out what the cause is for this as it's causing user grief with extremely long connect times, and I

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Setup problem

2007-10-02 Thread Stephen Bosch
Doug Lytle wrote: Stephen Bosch wrote: He's using the beta wanpipe, which works with the newer kernels. So am I. wanpipe-3.1.4.tgz ftp://ftp.sangoma.com/linux/current_wanpipe/wanpipe-3.1.4.tgz Hmn -- here's what his post said: I've recompiled with the latest svn sources for zaptel,

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Setup problem

2007-10-02 Thread Doug Lytle
Stephen Bosch wrote: Doug Lytle wrote: I don't see a 3.3.0.p4 on the wiki, but maybe it's on the ftp... That it is! ftp://ftp.sangoma.com/linux/custom/3.3 Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve

[asterisk-users] Segmentation fault in app_voicemail (ODBC/PSQL problem)

2007-10-02 Thread stephen.hindmarch
I have been testing with asterisk 1.4.11 and have found a segmentation fault while using voicemail. It happens when I try to forward a voicemail. As soon as I press the option the server crashes. I ran asterisk up inside gdb and got the following stack trace

Re: [asterisk-users] What's the deal with ATAcomm?

2007-10-02 Thread Kenneth Padgett
Dear Atacomm Customers, We apologize, but as of 6:00pm CST Friday, September 21st, Atacomm and its parent company Ataractic Corporation has ceased operations. We appreciate the 7 years of loyalty and support from our customers. We sincerely regret any adverse effects this may have caused.

Re: [asterisk-users] What's the deal with ATAcomm?

2007-10-02 Thread Eric ManxPower Wieling
Kenneth Padgett wrote: Dear Atacomm Customers, We apologize, but as of 6:00pm CST Friday, September 21st, Atacomm and its parent company Ataractic Corporation has ceased operations. We appreciate the 7 years of loyalty and support from our customers. We sincerely regret any adverse effects

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue members, URI.

2007-10-02 Thread Julian Lyndon-Smith
Thomas Kenyon wrote: Is there an advantage to having a Queue members URI in the form: SIP/User (or indeed IAX2/User) Over Local/number@context ? I know that the latter will allow you to do things like set counting logic etc. through dialplan operations, but the former appears to be a

Re: [asterisk-users] Hey

2007-10-02 Thread Mojo with Horan Company, LLC
Yes, I second that. I talk and talk and talk but haven't said thank you enough! Ken Williams wrote: Just a quick thanks for all being here. I started to type up a message and realized my problem, so instead I'm saying thanks for all the good information you all pass through my mailbox

[asterisk-users] WARNING[26913]: channel.c:786 channel_find_locked: Avoided deadlock for '0x82d9668', 10 retries!

2007-10-02 Thread Ed Nuñez
Is anyone familiar with this error message? WARNING[26913]: channel.c:786 channel_find_locked: Avoided deadlock for '0x82d9668', 10 retries! Why does it happen, and how can I prevent from happening. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

[asterisk-users] Rhino RCB8FXX

2007-10-02 Thread Jeremy Mann
Anyone know if Rhino is planning on supporting zaptel 1.4 anytime soon? This e-mail, facsimile, or letter and any files or attachments transmitted with it contains information that is confidential and privileged. This information is intended only for the use of

[asterisk-users] Rhino RCB8FXX

2007-10-02 Thread John covici
We are using it successfully with zaptel 1.4 -- just be sure and get the latest drivers which are now independent of the zaptel sources. on Tuesday 10/02/2007 Jeremy Mann([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote Anyone know if Rhino is planning on supporting zaptel 1.4 anytime soon?

Re: [asterisk-users] Rhino RCB8FXX

2007-10-02 Thread Jeremy Mann
Latest being 1.1.1 ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John covici Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 2:59 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Rhino RCB8FXX We are using it successfully

Re: [asterisk-users] Supermicro PDSME+ and TE110P [ ref:00D36mPe.50033qy57:ref ] NEW CASE 22828

2007-10-02 Thread Matt Riddell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Olivier wrote: Hello Matt, Do you mean this comes from (lack of) e1000 network card driver support in Linux ? From memory, Supermicro systems are sold as Linux compliant. Then, providing Linux compliant drivers should be Supermicro's problem.

