On Wednesday 16 March 2005 17:27, Harald Milz wrote:
> Kevin P. Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > promise of the Opteron's potential :-) There are very cheap systems out
> > there (designed for workstations using Athlon64) and there are very good
> > systems out there, and the latter can be ha
Kevin P. Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> promise of the Opteron's potential :-) There are very cheap systems out
> there (designed for workstations using Athlon64) and there are very good
> systems out there, and the latter can be had for reasonable prices.
Well, as a matter of fact, my sal
> >Is that with channels recording ? ;)
> >
> >>
> We are running 40-50 simultanious calls at the call center here, and
> recording everycall in and out, with no problems
> On a Pentium 3ghz with 1gig ram.
Can you share with us what type of system this is (or motherboard
model if not a commercial
Paul Dugas wrote:
Maybe this would be enlightening:
http://www.samag.com/documents/s=9408/sam0411b/0411b.htm
I believe there's more that one way to connect Opterons; some better than
others.
Yes, that's an excellent article; thanks for the link.
In my previous messages I was certainly assuming that
Is that with channels recording ? ;)
___
We are running 40-50 simultanious calls at the call center here, and
recording everycall in and out, with no problems
On a Pentium 3ghz with 1gig ram.
Kyle
___
On Wed, March 16, 2005 12:56 pm, Kevin P. Fleming said:
> If you are referring to the memory bus and/or the bus used to talk
> between the CPUs, that is exactly the reason that I suggested Opteron.
> Nothing out there in x86/x86-64 land even comes close to HyperTransport
> without spending large su
Vladyslav wrote:
Is that with channels recording ? ;)
If you have a fast disk subsystem, yes. Recording calls is not CPU
intensive, only transcoding is (at that call volume, anyway).
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 18:31, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > If we want a box that can perform 60 calls. What would be apoproximate
> > budget
> > for that using AMD x86-64 ?
>
> 60 calls can easily be done on a 3.4GHz Pentium 4 box, no special
> hardware is required.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we want a box that can perform 60 calls. What would be apoproximate budget
for that using AMD x86-64 ?
60 calls can easily be done on a 3.4GHz Pentium 4 box, no special
hardware is required.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Ast
Thanks Kevin for this info,
If we want a box that can perform 60 calls. What would be apoproximate budget
for that using AMD x86-64 ?
µSelon "Kevin P. Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Erick Perez wrote:
> > And what people are using to deploy super servers with astersik?
> > Itanium with linux? c
Erick Perez wrote:
And what people are using to deploy super servers with astersik?
Itanium with linux? clusters of itanium with linux? or some RISC
processor with some *nix? cause it seems asterisk is only 100%
supported on Linux/Intel
or am i totally wrong?
The highest-performing "standard" hardw
And what people are using to deploy super servers with astersik?
Itanium with linux? clusters of itanium with linux? or some RISC
processor with some *nix? cause it seems asterisk is only 100%
supported on Linux/Intel
or am i totally wrong?
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 05:51:18 -0600, Rich Adamson <[EMAI
> > im my case im looking into 100 seats initially and going up to 1000 at
> > the end (over a 18 months period).
> > Looks like we will have to develop *a lot* if we want to use * for it.
> > Maybe a commercial solution will be better at this time.
>
> On Cebit SGI announced a server solution bas
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 12:58 PM
To: Erick Perez; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call Center software opensource or commercial
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 13:24 -05
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 13:24 -0500, Erick Perez wrote:
> im my case im looking into 100 seats initially and going up to 1000 at
> the end (over a 18 months period).
> Looks like we will have to develop *a lot* if we want to use * for it.
> Maybe a commercial solution will be better at this time.
On
TC wrote:
Is there any development ongoing with ICD ? I wouldn't want to get
there is on going dev
I'm glad to hear it. Is there a mailing list anywhere that I can
subscribe to ?
involved in something that is not going to make it into CVS HEAD.
and it will never go to cvs head of asterisk :)
W
Dean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Riddell
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 5:19 PM
To: Erick Perez; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call Center software opensource or
commercial
Alternativel
Alternatively you could get someone to custom develop a solution for
you. Believe me the prices are not as bad as you may initially think!
:)
--
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
___
http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://www.sineapps.
> Is there any development ongoing with ICD ? I wouldn't want to get
there is on going dev
> involved in something that is not going to make it into CVS HEAD.
and it will never go to cvs head of asterisk :)
>
it will go to stable of http://aefirion.org/ & replace app_q chan_agent
> I really would
In data Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:45:18 +0100 (CET), Peter Svensson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
Any real experiences with * on this?
You can create a quite flexible callcenter solution from ICD (search for
app_icd). It is more of a framework to create a call center solution than
a finished product
im my case im looking into 100 seats initially and going up to 1000 at
the end (over a 18 months period).
Looks like we will have to develop *a lot* if we want to use * for it.
Maybe a commercial solution will be better at this time.
let's see,
Cheers.
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:16:37 +0100, lenz <[
Anybody got a few decent pointers to get people started with ICD? We'd
like to integrate that in Xc-Ast too.
Cheers,
l.
In data Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:12:18 +, Asterisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha
scritto:
Is there any development ongoing with ICD ? I wouldn't want to get
involved in something
Is there any development ongoing with ICD ? I wouldn't want to get
involved in something that is not going to make it into CVS HEAD.
I really would like to use this - just worried :)
Julian
Peter Svensson wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Erick Perez wrote:
Hi there, we are looking for an opensource
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Erick Perez wrote:
> Hi there, we are looking for an opensource or commercial * based Call Center.
> Full ACD, call monitoring, multiple queue, IVR, voicemail, management,
> reporting, CDR, etc is needed. over 100 seat can be the initial target
> and will grow in a very short
Hi there, we are looking for an opensource or commercial * based Call Center.
Full ACD, call monitoring, multiple queue, IVR, voicemail, management,
reporting, CDR, etc is needed. over 100 seat can be the initial target
and will grow in a very short time.
SIP phones will be used and multiple E1 li
25 matches
Mail list logo