[asterisk-users] Having problems posting to the list

2007-10-02 Thread robert boardman
Hi All I'm having problems posting to this list, no bounces the mails just dont show any advice how to get the postings through is there filtering? robb ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4.12 and Asterisk-addons 1.4.3 released

2007-10-02 Thread The Asterisk Development Team
The Asterisk Development Team has announced the releases of Asterisk 1.4.12 and Asterisk-addons 1.4.3. The Asterisk-addons release contains just a few fixes for the modules in that package, but the Asterisk release contains a large number of bug fixes for all parts of Asterisk. There are many

Re: [asterisk-users] Rhino RCB8FXX

2007-10-02 Thread John covici
I am actually using 1.1.0, I might take a look at .1, but this should work with 1.4. on Tuesday 10/02/2007 Jeremy Mann([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote Latest being 1.1.1 ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John covici Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [asterisk-users] meetme conference using g729?

2007-10-02 Thread Mark Quitoriano
On 10/2/07, Brian West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok Let me chime in on this one. If you can use ulaw/alaw because you'll end up with tandem encoding which will make the conference sound worse to some people. All audio coming in will get transcoded to signed linear and pushed down into zaptel

Re: [asterisk-users] meetme conference using g729?

2007-10-02 Thread Brian West
You still do not understand. It doesn't matter if the call coming in is g729 you must transcode it to signed linear, mix the frames and then code it back into g729 you end up with quality loss doing that. /b On Oct 2, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Mark Quitoriano wrote: anyway still if there's a

Re: [asterisk-users] Anyone use the Linksys phones?

2007-10-02 Thread Rafael Espinosa
We use 10 IP Phone SPA941 with asterisk , they are easy to set up, upgrade and are working very well. Regards Rafael -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jan de coster Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 4:39 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List

Re: [asterisk-users] meetme conference using g729?

2007-10-02 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Tuesday 02 October 2007 16:55:52 Brian West wrote: On Oct 2, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Mark Quitoriano wrote: anyway still if there's a hack for meetme to work with g729 codec this won't be an issue. So is there a hack or patch that i can use any codec for meetme? tnx You still do not

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4.12 and Asterisk-addons 1.4.3 released

2007-10-02 Thread Don Pobanz
the Asterisk release contains a large number of bug fixes for all parts of Asterisk. I am thankful to see the amount of fixes that have gone into this release. However, seeing this many fixes does not give me a warm fuzzy feeling that we won't see a lot more fixes in the near future. So are

Re: [asterisk-users] meetme conference using g729?

2007-10-02 Thread Brian West
Thanks for making it clearer :) My mind is mush today! /b On Oct 2, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Tilghman Lesher wrote: Or, in other words, you cannot mix compressed data. You must first decompress the data for mixing, then recompress it for transmission. During both operations, there is a potential

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4.12 and Asterisk-addons 1.4.3 released

2007-10-02 Thread Philipp Kempgen
Don Pobanz wrote: the Asterisk release contains a large number of bug fixes for all parts of Asterisk. I am thankful to see the amount of fixes that have gone into this release. However, seeing this many fixes does not give me a warm fuzzy feeling that we won't see a lot more fixes in the

[asterisk-users] Problem making chanskype work in Asterisk 1.4.11 in Fedora 7

2007-10-02 Thread chankm
Hi, I installed chanskype in Asterisk 1.4.11 in Fedora 7 as follows: a) obtained chanskype tar ball from www.timhunt.net b) tar zxpvf chanskype-trixbox.tgz c) cd chanskype.trixbox d) ./install.sh e) ./makeaccount.sh 1 f) make vncserevr autostart using ntsysv g) install chanskype-1.2.11 h) Add in

Re: [asterisk-users] What's the deal with ATAcomm?

2007-10-02 Thread Al lists
Send me an email off the list, i have em somewhere in my HDD. On 10/2/07, Eric ManxPower Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kenneth Padgett wrote: Dear Atacomm Customers, We apologize, but as of 6:00pm CST Friday, September 21st, Atacomm and its parent company Ataractic Corporation has

[asterisk-users] Asterisk like big Voicemail system

2007-10-02 Thread Pepo
Hi friends. I am working in a TELCO, we have a trouble with our very old Alcatel Voicemail system (and now we dont have support and worst this system was forgotten for Alcatel) I've used Asterisk for just small jobs, but I've proposed use it and tomorrow begins with the tests :) ... so: we

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk like big Voicemail system

2007-10-02 Thread C F
If you are asking for dial plan help. The easiest way to do this is to have it come into an extension that just goes to voice mail then use externotify in voicemail.conf to turn on mwi or stuter dial tone. for subscriber service just start in a different extension that calls voicemailmain. you can

[asterisk-users] extensions.conf vs. AEL

2007-10-02 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello, I see that most people are using the extensions.conf syntax (most of the examples and questions here use that syntax). recently I've translated all my dial plan to AEL syntax and I find it much easier, especially when you need IFs. Why most people don't use it? Am I missing